Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:18:32.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - The representation of the city in the visual arts

from Part V - Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Caroline Arscott
Edited by
Martin Daunton
Martin Daunton
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

HISTORICAL PATTERNS OF RESPONSE: CELEBRATION AND DESPAIR

Artists’ Responses to the city in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries have to be understood in terms of social and political issues and debates. The prospect of ever-increasing urban populations, particularly in the metropolis and industrial centres of the North, elicited mixed feelings in contemporary commentary. For some the growth of cities was evidence of the prosperity and strength of the national or local community. The densely packed population represented unparalleled human resources, offering skills, industriousness and simple energy to push forward the manufacturing and trading enterprises that underpinned expansion. The pace and scale of construction of transport and other infrastructural facilities, industrial and commercial premises, residential and administrative buildings and centres for worship and the arts were a source of pride and wonder to those commentators who saw the modern city in a positive light. The modern city could be celebrated as a unique source of invention and harmony, in which the collective energy and intelligence of a democracy came into play. For others pride and wonder gave way to feelings of disquiet. Awe could tip over into terror if the massed population appeared uncontrollable or the environment seemed so huge and complex that the individual was dwarfed or lost. Lack of planning and sanitation became key policy issues as the conditions of slum dwellers were investigated. The city was regularly associated with vice and its smoke and dirt were connected with immorality and crime as well as disease.

Keywords

Edwardian periodurban populationsgenre paintingsmodern cityVictorian period
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Urban History of Britain , pp. 809 - 832
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annan, T., Old Closes and Streets, a Series of Photogravures, 1868–1899, Glasgow, James Maclehose, 1900
Arscott, C., ‘Victorian development and images of the past’ (on lithographic views of Wakefield), in Shaw, C. and Chase, M., eds., The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia (Manchester, 1989).Google Scholar
,Barbican Art Gallery, The Edwardian Era, exhibition catalogue, ed. Beckett, J. and Cherry, D. (London, 1987)
Baron, W., The Camden Town Group (London, 1979).
Berman, M., All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity (New York, 1982; London, 1983)
Booth, C., Life and Labour of the People in London, 17 vols. (London, 1889–1903).
Carmichael, J. W., The Pool of London (c. 1840)
Christ, C. T., and Jordan, J. O., eds., Victorian Literature and the Victorian Visual Imagination (Berkeley, 1995)
Coleman, B. I., The Idea of the City in Nineteenth-Century Britain (London, 1973)
Cosgrove, D., and Daniels, S., eds., The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments (Cambridge, 1988)
Cowling, M. C., The Artist as Anthropologist: The Representation of Type and Character in Victorian Art (Cambridge, 1989)
Daniels, S., Fields of Vision: Landscape and National Identity in England and the United States (Cambridge, 1993)
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, A. (Harmondsworth, 1970)
Gallagher, C., ‘The body versus the social body in the works of Thomas Malthus and Henry Mayhew’, in Gallagher, C. and Laqueur, T., eds., The Making of the Modern Body (Berkeley, 1987)Google Scholar
Grieve, A. I., The Art of Dante Gabriel Rossetti: 1. Found, 2. The Pre Raphaelite Modern Life Subject (Norwich, 1976)
Hyde, R., The Fish-Eye View of London (London, 1987)
Johnson, E. D. H., Paintings of the British Social Scene from Hogarth to Sickert (London, 1986)
Landow, G. P., The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin (Princeton, N.J., 1971)
Lochnan, K. A., The Etchings of James McNeill Whistler (New Haven, 1984)
Nadel, I. B., and Schwarzbach, F. S., eds., Victorian Artists and the City: A Collection of Critical Essays (Elmsford, N. Y., and Oxford, 1979)
,National Portrait Gallery, The Camera and Dr. Barnardo, exhibition catalogue, text by Lloyd, V. and Wagner, G. (Hertford, 1974)
Newman, T. and Watkinson, R., Ford Madox Brown and the Pre-Raphaelite Circle (London, 1991), p..
Parrott, W., London from the Thames (1842)
Patten, R. L., George Cruikshank: Life, Times and Art, vol. II (Cambridge, 1996).
Phillips, J. F. C., Shepherd’s London (London, 1976).
Prettejohn, E., Rossetti and his Circle (London, 1997).
Robertson, A., Atkinson Grimshaw (Oxford, 1988)
Robins, A. G., ‘Sickert “painter-in-ordinary” to the music-hall’, in Royal Academy of Arts, Sickert: Paintings, exhibition catalogue (London, 1992).Google Scholar
Roundell, J., Thomas Shotter Boys (London, 1974).
Shepherd, T. H., Metropolitan Improvements (London, 1827–30)
Stevenson, S., Thomas Annan 1829–1887 (Edinburgh, 1990).
Tagg, J., The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories (London, 1988)
Thoresby, R. and Whitaker, T., Ducatus Leodiensis, 2nd edn (1816)
Whistler, J. A. M., The Gentle Art of Making Enemies, 2nd edn (London, 1892)
Wolff, J., and Seed, J., eds., The Culture of Capital: Art, Power and the Nineteenth-Century Middle Class (Manchester, 1988)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×