Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T17:14:39.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Understanding the Nature, Measurement, and Utility of Implicit Intergroup Biases

from Part II - Prejudice in Specific Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

By
Kumar Yogeeswaran ,
Thierry Devos  and
Kyle Nash
Edited by
Chris G. Sibley  and
Fiona Kate Barlow
Kumar Yogeeswaran
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Thierry Devos
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Kyle Nash
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Fiona Kate Barlow
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

On July 17, 2014, plain-clothed officers from the New York Police Department (NYPD) approached Eric Garner, a 43-year-old African American man suspected of selling loose cigarettes. Garner argued he had not done anything wrong and wanted to be left alone. Officer Pantaleo attempted to handcuff Garner, who moved his arms asking not to be touched, after which Pantaleo put Garner in a chokehold from behind and pulled him to the ground. Other officers surrounded Garner, while Pantaleo pushed Garner's head down to the sidewalk. In a video of the incident, Garner is heard screaming, “I can't breathe” several times before losing consciousness. Seven minutes passed before an ambulance arrived, during which time, CPR was not performed. Garner was declared dead on arrival at the hospital.

Within a few months of this incident, other cases of police brutality toward young African American men came into the spotlight, including the fatal shootings of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri; Tamir Rice in Cleveland, Ohio; Akai Gurley in Brooklyn, New York; and John Crawford near Dayton, Ohio. The common link between all these shootings was that they involved police officers and African American males between ages 12 and 43. Following the failure to indict officers involved in these cases, widespread demonstrations on the street called for justice (Gambino, Thrasher, & Epstein, 2014). Social movements including Twitter's “#BlackLivesMatter” and “#ICan'tBreathe” also called for action against police violence toward African Americans.

Despite public outcry over these cases, national surveys revealed a clear racial gap in perceptions of such incidents. Whereas 80% of African Americans believed that the shooting of Michael Brown raised racial issues that warranted discussion, only 37% of White Americans believed so. By contrast, 47% of White Americans believed race was getting more attention than it deserved (Anderson, 2014). To some individuals, race was irrelevant because there was no overt expression of racism. US Congressman Peter King, for example, argued that racial bias was irrelevant in Garner's death because racial epithets were not used by the police, and the officers would have treated Garner the same if he were a White male (Levine, 2014). Yet, federally collected data on police shootings reveal that young African American men are 21 times more likely to be shot dead by police than their White counterparts (Gabrielson, Jones, & Sagara, 2014).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice , pp. 241 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agerström, J., & Rooth, D. (2011). The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 790–805. doi:10.1037/a0021594Google Scholar
Allen, T., & Sherman, J. (2011). Ego threat and intergroup bias: A test of motivated-activation versus self-regulatory accounts. Psychological Science, 22(3), 331–333.Google Scholar
Allison, T., Wood, C., & McCarthy, G. (1986). The central nervous system. In Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., & Porges, S.W. (Eds). Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications (pp. 5–25). New York: Guilford Press.
Amodio, D. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670–682.Google Scholar
Amodio, D., Bartholow, B., & Ito, T. (2014). Tracking the dynamics of the social brain: ERP approaches for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 385–393.Google Scholar
Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 652–661. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (2014). Vast majority of Blacks view the criminal justice system as unfair. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/12/vast-majority-of-blacks-view-the-criminal-justice-system-as-unfair/
Barden, J., Maddux, W., Petty, R., & Brewer, M. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Bartholow, B., Dickter, C., & Sestir, M. (2006). Stereotype activation and control of race bias: Cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 272.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, T., Götte, L., Gügler, R., & Fehr, E. (2012). The mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement. Human Brain Mapping, 33(6), 1452–1469.Google Scholar
Blair, I., & Banaji, M. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142–1163.Google Scholar
Blair, I., Ma, J., & Lenton, A. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828–841.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J., Berntson, G., Lorig, T., Norris, C., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003) Just because you're imaging the brain doesn't mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 650–661.Google Scholar
Calanchini, J., Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J., & Klauer, K. (2013). Counter-prejudicial training reduces activation of biased associations and enhances response monitoring. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 321–325.Google Scholar
Calanchini, J., & Sherman, J. (2013). Implicit attitudes reflect associative, non-associative, and non-attitudinal processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(9), 654–667.Google Scholar
Chekroud, A., Everett, J., Bridge, H., & Hewstone, M. (2014). A review of neuroimaging studies of race-related prejudice: Does amygdala response reflect threat? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 179.Google Scholar
Conrey, F., Sherman, J., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469–487.Google Scholar
Correll, J., Urland, G. R., & Ito, T. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 120–128.Google Scholar
Craig, A. (2009). How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59–70.Google Scholar
Cunningham, W., Johnson, M., Raye, C., Gatenby, J., Gore, J., & Banaji, M. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of Black and White faces. Psychological Science, 15(12), 806–813.Google Scholar
Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A., Brown, A., Gray, N., & Snowden, R. (2010). Faking of the Implicit Association Test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 302–314.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N. (2009). Mechanisms underlying the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes: The role of automaticity and cognitive control. In Nelson, T. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 267–284). New York: Psychology Press.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800–814.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. (2006). From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 268–280.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. (2008). When social context matters: The influence of long-term contact and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26(1), 112–123.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 347–368.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869.Google Scholar
Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
Devine, P., Forscher, P., Austin, A., & Cox, W. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278.Google Scholar
Devine, P., Plant, E., Amodio, D., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835–848.Google Scholar
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. (2005). American = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 447–466.Google Scholar
Devos, T., Gavin, K., & Quintana, F. (2010). Say “adios” to the American dream? The interplay between ethnic and national identity among Latino and Caucasian Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(1), 37–49.Google Scholar
Devos, T., Huynh, Q.-L., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). Implicit self and identity. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (ed., pp. 155–179). New York: Guilford Press.
Devos, T., & Ma, D. S. (2008). Is Kate Winslet more American than Lucy Liu? The impact of construal processes on the implicit ascription of a national identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Devos, T., & Ma, D. (2013). How “American” is Barack Obama? The role of national identity in a historic bid for the White House. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 214–226.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62–68.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510–540.Google Scholar
Dunham, Y., Baron, A., & Banaji, M. (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 248–253.Google Scholar
Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport, 11(10), 2319–2324.Google Scholar
Fazio, R., Jackson, J., Dunton, B., & Williams, C. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013–1027.Google Scholar
Fazio, R., & Olson, M. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.Google Scholar
Gambino, L., Thrasher, S., & Epstein, K. (2014). Thousands march to protest police brutality in major US cities. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/13/marchers-protest-police-brutality-new-york-washington-boston
Gabrielson, R., Jones, R. G., & Sagara, E. (2014). Deadly force, in Black and White. ProPublica. Retrieved from www.propublica.org/article/deadly-force-in-black-and-white?utm_source=et&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dailynewsletter
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. (2014). Implicit and explicit evaluation: A brief review of the associative–propositional evaluation model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(8), 448–462.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. (2006). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 15(3), 485–499.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
Gawronski, B., & Sritharan, R. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In Gawronski, B. & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 216–240). New York: Guilford Press.
Gonsalkorale, K., Allen, T., Sherman, J., & Klauer, K. (2010). Mechanisms of group membership and exemplar exposure effects on implicit attitudes. Social Psychology, 41(3), 158–168.Google Scholar
Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J., Allen, T., Klauer, K., & Amodio, D. (2011). Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias: The roles of association activation, response monitoring, and overcoming bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1534–1545.Google Scholar
Green, A. R., Carney, D. R., Pallin, D. J., Ngo, L. H., Raymond, K. L., Iezzoni, L. I., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for Black and White patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(9), 1231–1238.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 553–561.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., McGhee, D., & Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., Poehlman, T., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., Smith, C., Sriram, N., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. (2009). Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 9(1), 241–253.Google Scholar
Hahn, A., Judd, C., Hirsh, H., & Blair, I. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1369–1392.Google Scholar
Harris, L., & Fiske, S. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853.Google Scholar
Hehman, E., Volpert, H. I., & Simons, R. F. (2013). The N400 as an index of racial stereotype accessibility. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(4), 544–552.Google Scholar
Ito, T., & Cacioppo, J. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(6), 660–676.Google Scholar
Ito, T., & Cacioppo, J. (2007). Attitudes as mental and neural states of readiness: Using physiological measures to study implicit attitudes. In Wittenbrink, B. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 125–158). New York: Guilford Press.
Ito, T., Thompson, E., & Cacioppo, J. (2004). Tracking the time-course of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1267–1280.Google Scholar
Ito, T., & Urland, G. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616–626.Google Scholar
Johns, M., Cullum, J., Smith, T., & Freng, S. (2008). Internal motivation to respond without prejudice and automatic egalitarian goal activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1514–1519.Google Scholar
Jost, J., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–920.Google Scholar
Kang, J., Dasgupta, N., Yogeeswaran, K., & Blasi, G. (2010). Are ideal litigators White? Measuring the myth of colorblindness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(4), 886–915.Google Scholar
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 871–888.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Hoffman, K., & Nosek, B. (2013). Reducing implicit prejudice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(5), 315–330.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Marini, M., Lehr, S., Cerruti, C., Shin, J.-E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. … Nosek, B. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765–1785.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4–5), 727–738.Google Scholar
Lenton, A., Bruder, M., & Sedikides, C. (2009). A meta-analysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 183–196.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2014). Peter King says Eric Garner would not have died from chokehold were he not obese. Huffington Post. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/03/peter-king-eric-garner_n_6265748.html
Lieberman, M., Hariri, A., Jarcho, J., Eisenberger, N., & Bookheimer, S. (2005). An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nature Neuroscience, 8(6), 720–722.Google Scholar
Luck, S. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ma, D., & Devos, T. (2014). Every heart beats true, for the red, white, and blue: National identity predicts voter support. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 22–45.Google Scholar
Macrae, C., & Bodenhausen, G. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.Google Scholar
Marini, M., Sriram, N., Schnabel, K., Maliszewski, N., Devos, T., Ekehammar, B. … Nosek, B. (2013). Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PLoS ONE, 8, e83543.Google Scholar
McConnell, A., & Leibold, J. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435–442.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663.Google Scholar
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326.Google Scholar
Newheiser, A., Dunham, Y., Merrill, A., Hoosain, L., & Olson, K. (2014). Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1081–1090.Google Scholar
Newheiser, A., & Olson, K. (2012). White and Black American children's implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 264–270.Google Scholar
Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. (2001). The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19(6), 625–666.Google Scholar
Nosek, B., Smyth, F., Hansen, J., Devos, T., Lindner, N., Ranganath, K. … Banaji, M. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88.Google Scholar
Nosek, B., Smyth, F., Sriram, N., Lindner, N., Devos, T., Ayala, A. … Greenwald, A. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10593–10597.Google Scholar
Ofan, R., Rubin, N., & Amodio, D. (2011). Seeing race: N170 responses to race and their relation to automatic racial attitudes and controlled processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3153–3161.Google Scholar
Olson, M., Crawford, M., & Devlin, W. (2009). Evidence for the underestimation of implicit ingroup favoritism among low-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1111–1116.Google Scholar
Olson, K., & Dunham, Y. (2010). The development of implicit social cognition. In Gawronski, B. & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 241–254). New York: Guilford Press.
Olson, M., & Fazio, R. (2002). Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes. Social Cognition, 20(2), 89–104.Google Scholar
Oswald, F., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Tetlock, P. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R. (1980). Effects of information processing demands on slow negative shift latencies and N100 amplitude in selective and divided attention. Biological Psychology, 11(3), 217–233.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K. (2008). What mistakes disclose: A process dissociation approach to automatic and controlled processes in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 1073–1092.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Krosnick, J., Pasek, J., Lelkes, Y., Akhtar, O., & Tompson, T. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 367–374.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Lambert, A., & Jacoby, L. (2002). Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 384–396.Google Scholar
Phelps, E., Cannistraci, C., & Cunningham, W. (2003). Intact performance on an indirect measure of race bias following amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 203–208.Google Scholar
Phelps, E., O'Connor, K., Cunningham, W., Funayama, E., Gatenby, J., Gore, J., & Banaji, M. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 729–738.Google Scholar
Phills, C., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 197–210.Google Scholar
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148.Google Scholar
Ratner, K., & Amodio, D. (2013). Seeing “us vs. them”: Minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 298–301.Google Scholar
Rooth, D. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real-world evidence. Labour Economics, 17, 523–534.Google Scholar
Richeson, J., Baird, A., Gordon, H., Heatherton, T., Wyland, C., Trawalter, S., & Shelton, J. (2003). An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature Neuroscience, 6(12), 1323–1328.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 79–82.Google Scholar
Rudman, L., & Ashmore, R. (2007). Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(3), 359–372. doi:10.1177/1368430207078696Google Scholar
Rudman, L., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20(4), 294–320.Google Scholar
Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Milne, A., & McGeorge, P. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: Children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76(2), 451–466.Google Scholar
Rydell, R., Hamilton, D. L., & Devos, T. (2010). Now they are American, now they are not: Valence as a determinant of the inclusion of African Americans in the American identity. Social Cognition, 28(2), 161–179.Google Scholar
Sekaquaptewa, D., Espinoza, P., Thompson, M., Vargas, P., & von Hippel, W. (2003). Stereotypic explanatory bias: Implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 75–82.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. (2006). On building a better process model: It's not only how many, but which ones and by which means? Psychological Inquiry, 17(3), 173–184.Google Scholar
Stanley, D., Sokol-Hessner, P., Banaji, M., & Phelps, E. (2011). Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(19), 7710–7775.Google Scholar
Stanley, D., Phelps, E., & Banaji, M. (2008). The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 164–170.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Harwood, J., Voci, A., & Kenworthy, J. (2006). Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 413–429.Google Scholar
Turner, R., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369–388.Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858.Google Scholar
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 815–827.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., Adelman, L., Parker, M., & Dasgupta, N. (2014). In the eyes of the beholder: National identification predicts differential reactions to ethnic identity expressions. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 362–369.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., & Dasgupta, N. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1332–1345.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., Dasgupta, N., Adelman, L., Eccleston, A., & Parker, M. T. (2011). To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 908–914.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., Dasgupta, N., & Gomez, C. (2012). A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 691–705.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×