Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:23:22.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 65 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Benedict, P. (2002). Christ’s Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. (2009). Calvin. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, A., and van Lieburg, F. (eds). (2011). Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–1619). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, P. (2004). John Calvin’s Ideas. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. A. (2002). The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sierhuis, F. (2015). The Literature of the Arminian Controversy: Religion, Politics and the Stage in the Dutch Republic. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanglin, K. D., and McCall, T. H. (2012). Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus De Intellectus Emendatione. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999). Spinoza’s causal axiom. In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 43–66). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Burgersdijk, F. (1660). Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Gillis Valckenier and Casparus Commelijn.Google Scholar
Carraud, V. (2002). Causa sive ratio: La raison de la cause de Suárez à Leibniz. Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (2005). Spinoza on final causality. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Brill. Articles by Bennett and Curley on teleology.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1999). Teleological explanation in Spinoza and early modern philosophy. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 310–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, 2 vols. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2008). Spinoza’s essentialist mode of causation. Inquiry, 51, 412–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999). Spinoza’s causal axiom (Ethics I, Axiom 4). In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 141–65). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zylstra, S. (2023). Spinoza, emanation, and formal causation. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61(4), 603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Miner, R. C. (2002). The dependence of Descartes’ ontological proof upon the doctrine of causa sui. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 58, 873–86.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza’s ‘ontological’ argument. Philosophical Review, 88, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. i: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (2020). Descartes (and Spinoza) on intellectual experience and skepticism. Roczniki Filozoficzne / Annals of Philosophy, 68(2), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. C. V. Boundas. Zone. (Original work published 1968.)Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018a). Truth and ideas of imagination in the Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione. In Garrett, , Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 151–75). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018b). Truth, method, and correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz. In Garrett, , Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 176–98). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleizer, M. (2017). Vérité et certitude chez Spinoza. Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Malinowski-Charles, S. (2024). Spinoza on knowing that I know [MS].Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1971). Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carlisle, C. (2021). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press. Chapter 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press. Chapter 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophising. Oxford University Press. Chapter 9.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

James, S. (2014). Spinoza, the body, and the good life. In Kisner, M. J. & Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 143–59). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2009). The anatomy of the passions. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 188–222). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2020). The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carlisle, C. (2021). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press. Chapter 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). ‘Christus secundum spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the infinite intellect. In Stahl, N. (ed.), The Jewish Jesus (pp. 140–51). Routledge.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Field, S. L. (2020). Political power and depoliticized acquiescence: Spinoza and aristocracy. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 27(4), 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (2020). Women and servants in Spinozist democracy. In Matheron, , Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza, ed. F. Del Lucchese, D. Maruzzella, and G. Morejon, trans. D. Maruzzella and G. Morejon (pp. 260–79). Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, H. (2012). Eve’s perfection: Spinoza on sexual (in)equality. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(4), 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2008). Spinoza on being sui juris and the republican conception of liberty. History of European Ideas, 34, 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. R. Hurley. City Lights.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2021). Spinoza on universals. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 183–201). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022). Spinoza’s epistemology and philosophy of mind. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/spinoza-epistemology-mindGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2024). Prejudices, common notions, intuitions: Knowledge of God between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (pp. 59–80). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2019). Spinoza on Reason, Passions, and the Supreme Good. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Baumgarten, J., Rosier-Catach, I., and Totaro, P. (eds.). (2019). Spinoza: Philosophe grammairien. CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Cassuto, P. (1999). Spinoza Hébraïsant: L’Hébreu dans le “Tractatus theologico-politicus” et le “Compendium Grammatices Linguae Hebraeae.” Peeters.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. Z. (2002). Spinoza’s metaphysical Hebraism. In Ravven, H. M. and Goodman, L. E. (eds.), Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 107–14). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Klijnsmit, A. J. (1986). Spinoza and grammatical tradition. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis, 49.Google Scholar
Levy, Z. (1989). The problem of normativity in Spinoza’s “Hebrew Grammar.” In Levy, Z. (ed.), Baruch or Benedict: On Some Jewish Aspects of Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 155–93). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mock, K. (2016). Hébreu: Du sacré au maternel. CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018). Aliquid remanet: What are we to do with Spinoza’s Compendium of Hebrew Grammar? Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56, 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proietti, O. (2010a). Compendium XXIII, 82–86. Emendazioni alla Grammatica spinoziana. Quaderni di storia, 71, 159–71.Google Scholar
Proietti, O. (2010b). Emendazioni all Grammatica ebraica spinoziana. Rivista di storia della filosofia, 65, 25–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Della Rocca, M. (2008a). Spinoza. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2008b). Rationalism run amok. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 67–84). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2002). Spinoza’s conatus argument. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 127–58). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2019). Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). Inherence, causation, and conceivability in Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(3), 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. (2013). The relation between conception and causation in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2010). Another kind of Spinozistic monism. Noûs, 44(3), 469–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (2016). Glossary entries for CONFUSIO. In The Collected Works of Spinoza ed. Curley, , 2 vols. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022). Spinoza’s epistemology and philosophy of mind. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-epistemology-mindGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A. (2013). The structure of Cartesian sensations. Analytic Philosophy, 54(2), 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (2021). Spinoza’s non-theory of non-consciousness. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 304–27). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2008). Representation and consciousness in Spinoza’s naturalistic theory of the imagination. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 4–25). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2010). Theories about consciousness in Spinoza’s Ethics. Philosophical Review, 119(4), 531–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (2007). The status of consciousness in Spinoza’s concept of mind. In Heinämaa, L., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (pp. 203–20). Springer.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2008). Spinoza and consciousness. Mind, 117, 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrama, O. (2017). Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(3), 506–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. D. (1980). Objects, ideas and “minds”: Comments on Spinoza’s theory of mind. In Kennington, R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (pp. 103–20). Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carlisle, C. (2017). Spinoza’s acquiescentia. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(2), 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (1999). Salvation as a State Of Mind: The place of acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7, 447–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totaro, G. (1994). Acquiescentia dans la cinquième partie de l’Éthique de Spinoza. Revue philosophique de la France et l’etranger, 184, 65–79.Google Scholar
Voss, S. H. (1981). How Spinoza enumerated the affects. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 63, 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • C
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • C
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • C
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×