Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:11:04.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Advances in Teacher Learning Research in the Learning Sciences

from Part VI - Moving Learning Sciences Research into the Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

By
Barry J. Fishman ,
Carol K. K. Chan  and
Elizabeth A. Davis
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the contribution of the learning sciences to teacher learning research, with particular consideration of how cognitive, sociocognitive, sociocultural, and improvement-focused perspectives extend teacher learning research. Learning scientists study all phases of teacher learning, including preservice education (before becoming a teacher), the first few years of teaching, and ongoing mastery throughout the career. Research often focuses on teaching practices – what teachers do in the classroom and how they move from novice to expert performance. Teacher learning can be supported through collaboration with other teachers in a professional learning community (PLC); through coaching and mentoring; through videos of expert teaching practice; and through educative curriculum materials.

Keywords

pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)professional development (PD)professional learning community (PLC)teacher beliefsresearch-practice partnerships (RPP)educative curriculum materials
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 619 - 637
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arias, A., Bismack, A., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, A., & Davis, E. A. (2017). Supporting children to construct evidence-based claims in science: Individual learning trajectories in a practice-based program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66(1), 204–218.Google Scholar
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8.Google Scholar
Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 29(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, N. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372.Google Scholar
Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2015). Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Beyer, C., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers’ curricular planning: A comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(5), 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, C. J., Delgado, C., Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 977–998.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.Google Scholar
Borko, H., Jacobs, J. Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436.Google Scholar
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In Peterson, P. L., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 548–556). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenman, B., & Lloyd, G. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, T., McKenna, T. J., Fazio, X., Hetherington-Coy, A., & Pierce, P. (2019). Negotiating coherent science teacher professional learning experiences across a university and partner school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
Cesareni, D., Martini, F., & Mancini, I. (2011). Building a community among teachers, researchers and university students: A blended approach to training. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 625–646.Google Scholar
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Chan, K. K. H., Chan, C. K. K., Clarke, S. N., & Resnick, L. B. (2020). Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom dialogue and student learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(4–5), 642–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, P., Jackson, K., Smith, T., Sorum, M., & Henrick, E. (2013). Design research with educational systems: Investigating and supporting improvements in the quality of mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In Fishman, B., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 112(2), pp. 320–349). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797–810.Google Scholar
Davis, E. A., Kloser, M., Wells, A., Windschitl, M., Carlson, J., & Marino, J. C. (2017). Teaching the practice of leading sensemaking discussions in science: Science teacher educators using rehearsals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 275–293.Google Scholar
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 2–14.Google Scholar
Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A., & Kademian, S. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.Google Scholar
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.Google Scholar
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C., Fishman, B., & Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2019). New contexts for professional learning: Analyzing high school science teachers’ engagement on Twitter. AERA Open, 5(4). doi:10.1177/2332858419894252Google Scholar
Fishman, B. (2003). Linking on-line video and curriculum to leverage community knowledge. In Brophy, J. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 201–234). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fishman, B. (2016). Possible futures for online teacher professional development. In Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., & Hartley, A. (Eds.), Teacher learning in the digital age: Online professional development in STEM education (pp. 13–30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, B., & Dede, C. (2016). Teaching and technology: New tools for new times. In Gitomer, D. & Bell, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1269–1334). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.Google Scholar
Fishman, B., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 112[2]). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, B., Penuel, W. R., Hegedus, S., & Roschelle, J. M. (2011). What happens when the research ends? Factors related to the sustainability of a technology-infused mathematics curriculum. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(4), 329–353.Google Scholar
Frumin, K., Dede, C., Fischer, C., et al. (2018). Adapting to large-scale changes in Advanced Placement Biology, Chemistry, and Physics: The impact of online teacher communities. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, L. F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1037–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 408–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teaching Education, 68(4), 411–425.Google Scholar
Gomez, L. M., Bryk, A. S., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.Google Scholar
Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffernan, N. T., Heffernan, C. L., Bennett Decoteau, M., & Militello, M. (2012). Effective and meaningful use of educational technology: Three cases from the classroom. In Dede, C. & Richards, J. (Eds.), Digital teaching platforms: Customizing classroom learning for each student (pp. 88–102). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Horn, I. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.Google Scholar
Horn, I., Garner, B., Chen, I.-C., & Frank, K. A. (2020). Seeing colleagues as learning resources: The influence of mathematics teacher meetings on advice-seeking social networks. AERA Open, 6(2). doi:10.1177/2332858420914898Google Scholar
Horn, I., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in Mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418.Google Scholar
Johnson, H., & Cotterman, M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ knowledge of science teaching through video clubs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 393–417.Google Scholar
Kang, H., & van Es, E. A. (2019). Articulating design principles for productive use of video in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 237–250.Google Scholar
Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235.Google Scholar
Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou, A. (2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insight from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18–31.Google Scholar
Kelley-Petersen, M., Davis, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Kloser, M., & Monte-Sano, C. (2018). Rehearsals as examples of approximation. In Grossman, P. (Ed.), Teaching core practices in teacher education (pp. 85–105). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Laferrière, T., Allaire, S., Breuleux, A., et al. (2015). The knowledge building international project (KBIP): Scaling up professional development using collaborative technology. In Looi, C. K. & Teh, L. W. (Eds.), Scaling educational innovations (pp. 255–276). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laferrière, T., Montane, M., Gros, B., et al. (2010). Partnerships for knowledge building: An emerging model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1).Google Scholar
Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., et al. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.Google Scholar
Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H. T., & Fishman, B. (2006). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ curriculum enactment experience and their understanding of underlying unit structures. In 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 432–438). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 287–337.Google Scholar
McDonald, S. P. (2010). Building a conversation: Preservice teachers’ use of video as data for making evidence-based arguments about practice. Educational Technology, 50(1), 28–31.Google Scholar
McKenney, S., & Mor, Y. (2015). Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 265–279.Google Scholar
McNeill, K. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268.Google Scholar
Mikeska, J., Howell, H., & Straub, C. (2019). Using performance tasks within simulated environments to assess teachers’ ability to engage in coordinated, accumulated, and dynamic (CAD) competencies. International Journal of Testing, 19(2), 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221–229.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2015). Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts (Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education Ed.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oshima, J., Oshima, R., Chiyonishio, Y., & Ohsaki, A. (2018). A new approach to lesson study practice in Japan from the DBIR perspective. In Kay, J. & Luckin, R. (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count (Vol. 2, pp. 673–680). London, England: International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/482Google Scholar
Palincsar, A., Magnusson, S., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
Penuel, W. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a practice of design-based research for supporting and studying equitable implementation and sustainability of innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.Google Scholar
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.Google Scholar
Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2009). Preparing teachers to design instruction for deep understanding in middle school earth science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(4), 461–508.Google Scholar
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2004). The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with The Math Forum. In Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 181–209). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruopp, R. R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Russell, J. L., Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., et al. (2020). Learning from adaptation to support instructional improvement at scale: Understanding coach adaptation in the TN mathematics coaching project. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 148–187.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2019). The creative classroom: Innovative teaching for 21st-century learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Schlager, M. S., Farooq, U., Fusco, J., Schank, P., & Dwyer, N. (2009). Analyzing online teacher networks: Cyber networks require cyber research tools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 86–100.Google Scholar
Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In Renninger, K. A. & Shumar, W. (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.Google Scholar
Sergis, S., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review. In Peña-Ayala, A. (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundamentals, applications, and trends (pp. 25–63). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564.Google Scholar
Seymour, J. R., & Lehrer, R. (2006). Tracing the evolution of pedagogical content knowledge as the development of interanimated discourses. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 549–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.Google Scholar
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
Slotta, J. (2004). The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.Google Scholar
Tan, S. C., Chue, S., & Teo, C. L. (2016). Teacher learning in a professional learning community: Potential for a dual-layer knowledge building. In Looi, C. K., Polman, J., Cress, U., & Reimann, P. (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: Proceedings for the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 178–185). London, England: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Teasley, S. D. (2019). Learning analytics: Where information science and the learning sciences meet. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1,2), 59–73.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Fulmer, S. M., & Trucano, M. (2018). The development of professional learning communities and their teacher leaders: An activity systems analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 49–88.Google Scholar
US Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the National Education Technology Plan. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137.Google Scholar
van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop pre-service teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M. (2008). Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry modules. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 341–356.Google Scholar
Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. doi:10.1007/s11251–014-9340-7Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wise, A. F., & Jung, Y. (2019). Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 53–69.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×