Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:35:27.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Hippolytus, Ps.-Hippolytus and the early canons

from A - LITERARY GUIDE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Frances Young
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Lewis Ayres
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Andrew Louth
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Augustine Casiday
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Hippolytus is one of the most enigmatic figures in the history of the early Church. He appears to have been a man of great importance, but both his identity and his writings are surrounded with problems. The traditional depiction of his life, since the discovery and publication in 1851 of the Refutation of All Heresies, places his activities in Rome in the first third of the third century. He was a priest there perhaps as early as the bishopric of Victor (189–99). He strongly opposed the endorsement of modalistic monarchianism by the bishops Zephyrinus (199–217) and Callistus (218–22), and what he considered to be the lax penitential policy of the latter, and consequently he became bishop of a schismatic church in Rome in opposition to Callistus. He was the author of a large number of exegetical works, two works against heresies, a work concerning the universe, a chronicle, a computation of the dates of Easter, and a work on church order. In 235 he was exiled to Sardinia, along with Pontianus, bishop of Rome, by the Emperor Maximinus Thrax. Both men died there as martyrs. Before suffering martyrdom, however, it is assumed that Hippolytus was reconciled with Pontianus, for Fabian, bishop of Rome (236–50), brought both back to Rome for burial, and Hippolytus was later recognized as a martyr by Damasus (bishop 366–84). Some, however, relying on a reference in the Chronicon Paschale to Hippolytus, bishop of Porto near Rome, take the latter to have been the author and martyr, and not the priest who became head of a schismatic church in Rome.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achelis, H. Die Canones Hippolyti, Texte und Untersuchungen 6.4 (1891).
Ann Rossi, MaryPriesthood, Precedent and Prejudice’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 7 (Spring 1991).Google Scholar
Bardy, G. Paulde Samosate, Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense études et documents, 4 (Louvain: Spicilegium sacrum bureaux, 1923).Google Scholar
Beck, Alexander, Römisches Recht bei Tertullian und Cyprian (Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1930).
Botte, B. La tradition apostolique de saint Hippolyte, Liturgiewissenschaftliche Quellen und Forschungen 39 (Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1963).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. ed., and Bebawi, G., trans., The Canons of Hippolytus, Alcuin/Grove Liturgical Studies 2 (Bramcote: Grove, 1987).Google Scholar
Brakmann, H.Alexandreia und die Kanones des Hippolyt’, Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 22 (1979).Google Scholar
Brent, A. Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century, Supplements Vigiliae Christianae 31 (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Brown, Peter Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992).
Butterworth, R. Hippolytus of Rome: Contra Noetum, Heythrop Monographs 2 (London: Heythrop College, 1977).
Cerrato, J. A., ‘The Hippolytan Biblical Commentaries and the Identity and Provenance of their Author,’ Theology Faculty, University of Oxford, DPhil Thesis, 1996.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H.Philo and the Beginning of Christian Thought’, in Armstrong, A. H., ed., The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Connolly, R. H. The So-called Egyptian Church Order and Derived Documents, Texts and Studies 8.4 (Cambridge, 1916).
Cooper, Kate The Virgin and the Bride (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).
Coquin, R.-G. Les canons d’Hippolyte, Patrologia Orientalis 31.2 (Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1966).Google Scholar
Cox, P. Biography in Late Antiquity, Transformation of the Classical Heritage 5 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
Cuming, G. J. Hippolytus: A Text for Students, Alcuin/Grove Liturgical Studies 8 (Bramcote: Grove, 19912).Google Scholar
de Riedmatten, H. Les actes du procès de Paul de Samosate, Paradosis 6 (Fribourg: Éditions St-Paul, 1952).Google Scholar
Dix, G. The Treatise on the Apostolic Tradition of St Hippolytus of Rome I (London: SPCK, 1937); corrected edn: Dix, G. and Chadwick, H. (London: SPCK, 19682).
Dixon, Suzanne The Roman Mother (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1988).
Eisen, Ute E. Arztsträgerinnen im frühen Christentum (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996).
Frickel, J. Das Dunkel um Hippolyt von Rom (Graz: Eigenverlag des Instituts für Ökumenische Theologie und Patrologie an der Universität Graz, 1988).
Garitte, G. Traités d’Hippolyte sur David et Goliath, sur le Cantique des cantiques et sur l’Antichrist, Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 264, Scriptores Iberici 16 (1965).Google Scholar
Hadot, I.Les introductions aux commentaires exégétiques chez les auteurs néoplatoniciens et les auteurs Chrétiens’, in Tardieu, M., ed., Les règles de l’interprétation (Paris: Cerf, 1987).Google Scholar
Hagemann, H. Die Römische Kirche (Freiburg: Herder, 1864).
Hallett, Judith Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Havelock, E. Preface to Plato (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1963).
Heine, R. E. The Montanist Oracles and Testimonia, Patristic Monograph Series 14 (Macon, GA: The Philadelphia Patristic Foundation Ltd, 1989).Google Scholar
Heine, R. E.The Christology of Callistus’, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 49 (1998).Google Scholar
Helm, R., Der Chronik des Hieronymus, Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller 46 (1955).Google Scholar
Herrmann, Elisabeth Ecclesia in Re Publica (Frankfurt: Peter D. Lang, 1980).
Jo Torjesen, Karen When Women Were Priests (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1995).
Jungmann, J. A. The Early Liturgy (London: Dorton, Longman and Todd, 1959, 19802).
Klauser, TheodoreBischöfe als staatliche Prokuratoren im dritten Jahrhundert?Jahrbuch fur Antike und Christentum, Jahrgang 14 (1971).Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition, Transformation of the Classical Heritage 9 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
Lefèvre, M. Hippolyte, Commentaire sur Daniel, Sources chrétiennes 14 (1947).Google Scholar
Loofs, F. Paulus von Samosata, Texte und Untersuchungen 44.5 (1924).
Lyman, J. R. Christology and Cosmology, Oxford Theological Monographs (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Malley, W. J.Four Unedited Fragments of the De Universe of the Pseudo-Josephus Found in the Chronicon of George Hamartolus (Coislin 305)’, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 16 (1965).Google Scholar
Mansfield, J. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Greek philosophy, Philosophia Antiqua 56 (Leiden: Brill, 1992).Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. Hippolytus Refutatio Omnium Haeresium, Patristische Texte und Studien 25 (1986).
McGowan, A. Ascetic Eucharists. Food and Drink in Early Christian Ritual Meals, Oxford Early Christian Studies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).
Millar, F.Paul of Samosata, Zenobia and Aurelian: The Church, Local Culture and Political Allegiance in Third-Century Syria’, Journal of Roman Studies 61 (1971).Google Scholar
Mouraviev, S. N.Hippolyte, Héraclite et Noët (Commentaire d’Hippolyte, Refut. omn. Refutatio omnium haeresium or Haereticarum fabularum compendium. IX 8–10)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 36. 6 (1992).Google Scholar
Mueller, I.Heterodoxy and Doxography in Hippolytus’ “Refutation of All Heresies”, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 36. 6 (1992).Google Scholar
Nautin, P. Lettres et écrivains Chrétiens des IIe et IIIe siècles (Paris, 1961).
Nautin, P. Hippolyte et josipe (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1947).
Nautin, P. Hippolyte, Contre les hérésies: fragment, étude, et édition critique (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1949).
Nautin, P. Le dossier d’Hippolyte et de Méliton dansles florilèges dogmatiques et chez les historiens modernes (Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1953).
Norelli, E. Ippolito. L’Anticristo, Bibliotheca Patristica 10 (Florence: Nardini, 1987).
Norris, F. W.Paul of Samosata: Procurator Ducenarius’s, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 34 (1984).Google Scholar
Osborne, C. Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy (London: Duckworth, 1987).
Otranto, GiorgioNote sul sacerdozio femminile nell’ antichità in margine a una testimonianze di Gelasio’, Vetera Christianorum 19 (1982).Google Scholar
Perkins, Judith The Suffering Self (New York: Routledge, 1995).
Pollard, T. E. Johannine Christology and the Early Church (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).
,Ricerche su Ippolito, Studia Ephemeridis ≪Augustinianum≫ 13 (Rome: Augustinianum, 1977).
Richard, M.Hippolyte de Rome’, in Opera Minora, I (Turnhout/Leuven:Brepols/University of Leuven Press, 1976), 10, cols.Google Scholar
Richlin, AmyCarrying Water in a Sieve: Class and Body in Roman Women’s Religion’, King, Karen, in ed., Women and Goddesses (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. Religion and Authority in Ancient Carthage (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Sample, R. L.The Messiah as Prophet: The Christology of Paul of Samosata’, Northwestern University, dissertation, 1977.Google Scholar
Schöllgen, G. and Geerlings, W., Didache, Zwölf-Apostel-Lehre; Traditio Apostolica, Apostolische Überlieferung (Freiburg: Herder, 1991).
Schwartz, E. Über die pseudoapostolische Kirchenordnung, Schriften der wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft in Strassburg 6, (Strasbourg, 1910).
Smith, A. Porphyry’s Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1974).
Vallée, G. A Study in Anti-Gnostic Polemics (Waterloo, Ontario, 1981).
Walzer, R. Galen on Jews and Christians (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949).
Widdicombe, P. The Fatherhood of God from Origen to Athanasius, Oxford Theological Monographs (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Williams, R.Does It Make Sense To Speak of Pre-Nicene Orthodoxy?’, Williams, R., ed., The Making of Orthodoxy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×