Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:22:47.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - The influence of Arabic Aristotelianism on scholastic natural philosophy: projectile motion, the place of the universe, and elemental composition

from III - Natural philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Robert Pasnau
By
Rega Wood
Robert Pasnau
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

Most popular accounts of the introduction of Aristotle’s natural philosophy credit Arabic civilization with transmitting classical Greek works to the Latin West. By contrast, a few contemporary authors, hostile to Islam, deny any contribution of the Islamic world to scholasticism. Neither claim is credible. As we shall see, although Arabic Aristotelianism did not provide the primary access to Aristotle’s texts themselves, it did make a profound contribution to scholastic natural philosophy.

Confounding this dispute is a misunderstanding of the significance of Arabic-based Aristotle translations. Scholastic authors seldom commented on translations based on the Arabic Aristotle. Almost every major scholastic commentary on Greek philosophical works is based on a direct translation from Greek into Latin, with a few early exceptions. Scholastics evidently recognized that though they were often harder to follow and more obscure than translations from the Arabic Aristotle, Greek-based translations were closer to the original.

So let us look chiefly at the influence of the interpretative tradition of Arabic Aristotelianism on the Latin West, after saying a few words on translations of Arabic texts. We will suggest that though scholastics did not comment on Arabic-based translations of Aristotle, without these translations and more importantly without the interpretative tradition that accompanied them, the scholastic tradition would have been much poorer; indeed, it might never have arisen. After all, James of Venice’s translations had been available since about 1150, but Aristotelian analytics, metaphysics, and natural philosophy began to influence major scholastic authors only when the Michael Scot translations became available around 1225.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy , pp. 247 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobik, Joseph, Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles, “Arabic into Latin: The Reception of Arabic Philosophy into Western Europe,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
d’Ancona, Cristina, “From Latin Antiquity to the Arab Middle Ages: The Commentaries and the Harmony between the Philosophies of Plato and Aristotle,” in Honnefelder, L. et al. (eds.) Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter (Münster: Aschendorf, 2005).Google Scholar
Donati, Silvia, “The Anonymous Commentary on the Physics in Erfurt,”Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 72 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Abel, “Avempace, Projectile Motion, and Impetus Theory,”Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2004).Google Scholar
Frede, D., “On Mixture and Mixables,” in Mansfeld, J. and Haas, F. (eds.) Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine, “Notes sur les débuts (1225–1240) du premier ‘averroïsme’,”Revue des sciences philosophique théologiques 66 (1982).Google Scholar
Gillispie, C. C., (ed.) Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York: Scribner, 1970–80).Google Scholar
Grant, Edward, “The Medieval Doctrine of Place: Some Fundamental Problems and Solutions,” in Maierù, A. and Bagliani, A. (eds.) Studi sul XIV seculo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizione di Storia e Letteratura, 1981).Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle, “De l’Arabe au Latin: l’influence de quelque choix lexicaux (impressio, ingenium, intuitio),” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Aux origines du lexique philosophique Europeen (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1997).Google Scholar
Joutsivuo, Timo, Scholastic Tradition and Humanist Innovation: The Concept of Neutrum in Renaissance Medicine (Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica: 1999).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, Zwei Grundprobleme der Scholastischen Naturphilosophie (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1968).Google Scholar
Maier, , An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft, 2nd edn (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1952).Google Scholar
McGinnis, Jon, “Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian,”Phronesis 51 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Paul, “Duhem’s Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception,”Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, Per-Gunnar, Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1984).Google Scholar
Pines, , “Les précurseurs musulmans de la theorie de l’impetus,”Archeion 21 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarnowsky, Jürgen, Die Aristotelish-scholastische Theorie der Bewegung (Münster: Aschendorff, 1989).Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris, ed. “Francis of Marchia’s Virtus derelicta and the Context of its Development,”Vivarium 44 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jane, “Islam and Christendom,” in Esposito, J. (ed.) Oxford History of Islam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Teske, Roland, “William of Auvergne’s Debt to Avicenna,” in Janssens, J. and Smet, D. (eds.) Avicenna and his Heritage (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Trifogli, Cecilia, Oxford Physics in the Thirteenth Century (ca. 1250–1270): Motion, Infinity, Place and Time (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Wood, Rega, “The Works of Richard Rufus: The State of the Question in 2008,”Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales, 76 (2009).Google Scholar
Wood, Rega, “Richard Rufus: Physics at Paris before 1240,”Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 5 (1994).Google Scholar
Wood, Rega, and Weisberg, Michael, “Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems about Elemental Composition from Philoponus to Cooper,”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanin, Fabio, “Francis of Marchia, Virtus derelicta, and Modifications of the Basic Principles of Aristotelian Physics,”Vivarium 44 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×