Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:52:00.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Latin and vernacular from Dante to the age of Lorenzo (1321–c. 1500)

from VI - LATIN AND VERNACULAR IN ITALIAN LITERARY THEORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Martin McLaughlin
Edited by
Alastair Minnis  and
Ian Johnson
Alastair Minnis
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Ian Johnson
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

The previous chapter stressed the ways in which Dante's achievement represented a challenge to prevailing orthodoxies: he had chosen the vernacular for a major poetic work, and the Commedia itself had engendered a tradition of commentary on a par with that usually reserved for classical texts. Petrarch's literary hegemony, which from 1350 onwards restored Latin to its privileged position, in a sense constituted a linguistic counterrevolution. The rivalry between the two languages was to continue for two centuries from the death of Dante, and since it represents an obligatory topic in critical thinking in this period it seems best to treat the question in this separate chapter. There are four major stages in the debate: first the Petrarchan revolution; second the arguments for and against the vernacular around 1400; third the crucial decade 1430–40; and finally the age of Landino, Poliziano and Lorenzo de’ Medici.

The conflicting currents, set in motion on the one hand by Dante's enhancement of the status of the volgare and on the other by the new humanist conviction of the superiority of Latin, were already visible in Dante's last years in his exchange of Latin hexameters with Giovanni del Virgilio (c. 1320). Giovanni criticised Dante for writing serious poetry for the masses, bemoaning their ignorance, their tendency to distort the poet's words in the street, and the fact that the vernaculars are too many and transitory to be the vehicle of serious work (Eclogues 1.6–16). Dante replied to Giovanni in the same metre but reviving the ancient genre of the eclogue (Eclogue 2), possibly to couch the content of his reply (defence of the layman's language and the comic genre of the Commedia) in an appropriate form (pastoral was the lowest genre, according to the rota Virgilii; see p. 517 above).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 612 - 625
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accolti, Benedetto, Dialogus de praestantia virorum sui aevi, in Filippo Villani, De origine civitatis Florentie et de eiusdem famosis civibus, ed. Galletti, G. C. (Florence, 1847).Google Scholar
Agliotti, Girolamo, De monachis erudiendis, in Hieronymi Aliotti Arretini epistolae et opuscula (2 vols., Arezzo, 1769), II.Google Scholar
Alan, Lille, Anticlaudianus, ed. Bossuat, R. (Paris, 1955); tr. Sheridan, J. J. (Toronto, 1973).Google Scholar
Alberti, Leon Battista, Della famiglia, in Opere volgari, I.
Alberti, Leon Battista, Della pittura, in Opere volgari, III.
Alberti, Leon Battista, Rime, in Opere volgari, II.
Alberti, Leon Battista, La prima grammatica della lingua volgare: La Grammatichetta Vaticana Cal. Vat. Reg. 1370, ed. Grayson, C. (Bologna, 1964).Google Scholar
Alberti, Leon Battista, Opere volgari, ed. Grayson, C. (3 vols., Bari, 1960–73).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, De vulgari eloquentia, ed. Mengaldo, P. V., in Opere minori, II.
Alighieri, Dante, Epistola XIII, ed. Brugnoli, G., in Opere minori, II.
Alighieri, Dante, Epistole, ed. Frugoni, A., in Opere minori, II.
Alighieri, Dante, Il Convivio, ed. Vasoli, C. and Robertis, D., in Alighieri, Dante, Opere minori, I.2 (2 vols., Milan and Naples, 1979–88).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, La Commedia secondo l'antica vulgata, ed. Petrocchi, G. (2nd edn, 4 vols., Florence, 1994).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, Le Egloghe, ed. Brugnoli, G. and Scarcia, R. (Milan and Naples, 1980).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, Monarchia, ed. Shaw, P. (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, Rime della ‘Vita Nuova’ e della giovinezza, ed. Barbi, M. and Maggini, F. (Florence, 1956).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, Rime della maturità e dell'esilio, ed. Barbi, M. and Pernicone, V. (Florence, 1969).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Jacopo, Chiose all' ‘Inferno’, ed. Bellomo, S. (Padua, 1990).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Pietro, Il ‘Commentarium’ di Pietro Alighieri nelle redazioni Ashburnhamiana e Ottoboniana, ed. Vedova, R. della and Silvotti, M. T. (Florence, 1978) [Pietro I, II and III].Google Scholar
Allen, Judson Boyce, The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A Decorum of Convenient Distinction (Toronto, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonio, da Rho, Apologia, Orazioni, ed. Lombardi, G. (Rome, 1982).Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert R., ‘Access to Authority: Dante in the Epistle to Cangrande’, in Barański, Z. G. (ed.), Seminario dantesco internazionale / International Dante Seminar I (Florence, 1997).Google Scholar
Avalle, G.[‘Chiose Marciane’]: Le antiche chiose anonime all' ‘Inferno’ di Dante secondo il testo Marciano, ed. (Città di Castello, 1900).Google Scholar
Azzetta, Luca, ‘Le chiose alla Commedia di Andrea Lancia, l'Epistola a Cangrande e altre questioni dantesche’, L'Alighieri, n. s. 21 (2003).Google Scholar
Bambaglioli, Graziolo, Commento all' ‘Inferno’ di Dante, ed. Rossi, L. C. (Pisa, 1998).Google Scholar
Bambaglioli, Graziolo, Il commento dantesco di Graziolo de' Bambaglioli, ed. Fiammazzo, A. (Savona, 1915).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., ‘Il Convivio e la poesia: problemi di definizione’, in Tateo, F. and Pegorari, D. M. (eds.), Contesti della ‘Commedia’: Lectura Dantis Fridericiana 2002–2003 (Bari, 2004).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., ‘The Poetics of Meter: “terza rima”, canto, canzon, cantica’, in Cachey, T. J. Jr. (ed.), Dante Now (South Bend IN and London, 1994).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., ‘Comedía: Notes on Dante, the Epistle to Cangrande, and Medieval Comedy’, Lectura Dantis, 8 (1991) ; rev. in Barański, , ‘Chiosar’.Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., ‘Chiosar con altro testo’: Leggere Dante nel Trecento (Fiesole, 2001).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., ‘Sole nuovo, luce nuova’: Saggi sul rinnovamento culturale in Dante (Turin, 1996).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G., Dante e i segni: Saggi per una storia intellettuale di Dante Alighieri (Naples, 2000).Google Scholar
Barański, Zygmunt G. (ed.) ‘Libri poetarum in quattuor species dividuntur’: Essays on Dante and ‘Genre’, suppl. 2, The Italianist, 15 (1995).Google Scholar
Barbaro, Ermolao il Vecchio, Orationes contra poetas, ed. Ronconi, G. (Florence, 1972).Google Scholar
Barbaro, Ermolao, Epistulae, orationes et carmina, ed. Branca, V. (2 vols., Florence, 1943).Google Scholar
Barberi, Squarotti G., ‘Le poetiche del Trecento in Italia’, in Momenti e problemi di storia dell'estetica, Problemi ed orientamenti critici di lingua e di letteratura italiana, 5 (4 vols., Milan, 1959–61), 1.Google Scholar
Barbi, Michele, ‘Benvenuto da Imola e non Stefano Talice da Ricaldone’, in Problemi di critica dantesca: prima serie (Florence, 1934).Google Scholar
Barbi, Michele, ‘La lettura di Benvenuto da Imola e i suoi rapporti con altri commenti’, in Problemi di critica dantesca: seconda serie (Florence, 1941).Google Scholar
Bareiss, Karl-Heinz, Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komödiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
Bargagli, Stoffi-Mühlethaler B., ‘“Poeta”, “poetare” e sinonimi: studio semantico su Dante e la poesia duecentesca’, Studi di lessicografia italiana, 8 (1986).Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda, Dante's Poets (Princeton NJ, 1984).Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda, The Undivine Comedy: Detheologizing Dante (Princeton NJ, 1993).Google Scholar
Baron, Hans, The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance (2nd edn, Princeton NJ, 1966).Google Scholar
Baroni, G., and Pettinelli, R. A., Storia della critica letteraria in Italia (Turin, 1997).Google Scholar
Barzizza, [delli Bargigi], Guiniforte, Lo ‘Inferno’ della ‘Commedia’ di Dante Alighieri col comento di Guiniforte delli Bargigi, ed. Zacheroni, G. (Marseilles and Florence, 1838).Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
Bellomo, Saverio, ‘Primi appunti sull’ Ottimo Commento dantesco’, Giornale storico della letteratura italiana, 157 (1980).Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro, Prose della volgar lingua, in Prose e rime, ed. Dionisotti, C. (Turin, 1960).Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro, Gli asolani, ed. Dilemmi, G. (Florence, 1991).Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro, and Mirandola, Pico della, Giovan Francesco, Le epistole ‘De Imitatione’, ed. Santangelo, G. (Florence, 1954).Google Scholar
Bene, Florence, Candelabrum, ed. Alessio, G. C. (Padua, 1983).Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Rambaldis da Imola, Comentum super Dantis Aldigherij … Comoediam, ed. Lacaita, J. P. (5 vols., Florence, 1887).Google Scholar
Berisso, Marco, ‘Per una definizione di prosopopea: Dante, Convivio, III.ix.2’, Lingua e stile, 26 (1991).Google Scholar
Billanovich, G., ‘Giovanni del Virgilio, Pietro da Moglio, Francesco da Fiano’, Italia medievale e umanistica, 6 (1963).Google Scholar
Billanovich, G., Restauri boccacceschi (Rome, 1945).Google Scholar
Biondo, Flavio, De verbis romanae locutionis, in Tavoni, , Latino, grammatica, volgare.
Biondo, Flavio, Italia illustrata, in Biondo, , De Roma triumphante libri X.
Biondo, Flavio, De Roma triumphante libri X (Basel, 1531).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Epistule, ed. Auzzas, G., in Opere, ed. Branca, , V.1 (Milan, 1992).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Genealogie deorum gentilium libri, ed. Romano, V. (Bari, 1951); in part tr. Osgood, C. G., Boccaccio on Poetry: Being the Preface and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Books of Boccaccio's ‘Genealogia deorum gentilium’ in an English Version with Introductory Essay and Commentary (Princeton NJ, 1930).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Rime, ed. Branca, V., in Opere, ed. Branca, , V.1 (Milan, 1992).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Trattatello in laude di Dante, ed. Ricci, P. G., in Opere, ed. Branca, , III (Milan, 1974).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Esposizioni sopra la ‘Comedia’ di Dante, ed. Padoan, G. (Verona, 1965).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Opere, ed. Branca, V. et al. (12 vols., Milan, 1964–92).Google Scholar
Bolgar, R. R., The Classical Heritage and its Beneficiaries (1954; rpt. Cambridge, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, Todd, ‘Boccaccio's Trattatello in laude di Dante or Dante Resartus’, Renaissance Quarterly, 41 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, L., ‘La dottrina morale di Coluccio Salutati’, Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa, s. 2, 3 (1934).Google Scholar
Botterill, Steven, ‘“Quae non licet homini loqui”: The Ineffability of Mystical Experience in Paradiso I and the Epistle to Can Grande’, Modern Language Review, 83 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracciolini, Poggio, De avaritia (Dialogus contra avaritiam), ed. Germano, G. and Nardi, A. (Livorno, 1994).Google Scholar
Brugnoli, Giorgio, ‘Epistole: Introduzione’, in Dante Alighieri, Opere minori (2 vols., Milan and Naples, 1979–1988), II.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo, De studiis et litteris, in Garin, (ed.), Il pensiero pedagogico.
Bruni, Leonardo, Dialogi ad Petrum Paulum Histrum, in Bruni, , Opere letterarie e politiche.
Bruni, Leonardo, Historiarum Florentini populi libri XII, ed. Santini, E. and Pierro, C. Di, in Rerum italicarum scriptores, 19.3 (Città di Castello, 1914).Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo, Le vite di Dante e del Petrarca, in Bruni, , Opere letterarie e politiche.
Bruni, Leonardo, Epistolarum libri VIII, ed. Mehus, L. (2 vols., Florence, 1741).Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo, Humanistich-Philosophische Schriften, ed. Baron, H. (Leipzig and Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo, Laudatio Florentine urbis, ed. Baldassarri, S. U. (Tavarnuzze [Florence], 2000).Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo, Opere letterarie e politiche, ed. Viti, P. (Turin, 1996).Google Scholar
Buck, August, Italienische Dichtungslehre vom Mittelalter bis zum Ausgang der Renaissance, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 94 (Tübingen, 1952).Google Scholar
Buck, August (ed.), Die italienische Literatur im Zeitalter Dantes und am Übergang vom Mittelalter zur Renaissance, Grundriβ der romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters, 10.1 (Heidelberg, 1987).Google Scholar
Caldiera, Giovanni, Concordantiae poetarum philosophorum et theologorum (Venice, 1547).Google Scholar
Calmeta, Vincenzo, Prose e lettere edite ed inedite (con due appendici di altri inediti), ed. Grayson, C. (Bologna, 1959).Google Scholar
Cardini, Roberto, La critica del Landino (Florence, 1973).Google Scholar
Carrara, E., Le Chiose Cagliaritane scelte e annotate, ed. (Città di Castello, 1902).Google Scholar
Cavallari, Elisabetta, La fortuna di Dante nel Trecento (Florence, 1921).Google Scholar
Cecchini, Enzo, ‘Introduzione’, in Dante Alighieri, Epistola a Cangrande (Florence, 1995).Google Scholar
[‘Chiose Cassinesi’]: Il codice cassinese della ‘Divina Commedia’ (Montecassino, 1865).
Cioffari, V.‘Anonimo Latino’, Anonymous Latin Commentary on Dante's ‘Commedia’: Reconstructed Text, ed. (Spoleto, 1989).Google Scholar
Cloetta, Wilhelm, Komödie und Tragödie im Mittelalter (Halle, 1890).Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco, Hypnerotomachia Poliphili, ed. Pozzi, G. and Ciapponi, L. A. (2 vols., Padua, 1964).Google Scholar
Contini, Gianfranco, Un'idea di Dante (Turin, 1976).Google Scholar
Contini, Gianfranco, Varianti e altra linguistica (Turin, 1970).Google Scholar
Cortese, Paolo, Epistle to Poliziano, in Prosatori latini del Quattrocento.
Cortese, Paolo, De Cardinalatu (Castro Cortesio, 1510).Google Scholar
Cortese, Paolo, De hominibus doctis, ed. Ferraù, G. (Palermo, 1979).Google Scholar
Craven, W. G., ‘Coluccio Salutati's Defence of Poetry’, Renaissance Studies, 10 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert, ‘Dante und das lateinische Mittelalter’, Romanische Forschungen, 57 (1943).Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert, Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter (2nd edn, Bern, 1948). English tr. of the first edition under the title European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, by Trask, W. R. (London, 1953).Google Scholar
Da Prati, P., Giovanni Dominici e l'umanesimo (Naples 1965).Google Scholar
D'Amico, J., ‘The Progress of Renaissance Latin Prose: The Case of Apuleianism’, Renaissance Quarterly, 37 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decembrio, Angelo, Politiae literariae libri septem (Basel, 1562).Google Scholar
Denley, Peter, ‘Giovanni Dominici's Opposition to Humanism’, Religion and Humanism, Studies in Church History, 17 (Oxford 1982).Google Scholar
Dino, del Garbo, [Commentary on ‘Donna mi prega’], in Guido Cavalcanti: ‘Rime’, ed. Favati, G. (Milan and Naples, 1957).Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo, Gli umanisti e il volgare fra Quattro e Cinquecento (Florence, 1968).Google Scholar
Dominici, Giovanni, Lucula noctis, ed. Coulon, R. (Paris 1908); also ed. Hunt, E. (Notre Dame IN, 1940).Google Scholar
Douglas, R. M., ‘Talent and Vocation in Humanist and Protestant Thought’, in Rabb, T. K. and Seigel, J. E. (eds.), Action and Conviction in Early Modern Europe (Princeton NJ, 1969).Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter, Dante and Medieval Latin Traditions (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Emerton, E., Enciclopedia dantesca (6 vols., Rome, 1970–9).Google Scholar
Emerton, E., Humanism and Tyranny (Cambridge MA, 1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Falso Boccaccio’, Chiose sopra Dante (Florence, 1846).
Fanfani, P.‘Anonimo Fiorentino’, Commento alla ‘Divina Commedia’ d'Anonimo Fiorentino del secolo XIV, ed. (3 vols., Bologna, 1866–74).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio, Opera (1576; rpt. Turin, 1959).Google Scholar
Field, Arthur, The Origins of the Platonic Academy of Florence (Princeton NJ, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filelfo, Francesco, Epistolarum familiarum libri XXXVII (Venice, 1502).Google Scholar
Fisher, A., ‘Three Meditations on the Destruction of Virgil's Statue: The Early Humanist Theory of Poetry’, Renaissance Quarterly, 40 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francesco, da Barberino, I Documenti d'amore, ed. Egidi, F. (4 vols., Rome, 1905–27).Google Scholar
Francesco, da Fiano, Contra ridiculos oblocutores et fellitos detractores poetarum, ed. Plaisant, M.-L., Rinascimento, s. II.2 (1961) ; also ed. Taù, I., Archivio italiano per la storia della pietà, 4 (1965).Google Scholar
Fubini, R., ‘L'umanista: ritorno di un paradigma? Saggio per un profilo storico dal Petrarca ad Erasmo’, Archivio storico italiano, 147 (1989).Google Scholar
Fubini, R., L'umanesimo italiano e i suoi storici: Origini rinascimentali – critica moderna (Milan, 2001).Google Scholar
Garin, E.Prosatori latini del Quattrocento, ed. (Milan and Naples, 1952).Google Scholar
Garin, E., ‘Le favole antiche’, in Garin, Medioevo e Rinascimento.
Garin, E., L'umanesimo italiano (Bari, 1964); tr. by Munz, P. as Italian Humanism (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Garin, E., L'educazione in Europa (1400–1600) (Bari, 1957).Google Scholar
Garin, E., La cultura filosofica del Rinascimento italiano (Florence, 1961).Google Scholar
Garin, E., Medioevo e Rinascimento (Bari, 1976).Google Scholar
Garin, E. (ed.), Il pensiero pedagogico dello umanesimo (Florence, 1958).Google Scholar
George, Trebizond, Rhetoricorum libri V (Venice, 1523).Google Scholar
Gherardi, da Prato, Giovanni, , Il Paradiso degli Alberti, ed. Lanza, A. (Rome, 1975).Google Scholar
Gilson, Simon, Dante and Renaissance Florence (Cambridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Giustiniani, V. R., ‘Il Filelfo: L'interpretazione allegorica di Virgilio e la tripartizione platonica dell'animo’, in Branca, V. et al. (eds.), Umanesimo e Rinascimento: Studi offerti aKristeller, P. O. (Florence, 1980).Google Scholar
Gorni, Guglielmo, ‘Le forme primarie del testo poetico’, in Asor Rosa, A. (ed.), Letteratura italiana (9 vols., Turin, 1982–2000), III.i.Google Scholar
Gorni, Guglielmo, ‘Storia del Certame Coronario’, Rinascimento, 12 (1972).Google Scholar
Grafton, A. T., ‘Renaissance Readers and Ancient Texts: Comments on some Commentaries’, Renaissance Quarterly, 38 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. T., and Jardine, L., ‘Humanism and the School of Guarino: A Problem of Evaluation’, Past and Present, 66 (1982).Google Scholar
GrazioloBambaglioli, . See: Bambaglioli, Graziolo de'.
Greenfield, Concetta Carestia, Humanist and Scholastic Poetics, 1250–1500 (Lewisburg PA, 1981).Google Scholar
Grendler, Paul F., Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning 1300–1600 (Baltimore MD and London, 1989).Google Scholar
Guarino, da Verona, Epistolario, ed. Sabbadini, R. (3 vols., Venice, 1915–19).Google Scholar
GuarinoBattista, , De ordine docendi, in Garin, (ed.), Il pensiero pedagogico.
Guido, da Pisa, Expositiones et glose super Comediam Dantis, ed. Cioffari, V. (Albany NY, 1974).Google Scholar
Guthmüller, B., ‘Lateinisch und volksprachliche Kommentare zu Ovids Metamorphosen’, in Buck, A. and Herding, O. (eds.), Der Kommentar in der Renaissance, Kommission für Humanismusforschung, Mitteilung 1 (Boppard, 1975).Google Scholar
Hall, Ralph G., and Sowell, Madison U., ‘Cursus in the Can Grande Epistle: A Forger Shows His Hand?’, Lectura Dantis, 5 (1989).Google Scholar
Hankins, James, Plato in the Italian Renaissance (2 vols., Leiden and New York, 1990).Google Scholar
Hardie, Colin, ‘The Epistle to Cangrande Again’, Deutsches Dante-Jahrbuch, 38 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Robert, Allegory in Dante's ‘Commedia’ (Princeton NJ, 1969).Google Scholar
Hollander, Robert, Dante's ‘Epistle to Cangrande’ (Ann Arbor MI, 1993).Google Scholar
Holmes, G., The Florentine Enlightenment 1400–1450 (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Iannucci, Amilcare A. (ed.), ‘Dante's Theory of Genres’, Dante Studies, 91 (1975).Google Scholar
Iannucci, Amilcare A. (ed.), Dante e la ‘bella scola’ della poesia: Autorità e sfida poetica (Ravenna, 1993).Google Scholar
Jacopo, della Lana, Comedia di Dante degli Allaghieri col Commento di Jacopo della Lana, ed. Scarabelli, L. (3 vols., Bologna, 1866).Google Scholar
Jenaro-MacLennan, L., ‘The Dating of Guido da Pisa's Commentary on the Inferno’, Italian Studies, 23 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenaro-MacLennan, L., The Trecento Commentaries on the ‘Divina Commedia’ and the ‘Epistle to Cangrande’ (Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Parisiana poetria, ed. and tr. Lawler, T. (New Haven CT and London, 1974).Google Scholar
Kallendorf, C., ‘Cristoforo Landino's Aeneid and the Humanist Critical Tradition’, Renaissance Quarterly, 36 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallendorf, C., ‘The Rhetorical Criticism of Literature in Early Italian Humanism from Boccaccio to Landino’, Rhetorica, 2 (1983).Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry A., Tragedy and Comedy from Dante to Pseudo-Dante, University of California Publications in Modern Philology, 121 (Berkeley CA, 1989).Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O., ‘The Humanist Movement’, in Kristeller, The Classics and Renaissance Thought (Cambridge MA, 1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Favia, Louis Marcello, Benvenuto Rambaldi da Imola: dantista (Madrid, 1977).Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, Formulario di epistole, Proemio, in Scritti critici e teorici, I.
Landino, Cristoforo, Proemio al comento dantesco, in Scritti critici e teorici, I.
Landino, Cristoforo, Prolusione petrarchesca, in Scritti critici e teorici, I.
Landino, Cristoforo, Translation of Giovanni Simonetta's Sforziade, Proemio, in Scritti critici e teorici, I.
Landino, Cristoforo, Translation of the Elder Pliny, Proemio, in Scritti critici e teorici, I.
Landino, Cristoforo, Xandra, in Carmina omnia, ed. Perosa, A. (Florence, 1939).Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, Disputationes camaldulenses, ed. Lohe, P. (Florence, 1980).Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, La ‘Commedia’ di Dante Alighieri [with commentary] (Venice, 1491).Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, Scritti critici e teorici, ed. Cardini, R. (2 vols., Rome, 1974).Google Scholar
Lanza, A. (ed.), Polemiche e berte letterarie nella Firenze del primo Quattrocento (1971; 2nd edn, Rome, 1989).Google Scholar
Lindhardt, J., Rhetor, Poeta, Historicus: Studien über rhetorische Erkenntnis und Lebensanschauung im italienischen Renaissancehumanismus (Leiden, 1979).Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Medici, Opere, ed. Simioni, A. (2 vols., Bari, 1913).Google Scholar
Mancini, Augusto, ‘Nuovi dubbi ed ipotesi sulla Epistola a Cangrande’, Atti della R. Accademia d' Italia, rendiconti: classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, ser. 7, 4 (1943).Google Scholar
Manetti, Giannozzo, De vita et moribus trium illustrium poetarum Florentinorum, in Le vite di Dante, Petrarca e Boccaccio, ed. Solerti, A. (Milan, 1904).Google Scholar
Maramauro, Guglielmo, Expositione sopra l' ‘Inferno’ di Dante Alligieri, ed. Pisoni, P. G. and Bellomo, S. (Padua, 1998).Google Scholar
Marlines, L., Power and Imagination (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Martellotti, G., ‘Latinità del Petrarca’, Studi petrarcheschi, 7 (1961).Google Scholar
Martin, Alfred W. O. von, Coluccio Salutati und das humanistische Lebensideal, Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte des Mittelalters und der Renaissance, 23 (Leipzig, 1916).Google Scholar
Martinelli, Bruno, ‘La dottrina dell'Empireo nell'Epistola a Cangrande (capp.)’, Studi danteschi, 57 (1985).Google Scholar
Matthew, Vendôme, Ars versificatoria, in Faral, E. (ed.), Les arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle, Bibliothèque de l'École des hautes études, 238 (1923; rpt. Geneva, 1982) ; also in Opera, ed. Munari, F. (3 vols., Rome 1977–88), III. Tr. Galyon, A. E. (Ames IA, 1980); also tr. Parr, R. P. (Milwaukee WI, 1981).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘Guido da Pisa interprete di Dante e la sua fortuna presso il Boccaccio’, Studi danteschi, 35 (1958).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘Jacopo della Lana e la crisi nell'interpretazione della Divina Commedia’, in Dante e Bologna nei tempi di Dante, VII centenario della nascita di Dante, II (Bologna, 1967).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘L'Epistola a Cangrande’, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei: classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, ser. 8, 10 (1955).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘La critica dantesca del secolo XIV’, Cultura e scuola (1965).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘Per la storia della critica dantesca, I: Jacopo Alighieri e Graziolo Bambaglioli (1322–24)’, Studi danteschi, 30 (1951).Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Francesco, ‘Pietro Alighieri interprete di Dante’, Studi danteschi, 40 (1963).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. L., ‘Humanist Concepts of Renaissance and Middle Ages in the Tre- and Quattrocento’, Renaissance Studies, 2 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, M. L., Literary Imitation in the Italian Renaissance: The Theory and Practice of Literary Imitation in Italy from Dante to Bembo (Oxford, 1995).Google Scholar
Mengaldo, Pier Vincenzo, ‘Dante come critico’, La parola del testo, I (1997).Google Scholar
Mengaldo, Pier Vincenzo, Linguistica e retorica di Dante (Pisa, 1978).Google Scholar
Michel, K., Der liber de consonancia nature et gracie des Raphael von Pornaxio, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, 18.1 (Münster, 1915).Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J., Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages (1984; 2nd edn, Aldershot, 1988).Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J., and Scott, A. B., with Wallace, David (eds.), Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism, c. 1100–c. 1375: The Commentary-Tradition (1988; rev. edn, Oxford, 1991; rpt. 2001).Google Scholar
Montgomery, R., The Reader's Eye (Berkeley CA, 1979).Google Scholar
Moore, Edward, ‘The Genuineness of the Dedicatory Epistle to Can Grande’, in Studies on Dante: Third Series, ed. Hardie, C. (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar
Morici, M., ‘Dante e Ciriaco d' Ancona’, Giornale dantesco, 7 (1899).Google Scholar
Müller, Gregor, Mensch und Bildung im italienischen Renaissance-Humanismus. Vittorino da Feltre und die humanistischen Erziehungsdenker (Baden-Baden, 1984).Google Scholar
Mussato, Albertino, Opera (Venice, 1630) rpt. in GeorgGraevius, J. (ed.), Thesaurus antiquitatem et historiarum Italiae (Leiden, 1722), VI.2, cols..Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno, ‘Osservazioni sul medievale accessus ad auctores in rapporto all'Epistola a Cangrande’, in Studi e problemi di critica testuale: Convengno di studi di filologia italiana nel centenario della Commissione per I testi di lingua, 7–9 aprile 1960 (Bologna, 1961).Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno, Il punto sull'Epistola a Cangrande (Florence, 1960).Google Scholar
Nasti, Paola, ‘Autorità, topos e modello: Salomone nei commenti trecenteschi alla Commedia’, The Italianist, 19 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasti, Paola, ‘La memoria del Cantico nella Vita Nuova: una nota preliminare’, The Italianist, 18 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orvieto, E., ‘Guido da Pisa e il commento inedito all' Inferno dantesco: Le chiose al trentatreesimo canto’, Italica, 46 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, Giorgio, ‘La “mirabile visione” di Dante e l'Epistola a Cangrande’, in Padoan, Il pio Enea, l' empio Ulisse (Ravenna, 1977).Google Scholar
Padoan, Giorgio, L'ultima opera di Giovanni Boccaccio: le ‘Esposizioni sopra il Dante’ (Padua, 1959).Google Scholar
Palmieri, Matteo, Della vita civile, ed. Belloni, G. (Florence, 1982).Google Scholar
Paolazzi, Carlo, ‘Petrarca, Boccaccio e il Trattatello in laude di Dante’, Studi danteschi, 55 (1983).Google Scholar
Paolazzi, Carlo, Dante e la ‘Comedia’ nel Trecento (Milan, 1989).Google Scholar
Paratore, Ettore, Tradizione e struttura in Dante (Florence, 1968).Google Scholar
Parker, Deborah, Commentary and Ideology: Dante in the Renaissance (Durham NC and London, 1993).Google Scholar
Pépin, Jean, Dante et la tradition de l' allégorie (Montreal and Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Pertile, Lino, ‘Canto-cantica-Comedía e l'Epistola a Cangrande’, Lectura Dantis, 9 (1991).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Invective contra medicum and Collatio laureationis, in Opere latine (2 vols., Turin, 1975), II.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Secretum, in Opere latine, ed. Bufano, A. (2 vols., Turin, 1975), I.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Seniles, in Opera omnia.
Petrarch, Francis, Africa, ed. Festa, N., nazionale, Edizione, I (Florence, 1926).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, De viris illustribus, ed. Martellotti, G., nazionale, Edizione, 2 (Florence, 1964).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Le familiari, ed. Rossi, V. and Bosco, U. (4 vols., Florence, 1933–42).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Lettere senili, tr. Fracasetti, G. (2 vols., Florence, 1869–92).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Opera omnia (Basel, 1581).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Seniles V.2, ed. Berté, M. (Florence, 1998).Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis, Trionfi, ed. Bezzola, G. (Milan, 1984).Google Scholar
Piccolomini, Enea Silvio (Pius II), Der Briefwechsel des Eneas Silvius Piccolomini, ed. Wolkan, R., Fontes rerum austriacarum, 2 Abt., 61 (1909), 67 (1912), 68 (1918).Google Scholar
Piccolomini, Enea Silvio (Pius II), Epistola ad Ladislaum posthumum, in Der Briefwechsel, ed. Wolkan, , Fontes rerum austriacarum, 2 Abt., 67 (1912), no..Google Scholar
Piccolomini, Enea Silvio (Pius II), De liberorum educatione, ed. and tr. Nelson, J. S. (Washington DC, 1940).Google Scholar
Piccolomini, Enea Silvio (Pius II), Opera omnia (Basel, 1551).Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Francesco, Giovan. See: Bembo, Pietro
Pico, della Mirandola, , Giovanni, Epistle to Ermolao Barbaro, in Prosatori latini del Quattrocento.
Picone, Michelangelo, ‘Baratteria e stile comico in Dante (Inferno XXI–XXIII)’, in Alessio, G. C. and , R. Hollander (eds.), Saggi danteschi americani (Milan, 1989).Google Scholar
Picone, Michelangelo, ‘Dante e la tradizione arturiana’, Romanische Forschungen, 94 (1982).Google Scholar
Picone, Michelangelo, ‘Paradiso IX: Folchetto e la diaspora trobadorica’, Medioevo romanzo, 8 (1981–3).Google Scholar
Picone, Michelangelo, ‘Vita Nuova’ e tradizione romanza (Padua, 1979).Google Scholar
Picone, Michelangelo (ed.) Dante e le forme dell'allegoresi (Ravenna, 1987).Google Scholar
Picone, Michelangelo, and Crivelli, Tatiana (eds.), Dante: Mito e Poesia (Florence, 1999).Google Scholar
Pisoni, Pier Giacomo, ‘Guglielmo Maramauro commentatore di Dante e amico del Petrarca’, Studi petrarcheschi, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
Polenton, Sicco, Scriptorum illustrium latinae linguae libri XVIII, ed. Ullman, B. L. (Rome, 1928).Google Scholar
Poliziano, Angelo, ‘Oratio super Fabio Quintiliano et Statii Sylvis’, in Prosatori latini del quattrocento.
Poliziano, Angelo, Lamia: Praelectio in Priora Aristotelis analytica, ed. Wesseling, A. (Leiden, 1986).Google Scholar
Poliziano, Angelo, Miscellanea: Miscellaneorum centuria secunda, ed. Branca, V. and Stocchi, M. P. (4 vols., Florence, 1972).Google Scholar
Poliziano, Angelo, Opera quae quidem extitere hactenus omnia (Basel, 1553).Google Scholar
Pontano, Giovanni, De aspiratione (Naples, 1481).Google Scholar
Pontano, Giovanni, I dialoghi, ed. Previtera, C. (Florence, 1943).Google Scholar
Procaccioli, Paolo, Filologia ed esegesi dantesca nel Quattrocento: l'‘Inferno’ nel ‘Comento sopra La comedia’ di Cristoforo Landino (Florence, 1989).Google Scholar
Promis, V. and Negroni, C. ‘Talice da Ricaldone, Stefano’, La ‘Commedia’ di Dante Alighieri col commento inedito di Stefano Talice da Ricaldone, ed. (3 vols., Milan, 1888).Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, Franz, Die antike Theorie der ‘Genera dicendi’ im lateinischen Mittelalter, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 241, 2 (Vienna, 1962).Google Scholar
Quint, D., ‘Humanism and Modernity: A Reconsideration of Bruni's Dialogus’, Renaissance Quarterly, 38 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklin, Thomas (ed.), Das Schreiben an Cangrande della Scala (Hamburg, 1993).Google Scholar
Rinuccini, Alamanno, Lettere ed orazioni, ed. Giustiniani, V. R. (Florence, 1953).Google Scholar
Rinuccini, Cino, Invettiva, in Lanza, (ed.), Polemiche (1971).
Rizzo, S., ‘Il latino del Petrarca nelleFamiliari’, in Dionisotti, A. C., Grafton, A. and Kraye, J. (eds.), The Uses of Greek and Latin (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Rizzo, S., ‘Petrarca, il latino e il volgare’, Quaderni petrarcheschi, 7 (1990).Google Scholar
Rizzo, S., Ricerche sul latino umanistico (Rome, 2002).Google Scholar
Robey, David, ‘Humanism and Education in the Early Quattrocento: The De ingenuis moribus of P. P. Vergerio’, Bibliothéque d'Humanisme et Renaissance, 42 (1980).Google Scholar
Robey, David, ‘P. P. Vergerio the Elder: Republicanism and Civic Values in the Work of an Early Humanist’, Past and Present, 58 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robey, David, ‘Studia Humanitatis, the Humanities, Modern Languages’, in Griffiths, C. E. J. and Hastings, R. (eds.), The Cultural Heritage of the Italian Renaissance (Lewiston NY, 1993).Google Scholar
Robey, David, ‘Virgil's Statue at Mantua and the Defence of Poetry: An Unpublished Letter of 1397’, Rinascimento, 20 (1969).Google Scholar
Robey, David, ‘Vittorino da Feltre e Vergerio’, in Giannetto, N. (ed.), Vittorino e la sua scuola (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar
Rocca, Luigi, Di alcuni commenti della ‘Divina Commedia’ composti nei primi vent'anni dopo la morte di Dante (Florence, 1891).Google Scholar
Ronconi, G., s.v. ‘Dominici’, in Dizionario critico della letteratura italiana (3 vols., Turin, 1973), 11.Google Scholar
Ronconi, G., s.v. ‘Il grammatico Antonio Beccaria difensore della poesia e la sua “Oratio in Terentium”’, in Medioeveo e Rinascimento Veneto (in onore di L. Lazzarini) (2 vols., Padua, 1979), I.Google Scholar
Ronconi, G., s.v. Le origini delle dispute umanistiche sulla poesia (Rome, 1976).Google Scholar
Rossi, L. C., Le Chiose Ambrosiane alla ‘Commedia’, ed. (Pisa, 1990).Google Scholar
Rüben, H., Der Humanist und Regularkanoniker Timoteo Maffei aus Verona (c. 1415–70) (Aachen, 1975).Google Scholar
Sabbadini, R., Storia del ciceronianismo (Turin, 1885).Google Scholar
Sabellico, Marcantonio, De latinae linguae reparatione, ed. Bottari, G. (Messina, 1999).Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio, De fato et fortuna, ed. Bianca, C. (Florence, 1985).Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio, De laboribus Herculis, ed. Ullman, B. L. (Zurich, 1951).Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio, De nobilitate legum et medicinae, ed. Garin, E. (Florence, 1947).Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio, De seculo et religione, ed. Ullman, B. L. (Florence, 1957).Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio, Epistolario, ed. Novati, F. (4 vols., Rome, 1891–1905).Google Scholar
Sandkühler, Bruno, Die frühen Dantekommentare und ihr Verhältnis zur mittelalterlichen Kommentartradition (Munich, 1967).Google Scholar
Santoro, M., ‘Poliziano o il Magnifico?’, Giornale italiano di filologia, 1 (1948).Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E., ‘“Civic Humanism” or Ciceronian Rhetoric?’, Past and Present, 34 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E., Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism: The Union of Eloquence and Wisdom, Petrarch to Valla (Princeton, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selmi, F.[‘Chiose Selmiane’]: Chiose anonime alla prima Cantica della ‘Divina Commedia’, ed. (Turin, 1865).Google Scholar
Seriacopi, Massimo, ‘Un commento inedito di fine Trecento ai canti 2–5 dell' Inferno’, Dante Studies, 117 (1999).Google Scholar
Serravalle, Giovanni Bertoldi da, Translatio et comentum totius libri Dantis Aldigherii, ed. da Civezza, M. and Domenichelli, T. (Prato, 1891).Google Scholar
Seznec, J., La Survivance des dieux antiques (London, 1940); tr. Sessions as, B. F.The Survival of the Pagan Gods (New York, 1953).Google Scholar
Solerti, A.Le vite di Dante, Petrarca e Boccaccio scritte fino al secolo decimosesto, ed. (Milan, 1905).Google Scholar
Tateo, Francesco, ‘Retorica’ e ‘poetica’ fra Medioevo e Rinascimento (Bari, 1960).Google Scholar
Tateo, Francesco, Questioni di poetica dantesca (Bari, 1972).Google Scholar
Tavoni, Mirko, Latino, grammatica, volgare: storia di una questione umanistica (Padua, 1984).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Symbolisme et interprétation (Paris, 1978); tr. by Porter, C. as Symbolism and Interpretation (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Torri, A.Ottimo I: L'‘Ottimo commento’ della ‘Divina Commedia’: testo inedito d'uncontemporaneo di Dante, ed. (3 vols., Pisa, 1827–9).Google Scholar
Trabalza, C., La critica letteraria (Dai primordi dell'Umanesimo all'Età nostra), vol. II (Milan, 1915) [= Bacci, O. and Trabalza, C., La critica letteraria, II].Google Scholar
Trinkaus, C., ‘In Our Image and Likeness’: Humanity and Divinity in Italian Humanist Thought (2 vols., London, 1970).Google Scholar
Trovato, Mario, ‘Il primo trattato del Convivio visto alla luce dell' accessus ad auctores’, Misure critiche, 6 (1976).Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L., The Humanism of Coluccio Salutati (Padua, 1963).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Proems to Elegantiarum linguae latinae libri VI, in Prosatori latini del Quattrocento.
Valla, Lorenzo, Antidotum in Facium, ed. Wesseling, A. (Amsterdam, 1978).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Epistole, ed. Besomi, O. and Regoliosi, M. (Padua, 1984).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Gesta Ferdinandi Regis Aragonum, ed. Besomi, O. (Padua, 1973).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Opera omnia (Basel, 1540), rpt. with intro. by Garin, E. (2 vols., Turin, 1962).Google Scholar
Vallone, Aldo, Storia della critica dantesca dal XIV al XX secolo (2 vols., Padua, 1981).Google Scholar
Vandelli, G.Ottimo III: extracts ed. ‘Una nuova redazione dell'Ottimo’, Studi danteschi, 14 (1930).Google Scholar
Vasoli, C., ‘L'estetica dell'Umanesimo e del Rinascimento’, in Momenti e problemi di storia dell'estetica, Problemi ed orientament critici di lingua e di letteratura italiana, 5 (4 vols., Milan, 1959–61), 1.Google Scholar
Vegio, Maffeo, De educatione liberorum et eorum claris moribus, ed. Fanning, M. W. and Sullivan, A. S. (2 vols., Washington DC, 1933–6).Google Scholar
Vergerio, Pier Paolo, De ingenuis moribus, ed. Gnesotto, A., Atti e memorie della R. Accademia di scienze, lettere ed arti di Padova, 34 (1917).Google Scholar
Vergerio, Pier Paolo, Epistolario, ed. Smith, L. (Rome 1934).Google Scholar
Villa, Claudia, La ‘Lectura Terentii’ (Padua, 1984).Google Scholar
Villani, Filippo, De origine civitatis Florentie et de eiusdem famosis civibus, ed. Tanturli, G. (Padua, 1997).Google Scholar
Villani, Filippo, Expositio seu comentum super ‘Comedia’ Dantis Allegherii, ed. Bellomo, S. (Florence, 1989).Google Scholar
Villani, Giovanni, Cronica: con le continuazioni di Matteo e Filippo, ed. Aquilecchia, G. (Turin, 1979).Google Scholar
Vitale, Maurizio, La questione della lingua (Palermo, 1978).Google Scholar
Vossler, K., Poetische Theorien in der Italienischen Frührenaissance, Literaturhistorische Forschungen, 12 (Berlin, 1900).Google Scholar
Witt, Ronald G., ‘Coluccio Salutati and the Conception of the Poeta Theologus in the Fourteenth Century’, Renaissance Quarterly, 30 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ronald G., Hercules at the Crossroads: The Life, Works and Thought of Coluccio Salutati (Durham NC, 1983).Google Scholar
Woodward, W. H., Vittorino da Feltre and Other Humanist Educators (Cambridge, 1897).Google Scholar
Zabughin, V., Vergilio nel Rinascimento italiano (2 vols., Bologna, 1921–3).Google Scholar
Zippel, G. (ed.), ‘Le vite di Paolo II di Gaspare di Verona e Michele Canensi’, Rerum italicarum scriptores, 3.16 (2nd edn, Città di Castello, 1904).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×