Change in Global Environmental Politics Temporal Focal Points and the Reform of International Institutions
Book contents
- Change in Global Environmental Politics
- Change in Global Environmental Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 It’s About Time
- 3 The Stockholm Conference and Institutional Change
- 4 UNEP and the 1982 Nairobi Conference
- 5 The Brundtland Commission and the Seeds of Change
- 6 The Rio Conference and Institutional Change
- 7 Post-UNCED UN Environmental Institutions
- 8 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 May 2022
Book contents
- Change in Global Environmental Politics
- Change in Global Environmental Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 It’s About Time
- 3 The Stockholm Conference and Institutional Change
- 4 UNEP and the 1982 Nairobi Conference
- 5 The Brundtland Commission and the Seeds of Change
- 6 The Rio Conference and Institutional Change
- 7 Post-UNCED UN Environmental Institutions
- 8 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Change in Global Environmental PoliticsTemporal Focal Points and the Reform of International Institutions, pp. 260 - 291Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Brundtland, Gro Harlem. “Address to UNCTAD VII,” Government of Norway (July 10, 1987a). www.regjeringen.no/upload/SMK/Vedlegg/Taler%20og%20artikler%20av%20tidligere%20statsministre/Gro%20Harlem%20Brundtland/1987/Address_to_UNCTAD_VII.pdf (accessed August 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Brundtland, Gro Harlem. “Statement at the 42nd Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations” (October 19, 1987b), Government of Norway. www.regjeringen.no/upload/SMK/Vedlegg/Taler%20og%20artikler%20av%20tidligere%20statsministre/Gro%20Harlem%20Brundtland/1987/Presentation_of_WCED_Report_to_UN_General_Assembly.pdf (accessed August 5, 2012).Google Scholar
Climate Action Tracker. “Paris Agreement Turning Point: Wave of Net Zero Targets Reduces Warming Estimate to 2.1°C in 2100, All Eyes on 2030 Targets” (December 2020). https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CAT_2020-12-01_Briefing_GlobalUpdate_Paris5Years_Dec2020.pdf (accessed December 29, 2020).Google Scholar
“The Cocoyoc Declaration: Adopted by the Participants in the UNEP/UNCTAD Symposium on ‘Patterns of Resource Use, Environment and Development Strategies.’” Cocoyoc, Mexico (October 8–12, 1974); International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development (IUCN, 1980); and The Brandt Commission, North-South – A Programme for Survival, (London: Pan Books, 1980).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Secretariat. Sustainable Development: An Imperative for Environmental Protection (London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 1991).Google Scholar
Department of External Affairs and International Trade. From Stockholm to Rio 1972–1992 Report of the Seminar Convened by the Canadian Department of External Affairs and International Trade and the Department of Environment” (December 8–9, 1991).Google Scholar
“Development and Environment: Report of the Panel of Experts Convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Founex, Switzerland, 4–12 June 1971)” (1971) United Nations Conference on the Human Environment: Development and Environment (Subject Area V), A/CONF.48.10, Annex I.Google Scholar
ECOSOC. “Statement by U.S. Ambassador Adlai Stevenson to the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Economic and Social Council” (June 9, 1965), ECOSOC Official Records, Doc. ESR.1375.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Inter-sessional Preparatory Committee. “Institutional Arrangements for International Environmental Co-operation” (November 13, 1986), Doc. 1899e.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Inter-sessional Preparatory Committee. “Environmental Perspective to the Year 2000 and Beyond,” United Nations General Assembly, 42/186 (December 11, 1987).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (August 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics (2020). https://ipbes.net/pandemics (accessed August 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon B. “Special Message to the Congress on Conservation and Restoration of Natural Beauty, February 8, 1965.” Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library (1965). www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/speeches.hom/650208.asp (accessed June 26, 2013).Google Scholar
Kennedy, John F. “Address at 18th U.N. General Assembly, 20 September 1963,” John F. Kennedy Presidential Library (1963). www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKPOF-046-041.aspx (accessed June 26, 2013).Google Scholar
“Letter Dated 20 March from the Permanent Representative of Mexico to the United Nations Office at Geneva Addressed to the Secretary-General of the UNCED (Tlatelolco Platform),” A/CONF.151/PC/L.30 (March 22, 1991). [Reproduced in: Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, International Organizations and the Law of the Sea: Documentary Yearbook (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.]Google Scholar
Our World in Data. “SDG Tracker” (n.d.). https://sdg-tracker.org (accessed December 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, “Preparations for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development on the Basis of General Assembly Resolution 44/228 and Taking into Account Any Other Relevant General Assembly Resolutions: Institutional Proposals – Report by the Secretary General of the Conference” (December 13, 1991), A/CONF.151/PC/102.Google Scholar
Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Second Session (February 8–19, 1971), A/CONF.48/PC.8.Google Scholar
UN DESA. High Level Dialogue on Strengthening the Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development, Solo, Indonesia (July 19–21, 2011), Discussion paper.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. “Informal Encounter on International Trade and Environment” (February 28–March 1, 1991), UNCTAD/VIII/2, GE-91-50739.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. Environment and International Trade: Report of the Secretary-General of UNCTAD Submitted to the Secretary-General of the Conference (UNCED) Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 45/210 (1992).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment,” United Nations Environment Programme Website (June 16, 1972). www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503 (accessed April 22, 2012).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Review of the Institutional Arrangements for International Environmental Co-operation” (February 16, 1976a), UNEP/GC/75.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Introductory Statement by the Executive Director: Four Years after Stockholm” (March 24, 1976b), UNEP/GC/L.36.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Report of the Governing Council on the Work of Its Ninth Session” (May 13–26, 1981), General Assembly, 36th Session, Suppl. No. 25, A/36/25.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Report of the Governing Council (Session of a Special Character and Tenth Session)” (1982), General Assembly, 37th Session, Suppl. No. 25, A/37/25.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “‘UNEP in the Next Decade’ Executive Summary of the Seminar Deliberations – Note by the Executive Director” (March 25, 1986), Doc. 0174W.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Suggested Text of a Draft Resolution on Sustainable Development and the Environmental Perspective to the Year 2000 and Beyond for Submission by the Governing Council to the General Assembly” (1987) UNEP/GC.14/4/Add.7, Annex I.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Proceedings of the Governing Council at Its Sixteenth Session” (May 20–31, 1991), UNEP/GC.16/27.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report (2020). www.unenvironment.org/emissions-gap-report-2020. (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. “Process of Preparation of the Environmental Perspective to the Year 2000 and Beyond,” Resolution 38/161 (December 19, 1983).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development” (December 11, 1987), A/RES/42/187.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2398 (XXIII). “Problems of the Human Environment” (December 3, 1968).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2657 (XXV). “United Nations Conference on the Human Environment” (December 7, 1970).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2997 (XXVII). “International and Financial Arrangements for International Environmental Cooperation” (December 15, 1972).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 35/74. “International Co-operation on the Field of the Environment” (December 5, 1980).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 36/189. “Session of a Special Character of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme” (December 17, 1981).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 44/228. “United Nations Conference on Environment and Development” (December 22, 1989), A/RES/44/228.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 45/221. “United Nations Conference on Environment and Development” (December 21, 1990), A/RES/45/221.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 53/242. “Report of the Secretary-General on Environment and Human Settlements” (August 10, 1999), A/RES/53/242.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55/199. “Ten-Year Review of Progress Achieved in the Implementation of the Outcome of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development” (February 5, 2001), A/RES/55/199.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 66/288. “The Future We Want” (September 11, 2012), A/RES/66/288.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 67/213. “Report of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme on Its Twelfth Special Session and the Implementation of Section IV.C, Entitled ‘Environmental Pillar in the Context of Sustainable Development’, of the Outcome Document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development” (December 21, 2012), A/RES/67/213.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 67/290. “Format and Organizational Aspects of the High-Level Forum on Sustainable Development” (August 23, 2013), A/RES/67/290.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 70/1. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” (October 21, 2015), A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 71/313. “Work of the Statistical Commission Pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” (July 10, 2017), A/RES/71/313.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 72/277. “Towards a Global Pact for the Environment” (May 14, 2018), A/RES/72/277.Google Scholar
United Nations Information Service. Economic Commission for Africa – Addis Ababa Press Release (September 2, 1971), ECA/545,.Google Scholar
United Nations Press Release. “General Assembly Hears World Leaders Support Recommendations of World Commission on Environment and Development, Statements to Continue at Meeting This Afternoon” (October 19, 1987), GA/7529.Google Scholar
United States Congress – House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations. Review of the Global Environment 10 Years after Stockholm: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, March 30, April 1 and 20, 1982 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982).Google Scholar
United States Council on Environmental Quality and Department of State. Global Future: Time to Act – Report to the President on Global Resources, Environment and Population (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981).Google Scholar
United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. E–1 (2005), Document on Global Issues, 1969–1972. http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve01 (accessed September 30, 2013).Google Scholar
United States Senate. Beyond the Earth Summit: Developing an Energy-Efficient World: Hearing before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session, May 21, 1992 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993).Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 42, no. 1 (February 1998), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Bernstein, Steven. “The High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by Default and Design,” Global Policy, vol. 6, no. 3 (September 2015), pp. 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, William M. Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in the Third World, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Agarwal, Anil. “The North-South Perspective: Alienation or Interdependence?,” Ambio, vol. 19, no. 2 (April 1990), pp. 94–96.Google Scholar
Ågesta Group AB. Twenty Years after Stockholm, 1972–1992: A Report on the Implementation of the Stockholm Action Plan and on Priorities and Institutional Arrangements for the 1980s. A Parliamentary View of the State of the World Environment: The Results of a Survey Carried out by the Secretariat of the International Parliamentary Conference on the Environment (Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH, 1982).Google Scholar
American Geophysics Union. “New Studies Highlight Challenge of Meeting Paris Agreement Climate Goals,” Science Daily (April 23, 2019). www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190423114029.htm (accessed December 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Andersen, Inger. Conversation with Maria Ivanova, “Towards UNEP at 50: A Conversation with Inger Andersen” (May 7, 2021). www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp5ynMHouYo (accessed July 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Andresen, Steinar. “The Effectiveness of UN Environmental Institutions,” International Environmental Agreements, vol. 7, no. 4 (2007), pp. 317–336.Google Scholar
de Araujo Castro, Joao Augusto. “Environment and Development: The Case of the Developing Countries,” International Institutions and the Environmental Crisis, International Organization vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arge, Ralph C. and Kneese, Allen V., “Environmental Quality and International Trade,” International Organization, vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 419–465.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah and Westerwinter, Oliver, “Introduction: Networks and Transnational Security Governance,” in Avant, Deborah and Westerwinter, Oliver (eds.), The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1981).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ban, Ki-Moon. Resolved: Uniting Nations in a Divided World (New York: Columbia University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László. Bursts: The Hidden Patterns behind Everything We Do, from Your E-Mail to Bloody Crusades (New York: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4 (Autumn 1999), pp. 699–732.Google Scholar
Barros, Antonio Teixeira de. “Brazil’s Discourse on the Environment in the International Arena,” Contexto International, vol. 39, no. 2 (2017), pp. 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, et al. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no. 3 (2009), pp. 603–620.Google Scholar
Benitez, Helen. “Success for a Sub-regional ‘ASEAN’ Plan,” Uniterra, vol. 2 (1982), p. 25.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and George, Alexander L.. “Process Tracing in Case Study Research,” Paper presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA), October 1997, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Berenstain, Stan and Berenstain, Jan. Don’t Pollute (Anymore) (New York: Random House, 1991).Google Scholar
Bergesen, Helge Ole and Sydnes, Anne Kristin. “Protection of the Global Climate: Ecological Utopia or Just a Long Way to Go?,” in Bergesen, H. O., Norderhaug, M., and Parmann, G. (eds.), Green Globe Yearbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Helge Ole, Norderhaug, Magnar, and Parmann, Georg (eds.). Green Globe Yearbook 1992 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. “Rio + 20: Sustainable Development in a Time of Multilateral Decline,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 13, no. 4 (November 2013), pp. 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berruga, Enrique and Maurer, Peter. “Informal Consultations on Environmental Activities Co-chair Summary,” in Swart, Lydia and Perry, Estelle (eds.), Global Environmental Governance: Perspectives on the Current Debate (New York: Center for UN Reform Education, 2007), pp. 16–25.Google Scholar
Biden, Joseph Jr. “The Power of America’s Example: The Biden Plan for Leading the Democratic World to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century” (2021). https://joebiden.com/americanleadership/ (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank. “The Case for a World Environment Organization,” Science, vol. 42, no. 9 (2000), pp. 22–31.Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank. Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Abbott, Kenneth, Andresen, Steinar, et al. “Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6074 (March 16, 2012), pp. 1306–1307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. “The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 9, no. 4 (November 2009), pp. 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, Frank and Kim, Rakhyun. Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Binswanger, Hans. “Fiscal and Legal Incentives with Environmental Effects on the Brazilian Amazon,” World Bank Working Paper (Washington: World Bank, 1987).Google Scholar
Black, Richard. “Key Powers Reach Compromise at Climate Summit,” BBC, December 19, 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8421935.stm (accessed August 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. “Powering, Puzzling, or Persuading? The Mechanisms of Building Institutional Orders,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 4 (December 2007), pp. 761–777.Google Scholar
Borowy, Iris. Defining Sustainable Development for Our Common Future: A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Boughton, James M. “It Is Finally Time for a New Bretton Woods,” Centre for International Governance Innovation (June 22, 2020). www.cigionline.org/articles/it-finally-time-new-bretton-woods (accessed July 26, 2020).Google Scholar
Brenton, Tony. The Greening of Machiavelli: The Evolution of International Environmental Politics (London: Earthscan, 1994).Google Scholar
Bruce, Geoffrey. “Canada’s Road from Stockholm to Rio,” in: Environment Canada (ed.), From Stockholm to Rio: Summary Report of the Seminar Convened by the Canadian Department of External Affairs and International Tarade and the Department of Environment, Willson House, Meech Lake, Quebec, December 8–9, 1991.Google Scholar
Brundtland, Gro Harlem. Madam Prime Minister: A Life in Power and Politics (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005).Google Scholar
Buckley, James L. “International Environmental Issues,” Department of State Bulletin, vol. 57 (June 1982).Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. “Life after Debt: The New Economic Trajectory in Latin America,” Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Environmental Politics (London: Earthscan, 1992).Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. “Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Development in the EU: The Development of Supranational Authority over Government Subsidies (State Aid),” in Rixen, Thomas and Viola, Lora Anne (eds.), Historical Institutionalism and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 37–67.Google Scholar
Caballero, Paula. “A Short History of the SDGs,” Impakter (September 20, 2016). https://impakter.com/short-history-sdgs/ (accessed December 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton Keith. International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions, 2nd ed. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Canadian Environmental Advisory Council. Canada and Sustainable Development (Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, 1987).Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall L. “Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions,” in Knight, Jack and Sened, Itai (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. “Critical Junctures,” in: Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni and Kelemen, Daniel, “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narratives, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics, vol. 59, no. 3 (2007), pp. 341–369.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Hans and van Damme, Eric, “Global Games and Equilibrium Selection,” Econometrica, vol. 61, no. 5 (September 1993), pp. 989–1018.Google Scholar
Carney, Mark, “Completing the G20 Reform Agenda for Strengthening Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets,” Financial Stability Review (April 2013), www.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/financial-stability-review-17_2013-04.pdf (accessed January 7, 2022).Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli, “Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms,” International Organization, vol. 65, no. 1 (Winter 2011), pp. 69–102.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age (New York: Polity, 2012).Google Scholar
Chan, Nicholas. “Climate Contributions and the Paris Agreement: Fairness and Equity in a Bottom-Up Architecture,” Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 30, no. 3 (2016), pp. 291–301.Google Scholar
Chapnick, Adam. The Middle Power Project: Canada and the Founding of the United Nations (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Chasek, Pamela S. and Downie, David L., Global Environmental Politics, 8th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2021).Google Scholar
Chirac, Jacques. “Speech to the Plenary Session of the World Summit on Sustainable Development,” Johannesburg (September 2, 2002) www.jacqueschirac-asso.fr/archives-elysee.fr/elysee/elysee.fr/nglaise/speeches_and_documents/2002-2001/fi005004.html (accessed July 9, 2021).Google Scholar
Choucri, Nazali. “Population, Resources, and Technology: Political Implications of the Environmental Crisis,” International Institutions and the Environmental Crisis, International Organization vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 175–212.Google Scholar
Clarke, Robin and Timberlake, Lloyd, Stockholm Plus Ten: Promises, Promises? The Decade since the 1972 UN Environment Conference (London: Earthscan, 1982).Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Collier, David, Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Commoner, Barry. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology (New York: Knopf, 1971).Google Scholar
Corrêa do Lago, André Aranha. Stockholm, Rio, Johannesburg: Brazil and the Three United Nations Conferences on the Environment (Brasília: Ministry of External Relations, 2009).Google Scholar
Crocitti, John J. and Vallance, Monique. Brazil Today (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2012).Google Scholar
Culpepper, Roy. “Managing the Global Commons: The Economic Setting and Financial Options,” in Environment Canada (ed.), From Stockholm to Rio: Summary Report of the Seminar Convened by the Canadian Department of External Affairs and International Tarade and the Department of Environment, Willson House, Meech Lake, Quebec, December 8–9, 1991.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2 (April 1983), pp. 147–160.Google Scholar
Dodds, Felix and Nayar, Anita, “Rio+20: A New Beginning,” United Nations Environment Programme: Perspectives, no. 8 (June 20, 2015), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Dodds, Felix and Strauss, Michael, with Strong, Maurice, Only One Earth: The Long Road via Rio to Sustainable Development (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. “Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4 (2016), pp. 937–956.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. “Case Studies in Political Science,” in Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7 (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 79–138.Google Scholar
ENDA-Tiers Monde, Poverty and Environment in Africa: Which Way Ahead? Paper 21, December 1991 (London: IIED, 1991).Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Gould, Stephen Jay, “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,” in Schopf, Thomas J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology (San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper & Company, 1972), pp. 82–115.Google Scholar
Engfeldt, Lars-Göran. From Stockholm to Johannesburg and Beyond: The Evolution of the International Systems for Sustainable Development Governance and Its Implications (Stockholm: The Government Offices of Sweden, 2009).Google Scholar
Evans, Alex and Steven, David, Sustainable Development Goals – A Useful Outcome from Rio+20? (New York: NYU Center for International Cooperation, 2012).Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. “Signaling versus the Balance of Power and Interests: An Empirical Test of a Crisis Bargaining Model,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 38, no. 2 (June 1994), pp. 236–269.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. “Bargaining, Enforcement and International Cooperation,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 269–305.Google Scholar
Figueres, Christiana and Rivett-Carnac, Tom, The Stubborn Optimist’s Guide to the Climate Crisis (New York: Vintage, 2020).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 887–917.Google Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. “Historical Institutionalism and International Relations,” International Organization, vol. 65, no. 2 (Spring 2011), pp. 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. (ed.). International Politics and Institutions in Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, Ury, William, and Patton, Bruce, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd ed. (London: Penguin Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Mary Anne. “U.N. Environment Conference Ends Feeling Pinch of Reduced U.S. Role,” The Washington Post (May 19, 1982) p. A19.Google Scholar
Fomerand, Jacques. “UN Conferences: Media Events or Genuine Diplomacy,” Global Governance, vol. 2, no. 3 (September–December 1996), pp. 361–375.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sustainable Development and the Environment: FAO Policies and Actions, Stockholm 1972–Rio 1992 (Rome: FAO, 1992).Google Scholar
Founex Report, Environment and Development, Development and Environment: Report and Working Papers of a Panel of Experts Convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Founex, Switzerland, June 4–12, 1971) (Paris: Mouton, 1972).Google Scholar
Pope Francis, , Laudato Si: On Care for Our Common Home (2015). www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (accessed July 22, 2021).Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth. The Stockholm Conference Only One Earth: An Introduction to the Politics of Survival (London: Earth Island Limited, 1972).Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Assessment and Recommendations (London: Friends of the Earth, 1992).Google Scholar
Gardner, Richard N. “The Role of the UN in Environmental Problems,” International Institutions and the Environmental Crisis, International Organization, vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 237–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Weingast, Barry R., “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas & Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton. “Slaughter in Racak Changed Kosovo Policy, The Washington Post (April 18, 1999), p. A1.Google Scholar
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. “Industrial Pollution Control and International Trade,” in Development and Environment: Report and Working Papers of a Panel of Experts Convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Founex, Switzerland, June 4–12, 1971) (Paris: Mouton, 1972).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Germain, G., Simon, A., Arsenault, J., et al. Quebec’s Multi-Party Observatory on Zoonoses and Adaptation to Climate Change, “Quebec’s Multi-Party Observatory on Zoonoses and Adaptation to Climate Change,” The Canadian Communicable Disease Report, vol. 45, no. 5 (May 2019), pp. 143–148.Google Scholar
Gerschewski, Johannes, “Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal,” American Political Science Review, vol. 115, no. 1 (2021), pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
Gersick, Connie J. G. “Time and Transitions in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development,” The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 31, no. 1 (March 1988), pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
Gersick, Connie J. G. “Making Time Predictable: Transitions in Task Groups,” The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 2 (June 1989), pp. 274–309.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Edward. “The Retreat from Stockholm,” The Ecologist, vol. 12, no. 3 (May–June 1982), pp. 98–100.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, Anne. “Eight Principles for Sound Environmental Development,” Uniterra vol. 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Gotlieb, Allan. The Washington Diaries, 1981–1989 (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 2006).Google Scholar
Grief, Avner and Laitin, David D., “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, vol. 98, no. 4 (November 2004), pp. 633–652.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd, Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Grunberg, Carole A. “Report on the United Nations Environment Programme’s Session of a Special Character, May 10–18, 1982, Nairobi, Kenya,” United States Congress, Review of the Global Environment 10 Years after Stockholm.Google Scholar
Guterres, António. “Secretary-General’s Address at Columbia University: ‘The State of the Planet’.” (December 2, 2020). www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2020-12-02/address-columbia-university-the-state-of-the-planet (accessed July 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 1 (Winter 1992a), pp. 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 1 (Winter 1992b), 1–35.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. “UN Conferences and Constructivist Governance of the Environment,” Global Governance, vol. 8, no. 1 (January–March 2002), pp. 73–91.Google Scholar
Haigh, Nigel. “The European Community and International Environmental Policy, in Hurrell, Andrew and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 228–249.Google Scholar
Hall, Nina. Displacement, Development, and Climate Change: International Organizations Moving beyond Their Mandates (Abington: Routledge 2016).Google Scholar
Halle, Mark. “Life after Rio: A Commentary by Mark Halle, IISD,” International Institute for Sustainable Development (June 2012). www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/com_life_after_rio.pdf (accessed August 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler, with Hart, Michael. Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine and Zürn, Michael. “Reactive Sequences in Global Health Governance,” in Fioretos, Orfeo (ed.), International Politics and Institutions in Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
ul Haq, Mahbub. The Poverty Curtain: Choices for the Third World (New York: Columbia University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. “Games with Randomly Distributed Payoffs: A New Rationale for Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium Points,” International Journal od Game Theory, vol. 2 (1973) pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Harvey, Fiona. “Trillions of Dollars Spent on Covid Recovery in Ways that Harm Environment,” The Guardian (July 15, 2021). www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/15/trillions-of-dollars-spent-on-covid-recovery-in-ways-that-harm-environment (accessed August 16, 2021).Google Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. “Sacred Time and Conflict Initiation,” Security Studies, vol. 20, no. 4 (2011), pp. 491–520.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin and Wincott, Daniel, “Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism,” Political Studies, vol. XLVI (1998), pp. 951–957.Google Scholar
Heath, Ryan, Mathiesen, Karl, Colman, Zack, and Oroschakoff, Kalina, “World Pushes Ahead with Climate Action as U.S. Remains in Limbo,” Politio (November 17, 2020). www.politico.com/news/2020/11/17/global-summit-climate-action-biden-436833 (accessed January 6, 2021).Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. “Incremental Origins of Bretton Woods,” in: Fioretos, Orfeo (ed.), International Politics and Institutions in Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Herter, Christian A. Jr. and Binder, Jill E.. The Role of the Secretariat in Multilateral Negotiation: The Case of Maurice Strong and the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment (Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute, 1993).Google Scholar
Hickel, Jason. “The World’s Sustainable Development Goals Aren’t Sustainable,” Foreign Policy (September 30, 2020). https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/30/the-worlds-sustainable-development-goals-arent-sustainable/ (accessed December 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Holdgate, Martin W. A Perspective of Environment Pollution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Holdgate, Martin W. Penguins and Mandarins: The Memoirs of Martin Holdgate (Spennymoor: The Memoir Club, 2003).Google Scholar
Holdgate, Martin W., Kassas, Mohammed, and White, Gilbert F.. The World Environment 1972–1982: A Report by the United Nations Environment Programme (Dublin: Tycooly International Publishing, 1982).Google Scholar
Hom, Andrew R. International Relations and the Problem of Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Hopgood, Stephen. American Foreign Environment al Policy and the Power of the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Howard, Brian Clark. “Rio+20 Brings Hope and Solutions Despite Weak Talk,” National Geographic (June 21, 2012), www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/120621-rio-20-hope-solutions-official-talks#close (accessed January 7, 2022).Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. “The Politics of Amazonian Deforestation,” Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 23, no. 1 (1991), pp. 197–215.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. “Brazil and Amazonian Deforestation,” in Hurrell, Andrew and Kingsbury, Benedict (ed.), The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 398–429.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues. Common Security: A Blueprint for Survival (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982).Google Scholar
Independent Commission on International Development Issues. North-South: A Programme for Survival (New York: Pan Books, 1980).Google Scholar
Inomata, Tadanori. “Management Review of Environmental Governance within the United Nations System,” JIU/REP/2008/3(Geneva: Joint Inspection Unit, 2008).Google Scholar
Institute of Latin American Studies. The Debt Crisis in Latin America (Stockholm: Latinamerika-institute, 1986).Google Scholar
International Council of Scientific Unions’ Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment and International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics. Effects of Increased Ultraviolet Radiation on Biological Systems: Proceedings of a Workshop (Paris: SCOPE, 1992).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Monday Evening, 23 March 1992,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 18 (March 25, 1992a). www.iisd.ca/download/asc/enb0118.txt (accessed September 1, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Monday Evening, 30 March 1992,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 23 (March 30, 1992b). www.iisd.ca/download/asc/enb0123.txt (accessed September 4, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Saturday Evening, 28 March 1992,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 22 (March 31, 1992c). www.iisd.ca/download/asc/enb0122.txt (accessed September 4, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “70th Meeting of the Plenary,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 26 (April 3, 1992d). www.iisd.ca/download/asc/enb0126.txt (accessed September 4, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “UNCED Highlights, 5–6 June 1992: The Contact Groups,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 6 (June 7, 1992e). www.iisd.ca/vol02/0206002e.html (accessed September 5, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “UNCED Highlights, 8 June 1992: Main Committee Contact Groups,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 7 (June 9, 1992f). www.iisd.ca/vol02/0207001e.html (accessed September 5, 2013).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Summary Report, 23 April–4 May 2012: 2nd Round of UNCSD Informal Informal Consultations,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 35 (2012a), p. 7. https://enb.iisd.org/events/2nd-round-uncsd-informal-informal-consultations/summary-report-23-april-4-may-2012 (accessed July 9, 2021).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Summary Report, 29 May–2 June 2012: 3rd Round of UNCSD Informal Informal Consultations,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 40 (June 5, 2012b), p. 7. https://enb.iisd.org/events/3rd-round-uncsd-informal-informal-consultations/summary-report-29-may-2-june-2012 (accessed July 9, 2021).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Governments Begin Negotiating 2022 Political Declaration on Environment” (August 25, 2020a). https://sdg.iisd.org/news/governments-begin-negotiating-2022-political-declaration-on-environment/ (accessed December 29, 2020).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “Summary of the Climate Ambition Summit 2020: 12 December 2020,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin (December 15, 2020b). https://enb.iisd.org/vol12/enb12778e.html (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). “HLPF Reviews Progress towards Nine SDGs” (July 15, 2021). https://sdg.iisd.org/news/hlpf-reviews-progress-towards-nine-sdgs/ (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development Reporting Services. “Summary of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: 13–22 June 2012,” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 51, Monday (June 25, 2012).Google Scholar
International Soil Reference and Information Centre. World Status of Human-Induced Soil Degradation (Wageningen: ISRIC, 1990).Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development (Gland: IUCN-UNEP-WWF, 1980).Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. “Nature-Based Solutions.” (2021). www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-solutions (accessed July 18, 2021).Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. “Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: A Story of Compromise and Confrontation,” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics vol. 7, no. 3 (2007), pp. 337–361.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. “UNEP in Global Environmental Governance: Design, Leadership, Location,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 10, no. 1 (February 2010), pp. 30–59.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. “Institutional Design and UNEP Reform: Historical Insights on Form, Function and Financing,” International Affairs, vol. 88, no. 3 (2012), pp. 565–584.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. “The Contested Legacy of Rio+20,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 13, no. 4 (November 2013a), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. “Reforming the Institutional Framework for Environment and Sustainable Development: Rio+20’s Subtle but Significant Impact,” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no. 3 (September 2013b), pp. 211–231.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. The Untold Story of the World’s Leading Environmental Institution (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Johnson, Boris. “PM Climate Ambition Summit Opening Remarks: 12 December 2020,” Prime Minister’s Office (December 12, 2020). www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-climate-ambition-summit-opening-remarks-12-december-2020 (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
Johnson, Stanley. UNEP: The First Forty Years: A Narrative (Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2012).Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. “From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing,” Policy Studies Journal, vol. 40, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R.. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph and Caporaso, James A.. Theories of Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter, and Snidal, Duncan, Institutional Choice and Global Commerce (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. “Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance,” in Kahler, Miles (ed.), Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Kamau, Macharia, Chasek, Pamela, and O’Connor, David, Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy: The Inside Story of the Sustainable Development Goals (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists beyond Borders (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kennett, Wayland. “The Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment, International Affairs, vol. 48, no. 1 (1972), pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. “The Demand for International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982), pp. 325–355.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4 (December 1988), pp. 379–396.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Martin, Lisa L., “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, vol. 20, no. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper-Collins, 1989).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G., “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 9, no. 1 (March 2011), pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: Longman, 1984).Google Scholar
Kinsman, Jeremy. “History at a Juncture,” Policy (June 17, 2020). www.policymagazine.ca/history-at-a-juncture/ (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
Kjellén, Bo. A New Diplomacy of Sustainable Development: A Challenge of Global Change (New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics, vol. 28, no. 3 (April 1976), pp. 317–347.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, vol. 16, no. 2 (January 1984), pp. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics, vol. 43, no. 3 (April 1991), pp. 336–366.Google Scholar
Kruck, Andreas and Zangl, Bernhard, “The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis,” Global Policy, vol. 11, no. S3 (2020) pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
Lamb, Robert P. “Guest Editorial: An Interview with UNEP Chief,” Environmental Conservation, vol. 9, no. 1 (Spring 1982), p. 1.Google Scholar
Larson, Eric, Grieg, Chris, Jenkins, Jesse et al. “Net Zero America: Potential Pathways, Infrastructure, and Impacts” (December 2020). https://environmenthalfcentury.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf331/files/2020-12/Princeton_NZA_Interim_Report_15_Dec_2020_FINAL.pdf (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
Lashof, D. and Tirpak, D. A.. Policy Options for Stabilising Global Climate. 21P-2003. (Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1990).Google Scholar
Lax, David L. and Sebenius, James K.. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperative and Competitive Gain (New York: The Free Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lazar, Nomi Claire. Out of Joint: Power, Crisis, and the Rhetoric of Time (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Le Prestre, Philippe G. The World Bank and the Environmental Challenge (Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Lean, Geoffrey and Mayer, Marek, “Britain Moving towards Acid Rain Disaster,” The Observer (June 13, 1982), p. 2.Google Scholar
Lee, James A. “Environmental Considerations in Development Finance,” International Institutions and the Environmental Crisis, International Organization, vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 337–347.Google Scholar
Leonard, H. Jeffrey and Morell, David. “Emergence of Environmental Concern in Developing Countries: A Political Perspective,” Stanford Journal of International Law, vol. 17 (1981), pp. 281–314.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1 (1997), pp. 87–112.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul. “Poverty Is Linked to Harm to Land,” New York Times, (October 20, 1987), p. A5.Google Scholar
Libecap, G. D. Contracting for Property Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Litfin, Karen T. Ozone Discourse: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lim, Stephen Ghee-Soon and Murnighan, J. Keith, “Phases, Deadlines, and the Bargaining Process,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 58 (1994), pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
Lipscy, Phillip Y. Renegotiating the World Order: Institutional Change in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Long, Bill L. International Environmental Issues and the OECD 1950–2000 (Paris: OECD, 2000).Google Scholar
Lundgren, Magnus, Squatrito, Theresa, and Tallberg, Jonas. “Stability and Change in International Policy-Making: A Punctuated Equilibrium Approach,” Review of International Organizations, vol. 13, no. 4 (2018), pp. 547–572.Google Scholar
Lyons, Richard D. “Furor over Plan to Dump Nerve Gas,” New York Times (August 9, 1970).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Gordon J. “International Institutions for Environmental Management,” International Institutions and the Environmental Crisis, International Organization, vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 372–400.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret. Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World (New York: Random House, 2003).Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret. “The World after COVID-19: Margaret MacMillan on Covid-19 as a Turning Point in History,” The Economist (May 9, 2020). www.economist.com/by-invitation/2020/05/09/margaret-macmillan-on-covid-19-as-a-turning-point-in-history (accessed July 25, 2020).Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret. “Which Past Is Prologue? Heeding the Right Warnings from History,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 99, no. 5 (September/October 2020).Google Scholar
MacNeill, Jim. “Environment and Development,” International Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 3 (May/June 1988), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
MacNeill, Jim. “From Controversy to Consensus: Building Global Agreement for Change,” Environmental Policy and Law, vol. 37, no. 2–3 (2007), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, vol. 29, no. 4 (August 2000), pp. 507–548.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change,” in Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “Canada and the Kosovo Crisis: A Golden Moment in Canadian Foreign Policy?” International Journal, vol. 64, no. 2 (2009), pp. 565–581.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “Developing World Environmental Cooperation: The Founex Seminar and the Stockholm Conference,” in Kaiser, Wolfram and Meyer, John-Henrik (eds.), International Organizations and Environmental Protection in the Global Twentieth Century: Actors, Agenda-Setting and Institution-Building (New York: Berghahn Books, 2016), pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “Leading by Design: Informal Influence and International Secretariats,” Review of International Organizations, vol. 12, no. 4 (2017), pp. 497–522.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “A Bird in the Hand: Temporal Focal Points and Change in International Institutions,” Review of International Organizations, vol. 15, no. 1 (2020), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “The Networked Diplomacy of Informal International Institutions: The Case of the Proliferation Security Initiative,” Global Governance, vol. 27, no. 3 (Fall 2021a), pp. 410–432.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. “Justin Trudeau and Institutional Informality: Canada’s Response to the COVID-19 Crisis,” in Carment, David and Nimijean, Richard (eds.), Canada Among Nations 2020: Divided in a Dangerous World (London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2021b), pp. 211–232.Google Scholar
Manulak, Michael W. and Snidal, Duncan, “Hierarchy Plus Networks in Global Governance: The Supply of Informal International Governance,” in Barnett, Michael, Pevehouse, Jon, and Raustiala, Kal (eds.), Global Governance in a World of Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 182–213.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 4 (Autumn 1992), pp. 765–792.Google Scholar
Marx, Eric, “Rio+20: Earth Summit – Expecting the World? Disappointment Inevitable,” Reuters (June 11, 2012). www.reutersevents.com/sustainability/environment/rio20-earth-summit-expecting-world-disappointment-inevitable (accessed July 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
McChrystal, Stanley, with Collins, Tantum, Silverman, David, and Fussell, Chris. Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World (New York: Penguin, 2015).Google Scholar
McCormick, John. Reclaiming Paradise: The Global Environmental Movement (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
McDonald, John W. “Global Environmental Negotiations: The 1972 Stockholm Conference and Lessons for the Future,” Paper for the American Academy of Diplomacy and the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University (December 13, 1989).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Kathleen. Comments on World Resource Institute Panel, “ADVISORY: Press Call on 5-Year Anniversary of the Paris Agreement and Expectations for the Climate Ambition Summit” (December 3, 2020). www.wri.org/news/2020/12/advisory-press-call-5-year-anniversary-paris-agreement-and-expectations-climate (accessed January 6, 2021).Google Scholar
Meadows, Dennis L. and Randers, Jorgen, “Adding the Time Dimension to Environmental Policy,” International Organization vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jørgen, et al. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New York: Universe Books, 1972).Google Scholar
Meyer, John M. and Rowan, Brian. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, no. 2 (September 1977).Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. and Scott, W. R.. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Reality (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983), pp. 340–363.Google Scholar
Moi, Daniel arap. “Let’s Take Our Coats Off and Get Honourably Dirty,” Uniterra, vol. 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4 (Autumn 1997), pp. 513–553.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 2 (Spring 1999), pp. 267–306.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “The New Liberalism,” in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 234–254.Google Scholar
Munro, Bob. “Choosing Our Common Future,” in Environment Canada (ed.), From Stockholm to Rio: Summary Report of the Seminar Convened by the Canadian Department of External Affairs and International Tarade and the Department of Environment, Willson House, Meech Lake, Quebec, December 8–9, 1991.Google Scholar
National Geographic. Earth’88: Changing Geographic Perspectives – Proceedings of the Centennial Symposium (Washington, DC: National Geographic Society, 1988).Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. “Scientists Closer to Identifying Cause of Antarctic Ozone Depletion,” National Science Foundation News (October 20, 1986).Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (New York: Cambridge University Press,1990).Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. “The Other Global Power Shift,” Project Syndicate (August 6, 2020). www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-technology-threats-to-us-national-security-by-joseph-s-nye-2020-08?utm_source=Project%20Syndicate%20Newsletter&utm_campaign=635fee703d-sunday_newsletter_09_08_2020&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_73bad5b7d8-635fee703d-105615321&mc_cid=635fee703d&mc_eid=6f34189ace&barrier=accesspaylog (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Kate. “From Stockholm to Johannesburg and Beyond: The Evolving Meta-Regime for Global Environmental Governance,” Paper prepared for presentation at the 2007 Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (May 24–26 2007). . http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.662.8974&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Environment and Economics: Results of the International Conference on Environment and Economics – 18th–21st June 1984 (Paris: OECD Publication, 1985).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Benefits Estimates and Environmental Decision-Making (Paris: OECD, 1992).Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies,” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1 (October 1985), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Pallemaerts, Marc. “International Environmental Law from Stockholm to Rio: Back to the Future?,” in Sands, Philippe (ed.), Greening International Law (New York: The Free Press, 1994), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. “The World Order Is Starting to Crack,” Foreign Policy (July 25, 2018). https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/07/25/the-world-order-is-starting-to-crack/ (accessed October 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. “When the System Fails,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 99, no. 4 (July/August 2020), pp. 40–50.Google Scholar
Pearce, Fred. “Beyond Rio’s Disappointment: Finding a Path to the Future,” Yale Environment 360 (2012). https://e360.yale.edu/features/beyond_rios_disappointment_finding_a_path_to_the_future (accessed July 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy, Pierre, Jon, and King, Desmond S., “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 67, no. 4 (November 2005), pp. 1275–1300.Google Scholar
Piccioni, Luigi. “Only One Earth: The Holy See and Ecology,” in Kaiser, Wolfram and Meyer, John-Henrik (eds.), International Organizations and Environmental Protection in the Global Twentieth Century: Actors, Agenda-Setting and Institution-Building (New York: Berghahn Books, 2016), pp. 128–152.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no. 2 (June 2000), pp. 251–267.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V. (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002), pp. 693–721.Google Scholar
Powell, W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Pruitt, Dean G. “Ripeness Theory and the Oslo Talks,” International Negotiation, vol. 2 (1997), pp. 237–250.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics,” International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3 (Summer 1988), pp. 427–460.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. The Art and Science of Negotiation (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard, with Richardson, John and Metcalfe, David. Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rangarajan, Mahesh. “Striving for a Balance: Nature, Power, Science and India’s Indira Gandhi, 1917–1984,” Conservation & Society, vol. 7, no. 4 (2009) pp. 299–312.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures and the End of the Cold War,” International Organization, vol. 48, no. 2 (Spring 1994), pp. 185–214.Google Scholar
Rixen, Thomas, Viola, Lora Anne, and Zürn, Michael, “Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics,” in Rixen, Thomas and Viola, Lora Anne (eds.), Historical Institutionalism and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016a), pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Rixen, Thomas, Viola, Lora Anne, and Zürn, Michael, (eds.), Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016b).Google Scholar
Rocard, Michel. “Don’t Blame It on Rio,” Project Syndicate (February 22, 2012). www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/don-t-blame-it-on-rio?barrier=accesspaylog (accessed December 28, 2020).Google Scholar
Rojas-Suarez, Liliana. “From the Debt Crisis toward Economic Stability: An Analysis of the Consistency of Macroeconomic Policies in Mexico,” International Monetary Fund Working Paper (March 1992), WP/92/L7.Google Scholar
Rowland, Wade. The Plot to Save the World: The Life and Times of the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment (Toronto: Clarke, Irwin & Company Ltd., 1973).Google Scholar
Runnalls, David. “What Should Be Said at UNCED? Institutional Choices for the Rio Conference,” in Department of External Affairs and International Trade and the Department of Environment, Canada, From Stockholm to Rio, 1972–1992 (1991).Google Scholar
Sandholm, Thomas and Vulkan, Nir, “Bargaining with Deadlines,” Proceedings of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (1999). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/315149.315224 (accessed December 26, 2021), pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. “The Strategy of Conflict Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 2, no. 3 (September 1958), pp. 203–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. “Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight Saving: A Study of Binary Choices with Externalities,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 17, no. 3 (September 1973), pp. 381–428.Google Scholar
Schiavo-Campo, Salvatore and Singer, Hans W.. Perspectives of Economic Development (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970).Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Stephen. Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations (New York: Basic Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. “Institutions and Organizations: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis,” in Richard Scott, W. and Meyer, John W. (eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism (Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage, 1994), pp. 55–80.Google Scholar
Sebenius, James K. “International Negotiation Analysis,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002), pp. 229–255.Google Scholar
Sebenius, James K., Nicholas Burns, R., and Mnookin, Robert H., Kissinger the Negotiator: Lessons from Dealmaking at the Highest Level (New York: Harper, 2018).Google Scholar
Seib, Gerald F. “In Crisis, Opportunity for Barack Obama,” Wall Street Journal (November 21, 2008), p. A2.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. “U.S. Goes to Ecology Parley under Cloud of Doubt,” The New York Times (May 5, 1982a), p. A2.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. “U.S. Tells Ecologists to Trust Free Enterprise,” The New York Times (May 12, 1982b), p. A7.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. “The Environment Revisited,” The New York Times (May 23 1982c), p. 183.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. “Political and Economic Growth: A New Report Looks at the Links,” New York Times (April 27, 1987a), p. B12.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. “World Bank Offers Environmental Projects,” New York Times (May 6, 1987b), p. A14.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. A New Name for Peace: International Environmentalism, Sustainable Development, and Democracy (Hanover: University Press of New England, 1996).Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1, no. 2 (April 1989), pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. “Timing and Sequencing in International Politics,” in: Fioretos, Orfeo (ed.), International Politics and Institutions in Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 231–250.Google Scholar
Simon, Hebert A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (New York: Macmillan, 1961).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Skryms, Brian. “The Stag Hunt,” Presidential Address: Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association (March 2001). http://econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Evolution/skyrmsstaghunt.pdf (accessed July 31, 2020).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Sly, Eleanor. “Great Thunberg Criticises ‘Empty Words’ of World Leaders, Five Years since the Paris Agreement,” The Independent (December 12, 2020). www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/greta-thunberg-paris-agreement-video-b1770050.html (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
Smith, J. Eric. “The Role of Special Purpose and Nongovernmental Organizations in the Environmental Crisis,” International Organization, vol. 26, no. 2 (Spring 1972), pp. 302–326.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. “The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 14 (1973), pp. 423–515.Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel David. “The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures,” Comparative Political Science, vol. 45, no. 12 (2012), pp. 1572–1597.Google Scholar
Spector, Bertram I. “The Search for Flexibility on Financial Issues at UNCED: An Analysis of Preference Adjustment,” in Spector, Bertram I., Sjöstedt, Gunnar, and William Zartman, I. (eds.), Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) (London: Graham & Trotman, 1994).Google Scholar
Speth, James Gustave and Haas, Peter M.. Global Environmental Governance (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future. Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21): Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 (January 2012). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1126SD21%20Agenda21_new.pdf (accessed December 28, 2020).Google Scholar
Stein, Howard and Wayne Nafziger, E.. “Structural Adjustment, Human Needs, and the World Bank Agenda,” The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (1991), pp. 173–189.Google Scholar
Strandaneas, Jan-Gustav. “A Council for Sustainable Development: A Possible Outcome of the Rio+20 Process,” Stakeholder Forum (2012).Google Scholar
Strong, Maurice. “The Stockholm Conference: Where Science and Politics Meet,” Ambio, vol. 1, no. 3 (June 1972), pp. 73–78.Google Scholar
Struthers, David. “The United Nations Environment Programme after a Decade: The Nairobi Session of a Special Character, May 1981,” Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, vol. 12, no. 2 (1983).Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence E. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Tasker, John Paul. “Trudeau Unveils New Net-Zero Emissions Plan to Meet Climate Change Targets,” Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (November 19, 2020). www.cbc.ca/news/politics/net-zero-emissions-1.5807877 (accessed January 5, 2021).Google Scholar
Thacher, Peter S. “Background on Institutional Options for Management of the Global Environment and Commons,” in Environment Canada (ed.), From Stockholm to Rio: Summary Report of the Seminar Convened by the Canadian Department of External Affairs and International Tarade and the Department of Environment, Willson House, Meech Lake, Quebec, December 8–9, 1991.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 208–240.Google Scholar
Time. “Environment: Richard Nixon’s New Issue,” Time, special edition (February 2, 1970).Google Scholar
Time. “Planet of the Year: Endangered Earth,” Time, vol. 133, no. 1 (January 2, 1989).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “UNEP: Retrospect and Prospects: Introductory Statement to the Eighth Session of the Governing Council of UNEP,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal (ed.), Development without Destruction: Evolving Environmental Perceptions (Dublin: Tycooly International Publishing, 1982a).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “A Simple Choice – Co-operation or Catastrophe,” Uniterra, vol. 2 (1982b), p. 6.Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “The United Nations Conference on Desertification: A Review,” Mazingira, vol. 6, no. 1 (1982c), pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “Environmental Protection: Address to the Japan Environmental Agency Symposium, Tokyo,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal (ed.), Development without Destruction: Evolving Environmental Perceptions (Dublin: Tycooly International Publishing, January 1982d).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “Environmental Protection: Address to the Japan Environmental Agency Symposium, Tokyo,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal (ed.). Development without Destruction: Evolving Environmental Perceptions (Dublin: Tycooly International Publishing, 1982e).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “Environmental Protection: Address to the Japan Environmental Agency Symposium, Tokyo,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal (ed.). Sustainable Development: Constraints and Opportunities (London: Butterworths, 1987).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “Environmental Protection: Address to the Japan Environmental Agency Symposium, Tokyo,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal Saving Our Planet: Challenges and Hopes (London: Springer, 1992).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa K. “Environmental Protection: Address to the Japan Environmental Agency Symposium, Tokyo,” in Tolba, Mostafa Kamal Global Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating Environmental Agreements for the World, 1973–1992 (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa Kamal and Biswas, Asit K. (eds.). Earth and Us: Population-Resources-Environment-Development (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1991).Google Scholar
Tolba, Mostafa Kamal, El-Kholy, Osama A., Hinnawi, Essam E., Holdgate, M. W., Michael, D. F., and Munn, R. E., The World Environment: 1972–1992: Two Decades of Challenge (London: Chapman & Hall, 1992).Google Scholar
Tomlin, Brian, Hillmer, Norman, and Hampson, Fen, Canada’s International Policies: Agendas, Alternatives, and Politics (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Tower, Samuel A. “Stamps; U.N. Commemoratives,” New York Times, Arts and Leisure 2 (March 7, 1982).Google Scholar
UNESCO (Abdellatif Benachenhou). Environment and Development: Problems and Prospects for Sustainable Development (Paris: UNESCO, 1992).Google Scholar
United Kingdom Department of Environment. Our Common Future: A Perspective by the United Kingdom on the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (London: United Kingdom Government, 1988).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Technology Transfer and Development in a Changing International Environment: Policy Challenges and Options for Cooperation (New York: United Nations, 1992).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Report of the Governing Council (Session of a Special Character and Tenth Session)” (1982). https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/17274/82_05_GC10_%20special_character_report_of_the_GC_10_1982.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. The State of the Environment 1972–1982 (Nairobi: Kanaya Designs, 1982).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Malmö Ministerial Declaration,” Report of the Governing Council, 6th Special Session (May 29–31, 2000), A/55/25, UNEP/GC/DEC/SS.V1/1.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. Consultative Group of Ministers or High-Level Representatives on International Environmental Governance/Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome (December 13, 2010), UNEP/GC.26/18.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Letter from the Executive Director” (2019) Annual Report., www.unep.org/resources/annual-report/letter-executive-director-2019-review (accessed December 26, 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. “Making Peace with Nature: A Scientific Blueprint to Tackle the Climate, Biodiversity and Pollution Emergencies” (February 2021). https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34948/MPN.pdf (accessed July 17, 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (Committee of International Development Institutions on the Environment). Workshop on Environmental and Natural Resource Accounting: Nairobi, 24–26 February 1992: Summary Record (Nairobi: UNEP, 1992).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (Hussein Abaza). Consultative Meeting on Environment and Economics, Nairobi, 26–28 February 1992: Summary Record (Nairobi: UNEP, 1992).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization. Urban Air Pollution in Megacities of the World (Oxford: Blackwell Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Vabulas, Felicity and Snidal, Duncan. “Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements,” Review of International Organizations, vol. 8, no. 2 (2013), pp. 193–220.Google Scholar
Wagner, Travis. “Hazardous Waste: Evolution of a National Environmental Problem,” Journal of Policy History, vol. 16, no. 4 (2004), pp. 306–331.Google Scholar
Wapner, Paul Kevin. “World Summit on Sustainable Development: Toward a Post-Jo’Burg Environmentalism,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 3, no. 1 (February 2003), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Ward, Barbara and Dubos, René. Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet (New York: W. W. Norton, 1972).Google Scholar
Ward, Barbara, Dubos, René, Heyerdahl, Thor et al. Who Speaks for the Earth? Seven Citizens of the World on Major Issues of the Global Environment (New York: W. W. Norton, 1981).Google Scholar
Weibust, Inger. Green Leviathan: The Case for a Federal Role in Environmental Policy (Farnham: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. “Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives,” in Goodin, Robert and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 335–370.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2 (Spring, 1992), pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
Werksman, Jacob. “The Conference of the Parties to Environmental Treaties,” in Werksman, Jacob (ed.), Greening International Institutions (London: Earthscan, 1996), pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W., Blyth, Mark, and Seabrooke, Leonard, “Symposium on the Social: Construction of Wars and Crises as Openings for Change: Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 4 (December 2007), pp. 747–759.Google Scholar
Wijkman, Anders. Natural Disasters: Acts of God or Acts of Man (London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 1984).Google Scholar
Williams, Marc. “Re-Articulating the Third World Coalition: The Role of the Environmental Agenda,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1 (1993), pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 38, no. 3 (September 2000), pp. 595–613.Google Scholar
World Bank (Patrick Low). International Trade and the Environment (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992).Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (hereafter WCED). Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Our Planet, Our Health: Report of the WHO Commission on Health and Environment (Geneva: WHO, 1992a).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Commission on Health and Environment: Report of the Panel on Energy, WHO/EHE/92.3 (Geneva: WHO, 1992b)Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Commission on Health and Environment: Report of the Panel on Food and Agriculture, WHO/EHE/92.2 (Geneva: WHO, 1992c)Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Commission on Health and Environment: Report of the Panel on Urbanization, WHO/EHE/92.5 (Geneva: WHO, 1992d).Google Scholar
World Resources Institute, The World Conservation Union, United Nations Environment Programme; in consultation with Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization. “Global Biodiversity Strategy: Guidelines for Action to Save, Study, and Use Earth’s Biotic Wealth Sustainably and Equitably” (Washington, DC: World Resource Institute, 1992).Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. “Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982), pp. 277–297.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment,” International Organization, vol. 43, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 349–375.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. “Bargaining and Conflict Resolution,” in Kolodziej, Edward A. and Kanet, Roger E. (eds.), Coping with Conflict after the Cold War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William and Berman, Maureen. The Practical Negotiator (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Zelli, Fariborz. “The Fragmentation of the Global Climate Governance Architecture,” WIREs Climate Change, vol. 2 (March/April 2011), pp. 255–270.Google Scholar
Zucker, Lynne. “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence,” in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. “Historical Institutionalism and International Relations – Strange Bedfellows?” in Rixen, Thomas, Viola, Lora Anne, and Zürn, Michael (eds.), Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 199–228.Google Scholar