Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:48:30.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Goal-directed fluid therapy

from Section 3 - Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Timothy E. Miller  and
Tong J. Gan
Edited by
Robert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting , pp. 110 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pearse, RM, Moreno, RP, Bauer, P, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012; 380[9847]: 1059–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, RM, Harrison, DA, James, P, et al. Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care. 2006; 10[3]: R81. Epub 2006/06/06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khuri, SF, Henderson, WG, DePalma, RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005; 242[3]: 326–41; discussion 41–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, WC, Appel, PL, Kram, HB, et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 1988; 94[6]: 1176–86. Epub 1988/12/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, WC, Montgomery, ES, Kaplan, E, et al. Physiologic patterns in surviving and nonsurviving shock patients. Use of sequential cardiorespiratory variables in defining criteria for therapeutic goals and early warning of death. Arch Surg. 1973; 106[5]: 630–6. Epub 1973/05/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, O, Grounds, RM, Bennett, ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA. 1993; 270[22]: 2699–707. Epub 1993/12/08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J, Woods, I, Fawcett, J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. 1999; 318[7191]: 1099–103. Epub 1999/04/24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polonen, P, Ruokonen, E, Hippelainen, M, et al. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90[5]: 1052–9. Epub 2000/04/27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobo, SM, Salgado, PF, Castillo, VG, et al. Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28[10]: 3396–404. Epub 2000/11/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jr.Connors, AF, Speroff, T, Dawson, NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996; 276[11]: 889–97. Epub 1996/09/18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellamy, MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97[6]: 755–7. Epub 2006/11/14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandstrup, B, Tonnesen, H, Beier-Holgersen, R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003; 238[5]: 641–8. Epub 2003/10/28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett-Guerrero, E, Welsby, I, Dunn, TJ, et al. The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999; 89[2]: 514–19. Epub 1999/08/10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton-Davies, C, Mythen, MG, Salmon, JB, et al. Comparison of commonly used clinical indicators of hypovolaemia with gastrointestinal tonometry. Intensive Care Med. 1997; 23[3]: 276–81. Epub 1997/03/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osman, D, Ridel, C, Ray, P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35[1]: 64–8. Epub 2006/11/03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marik, PE, Baram, M, Vahid, B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008; 134[1]: 172–8. Epub 2008/07/17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, JN, Allen, DR, Chant, AD. Non-invasive Doppler-derived cardiac output: a validation study comparing this technique with thermodilution and Fick methods. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991; 5[5]: 497–500. Epub 1991/10/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okrainec, A, Bergman, S, Demyttenaere, S, et al. Validation of esophageal Doppler for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring under pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21[8]: 1349–53. Epub 2007/01/20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafanechere, A, Albaladejo, P, Raux, M, et al. Cardiac output measurement during infrarenal aortic surgery: echo-esophageal Doppler versus thermodilution catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006; 20[1]: 26–30. Epub 2006/02/07.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chytra, I, Pradl, R, Bosman, R, et al. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007; 11[1]: R24. Epub 2007/02/23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, RM, Lum-Lung, M, Dixon, K, et al. A prospective study on esophageal Doppler hemodynamic assessment in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006; 24[6]: 658–63. Epub 2006/09/21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dark, PM, Singer, M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30[11]: 2060–6. Epub 2004/09/16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, DH, Mayall, R, Abdul-Latif, MS, et al. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57[9]: 845–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gan, TJ, Soppitt, A, Maroof, M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97[4]: 820–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakeling, HG, McFall, MR, Jenkins, CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95[5]: 634–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblett, SE, Snowden, CP, Shenton, BK, et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006; 93[9]: 1069–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senagore, AJ, Emery, T, Luchtefeld, M, et al. Fluid management for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective, randomized assessment of goal-directed administration of balanced salt solution or hetastarch coupled with an enhanced recovery program. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52[12]: 1935–40. Epub 2009/11/26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mythen, MG, Webb, AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg. 1995; 130[4]: 423–9. Epub 1995/04/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKendry, M, McGloin, H, Saberi, D, et al. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery.[Erratum appears in BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329[7463]:438]. BMJ. 2004; 329[7460]: 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S, James, S, Singer, M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997; 315[7113]: 909–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venn, R, Steele, A, Richardson, P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88[1]: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassen, K, Soop, M, Nygren, J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery [ERAS] Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009; 144[10]: 961–9. Epub 2009/10/21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esophageal Doppler ultrasound-based cardiac output monitoring for real-time therapeutic management of hospitalized patients: a review. Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Rochville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health & Human Services, 2007.Google Scholar
Mowatt, G, Houston, G, Hernandex, R Evidence review: Oesophageal Doppler monitoring in patients undergoing high-risk surgery and in critically ill patients. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, 2008; http://www.deltexmedical.com/downloads/CEPreport.pdf.Google Scholar
Marik, PE, Cavallazzi, R, Vasu, T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37[9]: 2642–7. Epub 2009/07/16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkenstadt, H, Margalit, N, Hadani, M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92[4]: 984–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michard, F. Long live dynamic parameters! Crit Care. 2014; 18[1]: 413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, J, Gruenewald, M, Quaden, R, et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37[2]: 650–8. Epub 2008/12/31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavernier, B, Robin, E. Assessment of fluid responsiveness during increased intra-abdominal pressure: keep the indices, but change the thresholds. Crit Care. 2011; 15[2]: 134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guinot, PG, de Broca, B, Bernard, E, et al. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112[4]: 660–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Squara, P, Denjean, D, Estagnasie, P, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring [NICOM]: a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33[7]: 1191–4. Epub 2007/04/27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raval, NY, Squara, P, Cleman, M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008; 22[2]: 113–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldron, NH, Miller, TE, Thacker, JK, et al. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2014; 118[5]: 966–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eeftinck Schattenkerk, DW, van Lieshout, JJ, van den Meiracker, AH, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am J Hypertens. 2009; 22[4]: 378–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broch, O, Renner, J, Gruenewald, M, et al. A comparison of the Nexfin[R] and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67[4]: 377–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forget, P, Lois, F, de Kock, M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111[4]: 910–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiess, BD, Patel, MA, Soltow, LO, et al. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001; 15[5]: 567–73. Epub 2001/11/01.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suttner, S, Schollhorn, T, Boldt, J, et al. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32[12]: 2053–8. Epub 2006/10/14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, TE, Scott, MJ. Enhanced recovery and the changing landscape of major abdominal surgery. Anesthesiol Clinics. 2015; 33[1]: xv–xvi.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greco, M, Capretti, G, Beretta, L, et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014; 38[6]: 1531–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandstrup, B, Svendsen, PE, Rasmussen, M, et al. Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome: near-maximal stroke volume or zero fluid balance? Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109[2]: 191–9. Epub 2012/06/20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasa, S, Taylor, MH, Singh, PP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colectomy. Br J Surg. 2013; 100[1]: 66–74. Epub 2012/11/08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pestana, D, Espinosa, E, Eden, A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS Study [PeriOperative goal-directed thErapy in Major Abdominal Surgery]. Anesth Analg. 2014; 119[3]: 579–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, RM, Harrison, DA, MacDonald, N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014; 311[21]: 2181–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minto, G, Struthers, R. Stroke volume optimisation: is the fairy tale over? Anaesthesia. 2014; 69[4]: 291–6. Epub 2014/03/20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grocott, MP, Dushianthan, A, Hamilton, MA, et al. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111[4]: 535–48. Epub 2013/05/11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roger, C, Muller, L, Deras, P, et al. Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112[6]: 1015–23. Epub 2013/12/03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2: CD000567.Google Scholar
Yates, DR, Davies, SJ, Milner, HE, et al. Crystalloid or colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112[2]: 281–9. Epub 2013/09/24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brienza, N, Giglio, MT, Marucci, M, et al. Does perioperative hemodynamic optimization protect renal function in surgical patients? A meta-analytic study. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37[6]: 2079–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giglio, MT, Marucci, M, Testini, M, et al. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103[5]: 637–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×