Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:56:05.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - The Geometrical Tradition: Mathematics, Space, and Reason in the Nineteenth Century

from Part V - Mathematics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Since the Eighteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Mary Jo Nye
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Until the end of the nineteenth century, geometry was the study of space. As such, geometrical knowledge can be found in virtually all civilizations. Ancient Sumerians, Babylonians, Chinese, Indians, Aztecs, and Egyptians surveyed their lands, constructed their pyramids, and knew the relation among the sides of a right triangle. The Western geometrical tradition dates from Euclid’s (fl. 295 B.C.E.) Elements. What marks this work as seminal lies not so much in its content per se as in how that content was known.

Two tightly interwoven characteristics marked Euclidean geometrical knowledge. First, the objective characteristic was the strict correspondence between the terms of the geometry and the objects to which those terms referred. Euclid’s geometry dealt with something that we would call space. For example, the Euclidean definition “a point is that which has no part” neither explains the concept of point nor shows how to use it nor establishes its existence. It does, however, indicate what a point is. The definition has meaning; it refers to an aspect of space that we already know.

Euclidean axioms are self–evident truths; the postulates are obvious statements that must be accepted before the rest can follow. Like the definitions, the axioms and postulates are statements about space that make explicit what we already know. Euclid’s axioms and postulates do more, however. They support and structure all of the subsequent argument; all of the rest of the subject is drawn out of or built upon these basics. The adequacy of this axiomatic structure to support all legitimate geometrical conclusions is the second, rational, characteristic of Euclidean knowledge.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becher, Harvey, “William Whewell and Cambridge Mathematics,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belhoste, Bruno, Cauchy: Un Mathématicien Légitimiste au XIX Siècle, preface by Dhombres, Jean (Paris: Belin, 1985)Google Scholar
Bonola, Roberto, Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of its Developments, trans. with appendices by Carslaw, H. S. (New York: Dover, 1955)Google Scholar
Bos, H. J. M., “The Structure of Descartes’ GéometrieIl Metodo e I Saggi: Atti del Convegno per il 350 Anniversario della Publicazione del Discours de la Methode e degli Essais (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1990).Google Scholar
Bos, H. J. M., “Differentials and Derivatives in Leibniz’s Calculus,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 14 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauchy, Augustin, Cours d’analyse de l’école royale polytechnique (Paris, 1821).Google Scholar
Cayley, Arthur, “Note on Lobatchewsky’s Imaginary GeometryPhilosophical Magazine, 29 (1865), at.Google Scholar
Cayley, Arthur, “A Sixth Memoir upon Quantics,” in The Collected Works of Arthur Cayley, 11 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1889–97) :.Google Scholar
Clairaut, [Alexis Claude], Elémens de géométrie (Paris: Lambert & Durand, 1741).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard, The Newtonian Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), esp..Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine J., “The Physicalist Tradition in Early Nineteenth Century French Geometry,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupin, Charles, Essai historique sur les services et les travaux scientifiques de Gaspard Monge (Paris, 1819), p.Google Scholar
Fisch, Menachem and Schaffer, Simon, eds., William Whewell: A Composite Portrait (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Hans, “The Main Trends in the Foundations of Geometry in the19th Century,” in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, ed. Nagel, Ernst, Suppes, Patrick, and Tarski, Alfred (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Glas, Eduard, “On the Dynamics of Mathematical Change in the Case of Monge and the French Revolution,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17 (1986), at.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabiner, Judith V., The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Gray, Jeremy, Ideas of Space (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Gray, Jeremy, “The Revolution in Mathematical Ontology,” in Revolutions in Mathematics, ed. Gillies, Donald (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), at.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Niccolò, The Development of Newtonian Calculus in Britain 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Felix, Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19. Jahrhundert (1926–27, reprint; New York: Chelsea, 1967)Google Scholar
Kline, Morris, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Lacroix, Sylvestre François, Essais sur l’enseignement en général et sur celui des mathématiques en particulier (Paris, 1816).Google Scholar
Legendre, Adrien-Marie, El´ments de g´ometrie (Paris: F. Didot, 1794).Google Scholar
Lützen, Jesper, Joseph Liouville 1809–1882: Master of Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Motte, Andrew, rev. Cajori, Florian (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Richards, Joan L., “Projective Geometry and Mathematical Progress in Mid-Victorian Britain,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 17 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Joan L., Mathematical Visions: The Reception of Non-Euclidean Geometry in Victorian England (Boston: Academic Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Riemann, Bernhard, “On the Hypotheses which Lie at the Bases of Geometry,” trans. Clifford, W. K., Nature, 8 (1873).Google Scholar
Rowe, D., “Klein, Hilbert and the Göttingen Tradition,” in Olesko, Kathryn M., ed., “Science in Germany,” 2d ser., Osiris, 5 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand A. W., An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar
Saccheri, Giorlamo, Euclides vindicatus, trans. by Halsted, G. B. (Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 1920).Google Scholar
Schubring, Gerd, “The German Mathematical Community,” Möbius and his Band, ed. Flauvel, John, Flood, Raymond, and Wilson, Robin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Heath, ThomasSir trans. and ed. The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, 3 vols., (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar
Steiner, Jacob, Gesammelte Werke, 2 vols. (New York: Chelsea Publishing Company, 1971).Google Scholar
Struik, D. J., A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200–1800 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Turner, R. S., “The Growth of Professorial Research in Prussia,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3 (1971)Google Scholar
Whewell, William, Of a Liberal Education in General (London: J. W. Parker, 1845).Google Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce, “Science, Education and the French Revolution,” Isis, 44 (1953), at.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×