Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:08:00.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - The Relevance of World Englishes for Variationist Sociolinguistics

from Part III - Linguistics and World Englishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2019

By
Alexandra D’Arcy
Edited by
Daniel Schreier ,
Marianne Hundt  and
Edgar W. Schneider
Daniel Schreier
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Marianne Hundt
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Edgar W. Schneider
Affiliation:
Universität Regensburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Rooted in historical linguistics, variationist sociolinguistics is often concerned with diachrony as reflected in synchronic grammars. World Englishes (WEs), which emerge through particular sociohistorical factors (e.g. colonialization, language contact, mass migration, dialect mixing, etc.), provide an ideal window for examining questions that are central to this mission: the inheritance of shared features, ongoing evolutionary mechanisms, and pathways of innovation as dialects interact and settle within new local linguistic ecologies. These varieties thus extend our knowledge base concerning the underlying mechanisms of language variation and change. In so doing, they enable theoretical and empirical advances through application of the comparative method, exposing the interaction between external social forces and internal linguistic ones on linguist forms and functions. In this chapter, I review variationist research that targets multiple varieties, both in the Inner Circle and, where available, the Outer Circle, to outline the gains that are possible by harnessing the synergistic energies of WEs through a variationist lens.

Keywords

be likecomparative methoddiffusiondriftglobalizationtransmissionparallel development
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes , pp. 436 - 458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, Farhana and Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2011. Identity and ethnicity in /t/ in Glasgow-Pakistani high-school girls. In Lee, Wai-Sum and Zee, Eric Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS XVII). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, 216–219.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. 1980. A re-examination of the Black English copula. In Labov, W., ed. Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, 83–106.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1994. Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6: 303–326.Google Scholar
Bell, A. and Holmes, J.. (1992). H-droppin’: Two sociolinguistic variables in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 12: 223–248.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin. 2015. South Pacific Englishes: A Sociolinguistic and Morphosyntactic Profile of Fiji English, Samoan English and Cook Islands English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, Beyza. 2008. So where are we? Spoken lingua franca English at a technical university in Sweden. English Today 24: 35–41.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2003. Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Carl, Recktenwald, Sigrid and Wang, Jenny. 1990. I’m like, ‘Say what ?!’. A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65: 215–227.Google Scholar
Bodén, Petra. 2010. Pronunciation in Swedish multiethnolect. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A., eds. Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 65–78.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2003. Chinese Englishes: A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2002. Space and spatial diffusion. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. and Schilling-Estes, N., eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 603–637.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2004. Geolinguistics and linguistic diffusion. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. J. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 34–38.Google Scholar
Britain, David and Trudgill, Peter. 2005. New dialect formation and contact-induced reallocation: Three case studies from the Fens. International Journal of English Studies 5: 183–209.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2011. Quotations across the generations: A multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 decades of Tyneside speech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7: 59–92.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13: 291–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ronald. 1982. Editor’s note [on be like “think”]. American Speech 57: 149.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37: 637–659.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. The effect of speaker information on attitudes toward (ING). Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. and Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50: 333–355.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Kortmann, B., ed., Dialectology Meets Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 127–145.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 151–196.Google Scholar
Christy, Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14: 83–89.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2012. The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 24: 343–369.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2017. Discourse-pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight-hundred years of like. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. Forthcoming Reconfiguring direct quotation over time and the system-internal rise of be like. In Grund, P. and Walker, T., eds. The Dynamics of Speech Representation in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2008. New-Dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the Modal Auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, J., ed. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 343–365.Google Scholar
Durham, Mercedes. 2014. The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Lingua Fraca Context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1991. The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66: 3–21.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen and Bell, Barbara. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like. American Speech 70: 265–290.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. 1958. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14: 47–56.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan. 1956. Über den Verlauf des Lautwandels. Acta Linguistica 6: 173–278.Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. 1905. L’unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune. Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf. Halle: Max Niemayer. 175–232.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea and Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Greg. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W., ed. Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2015. The deletion of /t,d/ in Hong Kong English. World Englishes 35: 60–77.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Foulkes, Paul. 2016. The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92: 298–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Eduard. 1929. Lautveränderungen in der Individualsprache einer Mundart. Nachrichten der Gesellsch. der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 11: 195–214.Google Scholar
Höhn, Nicole. 2011. Quotatives in the Jamaican acrolect: Corpus-based variationist studies of vernacular globalisation in World Englishes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Freiburg.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Two for /t/: Flapping and glottal stops in New Zealand English. Te Reo 38: 53–72.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M. and Horvath, Ronald J.. 2002. The geolinguistics of /l/ vocalization in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 319–346.Google Scholar
Houston, Ann C. 1985. Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2014. Home is where you’re born: Negotiating identity in the diaspora. Studia Neophilologica 86: 125–137.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B., ed. 1982. The Other Tongue. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. B., Kachru, Yamuna and Nelson, Cecil L.. 2006. The Handbook of World Englishes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul and McDaniel, Chad K.. 1979. On the logic of variable rules. Language in Society 8: 151–187.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8: 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2013. Identity, ethnicity and place: The construction of youth language in London. In Auer, P., Hilpert, M., Stukenbrock, A. and Szmrecsanyi, B., eds. Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter. 128–164.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29: 65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Farhat. 1991. Final consonant cluster simplification in a variety of Indian English. In Cheshire, Jenny, ed. English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin, eds. 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://ewave-atlas.orgGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–94.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83: 344–387.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej and Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 431–463.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez and Fox, Sue. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 185–217.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2010. Socio-phonetics and social change: Deracialisation of the GOOSE vowel in South African English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 3–33.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam and Nagy, Naomi, eds. 2008. Social Lives in Language: Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam and Niedzielski, Nancy, 2003. The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 534–555.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2007. Off the shelf or under the counter? On the social dynamics of sound changes. In Cain, C. M. and Russom, G, eds. Studies in the History of the English Language, Vol. 3: Managing Chaos: Strategies for Identifying Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 149–172.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Rickford, John R., Bailey, Guy and Baugh, John, eds. 1998. African American English: Structure, History and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nigsch Rathore, Claudia and Schreier, Daniel. 2016. “Our heart is still in Africa”: Twice migration and its sociolinguistic consequences. Language in Society 45: 163–191.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 1991. Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t,d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3: 171–189.Google Scholar
Payne, Arvilla C. 1980. Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In Labov, W., ed. Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, 143–178.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce and Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob, 1985. Chicano English: An Ethnic Contact Dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2008. Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 43–61.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 2015. The creole origins hypothesis. In Lanehart, S., ed. The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–56.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., Ball, Arnetha, Blake, Renee, Jackson, Raina and Martin, Nomi. 1991. Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of the copula variation in African-American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 3: 103–132.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. 1997. Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24: 351–372.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne and Lange, Deborah. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66: 227–279.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David and Labov, William. 1979. On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8: 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1996. Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change 8: 63–89.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79: 233–281.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2017. Dialect formation in isolated communities. Annual Review of Linguistics 3: 347–362.Google Scholar
Sebba, Mark. 1993. London Jamaican. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani and Sankaran, Lavanya. 2011. Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23: 399–428.Google Scholar
Shaub, Mark. 2000. English in the Arab Republic of Egypt. World Englishes 19: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1997. Mixing, leveling and pidgin/creole development. In. Spears, A. K. and Winford, D., eds. The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 111–149.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes and Fortune, Liane. 2009. Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21: 69–95.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. and Preston, Dennis R., eds. 2009. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Steinholt, Anders. 1964. Målbryting i Hedrum. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sudbury, Andrea. 2001. Falkland Islands English: A southern hemisphere variety? English World-Wide 22: 55–80.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin and Røyneland, Unn. 2008. Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 63–83.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Kortmann, Bernd. 2009. Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Paulasto, H., eds. Vernacular Universals and language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Routledge, 33–53.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2002. Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. and Schilling-Estes, N., eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 729–763.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19: 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85: 58–108.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., D’Arcy, Alexandra and Rodríguez Louro, Celeste. 2016. Outliers, impact, and rationalization in linguistic change. Language 92: 824–849.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Denis, Derek. 2014. Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90: 90–136.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Hudson, Rachel. 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian Youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 147–172.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind, Gabrielatos, Costas, Hoffmann, Sebastian and Fox, Sue. 2011. A corpus-based study of pragmatic markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7: 93–118.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2009. Vernacular universals and the sociolinguistic typology of English dialects. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Paulasto, H., eds. Vernacular Universals and language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Routledge, 304–322.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2014. Diffusion, drift, and the irrelevance of media influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 214–222.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William and Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y., eds. Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–195.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2009. Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua 119: 782–806.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1997. On the origins of African American Vernacular English: A creolist perspective. Part 1: The sociohistorical background. Diachronica 14: 305–344.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1998. On the origins of African American Vernacular English: A creolist perspective. Part II: Linguistic features. Diachronica 15 : 99–155.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia. 1997. Growing Up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×