Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:49:34.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

196. - Wittich, Christoph (1625–1687)

from W

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Christoph Wittich, or Wittichius, was a strong critic of Spinoza, who attacked both his TTP and his Ethics. He dedicated an entire work to refuting the latter: Anti-Spinoza sive examen Ethices Benedicti de Spinoza, et commentaries de Deo et ejus attributis (Wittich 1690).

Wittich was a professor of theology, mathematics, and Hebrew at the universities of Herborn (1651–53), Duisburg (1653–55), Nijmegen (1655–71), and Leiden (1671–87). He was an explicit proponent of Descartes’s philosophy. His appointment at Herborn prompted the Count of Nassau to raise questions about the acceptability of teaching Cartesianism in the universities. This led to a controversy that was only resolved by an edict issued by the States of Holland in 1656.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Aalderink, M. (2004). Spinoza en Wittichius over essentiae en existentie. In Coppens, G. (ed.), Spinoza en het Nederlands cartesianisme (pp. 7994). Acco.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. (2015). Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism: Philosophy and Theology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, C. (1994). Les premières réfutations de Spinoza: Aubert de Versé, Wittich, Lamy. Presses de l’université de Paris Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Kato, Y., and Sakamoto, K. (2020). Between Cartesianism and orthodoxy: God and the problem of indifference in Christoph Wittich’s Anti-Spinoza. Intellectual History Review, 32(2), 239–57,Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2005). Wittich’s critique of Spinoza. In Schmaltz, T. M. (ed.), Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe (pp. 103–16). Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×