Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:17:02.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Personality and Aggression: A General Trait Perspective

from Part II - Biosocial Foundations of Violence and Aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2018

By
Courtland S. Hyatt ,
Chelsea E. Sleep ,
Brandon M. Weiss  and
Joshua D. Miller
Edited by
Alexander T. Vazsonyi ,
Daniel J. Flannery  and
Matt DeLisi
Alexander T. Vazsonyi
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Daniel J. Flannery
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Matt DeLisi
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression , pp. 221 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62–81.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. A. & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801–815.Google Scholar
Archer, J. & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Beanland, V., Sellbom, M., & Johnson, A. K. (2014). Personality domains and traits that predict self-reported aberrant driving behaviours in a southeastern US university sample. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 72, 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenson, K. R., Downey, G., Rafaeli, E., Coifman, K. G., & Leventhal-Paquin, N. (2011). The rejection-rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 681–690.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., Lochman, J. E., McMahon, R. J., & Pinderhughes, E. (2010). The effects of a multiyear universal social– emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D. W., Gunter, T., Allen, J., Blum, N., Arndt, S., Wenman, G., & Sieleni, B. (2007). Borderline personality disorder in male and female offenders newly committed to prison. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blais, J., Solodukhin, E., & Forth, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 797–821.Google Scholar
Blonigen, D. M. (2010). Explaining the relationship between age and crime: Contributions from the developmental literature on personality. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 89–100.Google Scholar
Bresin, K. & Robinson, M. D. (2015). You are what you see and choose: Agreeableness and situation selection. Journal of Personality, 83, 452–463.Google Scholar
Brugman, S., Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., Cima, M., Schuhmann, T., Dambacher, F., & Sack, A. T. (2015). Identifying cognitive predictors of reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 51–64.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J. & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108, 273–279.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J. & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.Google Scholar
Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 250–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cale, E. M. & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(8), 1179–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W. K. & Miller, J. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, E. N., Vazire, S., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2013). Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 81, 155–170.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crego, C. & Widiger, T. A. (2016). Cleckley’s psychopaths: Revisited. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 75–87.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
Dixon, L., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., & Browne, K. (2008). Classifying partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 74–93.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.Google Scholar
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, D. M., Bjork, J. M., Huckabee, H. C., Moeller, F. G., & Swann, A. C. (1999). Laboratory measures of aggression and impulsivity in women with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 85, 315–326.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., … & MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2013). An examination of the factor structure of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 247–253.Google Scholar
Foss, T. (2014). Freud 100 years ago: On narcissism: An introduction (1914a); On the history of the psychoanalytic movement (1914b); Preface to the 3rd edition of Three essays on the theory of sexuality (1914c). The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 37, 80–84.Google Scholar
Gardner, K. J., Archer, J., & Jackson, S. (2012). Does maladaptive coping mediate the relationship between borderline personality traits and reactive and proactive aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 38, 403–413.Google Scholar
Gore, W. L. & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.Google Scholar
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 953.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., Donnellan, M. B., Samuel, D. B., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Ten-year rank-order stability of personality traits and disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 335–344.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. A., Sippel, L. M., Mota, N., Whalen, D., & Schumacher, J. A. (2015). Borderline personality disorder and related constructs as risk factors for intimate partner violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 95–106.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The “little five”: Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 160–178.Google Scholar
John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102–138.Google Scholar
Jonason, P. K., Duineveld, J. J., & Middleton, J. P. (2015). Pathology, pseudopathology, and the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 43–47.Google Scholar
Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 329–337.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N. & Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 670–682.Google Scholar
Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. In Eissler, R. S., Freud, A., Kris, M., & Solnit, A. J. (Eds), The psychoanalytic study of the child (Vol. 27, pp. 360–400). New York: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Krizan, Z. & Johar, O. (2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 108(5), 784–801.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1998). The structure and stability of common mental disorders (DSM-III-R): A longitudinal-epidemiological study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(2), 216.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.Google Scholar
Leistico, A. M. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, And Treatment, 3(3), 327–340.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Francis Smith, S., Berg, J. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2015). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the Personality building blocks of Cleckley’s chimera. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 593–610.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. & Widows, M. R. (2005). PPI-R: Psychopathic personality inventory revised: Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., Schroeder, M. L., Jackson, D. N., & Jang, K. L. (1994). Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder: Implications for classification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
Lobbestael, J., Baumeister, R. F., Fiebig, T., & Eckel, L. A. (2014). The role of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in self-reported and laboratory aggression and testosterone reactivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 22–27.Google Scholar
Lobbestael, J., Cima, M., & Lemmens, A. (2015). The relationship between personality disorder traits and reactive versus proactive motivation for aggression. Psychiatry Research, 229, 155–160.Google Scholar
Mancke, F., Herpertz, S. C., & Bertsch, K. (2015). Aggression in borderline personality disorder: A multidimensional model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 278–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188.Google Scholar
McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 74, 192–210.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2006). Turning the Other Cheek: Agreeableness and the Regulation of Aggression-Related Primes. Psychological Science, 17, 136–142.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes: A review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 1565–1591.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference?. Journal of Personality, 85, 439–453.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. & Lynam, D. R. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: a meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765–798.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1469–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D. & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network: a meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (in press). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., & Jones, S. E. (2008). Externalizing behavior through the lens of the Five Factor Model: A focus on agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D., Lyman, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the five factor model adequately represent psychopathy?. Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Siedor, L., Crowe, M., Campbell, W. K. (2016) Consensual lay profiles of narcissism and their connection to existing assessment measures. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Rausher, S., Hyatt, C. S., Maples, J., & Zeichner, A. (2014). Examining the relations among pain tolerance, psychopathic traits, and violent and nonviolent antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. D., Zeichner, A., & Wilson, L. F. (2012). Personality correlates of aggression: Evidence from measures of the Five-Factor Model, UPPS Model of Impulsivity, and BIS/BAS. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2903–2919.Google Scholar
Newhill, C. E., Eack, S. M., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Violent behavior in borderline personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 541–554.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar
Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Developmental Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.Google Scholar
Reidy, D. E., Foster, J. D., & Zeichner, A. (2010). Narcissism and unprovoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 414–422.Google Scholar
Reidy, D. E., Shelley-Tremblay, J. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathy, reactive aggression, and precarious proclamations: A review of behavioral, cognitive, and biological research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 512–524.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (2007). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 240–248.Google Scholar
Rosell, D. R. & Siever, L. J. (2015) The neurobiology of aggression and violence. CNS Spectrums, 20, 254–279.Google Scholar
Russel, J. J., Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C., Sookman, D., & Paris, J. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 578–588.Google Scholar
Samstag, L. W. (2007). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change: Reactions to Rogers’ 1957 article. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 295–299.Google Scholar
Samuel, D. B. & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.Google Scholar
Sansone, R. A. & Sansone, L. A. (2009). Borderline personality and criminality. Psychiatry, 6, 16–20.Google Scholar
Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Miller, J. D. (2016). Perils of partialling Redux: The case of the dark triad. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Siever, L. J. (2002). The borderline diagnosis I: Psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 936–950.Google Scholar
South, S. C., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2008). Personality disorder symptoms and marital functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 769–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stead, R. & Fekken, G. C. (2014). Agreeableness at the core of the dark triad of personality. Individual Differences Research, 12, 131–141.Google Scholar
Tackett, J. L., Daoud, S. L., De Bolle, M., & Burt, S. A. (2013). Is relational aggression part of the externalizing spectrum? A bifactor model of youth antisocial behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 149–159.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. M., Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Donnellan, M. B., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012) Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 19, 135–145.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. & Campbell, W. K. (2003). ‘Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?’ Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 261–272.Google Scholar
Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101–111.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (2003). Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 541–558.Google Scholar
Whisman, M. A. & Schonbrun, Y. C. (2009). Social consequences of borderline personality disorder symptoms in a population-based survey: Marital distress, marital violence, and marital disruption. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 410–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widiger, T. A. (1993). The DSM-III-R categorical personality disorder diagnoses: A critique and an alternative. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 75–90.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.Google Scholar
Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2006). Agreeableness and the prolonged spatial processing of antisocial and prosocial information. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1152–1168.Google Scholar
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., One, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K. … & Livesly, W. J. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987−998.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×