Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:04:22.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - ACHAEMENID COINS, WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

A. D. H.
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

It is evident from the research of recent years that the lands constituting the Achaemenid Empire had inherited from earlier centuries two entirely separate currency systems. These systems continued in existence side by side until the last decades of the Empire. On the one hand, the territories south and east of the Taurus operated what can be described as a silver standard. The system, originated no doubt even as early as Sumer, and inherited by the Babylonians, had spread under the Assyrians, and later under the Achaemenids, to embrace Egypt, Syria, Eastern Anatolia, the Iranian Plateau and the Indo-Iranian borderlands. In those regions (though commodities such as gold, lead, corn, meat or wine may have served from time to time as media of payment), the most usual, and ultimate standard of worth was provided by fine silver. As necessary, this was tested for purity in the crucible, then reckoned for weight upon the scales, according to metrological standards already well established. Fundamentally, under this system, currency was silver – irrespective of the shape or form in which it was presented, and of whether or not it was made up in convenient units. There was no requirement for the silver to be offered in the form of coin, though during the 5th century B.C. and later it was often obtainable in that form. In particular, much silver coin arrived by trade and tribute from the states of the Aegean and the Greek world. Naturally such sources contributed an infinite variety of differing denominations and weight-standards, which, when lumped together, could not readily be reckoned by counting, but only on the balance, like the earlier bullion. Indeed, apart from the trading cities of Phoenicia and Southern Anatolia, there is no evidence that in Achaemenid times mint for coinage existed within the greater part of this silver-zone. The system did not require that pieces used in current transactions were necessarily adjusted to regular individual weights. There was no need for the stamp of an authority responsible for accuracy of weight or fineness. The only matters of consequence were total bulk weights, and the appearance of pure metal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babin, C.Note sur la metrologie et les proportions dans les monuments achéménides de la Perse”, Revue Archéologique XVII (1891).Google Scholar
Balmuth, Miriam S.The monetary forerunners of coinage in Phoenicia and Palestine”, in International Numismatic Convention, Jerusalem, 17–31 December 1963 (Tel Aviv, 1967).Google Scholar
Bivar, A, D. H.A hoard of ingot-currency of the Median period from Nūsh-i Jān, near Malayir”, Iran (journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies) (London-Tehran) IX (1971).Google Scholar
Bivar, A, D. H.Bent bars and straight bars: an appendix to the Mir Zakah hoard”, Studia Iranica (Leiden) XI (1982) (Mélanges offerts à Raoul Curiel).Google Scholar
Cameron, G. C. and Gershevitch, I.New tablets from the Persepolis Treasury”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies (Chicago) XXIV (1965).Google Scholar
Dayton, John, “Money in the Near East before coinage”, Berytus (archaeological studies published by the Museum of Archaeology and the American University of Beirut) (Copenhagen) XXIII (1974).Google Scholar
Güterbrock, H. G.Die historische Tradition und ihre literarische Gestaltung bei Babyloniern und Hethitern bis 1200”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie (Berlin) XLII (1934); XLIV (1938).Google Scholar
Hallock, R. T. Persepolis Fortification Tablets (Chicago, 1969), (Oriental Institute Publications 92) [Hallock, R. T., Persepolis Fortification Tablets (Chicago, 1969)].
Henning, W. B.The ‘coin’ with the cuneiform inscription”, Numismatic Chronicle (London) 1956.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Ernst, “Notes on the Achaemenid coinage and some Sasanian mint-namesTransactions of the International Numismatic Congress 1936 London, 1938, esp. 414–16.Google Scholar
Hesse, Albert. “Metrologie statistique d'elements architecturaux des palais achéménides de Suse”, Cahiers de la Délégation archéologique française en Iran (Paris) II (1972).Google Scholar
Hill, G. F.Notes on the Imperial Persian coinage”, XXXIX (1919). (Many interesting observations, but the attempt to attribute darics by their portraiture is no longer supported.)Google Scholar
Hill, G. F. Catalogue of the Greek coins of Arabia, Mesopotamia and Persia. London, 1922 (Catalogue of the Greek coins in the British Museum).
Jenkins, G. K.Coins from the collection of C. J. Rich”, British Museum Quarterly (London) XXVIII (1964).Google Scholar
Johns, C. H. W., Assyrian deeds and documents II (Cambridge, 1901)
Kraay, C. M., “The Asyut Hoard: some comments on chronology”, Numismatic Chronicle 1977.Google Scholar
Lehmann (-Haupt), C. F.Das altbabylonische Mass- und Gewichts-system als Grundlage der antiken Gewichts-, Müinz- und Massystem”, Actes du VIIIe Congrès Internationale des Orientalistes II, I, Section Sémitique, Partie B (Paris 1908). (A work of vast erudition, raising numerous issues of importance, but over-expanded with passages of unwarranted theorising.)Google Scholar
Michaelis, A.The metrological relief at Oxford”, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London) IV (1883).Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. C.The bronze lion weight from Abydos”, Iran (journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies) (London-Tehran) XI (1973).Google Scholar
Mørkholm, O.A coin of Artaxerxes III”, Numismatic Chronicle (London) 1974.Google Scholar
Naster, P.Remarques charactéroscopiques et technologiques au sujet des créseides”, in Congresso Internationale de numismatica, Roma 11–16 settembre 1961 II, Atti (Rome, 1965).Google Scholar
Noe, S. P. Two hoards of Persian sigloi. New York 1956 (ANSNNM 136).
Nylander, C. Ionians at Pasargadae (Uppsala, 1970).
Powell, M. A. Jr.A contribution to the history of money in Mesopotamia prior to the invention of coinage”, in Hruška, B. and Komoróczy, G. (eds), Festschrift Lubor Matouš (Budapest, 1978).Google Scholar
Regling, K.Dareikos und Kroiseios”, Klio (Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte) (Berlin) XIV (1915).Google Scholar
Regling, K. and Lehmann-Haupt, C. F.Die Sonderformen des ‘babylonischen’ Gewichtssystem”, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft (Wiesbaden) LXIII (1909).Google Scholar
Regling, K.Measures of capacity” in Persepolis II (Chicago, 1957). (The above are the briefest, clearest and most authoritative statements of the evidence for the Achaemenid weights, and measures of capacity.)Google Scholar
Robinson, E. S. G.A Silversmith's Hoard from Mesopotamia”, Iraq (journal of the British School of Archaeology in Iraq) (London) XII (1950).Google Scholar
Robinson, E. S. G.Greek coins acquired by the British Museum, 1938–1948”, Numismatic Chronicle (London) 1948. (For the tetradrachm of Tissaphernes see.)Google Scholar
Robinson, E. S. G.A silversmith's hoard from Mesopotamia”, Iraq (journal of the British School of Archaeology in Iraq) (London) XII (1950).Google Scholar
Robinson, E. S. G.The beginnings of Achaemenid coinage”, Numismatic Chronicle (London) 1958.Google Scholar
Roychaudhury, Mrityunjoy. “A gold coin of Croesus”, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Numismatic Supplement XXIV (1914), No. 146. (A find at Mari Indus in the Punjab.)Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C.Une trouvaille de monnaies archaïques grecques à Ras Shamra”, Mélanges syriens offerts à M. R. Dussaud I (Paris, 1939).Google Scholar
Schlumberger, D.L'argent grec dans l'empire achéménide”, in Curiel, R. and Schlumberger, D., Trésors monétaires d'Afghanistan (Paris, 1953), (Mémoires de la délégation archéologique française en Afghanistan (Paris) 14).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Erich F.Weights: classifications, frequencies, find-conditions” in Persepolis II (Chicago, 1957).Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard. “Awest. asparanō und byzantin. ἀσπρóν: Beitrage zur griechisch-orientalischen Münznamforschung”, Indogermanische Forschungen XLIX (1931).Google Scholar
Segrè, Angelo, Metrologia e circolaʐione monetaria degli antichi, Bologna 1928
Thureau-Dangin, F.Numération et métrologie sumeriennes”, Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale (Paris) XVIII (1921). (A wide-ranging inquiry into every aspect of Babylonian metrology, but with not always sufficient evidence to reach definitive solutions.)Google Scholar
Trousdale, William. “An Achaemenid stone weight from Afghanistan”, East and West (Quarterly published by the Instituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente) (Rome) XVIII (1968). (Publishes a damaged stone weight, originally Achaemenid, but apparently re-used in the Islamic period.)Google Scholar
Vallat, F.Deux nouvelles ‘Chartes de fondation’ d'un palais de Darius Ier à Suse”, Syria XLVIII (1971).Google Scholar
Weissberg, D. B.Origins of coinage” in A Survey of Numismatic Research 1966–1971 (International Numismatic Commission: New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Weissberg, D. B.The critical moment: transition from currency to coinage in the eastern Mediterranean”, World Archaeology vi. 3 (Feb. 1975).Google Scholar
Yadin, Yigael, ‘Ancient Judaean weights and the date of the Samaria ostracaScripta Hierosolymitana VIII (Jerusalem, 1961).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×