Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:18:00.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

M

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 333 - 380
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. (eds.). (1990). Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2004). Tumulti e indignatio: Conflitto, diritto e moltitudine in Machiavelli e Spinoza. Ghibli.Google Scholar
Haitsma Mulier, E. O. G. (1990). Dutch views on Machiavelli in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (pp. 247–63). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morfino, V. (2002). Il tempo e l’occasione: L’incontro Spinoza Machiavelli. LED.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2021). Spinoza’s “republican idea of freedom.” In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 402–09). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1981). Machiavelli. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (2010). Spinoza leest Machiavelli. In Klugkist, A.C. and van Sluis, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Zijn boeken en zijn denken (pp. 35–54). Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Walther, M. (2018). Natur, Recht und Freiheit: Spinozas Theorie von Recht, Staat und Politik im Kontext der Frühen Neuzeit. Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Chalier, C. (2006). Spinoza, Lecteur de Maïmonide: La question théologico-politique. Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2010). The ambiguity of the imagination and the ambivalence of language in Maimonides and Spinoza. In Dobbs-Weinstein, I., Goodman, L.E, and Grady, J.A (eds.), Maimonides and His Heritage (pp. 95–112). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Carlos. (2006). Maimonides’ God and Spinoza’s Deus sive Natura. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44, 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. Zev. (1981). A portrait of Spinoza as a Maimonidean. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (ed). (2014). Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravven, H., and Goodman, L. (eds.). (2002). Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Roth, L. (1963). Spinoza, Descartes, and Maimonides. Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, trans. B. Brewster. New Left Books.Google Scholar
Balibar, É. (1998). Spinoza and Politics, trans. P. Snowdon. Verso.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, K. (2019). Spekulativer Materialismus: Spinoza in der postmarxistischen Philosophie. turia + kant.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2015). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion and Its Heirs: Marx, Benjamin, Adorno. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuer, L. (1958). Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism. Beacon Hill Press.Google Scholar
Lordon, F. (2014). Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire, trans. G. Ash. Verso.Google Scholar
Seidel, H. (2009). Philosophie vernünftiger Lebenspraxis, ed. V. Caysa, . Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Sachsen.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Audié, F. (2005). Spinoza et les mathématiques. Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2016). The geometrical method as a new standard of truth, based on the mathematization of nature. In Gorham, G. et al. (eds.), The Language of Nature: Reassessing the Mathematization of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century (pp. 274–307). University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1973). Spinoza’s Letter on the Infinite. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 164–81). University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Homan, M. (2021). Spinoza’s Epistemology through a Geometrical Lens. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1986). Spinoza and Euclidean arithmetic: The example of the fourth proportional. In M. Grene and D. Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences (pp. 125–50). D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2000). On the exact science of nonbeings: Spinoza’s view of mathematics. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 3–22.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2018). Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 155–89). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Lin, M. (2005). Memory and personal identity in Spinoza. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 35(2), 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrama, O. (2019). Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind: Consciousness, Memory, and Reason. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Thiel, U. (2011). The Early Modern Subject. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Gartenberg, Z. (2021). Spinoza on relations. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 179–88). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on essences, universals, and beings of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97, 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquet, C. (ed.). (2004). Les Pensées métaphysiques de Spinoza. Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Klever, W. (1991). Lodewijk Meyer’s ethics. Studia Spinozana, 7, 241–60.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (1998). Inaugural dissertation on matter: On matter and its affections: Motion and rest. In Spinoza, The Principles of Cartesian Philosophy and Metaphysical Thoughts, trans. S. Shirley (pp. 144–59). Hackett.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2005). Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture, trans. S. Shirley, ed. Rice, L. C and Pastijn, F. Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, L. C. (2001). Meyer as precursor to Spinoza on the interpretation of scripture. Philosophy & Theology, 13(1), 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (2005). Introduction. In Meyer, L, Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture, trans. S. Shirley, ed. Rice, L. C. and Pastijn, F (pp. 1–19). Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bartuschat, W. (1992). Spinozas Theorie des Menschen. Meiner.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body-Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2021). The mind-body union. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 296–303). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, O. (2018). Spinoza on mind. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 273–94). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, L. (2000). L’automate spirituel: La naissance de la subjectivité moderne d’après l’Éthique de Spinoza. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Marshall, G.E. (2014). The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza’s Science of the Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018a). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018b). Finite subjects in the Ethics: Spinoza on indexical knowledge, the first person, and the individuality of human minds. In Della Rocca, M (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 204–19). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renz, U., and Hutchins, B.R. (2021). Spinoza on human and divine knowledge. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 253–64). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.D. (1999). Objects, ideas, and “minds”: Comments on Spinoza’s theory of mind. In Wilson, Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 126–40). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2017). The indiscernibility of identicals and the transitivity of identity in Spinoza’s logic of the attributes. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 12–42). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza. 2 vols. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022). Representation and mind-body identity in Spinoza’s philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60(1), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, O. (1996). Causality, intensionality and identity: Mind body interaction in Spinoza. Ratio, 9(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2019). Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L. E. (1981). From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. (2009). The mind and the body as ‘one and the same thing’ in Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(5), 897–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. (2017). Two puzzles about thought and identity in Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2018). Spinoza on Reason. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. (2010). Miracles, wonder, and state in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 231–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M., and Walski, G. (1999). “Spinoza’s necessitarianism revisited.” In Gennaro, R. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists, 241–62. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018). Spinoza’s necessitarianism (with Postscript). In Garrett, , Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 98–148). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015a). Spinoza on essences, universals, and beings of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(2), 58–88.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015b). On the significance of formal causes in Spinoza’s philosophy. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97(2), 196–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989). Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2017). Logic and knowledge. In Kaufman, D. (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy (pp. 224–49). Routledge.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2018). Spinoza and the philosophy of science. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 155–89). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2020). Spinning strands into aspects: Realism, idealism, and finite modes in Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy, 28, 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bayle, P. (1965). Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2001). Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carriero, J. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(2), 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. 1969. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E., and Walski, G. (1999). Spinoza’s necessitarianism reconsidered. In Gennaro, R. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 241–64). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1991). Spinoza’s necessitarianism. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 97–118). Brill.Google Scholar
Primus, K. (2019). Spinoza’s ‘infinite modes’ reconsidered. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Garrett, D. (1990). ‘A free man always acts honestly, not deceptively’: Freedom and the good in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P-F (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 221–38). Brill.Google Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2014). Spinozistic constructivism. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 57–84). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy, and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2020). Think Least of Death: Spinoza on How to Live and How to Die. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2018). Reconceiving Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2019). Two ethical ideals in Spinoza’s Ethics: The free man and the wise man. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(3), 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2010). Spinoza’s model of human nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2020). The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Israel, J. (2023). Spinoza, Life and Legacy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2012). Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theological-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Atlas, S. (1954). Moses in the philosophy of Maimonides, Spinoza, and Solomon Maimon. Hebrew Union College Annual, 25, 369–400.Google Scholar
Frankel, S. (2001). The invention of liberal theology: Spinoza’s theological-political analysis of Moses and Jesus. Review of Politics, 63, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, E. (2014). Spinoza, Maimonides and the politics of prophecy. Jewish Studies Quarterly, 21, 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Jaquet, C., Sévérac, P., and Suhamy, A. (eds.). (2008). La multitude libre: Nouvelles lectures du Traité Politique de Spinoza. Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lavaert, S., and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.). (2021). Spinoza et la politique de la multitude. Kimé.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1981). L’anomalia selvaggia: Saggio su potere e potenza in Baruch Spinoza. Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, trans. M. Hardt. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • M
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • M
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • M
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×