Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:28:00.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Conclusion

The Schools of the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

The schools of today were largely designed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to provide workers for the industrial economy. In the 1970s, economists and other social scientists began to realize that the world's economies were shifting from an industrial economy to a knowledge economy (Bell, 1973; Drucker, 1993; Toffler, 1980). By the 1990s, educators had begun to realize that if the economy was no longer the 1920s-era factory economy, then our schools were designed for a quickly vanishing world (Bereiter, 2002; Hargreaves, 2003; Sawyer, in press). Leading thinkers in business, politics, and education are now in consensus that schools have to be redesigned for the new economy, and that the learning sciences are pointing the way to this new kind of school – a school that teaches the deep knowledge required in a knowledge society. This consensus led major governmental and international bodies to commission reports summarizing learning sciences research; these reports include the U.S. National Research Council's How People Learn (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000), the OECD's Innovation in the Knowledge Economy: Implications for Education and Learning (2004), and a study of twenty-eight countries conducted by the International Society for Technology in Education, called Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change: A Global Perspective (Kozma, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barab, S., & Kirshner, D. (Eds.). (2001). Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences. Special issue of Journal of the Learning Sciences, Volume 10, Issues 1 and 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of the post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Borja, R. J. (2005, May 5). Cyber schools' status. Education Week, 24, 22–23.Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Cherniavsky, J. C. (2005). Research on cognitive tutors. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (in preparation). The second educational revolution: From apprenticeship to schooling to lifelong learning.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
Gobert, J., Buckley, B. C., & Dede, C. J. (2005). Logging students' learning with hypermodels in BioLogica and Dynamica. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (Eds.). (in press). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teacher's College Press.Google Scholar
Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
Lederman, N. G., Adb-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education, Finland. (1999). Education, training, and research in the information society: A national strategy for 2000–2004 (ISBN 952–442–228-X). Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2002). Masterplan 2. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mp2/mp2.htm. Accessed August 5, 2005.
OECD. (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD Publications.
OECD. (2004). Innovation in the knowledge economy: Implications for education and learning. Paris: OECD Publications.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (in press). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science.
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. S. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th edition, Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 679–744). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (in press). Educating for innovation. The Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity.
Schank, R. C. (1999). The disrespected student, or, the need for the virtual university: A talk with Roger Schank (interview with John Brockman, 8/16/1999), http://www.edge.org/3rd/culture/schank/schank/index.html, accessed August 1, 2005.
Schmidt, W. A., & McKnight, C. C. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1954/1968). The science of learning and the art of teaching. In Skinner, B. F. (Ed.), The technology of teaching (pp. 9–28). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published in 1954 in the Harvard Educational Review [Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 86–97]).Google Scholar
Stallard, C. K., & Cocker, J. S. (2001). The promise of technology in schools: The next 20 years. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Vogel, G. (1996). Global review faults U.S. curricula. Science, 274(5286), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.035
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.035
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.035
Available formats
×