Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:02:04.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 241 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. (1975). Descartes, Spinoza, and the ethics of belief. In Mandelbaum, M. and Freeman, E. (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation (pp. 159–90). Open Court.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2003). The power of an idea: Spinoza’s critique of pure will. Noûs, 37, 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2019). Spinoza on intentionality, materialism, and mind-body relations. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(43), 1–23. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0019.043Google Scholar
Koistinen, O. (2017). Spinoza on mind. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 273–94). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, Martin. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2008). Rationalism run amok: Representation and the reality of emotions in Spinoza. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 26–52) Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2012). Rationalism, idealism, monism, and beyond. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 7–26). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on negation, mind-dependence, and reality of the finite. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 221–37). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2016). Spinoza’s thinking substance and the necessity of modes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). Why Spinoza is not an eleatic monist (or why diversity exists). In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 206–22). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2011). Hegel’s Idealist reading of Spinoza; more recent Idealist readings of Spinoza. Philosophy Compass, 6(2), 100–19.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2012). Thinking, conceiving, and Idealism in Spinoza. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 94(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1977). Hegel, pantheism, and Spinoza. Journal of the History of Ideas, 38(3), 449–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2020). Spinning strands into aspects: Realism, idealism, and finite modes in Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy, 28(2), 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. (2016). ‘Determination is negation’: The adventures of a doctrine from Spinoza to Hegel to the British Idealists. Hegel Bulletin, 37(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2), 245–56. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022). Representation and mind-body identity in Spinoza’s philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60(1), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary, 104–11. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics, 172–79. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. (2017). Two puzzles about thought and identity in Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 56–81). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2021). Reflective Knowledge. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 265–75). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, L. (1990). Reflexive ideas in Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28(2), 201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

De Deugd, C. (1966). The Significance of Spinoza’s First Kind of Knowledge. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2008). Representation and consciousness in Spinoza’s naturalistic theory of the imagination. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 4–25). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, M. (2012). Compelling fictions: Spinoza and George Eliot on imagination and belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2010). Narrative as the means to freedom: Spinoza on the uses of imagination. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 250–67). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2012). From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2021[1994]). Experience and Eternity in Spinoza, trans. Boncardo, Robert. 1st edn. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2019). Spinozist cognitive psychology: Spinoza’s concept of the imagination. In Meer, R., Motta, G., and Stiening, G. (eds.), Konzepte der Einbildungskraft in der Philosophie, den Wissenschaften und den Künsten des 18. Jahrhunderts: Festschrift Zum 65. Geburtstag von Udo Thiel (pp. 9–24). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. (2005). Belief, affirmation, and the doctrine of conatus in Spinoza. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43(1), 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Two puzzles concerning Spinoza’s conception of belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(1), 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, O. I. (2018). Memory, recollection and consciousness in Spinoza’s Ethics. Society and Politics, 12(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
Vinciguerra, L. 2005. Spinoza et le signe: La logique de l’imagination. J. Vrin.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Boukouvala, A. (2017). Imitation of affects and mirror neurons: Exploring empathy in Spinoza’s theory and contemporary neuroscience. Philosophia, 45, 1007–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2004). Egoism and the imitation of affects in Spinoza. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Spinoza on Reason and the Free Man (pp. 101–21). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Drieux, P. (2014). Perception et sociabilité: La communication des passions chez Descartes et Spinoza. Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Montag, W. (2009). Imitating the affects of beasts: Interest and inhumanity in Spinoza. Differences, 20(2/3), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2011). Imitation of the affects and interhuman relations. In Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R. (eds.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary (pp. 167–78). Brill.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2013). Imitation, representation, and humanity in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51(3), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33, 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2003). Spinoza’s conatus argument. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 127–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (1994). Descartes and Spinoza on persistence and conatus. Studia Spinozana, 10, 43–68.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1994). Spinoza’s theory of metaphysical individuation. In Barber, K. and Gracia, J. (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 73–101). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lachterman, D. (1977). The physics of Spinoza’s Ethics. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 8, 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, A. (2017). The ‘Physical’ Interlude. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 102–20). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. M. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35, 174–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giancotti, E. (1991). On the problem of infinite modes. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 97–118). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. I: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. In Wilson, , Ideas and mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 237–59). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1991). Spinoza’s necessitarianism. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 191–218). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2009). The essence of the body and the part of the mind that is eternal. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 284–302). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G. E. (2008). Adequacy and innateness in Spinoza. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 4, 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press, 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2019). Spinoza’s ‘infinite modes’ reconsidered. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bayle, P. (1991). Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M., and Walski, G. (1999). Spinoza’s necessitarianism reconsidered. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 241–64). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2019). The elusiveness of the one and the many in Spinoza: Substance, attribute, and mode. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-first-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 59–86). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1991). Spinoza’s necessitarianism. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 191–218). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, ed. Rockmore, T., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on negation, mind-dependence, and reality of the finite. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 221–37). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2012). Spinoza’s monism and the reality of the finite. In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 223–43). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Primus, K. (2021). Spinoza’s monism II: A proposal. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 105(3), 444–69.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2018). Finite subjects in the Ethics: Spinoza on indexical knowledge, the first person, and the individuality of human minds. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 204–19). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2015). Causation and determinate existence of finite modes in Spinoza. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97(3), 334–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2018). Not wholly finite: The dual aspect of finite modes in Spinoza. Philosophia, 46, 433–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33, 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press. Chapter 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2008). Spinoza. Routledge. Chapter 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2002). Spinoza’s conatus argument. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 127–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1973). Experience in Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 25–59). Anchor.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2010). Spinoza’s theory of scientia intuitiva. In Sorrell, T., Rogers, G. A. J., and Kraye, J. (eds.), Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 99–116). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2024). Finding oneself in God: Scientia intuitiva as a metaphysically self-locating thought. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2016). The distinction between reason and intuitive knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. European Journal of Philosophy, 24, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1983). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1989). The third kind of knowledge as alternative salvation. In Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. i: The Marrano of Reason (pp. 153–71). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Gabbey, A. (2008). Spinoza, infinite modes, and the infinitive mood. Studia Spinozana, 16, 41–66.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2010). Spinoza’s theory of scientia intuitiva. In Sorell, T., Rogers, G. A. J., and Kraye, J. (eds.), Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 99–115). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. (2015). Restricting Spinoza’s causal axiom. Philosophical Quarterly, 65(258), 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1991). Spinoza’s causal axiom (Ethics I, Axiom 4). In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 133–60). Brill.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Fraenkel, C. (2013). Reconsidering the case of Elijah Delmedigo’s Averroism and its impact on Spinoza. In Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G. (eds.), Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe (pp. 213–36). Springer.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, N. (2019). Useful Enemies: Islam and The Ottoman Empire in Western Political Thought, 1450–1750. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • I
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • I
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • I
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×