Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- 32 Gender, Gender Norms, and National Culture: Global Work–Family at Multiple Levels of Analysis
- 33 Fatherhood, Work, and Family across the Globe: A Review and Research Agenda
- 34 Crossover, Culture, and Dual-Earner Couples
- 35 Cultural Considerations in the Division of Labor
- 36 Affective Processes in the Work–Family Interface: Global Considerations
- 37 Implications of Work–Family Connections for Children’s Well-Being across the Globe
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
34 - Crossover, Culture, and Dual-Earner Couples
from Part VII - Family Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- 32 Gender, Gender Norms, and National Culture: Global Work–Family at Multiple Levels of Analysis
- 33 Fatherhood, Work, and Family across the Globe: A Review and Research Agenda
- 34 Crossover, Culture, and Dual-Earner Couples
- 35 Cultural Considerations in the Division of Labor
- 36 Affective Processes in the Work–Family Interface: Global Considerations
- 37 Implications of Work–Family Connections for Children’s Well-Being across the Globe
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter discusses the international scope of research conducted on crossover, comparing crossover research from different national cultures and with an overall focus on the experiences of crossover experienced by dual-earner couples. The crossover and spillover processes are defined, with the key difference being that crossover specifically involves the interpersonal transmission of experiences and/or emotions from one individual to another. We discuss crossover involving both negative (e.g., strain) and positive (e.g., resources) processes and briefly review the identified 101 published empirical crossover articles based on samples originating from 17 different countries. Finally, we recommend specific areas for future crossover research including: assessments of the long-lasting crossover effects, the impact of social cultures and family size on the crossover process, the extent to which partners actively (rather than passively) influence crossover, and the refined assessment of gender differences in crossover research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 629 - 645Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aron, A., Mashek, D., McLaughline-Volpe, T., Wright, S., Lewandowski, G., & Aron, E. N. (2005). Including close others in the cognitive structure of the self. In Baldwin, M. W. (Ed.), Interpersonal Cognition (pp. 206–232). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In Grzywacz, J. G. & Demerouti, E. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Work and Family Research. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: integrating work–family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901–911. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.901Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Burnout contagion among intensive care nurses. Journal Advanced Nursing, 51(3), 276–287. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2648.2005.03494.xGoogle Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2000). Burnout contagion processes among teachers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(11), 2289–2308. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02437.xGoogle Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2011). Crossover of work engagement among Japanese couples: Perspective taking by both partners. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 112–125. doi:10.1037/a0021297Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Work engagement versus workaholism: A test of the spillover-crossover model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 63–80. doi:10.1108/JMP-05-2013-0148Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1562–1571. doi:10.1037/a0017525Google Scholar
Barnett, R. C., Gareis, K. C., & Brennan, R. T. (2010). School and school activity schedules affect the quality of family relations: A within-couple analysis. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 35–41. doi:10.1080/13668800902753853Google Scholar
Bass, B. L., Butler, A. B., Grzywacz, J. G., & Linney, K. D. (2009). Do job demands undermine parenting? A daily analysis of spillover and crossover effects. Family Relations, 58(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beehr, T. A., Johnson, L. B., & Nieva, R. (1995). Occupational stress: Coping of police and their spouses. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 3–25. doi:10.1002/job.4030160104Google Scholar
Bernard, J. (1971). Women and the Public Interest. London, UK: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(1), 175–183. doi:10.2307/352378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brough, P., & O’Driscoll, M.P. (2015). Integrating work and personal life. In Burke, R.J., Page, K.M., & Cooper, C.L. (Eds.), Flourishing in Life, Work, and Careers: Individual Wellbeing and Career Experiences (pp. 377–394). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Brough, P., Timms, C., O’Driscoll, M., Kalliath, T., Siu, O.L, Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2014). Work–life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724–2744. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2014.899262Google Scholar
Brough, P., Timms, C., Siu, O-l., Kalliath, T., O’Driscoll, M., Sit, C., Lo, D., & Lu, C-q. (2013). Validation of the job demands–resources model in cross-national samples: Cross-sectional and longitudinal predictions of psychological strain and work engagement. Human Relations, 66(10), 1311–1335. doi:10.1177/0018726712472915Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Kacmar, K., Grzywacz, J. G., & Whitten, D. (2011). Pay it forward: The positive crossover effects of supervisor work–family enrichment. Journal of Management, 37(3), 770–789. doi:10.1177/0149206310363613Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K., Zivnuska, S., & Ferguson, M. (2015). Do the benefits of family-to-work transitions come at too great a cost? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 161–171. doi:10.1037/a0038279Google Scholar
Cowlishaw, S., Evans, L., & McLennan, J. (2010). Work–family conflict and crossover in volunteer emergency service workers. Work & Stress, 24(4), 342–358. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.532947Google Scholar
Crossfield, S., Kinman, G., & Jones, F. (2005). Crossover of occupational stress in dual-career couples: The role of work demands and supports, job commitment and marital communication. Community, Work & Family, 8(2), 211–232. doi:10.1080/13668800500049779Google Scholar
Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: the role of work-self and family-self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 184–195. doi: 10.1037/a0026877Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 266–289. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.07.001Google Scholar
Drummond, S., O’Driscoll, M., Brough, P., Siu, O.-L., Kalliath, T., Riley, D., Timms, C., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2017). The relationship of social support with well-being via work–family conflict: Moderating effects of gender, dependants and nationality. Human Relations, 70(5), 544–565.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Kacmar, K. M., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2016). The supportive spouse at work: Does being work-linked help? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 37–50. doi:10.1037/a0039538Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218Google Scholar
Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office. (2007). White Paper on Gender Equality. Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/about_danjo/whitepaper/pdf/ewp2007.pdfGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, T. N. (1996a). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029–1042. doi:10.1093/sf/74.3.1029Google Scholar
Greenstein, T. N. (1996b). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 585–595. doi:10.2307/353719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., & Dormann, C. (2014). The role of partners and children for employees’ daily recovery. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 39–48. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IIIHaines, V. Y., Marchand, A., & Harvey, S. (2006). Crossover of workplace aggression experiences in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 305–314. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.305Google Scholar
Hare‐Mustin, R. T. (1987). The problem of gender in family therapy theory. Family Process, 26(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, M. Y., Chen, X., Cheung, F. M., Liu, H., & Jr.Worthington, E. L. (2013). A dyadic model of the work–family interface: A study of dual-earner couples in China. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 53–63. doi:10.1037/a0030885Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (1985). Personal and social resources and the ecology of stress resistance. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 265–290.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307Google Scholar
Howe, G. W., Levy, M. L., & Caplan, R. D. (2004). Job loss and depressive symptoms in couples: common stressors, stress transmission, or relationship disruption? Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 639–650. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.639Google Scholar
Jones, F., & Fletcher, B. (1993). An empirical study of occupational stress transmission in working couples. Human Relations, 46(7), 881–903. doi:10.1177/001872679304600705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawaguchi, A. (2013). Equal Employment Opportunity Act and work−life balance: Do work−family balance policies contribute to achieving gender equality? Japan Labor Review, 10(2), 35–56.Google Scholar
Lawson, K. M., Davis, K. D., McHale, S. M., Hammer, L. B., & Buxton, O. M. (2014). Daily positive spillover and crossover from mothers’ work to youth health. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 897–907. doi:10.1037/fam0000028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, L. Q., & Liu, S. (2016). The crossover of psychological distress from leaders to subordinates in teams: The role of abusive supervision, psychological capital, and team performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 142–153. doi:10.1037/a0039960Google Scholar
Lim, V. K., & Sng, Q. S. (2006). Does parental job insecurity matter? Money anxiety, money motives, and work motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1078–1087. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1078Google Scholar
Liu, H., & Cheung, F. M. (2015a). The moderating role of empathy in the work–family crossover process between Chinese dual-earner couples. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(3), 442–458. doi:10.1177/1069072714547612Google Scholar
Liu, H., & Cheung, F. M. (2015b). Testing crossover effects in an actor–partner interdependence model among Chinese dual-earner couples. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 106–114. doi:10.1002/ijop.12070Google Scholar
Liu, H., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheung, F. M. (2016). Work–family enrichment and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples: A crossover-spillover perspective. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(2), 209–231. doi:10.1037/a0039753Google Scholar
Lu, C.-q., Lu, J-J., Du, D.-y., & Brough, P. (2016). Crossover effects of work–family conflict among Chinese couples. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 235–250. doi:10.1108/jmp-09-2012-0283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, K. D., Claffey, S. T., & Williams, S. L. (2006). The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles, 55(1–2), 73–82. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9061-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, W., & Brough, P. (2017). Work, stress, and love: Investigating crossover through couples’ lived experiences. In Fitzgerald, J. (Ed.), Foundations for Couples Therapy: Research for the Real World (pp.464–474). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munyon, T. P., Breaux, D. M., Rogers, L. M., Perrewe, P. L., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2009). Mood crossover and relational reciprocity. Career Development International, 14(4–5), 408–427. doi:10.1108/13620430910989825Google Scholar
Neal, M. B., & Hammer, L. B. (2009). Dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation: Effects of coping strategies over time. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 205–234. doi:10.1080/10887150903316230Google Scholar
Neff, A., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Unger, D. (2012). What’s mine is yours: The crossover of day-specific self-esteem. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 385–394. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, A., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Unger, D. (2015). The crossover of self-esteem: A longitudinal perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2013.856298Google Scholar
Nemoto, K. (2013). Long working hours and the corporate gender divide in Japan. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(5), 512–527. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00599.xGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015). OECD Family database: The labour market position of families. Accessed December, 2016 from www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htmGoogle Scholar
Park, Y., & Fritz, C. (2015). Spousal recovery support, recovery experiences, and life satisfaction crossover among dual-earner couples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 557–566. doi:10.1037/a0037894Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover-crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9421-3Google Scholar
Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21(7), 906–943. doi:10.1177/019251300021007005Google Scholar
Schaer, M., Bodenmann, G., & Klink, T. (2008). Balancing work and relationship: Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET) in the workplace. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(s1), 71–89. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00355.xGoogle Scholar
Schooreel, T., & Verbruggen, M. (2016). Use of family-friendly work arrangements and work–family conflict: Crossover effects in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 119–132. doi:10.1037/a0039669Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2, 3–12.Google Scholar
Shimazu, A. (2015). Heavy work investment and work–family balance among Japanese dual-earner couples. In Lu, L. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Work–Life Balance in Asia (p. 61). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Shimazu, A., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). How job demands affect an intimate partner: A test of the spillover-crossover model in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 51(3), 239–248. doi:10.1539/joh.L8160Google Scholar
Song, Z., Foo, M. D., & Uy, M. A. (2008). Mood spillover and crossover among dual-earner couples: A cell phone event sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 443–452. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.443Google Scholar
Takeuchi, R., Yun, S., & Tesluk, P. E. (2002). An examination of crossover and spillover effects of spousal and expatriate cross-cultural adjustment on expatriate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 655–666. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.655Google Scholar
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., & Euwema, M. C. (2010). Is family-to-work interference related to co-workers’ work outcomes? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 461–469. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Haar, J. M., & van der Lippe, T. (2010). Crossover of distress due to work and family demands in dual-earner couples: A dyadic analysis. Work & Stress, 24(4), 324–341. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.533553Google Scholar
Timms, C., Brough, P., Siu, O.-L., O’Driscoll, M., & Kalliath, T. (2015). Cross-cultural impact of work–life balance on health and work outcomes. In Lu, L. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Work–Life Balance in Asia (pp. 295–314). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 848–859. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848Google Scholar
Unger, D., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Kuonath, A. (2015). The longer your work hours, the worse your relationship? The role of selective optimization with compensation in the associations of working time with relationship satisfaction and self-disclosure in dual-career couples. Human Relations, 68(12), 1889–1912. doi:10.1177/0018726715571188Google Scholar
Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 93–106. doi:10.1080/17439760500510569Google Scholar
Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717–751. doi:10.1177/0018726701546002Google Scholar
Westman, M., Brough, P., & Kalliath, T. (2009). Expert commentary on work–life balance and crossover of emotions and experiences: Theoretical and practice advancements. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 587–595. doi: 10.1002/job.616Google Scholar
Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (2005). The crossover of work–family conflict from one spouse to the other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(9), 1936–1957. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02203.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Chen, S. (2009). Crossover of positive experiences from business travelers to their spouses. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 269–284. doi:10.1108/02683940910939340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Horovitz, S. (2004). The toll of unemployment does not stop with the unemployed. Human Relations, 57(7), 823–844. doi:10.1177/0018726704045767Google Scholar
Westman, M., Keinan, G., Roziner, I., & Benyamini, Y. (2008). The crossover of perceived health between spouses. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(2), 168–180. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.2.168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westman, M., Vinokur, A. D., Hamilton, V., & Roziner, I. (2004). Crossover of marital dissatisfaction during military downsizing among Russian army officers and their spouses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 769–779. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.769Google Scholar
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by