Book contents
- The Cambridge World History of Violence
- The Cambridge History of Violence
- The Cambridge World History of Violence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Table
- Contributors to Volume II
- Introduction to Volume II
- Part I Beyond Warfare: Armies, Tribes and Lords
- Part II The Violence of Governments and Rulers
- 6 Early Medieval China’s Rulers, Retainers and Harem
- 7 Warrior Regimes and the Regulation of Violence in Medieval Japan
- 8 Torture and Public Executions in the Islamic Middle Period (Eleventh–Fifteenth Centuries)
- 9 Crime and Law in Europe
- Part III Social, Interpersonal and Collective Violence
- Part IV Religious, Sacred and Ritualised Violence
- Part V Depictions of Violence
- Index
- References
7 - Warrior Regimes and the Regulation of Violence in Medieval Japan
from Part II - The Violence of Governments and Rulers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 March 2020
- The Cambridge World History of Violence
- The Cambridge History of Violence
- The Cambridge World History of Violence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Table
- Contributors to Volume II
- Introduction to Volume II
- Part I Beyond Warfare: Armies, Tribes and Lords
- Part II The Violence of Governments and Rulers
- 6 Early Medieval China’s Rulers, Retainers and Harem
- 7 Warrior Regimes and the Regulation of Violence in Medieval Japan
- 8 Torture and Public Executions in the Islamic Middle Period (Eleventh–Fifteenth Centuries)
- 9 Crime and Law in Europe
- Part III Social, Interpersonal and Collective Violence
- Part IV Religious, Sacred and Ritualised Violence
- Part V Depictions of Violence
- Index
- References
Summary
The containment of violence was central to the mission of medieval Japan’s warrior governments, the Kamakura (1185-1333) and Muromachi (1336-1573) shogunates. It was also vital to the survival of the warlords who vied for supremacy in the war-torn sixteenth century. The two shogunates received their mandate to govern from the imperial court. They became, therefore, keepers of public order; the violence of political adversaries was by definition criminal and partisan; the force with which the shogunates responded was an act of peacemaking. With growing political turmoil in the fourteenth century, the shogunate attempted to finesse distinctions between intolerable aggressive warfare and acceptable defensive warfare. The second shogunate collapsed in the sixteenth century and the frequency and pitch of armed confrontations grew dramatically throughout the provinces. The most successful among the rising warlords began to claim the right to legislate on the sole strength of their success. Relying on noexternal source of legitimacy, their laws drew power from the much greater severity of their punishments and the much fuller delegitimisation of all violence other than their own, as seen in the abolition of all distinction between offensive and defensive violence.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History of Violence , pp. 143 - 163Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020