Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:22:54.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Research on Social Structure and Cross-National Homicide Rates

from Part III - Individual and Interpersonal Factors for Violence and Aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2018

By
Meghan L. Rogers  and
William Alex Pridemore
Edited by
Alexander T. Vazsonyi ,
Daniel J. Flannery  and
Matt DeLisi
Alexander T. Vazsonyi
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Daniel J. Flannery
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Matt DeLisi
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression , pp. 418 - 437
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andresen, M. A. (2012). Homicide in Lithuania. In Liem, M. C. A. & Pridemore, W. A. (Eds), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer, pp 437–449.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. R. (1991). Development and crime: A cross-national, time-series analysis of competing models. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 343–363.Google Scholar
Bjerregaard, B. & Cochran, J. K. (2008). A cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: Do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime? Western Criminology Review, 9, 31–48.Google Scholar
Chamlin, M. B. & Cochran, J. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 231–252.Google Scholar
Chervyakov, V. V., Shkolnikov, V. M., Pridemore, W. A., & McKee, M. (2002). The changing nature of murder in Russia. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1713–1724.Google Scholar
Chilton, R. & Spielberger, A. (1971). Is delinquency increasing? Age structure and the crime rate. Social Forces, 49, 487–493.Google Scholar
Clark, A. E. & D’Ambrosio, C. (2014). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. The Institute for the Study of Labor Working Paper Series, IZA DP No. 8136.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlebaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.Google Scholar
Currie, E. (1997). Market, crime and community: Toward a mid-range theory of post-industrial violence. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 147–172.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1897/1979). Suicide: A study in sociology. Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1900/1957). Professional ethics and civic morals. Translated by Cornelia Brookfield. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eckberg, D. L. (1995). Estimates of early twentieth-century U.S. homicide rates: An econometric forecasting approach. Demography, 32, 1–16.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1939/2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002) Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 1–40.Google Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Ramos, X. (2013). Inequality and happiness. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28, 1016–1027.Google Scholar
Fiala, R. & LaFree, G. (1988). Cross-national determinants of child homicides. American Sociological Review, 53, 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92–106.Google Scholar
Gartner, R. & Parker, R. N. (1990). Cross-national evidence on homicide and the age structure of the population. Social Forces, 69, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, B. (2006). The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 499–525.Google Scholar
Granath, S. (2012). Homicide in Sweden. In Liem, M. C. A. & Pridemore, W. A. (Eds), Handbook of European Homicide Research: Patterns, Explanations, and Country Studies. New York: Springer, pp 405–414.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. F. (1977). Delinquency and the age structure of society. Contemporary Crisis, 1, 189–223.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. F. (1985). Age, crime, and social explanation. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenewald, J. & Pridemore, W. A. (2009). Stability and change in homicide victim, offender, and event characteristics in Chicago between 1900 and 2000. Homicide Studies, 13, 355–384.Google Scholar
Hirschi, T. & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1998). Attitudes, values, and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization Studies, 19, 477–493.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organization across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. (2016). Statistics and database. Retrieved July 1, 2016 from www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/lang--en/index.htm.Google Scholar
International Social Survey Programme. (2012). Social Inequality IV. Retrieved November 2, 2015 from http://zacat.gesis.org/webview/index.jsp?v=2&submode=abstract&study=http%3A%2F%2F193.175.238.79%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2FZA5400&mode=documentation&top=yes.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (2000). Inequality and crime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 530–539.Google Scholar
LaFree, G. (1999). A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In Smith, M. D. & Zahn, M. A. (Eds), Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research (pp. 125–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
LaFree, G. (1998). Losing legitimacy: Street crime and the decline of social institutions in America. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
LaFree, G. (2005). Evidence for elite convergence in cross-national homicide victimization trends, 1956 to 2000. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 191–211.Google Scholar
LaFree, G., Curtis, K., & McDowall, D. (2015). How effective are our “better angels”? Assessing country-level declines in homicide since 1950. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 482–504.Google Scholar
Lehti, M. & Kivivuori, J. (2012). Homicide in Finland. In Liem, M. C. A. & Pridemore, W. A. (Eds), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer, pp 391–404.Google Scholar
Liem, M., Ganpat, S., Granath, S., Hagstedt, J., Kivivuori, J., Lehti, M., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). Homicide in Finland, the Netherlands, and Sweden: First Findings From the European Homicide Monitor. Homicide Studies, 17, 75–95.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. P. & Pridemore, W. A. (2011). Crime in the international perspective. In Wilson, J. Q. & Petersilia, J., Crime and Public Policy (2nd ed., pp. 5–52). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lysova, A. V., Shchitov, N. G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2012). Homicide in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. In Liem, M. C. A. & Pridemore, W. A. (Eds), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer, pp 451–469.Google Scholar
Macunovich, D. J. (2011). A note on inequality aversion across countries, using two new measures. The Institute for the Study of Labor Working Paper Series, IZA DP No. 5734.Google Scholar
Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Sutton, G. M. (2011). NIH Public Access, 48, 1–22.Google Scholar
Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (2007). Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Social structure and homicide: Theory and research. In Smith, M. D. & Zahn, M. A. (Eds), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 27–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Monkkonen, E. H. (1999). New York City offender ages: How variable over time? Homicide Studies, 3, 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkkonen, E. H. (1995). New York City homicides: A research note. Social Science History, 19, 201–214.Google Scholar
Nivette, A. E. (2011). Cross-National Predictors of Crime: A Meta-Analysis. Homicide Studies, 15, 103–131.Google Scholar
Nivette, A. E. & Eisner, M. (2013). Do legitimate polities have fewer homicides? A cross-national analysis. Homicide Studies, 17, 3–26.Google Scholar
O’Kane, R. H. T. (1993). Against legitimacy. Political Studies, 41, 471–487.Google Scholar
Pampel, F. C. & Williamson, J. B. (2001). Age patterns of suicide and homicide mortality rates in high-income nations. Social Forces, 80, 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paré, P. P. & Felson, R. (2014). Income inequality, poverty and crime across nations. British Journal of Sociology, 65, 434–458.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C. & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 32, 373–450.Google Scholar
Pridemore, W. A. (2002). What we know about social structure and homicide: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Violence & Victims, 17, 127–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pridemore, W. A. (2003). Demographic, temporal, and spatial patterns of homicide rates in Russia. European Sociological Review, 19, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridemore, W. A. (2007). Change and stability in the characteristics of homicide victims, offenders, and incidents during rapid social change. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 331–345.Google Scholar
Pridemore, W. A. (2008). Cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty – homicide thesis. Criminology, 46, 133–154.Google Scholar
Pridemore, W. A. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality-homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 739–772.Google Scholar
Pridemore, W. A. (2016). The Criminological Transition Model: A new theory of how societal evolution influences the nature of crime. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. (2014). A descriptive and graphical analysis of the (lack of) association between age and homicide cross-nationally. International Criminal Justice Review, 24, 235–253.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2013). The effect of poverty and social protection on national homicide rates: Direct and moderating effects. Social Science Research, 42, 584–595.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016a). A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Association between Percent Young and Cross-National Homicide Rates. British Journal of Criminology.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016b). The (Null) Effects of Percent Young on 15 to 24 Age-Specific and Male- and Female-Specific Cross-National Homicide Rates. Homicide Studies, 20, 257–292.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016c). Perceived income inequality. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016d). Do national homicide rates follow supranational trends? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016e). How does social protection influence cross-national homicide rates in developed nations? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016f). Not just another test of IAT: Accessing relative institutional imbalance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. & Pridemore, W. A. (2016g). The utility of model selection in testing criminological theory across nations. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Roth, R. (2009). American Homicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. & Lauritsen, J. L. (1994). Violent victimization and offending: Individual, situational-, and community-level risk factors. In Reiss, A. J. & Roth, J. A. (Eds), Understanding and Preventing Violence. Volume 2: Social Influences (pp. 1–114). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
South, S. J. & Messner, S. F. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83–106.Google Scholar
Stamatel, J. P. (2006). Incorporating socio-historical context into quantitative cross-national criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 30, 177-207.Google Scholar
Stamatel, J. P. (2009). Correlates of national-level homicide variation in post-communist East-Central Europe. Social Forces, 87, 1423–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatel, J. P. (2016). Democratic cultural values as predictors of cross-national homicide variation in Europe. Homicide Studies: An Interdisciplinary & International Journal, 20(3), 239–256..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacher, D. (2004). The rich get richer and the poor get robbed: Inequality in US criminal victimization, 1974–2000. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 89–116.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2014). Why crime rates are falling throughout the western world. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 43, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trent, C. L. S. & Pridemore, W. A. (2011). A review of the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide. In Liem, M. C. A. & Pridemore (Eds), W. A., Handbook of European Homicide Research: Patterns, Explanations, and Country Studies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. (2008). The world of crime: Breaking the silence on problems of security, justice and development across the world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
van Kesteren, J. (2007). Integrated database from the International Crime Victim Survey (ICVS) 1989–2005, codebook and data. Tiburg: INTERVICT.Google Scholar
van Kesteren, J., Mayhew, P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2000). Criminal Victimization in Seventeen Industrialized Countries. The Netherlands: Justice Wetenschappelijk Onderzoeken Documentaciecentrum.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2004). Why is violence more common where inequality is greater? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 1–12.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015). Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children. Retrieved July 1, 2016 from http://hbsc-nesstar.nsd.no/webview/index.jsp?v=2&submode=abstract&study=http%3A%2F%2F129.177.90.126%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2FHBSC2006OAed1.0&mode=documentation&top=yes.Google Scholar
World Values Survey (2014). Data and Documentation. Retrieved October 24, 2014 from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp.Google Scholar
World Values Survey (2016). Online Data Analysis. Retrieved August 1, 2016 from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp.Google Scholar
Zahn, M. A. & McCall, P. L. (1999). Trends and patterns of homicide in the 20th-century United States. In Smith, M. D. & Zahn, M. A. (Eds), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 9–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×