Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:16:46.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Styles and languages around the turn of the century

from Part Two - 1850–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Jim Samson
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access

Summary

The title of this chapter implies not only a concern with musical style and musical language, but also that a distinction may be drawn between the two. In the paragraphs that follow I shall take this distinction to be roughly equivalent to the point at which the style of a musical passage, work or repertory can be said to be more than simply a matter of how a composer’s musical mannerisms, habits or inclinations are identifiable as an emergent property of the music he or she produces. At this point, ‘style’ – as an attribute of a passage, piece or repertory – becomes something that can be manipulated along with the musical elements that express that style. Such manipulation allows musical language to be deployed as a means to a variety of ends: to express emotion, for example, or to articulate a drama, or to engage in cultural politics.

All of this presupposes that differences of style are actually recognisable as such across the field of contemporaneous musical composition, and indeed by the middle of the nineteenth century this had clearly been the case for some time. What is more, one of the century’s most notable attempts to deploy musical language for culture-political ends dates from this time, with the declaration of the New German School. But the most remarkable flowering of this kind of project was to come a little later, in and around the two decades that straddle the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A music-lover of catholic tastes who had the time and resources to travel around Europe and North America taking in premiéres during this period could have heard the first performances of works as diverse as Don Juan(1889), Pagliacci(1892), the Variations on America (1892), En Saga(1893), the Prélude à l’Aprè-midi d’un faune (1894), the ‘Resurrection’ Symphony (1895), Verklärte Nacht(1902), Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande (1902), Jenůfa (1904), Salome (1905), the Poem of Ecstasy (1908) and The Firebird (1910) – to name a mere dozen.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allende-Blin, JuanThese fragments are published in the version realised by Editions Jobert (Paris, 1979).
BakerJames, M., ‘Scriabin’s Music: Structure as Prism for Mystical Philosophy’, in Baker, M., James, Beach, W., David and Bernard, W., Jonathan (eds.), Music Theory in Concept and Practice (Rochester, N.Y. 1997)Google Scholar
Block, G., Ives: Concord Sonata. Cambridge, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulez, Pierre, Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, trans. Walsh, Stephen (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C., Between Romanticism and Modernism: Four Studies in the Music of the Later Nineteenth Century, trans. Whittall, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1980Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C., Schoenberg and the New Music, trans. Puffett, Derrick and Clayton, Alfred. Cambridge, 1987Google Scholar
Debussy’s, appreciation of Dukas’s Piano Sonata in ‘Monsieur Croche the Dilettante Hater’, trans. Davies, B. N. Langdon, in Three Classics in the Aesthetic of Music (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Dunsby, J., Schoenberg: Pierrot Lunaire. Cambridge, 1992Google Scholar
Forte, Allen, The Structure of Atonal Music (New Haven and London, 1973)Google Scholar
Franklin, P., Mahler: Symphony No. 3. Cambridge, 1991Google Scholar
Frisch, W., The Early Works of Arnold Schoenberg, 1893–1908. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1993Google Scholar
Haimo, Ethan, Schoenberg’s Serial Odyssey: The Evolution of his Twelve-Tone Method, 1914–1928 (Oxford, 1990)Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, Sibelius: Symphony No. 5 (Cambridge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepokoski, J., Sibelius: Symphony No. 5. Cambridge, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, R., Debussy and Wagner. London, 1979Google Scholar
Holloway, Robin’“Some”: Art or Kitsch?‘, in Derrick Pupett (ed.), Richard Strauss: Salome (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Karlinsky, Simon, ‘Igor Stravinsky and Russian Preliterate Theater’,in Pasler, Jann (ed.), Confronting Stravinsky: Man, Musician, and Modernist (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1986)Google Scholar
Kelkel, M., Alexandre Scriabine: Sa vie, l’ésotérisme et le langage musical dans son æuvre. Paris, 1978Google Scholar
Kerman, J. (ed.), Music at the Turn of the Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1990Google Scholar
Lambert, Constant, Music Ho! A Study of Music in Decline (London, 1934).Google Scholar
Layton, R., Sibelius. 2nd edn, London, 1978Google Scholar
Mellers, W., Vaughan Williams and the Vision of Albion. London, 1989Google Scholar
Murtomäki, Veijo, who points out that ‘Sibelius was indeed “a Russian composer”, since Finland was part of Russia for most of Sibelius’s creative life, until 1917’.Google Scholar
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques, ‘The Concepts of Plot and Seriation Process in Music Analysis’, trans. Dale, CatherineMusic Analysis 4/1 (1985)Google Scholar
Nicholls, D., American Experimental Music, 1840–1940. Cambridge, 1990Google Scholar
Nichols, R. and Langham Smith, R., Claude Debussy: Pelléas et Mélisande. Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar
ParksS., Richard, The Music of Claude Debussy (New Haven and London, 1989).Google Scholar
Pople, A., ‘Vaughan Williams, Tallis, and the Phantasy Principle’. In Frogley, Alain (ed.), Vaughan Williams Studies. Cambridge, 1996Google Scholar
Pople, Anthony, ‘Early Stravinsky’,in Cross, Jonathan (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar
Puffett, D. (ed.), Richard Strauss: Elektra. Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar
Puffett, D. (ed.), Richard Strauss: Salome. Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar
Puffett, D.Debussy’s Ostinato Machine. Nottingham, 1996Google Scholar
Röse, Otto and Prüwer, Julius, Elektra: Ein Musikführer durch das Werk (Berlin, 1909; English edn 1910).Google Scholar
Rothfarb, Lee, Ernst Kurth as Theorist and Analyst (Philadelphia, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadie, S. (ed.), Puccini and his Operas. London, 2000Google Scholar
Samson, J., Music in Transition: A Study of Tonal Expansion and Atonality, 1900–1920. London, 1977Google Scholar
Samuels, R., Mahler’s Sixth Symphony: A Study in Musical Semiotics. Cambridge, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schloezer, B. de, Scriabin: Artist and Mystic, trans. Slonimsky, N.. Oxford, 1987Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A., Theory of Harmony, trans. Carter, Roy E.. London, 1978Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold, ‘My Evolution’,(1949)Google Scholar
Stein, Erwin, (ed.), Arnold Schoenberg: Letters (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1964)Google Scholar
Taruskin, R., Defining Russia Musically: Historical and Hermeneutic Essays. Princeton, 1997Google Scholar
Taruskin, R., Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions: A Biography of the Works Through ‘Mavra’. Oxford, 1996Google Scholar
Tawaststjerna, Eric, Sibelius, Volume II: 1904–1914, trans. Layton, Robert (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Tyrrell, J., Leos Janáček: Kát’a Kabanová. Cambridge, 1982Google Scholar
Van den Toorn, P. C., Stravinsky and The Rite of Spring: The Beginnings of a Musical Language. Oxford, 1987Google Scholar
Walsh, S., Stravinsky: A Creative Spring: Russia and France, 1882–1934. London, 2000Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, Schoenberg Chamber Music (London, 1972)Google Scholar
Williamson, J., Strauss: Also Sprach Zarathustra. Cambridge, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×