Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- 22 Local Sense(s) of Place in a Global World
- 23 Urban Experimentation and the Role of Senses of Place
- 24 Domestic Matters
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
22 - Local Sense(s) of Place in a Global World
Towards a Normative Framework for Spatial Planners
from Part VII - Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2021
Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- 22 Local Sense(s) of Place in a Global World
- 23 Urban Experimentation and the Role of Senses of Place
- 24 Domestic Matters
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
In spatial planning, sense of place mostly entails singular, universal conceptualisations. This paper reflects on a case study of 22 purposively selected participants’ senses of place on the farm Kromdraai in Vredefort Dome World Heritage Site, South Africa in order to integrate pluralised senses of place into global policy principles for the purpose of spatial planning decision-making. A qualitative, transdisciplinary research approach was utilised to generate textual (interview) and visual data (photographs and collages) that were analysed using non-computerised thematic analysis. The research illustrates a shift away from singular universal conceptions towards the politicisation of senses of place in spatial planning by means of a democratic participatory process where power imbalances are minimised and that allowed senses of place to emerge spontaneously from the bottom-up, instead of imposing a preconceived framework in which senses of place are categorised or universalised. A flexible framework is suggested towards pluralising senses of place in spatial planning by using normative global principles in international policy.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Changing Senses of PlaceNavigating Global Challenges, pp. 287 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Beidler, K. J. and Morrison, J. M. (2016) ‘Sense of place: inquiry and application’, Journal of Urbanism, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2015.1056210Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Kyttä, M. (2018) ‘Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: toward integration or increased specialization?’, Applied Geography, vol. 95, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., Sanders, S. and Reed, P. (2018) ‘Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoning’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 177, pp. 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, M., Health, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003) Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design, Oxford, Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2013) Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners, London, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2017) ‘Thematic analysis’, Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Department of Land Affairs (1997) Rural Development Framework, Pretoria, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (2013) Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, Pretoria, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Erfani, G. (2020) ‘Sense of place as an investigative method for the evaluation of participatory urban redevelopment’, Cities, vol. 99, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102648Google Scholar
Fagerholm, N., Eilola, S., Kisanga, D., Arki, V. and Käyhkö, N. (2019) ‘Place-based landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1769–1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00847-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fainstein, S. S. and DeFilippis, J. (2016) Readings in Planning Theory, 4th ed., Chichester, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, M. L., Woolrich, R., Sixsmith, J., et al. (2016) ‘Place-making with older persons: establishing sense-of-place through participatory community mapping workshops’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 168, pp. 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.007Google Scholar
Fawcett, P. and Sturzaker, J. (2017) ‘Rediscovering place for social town planning’, Town and City Planning, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 196–199. Available at http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3001719 (accessed 10 February 2020).Google Scholar
Gifford, R. (2014) ‘Environmental psychology matters’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 65. no. 1, pp. 541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048Google Scholar
Hague, C. and Jenkins, P. (2005) Place Identity, Participation and Planning, Abingdon, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1988) Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880, New York, Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (2014) Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880, New York, Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Ward, C. (1999) Sociable Cities: The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard, Michigan, Wiley.Google Scholar
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W. and Smit, B. (2004) Finding Your Way in Qualitative Research, Pretoria, Van Schaiks.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2013) ‘Using participatory and visual methods to address power and identity in research with young people’, Graduate Journal of Social Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 132–151.Google Scholar
ISOCARP (2015) International Manual of Planning Practice, 6th ed., The Hague,International Society of City and Regional Planners.Google Scholar
Jivén, G. and Larkham, P. J. (2003) ‘Sense of place, authenticity and character: a commentary’, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480032000064773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudryavtsev, A. and Pavlodsky, J. (2012) ‘Description-based and experience-based decisions: individual analysis’, Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 316–331.Google Scholar
Laubscher, N., Hoffman, L., Drewes, E. and Nysschen, J. (2016) SPLUMA: A Practical Guide, Durban, LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Lewicka, M. (2011) ‘Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years?’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebenberg, L., Didkowsky, N. and Ungar, M. (2012) ‘Analysing image-based data using grounded theory: the Negotiating Resilience Project’, Visual Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2012.642958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. (1998) ‘Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design’, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, W. L. (2014) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th ed., Harlow, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Noy, C. (2008) ‘Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2015) ‘“Participatory” visual research revisited: a critical-constructive assessment of epistemological, methodological and social activist tenets’, Ethnography, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113505023Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramírez, I., García-Llorente, M., Benito, A. and Castro, A. J. (2019) ‘Exploring sense of place across cultivated lands through public participatory mapping’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1675–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00816-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punter, J. (1991) ‘Participation in the design of urban space’, Landscape Design, vol. 200, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
Puren, K., Drewes, E. and Roos, V. (2008) ‘A sense of place and spatial planning in the Vredefort Dome, South Africa’, South African Geographical Journal, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2008.9725320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puren, K., Roos, V. and Coetzee, H. (2018) ‘Sense of place: using people’s experiences in relation to a rural landscape to inform spatial planning guidelines’, International Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2017.1329087Google Scholar
Roos, V. and Redelinghuys, A. (2016) ‘Analyzing visual data with text from the Mmogo-method: experience of meaning during the third trimester of pregnancy’, in Roos, V. (ed.), Understanding Relational and Group Experiences Through the Mmogo-Method, Potchefstroom, Springer, pp. 119–138.Google Scholar
Smaldone, D., Harris, C. and Sanyal, N. (2005) ‘An exploration of place as a process: the case of Jackson Hole, WY’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.12.003Google Scholar
Soini, K., Vaarala, H. and Pouta, E. (2012) ‘Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, R. C. (2003) ‘Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place’, Society and Natural Resources, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309189Google Scholar
Steyn, J. (2015) Reforming Normative Planning: Essays on a Christian Approach to Planning, Orania, Prisca.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2020) ‘Vredefort Dome: UNESCO World Heritage Centre’[Online]. Available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1162/ (accessed 29 May 2020).Google Scholar
United Nations (2002) Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly: Strengthening the Mandate and Status of the Commission on Human Settlements and the Status, Role and Functions of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2008) Spatial Planning: Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition, Geneva, Economic Commission for Europe.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D. and Räthzel, N. (2009) ‘Transforming environmental psychology’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.005Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (2013) The Handbook of Visual Analysis, London, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Waters, J. (2015) ‘Snowball sampling: a cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.953316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by