Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:35:16.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Language Acquisition and World Englishes

from Part III - Linguistics and World Englishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2019

By
Sarah Buschfeld
Edited by
Daniel Schreier ,
Marianne Hundt  and
Edgar W. Schneider
Daniel Schreier
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Marianne Hundt
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Edgar W. Schneider
Affiliation:
Universität Regensburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Language acquisition and World Englishes (WEs) research are two subdisciplines with their own theoretical approaches, classifications, terminologies, and methodologies for investigation. They also have distinct perspectives on otherwise similar phenomena, viz. manifestations of acquiring/learning a language. As early as 1986, Sridhar and Sridhar discerned “a lack of articulation between theories of SLA and research on the acquisition and use of IVEs [indigenized varieties of English]” (Sridhar and Sridhar 1986: 12) and prompted an integrated approach. However, this call remained largely unheard for about twenty years. Only quite recently have studies pointed to potential similarities and the connectedness of learner Englishes and WEs as well as the possibility, if not necessity, of an integrated approach to the two objects of inquiry. The current chapter provides a scholarly review of these developments. It starts out with a summary and discussion of the potential and need for an integration of the Second Language Acquisition and WEs research paradigms, ultimately expanding the focus to a joint treatment of WEs and First Language Acquisition research.

Keywords

World Englishesfirst-language acquisitionsecond-language acquisitionintegrated approachsecond-language varietylearner EnglishSingaporeGreeceCyprus
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes , pp. 559 - 584
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anchimbe, E. A. 2009. Revisiting the notion of maturation in new Englishes. World Englishes 28(3): 337–352.Google Scholar
Anchimbe, E. A. 2012. Language contact in a postcolonial setting: Research approaches to Cameroon English and Cameroon Pidgin English. In Anchimbe, E., ed. Language Contact in a Postcolonial Setting: The Linguistic and Social Context of English and Pidgin in Cameroon. New York: de Gruyter, 3–25.Google Scholar
Biewer, C. 2011. Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective. In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning 33(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Bolton, K. and Ng, B. C.. 2014. The dynamics of multilingualism in contemporary Singapore. World Englishes 33(3): 307–318.Google Scholar
Brato, T. 2018. “Outdooring” the Historical Corpus of English in Ghana. English Today 34(2): 25–34.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. forthcoming a. What Cyprus and Greece can tell us about the paradigm gap between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition research. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. forthcoming b. Children’s English in Singapore: Acquisition, Properties, and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. 2013. English in Cyprus or Cyprus English? An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, S. and Kautzsch, A.. 2014. English in Namibia: A first approach. English World-Wide 35(2): 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, S. and Kautzsch, A.. 2017. Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 36(1): 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Census of Population. 2000. 2000 Statistical Release 2. www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/cop 192000/cop2000r2.html.Google Scholar
Census of Population. 2010. 2010 Statistical Release 1. www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/cop 192010/census10_stat_release1.html.Google Scholar
Collins, P. C., Borlongan, A. M. and Yao, X.. 2014. Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 68–88.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 1999. Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33(22): 185–209.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 2007. Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for SLA research? In Han, Z. H, ed. Understanding Second Language Process. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. 2010. The relationship between first and second language acquisition revisited. In Macaro, E., ed. The Continuum Companion to Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum, 137–157.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deshors, S. C., Götz, S., and Laporte, S.. 2016. Introduction. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL: Rethinking the linguistic creativity of non-native English speakers. Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes. Special Issue of the International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2): 131–150.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012. Special Eurobarometer 386. Europeans and Their Languages. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Selinker, L.. 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. 2015. At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared. English World-Wide 36(1): 91–124.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. and Granger, S.. 2011. From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1998. The origins and development of emigrant Englishes [1996]. In Görlach, M., ed. Even More Englishes: Studies 1996–1997. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–38.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 2002. English in Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, the Philippines … a second or a foreign language? In Görlach, M., ed. Still More Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, S. and Schilk, M.. 2011. Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English of advanced German learners. In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, E., Campbell, L., Hay, J., Maclagan, M., Sudbury, A. and Trudgill, P.. 2004. New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. 1989. Singapore Colloquial English and Standard English. Singapore Journal of Education 10(2): 33–39.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. 1994. The Step-Tongue. Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. 1997. Colonisation, migration, and functions of English. In Schneider, E. W., ed. Englishes Around the World. Vol. 1: General Studies, British Isles, North America. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. F. 1998. The situation of English in Singapore. In Foley, J. A., Kandiah, T., Zhiming, B., Gupta, A. F., Alsagoff, L., Lick, H. C., Wee, L., Talib, I. S. and Bokhorst-Heng, W. D., eds. English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore and Oxford: Singapore Institute of Management and Oxford University Press, 106–126.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. 2003. How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of new dialect formation. In Hickey, R., ed. Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213–239.Google Scholar
Hickey, R., ed. 2019. Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. and Mukherjee, J.. 2011. Introduction: Bridging a paradigm gap. In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–6.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. and Vogel, K.. 2011. Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner English – fact or fiction? In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–165.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. [1977] 2009. Linguistic Schizophrenia and Language Census: A Note on the Indian Situation. Linguistics 15(186): 17–32. doi:10.1515/ling.1977.15.186.17.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1992. Models for non-native Englishes. In Kachru, B. B., ed. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 48–74.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B., ed. 1992. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures (2nd ed.).Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Koch, C., Lange, C. and Leuckert, S.. 2016. This hair-style called as “duck tail”: The “intrusive as”-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes. Special Issue of the International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2): 151–176.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Laporte, S. 2012. Mind the gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the making. English Text Construction 5(2): 264–291.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, J. R. E. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, L. 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26(4): 446–473.Google Scholar
Lim, L. and Foley., J. A. 2004. English in Singapore and Singapore English. In Lim, L., ed. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–18.Google Scholar
Long, Michael H. 2003. Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H., eds. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 487–535.Google Scholar
Lowenberg, P. H. 1986. Non-native varieties of English: Nativization, norms, and implications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 8(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. and Bates, E.. 1994. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21(2): 339–366.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2011. Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2):121–145.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. and Bhatt, R. M.. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moag, R. F. 1992. The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In Kachru, B. B., ed. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 233–252.Google Scholar
Mollin, S. 2006. Euro-English. Assessing Variety Status. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Mollin, S. 2007. New variety or learner English? Criteria for variety status and the case of Euro-English. English World-Wide 28(2): 167–185.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005. Language evolution: The population genetics way. In Hauska, G., ed. Gene, Sprachen und ihre Evolution. Regensburg: Universitätsverlag Regensburg, 30–52.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. 2011. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. 2009. Co-selection phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide 30(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Percillier, M. 2016. World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition: Insights from Southeast Asian Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Platt, J. and Weber, H.. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, Features, Functions. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, J., Weber, H. and Ho, M. L.. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rathore, C. 2014. East African Indian twice migrants in Britain: Phonological variation across generations. Hundt, In M. and Sharma, D., eds. English in the Indian Diaspora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–83.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. C. 1986. Second language acquisition research and the study of non-native varieties of English: Some issues in common. World Englishes 5(1): 15–30.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. and Rohrbacher, B.. 2000. Null subjects in early child English and the theory of economy of projection. In Powers, S. M. and Hamann, C., eds. The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 345–396.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1): 9–32.Google Scholar
Schreier, D. 2014. On cafeterias and new dialects: The role of primary transmitters. In Buschfeld, S., Hoffmann, T., Huber, M. and Kautzsch, A., eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 231–248.Google Scholar
Scott, K. 2005. Child null subjects. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 1–25.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(3): 209–231.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4): 464–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, K. K. and Sridhar, S. N.. 1986. Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes 5(1):3–14.Google Scholar
Strevens, P. 1992. English as an international language: Directions in the 1990s. In Kachru, B. B., ed. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 27–47.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. and Kortmann, B.. 2011. Typological profiling: learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English. In Mukherjee, J. and Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–187.Google Scholar
Tan, Y.-Y. 2014. English as a “mother tongue” in Singapore. World Englishes 33(3): 319–339.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 2000. Still wrestling with “context” in interlanguage theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 182–198.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106(1–4): 23–79.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 1987. Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition. English World-Wide 8(2): 161–199.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 1989. Language acquisition, language contact and nativized varieties of English. RELC Journal 20(1): 39–67.Google Scholar
Winford, D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×