Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Introduction. The Unfoldment of the Cold War in the 1950s
- 1 The Ideological Construction of the Cold War in the 1950s
- 2 Faith, Dominion, and Managerialism: The Particularistic Markers of the Notion of American Exceptionalism in the 1950s
- 3 Communism, Eurasianism, and Despotism: The Markers of Soviet Foreign Policy in the 1950s
- 4 The Unidirectionality of History and Improving the World: Universalism in the Notion of American Exceptionalism
- 5 The Unidirectionality of History and Improving the World: Universalism in the Notion of American Exceptionalism
- 6 Centralization of Power and the Mastery of the International Order
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction. The Unfoldment of the Cold War in the 1950s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Introduction. The Unfoldment of the Cold War in the 1950s
- 1 The Ideological Construction of the Cold War in the 1950s
- 2 Faith, Dominion, and Managerialism: The Particularistic Markers of the Notion of American Exceptionalism in the 1950s
- 3 Communism, Eurasianism, and Despotism: The Markers of Soviet Foreign Policy in the 1950s
- 4 The Unidirectionality of History and Improving the World: Universalism in the Notion of American Exceptionalism
- 5 The Unidirectionality of History and Improving the World: Universalism in the Notion of American Exceptionalism
- 6 Centralization of Power and the Mastery of the International Order
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The National Interest and the Geopolitical Dimension
The more that the national interest is rooted in a geopolitical dimension the more likely it is that it will manifest in powerful ways. Isolationism is not a viable option for countries that seek to instill a narrative of greatness at home and abroad. A retreat away from the responsibility to manage the international order is likely to create the conditions for other powers to arise and erode that sense of greatness. The great powers do not have interests that revolve around economic reasons. They are glory seekers, in the words of Italian geopolitician Dario Fabbri.
The way that this manifested in the 1950s was ref lected in the impact that American Exceptionalism and Eurasianism had on creating an indelible mark on the international order. The expansion of American Exceptionalism and Eurasianism was undertaken in the context of changing the complexion of the area of inf luence with whom they shared cultural commonalities. American Exceptionalism profoundly altered the notion of Europeanness, which was imbued with the values of the modern world, namely liberalism. Something similar can be said about the Soviet Union and Eurasianism, in regard to the forms of organization adopted in the Eastern bloc.
The geopolitical dimension is the main way in which prominent states can accomplish their national interest due to the way in which culture and space interact. During the initial period of the Cold War, the interaction between the United States and the Soviet Union demarcated the geostrategic spaces that would enable them to fulfill their most vital interests. The geopolitical perspective explains why the divergence of interests between the superpowers did not result in overt military conflict. The United States and the Soviet Union were not motivated by the same interests. The United States had an expansive approach regarding the management of the international order, which translated into the handling of a common geopolitical space in areas of the world with cultural affinity and complementary economic interest. For the Soviet Union, the main interest was to maintain the vitality of the Communist system at home and to expand that ideology in a careful manner.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cold War in the 1950s , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2024