Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:15:28.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Drossos Stamboulakis
Drossos Stamboulakis
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Recognition and Enforcement
Foreign Judgments and Awards
 , pp. 265 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Administration of Justice Act 1920 (UK).Google Scholar
(France), 29 February 2012, 11-40.101, Inédit Case No.Google Scholar
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Tremblay (US 19 February 1912).Google Scholar
Case C-7/98 Dieter Krombach v. André Bamberski [2000] ECR.Google Scholar
Case C-45/13 Andreas Kainz v. Pantherwerke AG [2014].Google Scholar
Case C‑70/15 Emmanuel Lebek v. Janusz Domino.Google Scholar
Case C-116/02 Erich Gasser GmbH v. MISAT Srl ECR I-14693.Google Scholar
Case C‑559/14 Rūdolfs Meroni v. Recoletos Limited.Google Scholar
Chromalloy Aeroservices v. The Arab Republic of Egypt 939 F Supp 907 (District Court of Columbia) (District Court 1996).Google Scholar
Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (UK).Google Scholar
First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba 406 US 759 (1972).Google Scholar
Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 (UK).Google Scholar
Godard v. Gray (1870) LR 6 QB 139.Google Scholar
Hilton v. Guyot 159 US 113 (1895).Google Scholar
Mast, Foos & Company v. Stover Manufacturing Company 177 US 485 (1900).Google Scholar
Owens Bank Ltd v. Fulvio Bracco and Bracco Industria Chimica SpA (Case 129/92) [1994] ECR.Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) (2012).Google Scholar
RM Investments & Trading Co v. Boeing Co Supreme Court.Google Scholar
Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (entered into force on 15 July 1955) (US).Google Scholar
UNCITRAL UNCITRAL Secretariat Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (2016).Google Scholar
United States Constitution (US).Google Scholar
American Bar Association, ‘General Information Form 109A: Report’ (11 December 1992).Google Scholar
Borrás, A, Neophytou, I and Pocar, F, ‘13th Report on National Case Law Relating to the Lugano Convention’ (May 2012).Google Scholar
Brand, R, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments’ (International Litigation Guide, April 2012), International Litigation Guide.Google Scholar
California Law Revision Commission, ‘Recognition of Tribal and Foreign Court Money Judgments (Changes to Uniform Act in Other States)’ (17 July 2015).Google Scholar
Dickinson, A, ‘The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast) (“Brussels I Bis” Regulation)’ (Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, 20 September 2011), Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Green Paper on the Review of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (Green Paper COM(2009) 175 Final, 21 April 2009), Green Paper COM(2009) 175 final.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘A New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council’ (COM (2014) 158 final, 11 March 2014), COM(2014) 158 final.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (COM(1999) 348 final, 14 July 1999), COM(1999) 348 final.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (COM(2010) 748 final, 14 December 2010), COM(2010) 748 final.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Towards Greater Efficiency in Obtaining and Enforcing Judgments in the European Union’ (COM(1997) 609 FINAL; OJ [1998] C33/3, no date), COM(1997) 609 FINAL; OJ [1998] C33/3.Google Scholar
European Parliament, ‘European Parliament Resolution of 8 September 2015 on the Situation of Fundamental Rights in the European Union (2013-2014)’ (2014/2254 (INI), 8 September 2015), 2014/2254 (INI).Google Scholar
European Parliament, ‘Report on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast)’ (COM (2010) 748, 15 October 2012), COM(2010) 748.Google Scholar
Getman-Pavlova, I, ‘The Concept of “Comity” in Ulrich Huber’s Conflict Doctrine’ (Working Paper, 2013), Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gleeson, M, ‘The Influence of the Privy Council on Australia’ (Speech delivered at the Anglo-Australasian Lawyers Society, 31 May 2007), Speech delivered at the Anglo-Australasian Lawyers Society.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘17th Session: Final Act’ (29 May 1993).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Conclusions and Recommendations Adopted by the Council’ (Council on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference, 20 April 2012), Council on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Conclusions of the Special Commission of June 1992 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference’ (Preliminary Document, August 1992), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Interim Text: Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference 6–20 June 2001’ (Diplomatic Conference (6–20 June 2001), COMMISSION II: Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 2001), Diplomatic Conference (6–20 June 2001).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (Preliminary Document, August 2000), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Conclusions of the Working Group Meeting on Enforcement of Judgments’ (Preliminary Document, November 1992), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Explanatory Note Providing Background on the Proposed Draft Text and Identifying Outstanding Issues’ (Preliminary Document, April 2016), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Judgments Convention: Revised Preliminary Explanatory Report’ (Preliminary Document, May 2018), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Report of the Fifth Meeting of the Working Group on the Judgments Project (26–31 October 2015) and Proposed Draft Text Resulting from the Meeting’ (Preliminary Document, November 2015), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Some Reflections of the Permanent Bureau on a General Convention on Enforcement of Judgments’ (Preliminary Document, May 1992), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Statement of the 2005 Convention Working Group Drafters (Adopted by the Diplomatic Session)’ (no date).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of June 1997 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (Preliminary Document, November 1997), Preliminary Document.Google Scholar
Hartley, T and Dogauchi, M, ‘Explanatory Report on the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements’ (Explanatory Report, 2007), Explanatory Report.Google Scholar
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, ‘The Jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’ (Jurisdiction map, no date), Jurisdiction map.Google Scholar
Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (Lord Thomas), ‘Developing Commercial Law through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship between the Courts and Arbitration’ (The Bailii Lecture 2016, 9 March 2016), The Bailii Lecture 2016.Google Scholar
Nygh, P and Pocar, F, ‘Report by Peter Nygh & Fausto Pocar (Annexed to the 1999 Preliminary Draft Convention)’ (Report, August 2000), Report.Google Scholar
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, ‘Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (with Amendments as Adopted in 2006)’ (1985).Google Scholar
Waibel, M, ‘Principles of Treaty Interpretation: Developed for and Applied by National Courts?’ (University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper, 17 April 2015), University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper.Google Scholar
‘The Gradual Establishment of an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (Summary of EU Legislation (available on EUR-Lex), no date), Summary of EU Legislation (available on EUR-Lex).Google Scholar
Bennett, D, ‘The Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A Failure of Characterisation’ in Einhorn, T and Siehr, K (eds.), Intercontinental Cooperation through Private International Law: Essays in Memory of Peter E. Nygh (TMC Asser Press 2004).Google Scholar
van den Berg, AJ (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (ICCA Congress Series 14, Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Van den Berg, AJ, ‘Hypothetical Draft Convention on the International Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: Explanatory Note’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (ICCA Congress Series 14, 321st ed., Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Van den Berg, AJ, ‘Striving for Uniform Interpretation’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention: Experience and Prospects (United Nations 1999).Google Scholar
Van den Berg, AJ, ‘When Is an Arbitration Agreement in Writing Valid under Article II(2) of the New York Convention of 1958?’ in Sanders, P (ed.), Piet Sanders: een honderdjarige vernieuwer (Boom Juridische Uitgevers 2012).Google Scholar
Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Blackaby, N, Partasides, C, Redfern, A and Hunter, M, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th ed., Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Bockstiegel, K-H, ‘Summary of Discussion in the Third Working Group’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 years of Application of the New York Convention (KluwerArbitration, Kluwer Law International 1999).Google Scholar
Born, G, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts: Commentary and Materials (Kluwer Law International 1996).Google Scholar
Born, G, International Commercial Arbitration (KluwerArbitration, Third edition, Kluwer Law International BV 2020).Google Scholar
Brand, RA and Herrup, P, The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Commentary and Documents (Cambridge University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Briggs, A, Agreements on Jurisdiction and Choice of Law (Oxford Private International Law Series 2008).Google Scholar
Briggs, A, Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (6th ed., Informa Law from Routledge 2015).Google Scholar
Brydie-Watson, W, ‘The Three Sisters of Private International Law: An Increasingly Co-Operative Family Rather than Sibling Rivals’ in John, T, Gulati, R and Koehler, B (eds.), The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law (Elgar Companions to International Organisations series, Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).Google Scholar
Caffrey, B, International Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the LAWASIA Region: A Comparative Study of the Laws of Eleven Asian Countries Inter-Se and with the E.E.C. Countries (CCH Australia 1985).Google Scholar
van Calster, G, European Private International Law (2nd ed., Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Campbell, D (ed.), Enforcement of Foreign Judgements (LLP Professional Publishing 1997).Google Scholar
Chang, T, ‘Celebrating the Fiftieth Anniversary of the New York Convention’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (ICCA Congress Series 14, Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Cope, K, ‘Reconceptualizing Recognition Uniformity’ in Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Davies, M, Bell, A and Brereton, P, Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia (9th ed., LexisNexis Butterworths 2014).Google Scholar
Davies, M, Bell, A, Brereton, PLG and Douglas, M, Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed., LexisNexis Butterworths 2019).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y and Garth, BG, Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Language and legal discourse, University of Chicago Press 1996).Google Scholar
Dicey, AV and Morris, JHC, Dicey’s Conflict of Laws (6th ed., Stevens 1949).Google Scholar
Dickinson, A, ‘What, If Anything, Can Australia Learn from the EU Experience?’ in Dickinson, A, Keyes, M and John, T (eds.), Australian Private International Law for the 21st Century: Facing Outwards (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Dickinson, A and Lein, E (eds.), The Brussels I Regulation Recast (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Dodge, W, ‘The Penal and Revenue Rules, State Law, and Federal Preemption’ in Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Fauvarque-Cosson, B, ‘European Contract Law Through and beyond Pluralism: The Case of an Optional Instrument’ in Niglia, L (ed.), Pluralism and European Private Law (Hart Publishing 2013).Google Scholar
Fawcett, J, North, P and Carruthers, J, Cheshire, North & Fawcett: Private International Law (14th ed., Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G, Comparative Law as Critique (Elgar studies in legal theory, Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Gaillard, E, ‘Comment: The Urgency of Not Revising the New York Convention’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (ICCA Congress Series 14, Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Gaillard, E, ‘Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin: The French Experience’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (KluwerArbitration, Kluwer Law International 1999).Google Scholar
Giardina, A, ‘The Practical Application of Multilateral Convention’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (KluwerArbitration, Kluwer Law International 2011).Google Scholar
Graziadei, M, ‘Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions’ in Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Greenberg, S, Kee, C and Weeramantry, JR, International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia-Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Halliday, T and Block-Lieb, S, ‘Settling and Concordance: Two Cases in Global Commercial Law’ in Shaffer, G and Halliday, T (eds.), Transnational Legal Orders (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society, Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Hamilton, V and Briner, R, ‘The Genesis and General Purpose of The New York Convention’ in Gaillard, E, Di Pietro, D and N Leleu-Knobil, (eds.), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2008).Google Scholar
Hans, VL, ‘The Hague Conference on Private International Law: Current Problems and Perspectives’ in Cursos de derecho internacional de Vitoria Gasteiz (Courses on International Law and International Relations at Vitoria-Gasteiz) (Universidad del País Vasco (University of the Basque Country) 1983) vol 3.Google Scholar
Hartley, T, ‘The European Court, the Brussels Convention/Regulation and the Establishment of an Efficient System for International Litigation in Europe’ in Arnull, A, Eeckhout, P and Tridimas, T (eds.), Continuity and Change in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
von Hein, J, ‘The Role of the HCCH in Shaping Private International Law’ in John, T, Gulati, R and Koehler, B (eds.), The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law (Elgar Companions to International Organisations series, Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).Google Scholar
Huang, J, Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: Lessons for China from US and EU Law (Bloomsbury Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O, The Growth of Internationalism in English Private International Law (1960).Google Scholar
Kaplan, N, ‘New Developments on Written Form’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention: Experience and Prospects (United Nations 1999).Google Scholar
Karrer, PA, Introduction to International Arbitration Practice: 1001 Questions and Answers (Kluwer Law International 2014).Google Scholar
Lamm, C, ‘Comments on the Proposal to Amend the New York Convention’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (ICCA Congress Series 14, Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Lew, JDM, Mistelis, LA and Kröll, S, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2003).Google Scholar
Lewison, K, The Interpretation of Contracts (6th ed., Sweet & Maxwell 2015).Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, EA and Silberman, LJ, The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (JurisNet, LLC 2001).Google Scholar
Lutz, RE, A Lawyer’s Handbook for Enforcing Foreign Judgments in the United States and Abroad (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
MacCormick, N and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study ([Applied legal philosophy], Aldershot 1997).Google Scholar
Magnus, U and Mankowski, P (eds.), Brussels I Regulation (2nd ed., Sellier European Law Publishers 2007).Google Scholar
Maurer, AG, Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention: History, Interpretation, and Application (Revised, Juris Publishing, Inc 2013).Google Scholar
Maxeiner, J, Failures of American Civil Justice in International Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar
McEvoy, T, ‘Common Law versus Statutory Approaches to Enforcing Foreign Judgments: The Australian Experience’ in Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Von Mehren, A and Gottschalk, E, Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law (The Hague Academy of International Law Monographs 5, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007).Google Scholar
Melis, W, ‘Considering the Advisability of Preparing an Addition Convention, Complementary to the New York Convention’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention: Experience and Prospects (United Nations 1999).Google Scholar
Merryman, JH and Pérez-Perdomo, R, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (Stanford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘“One Size Can Fit All” – On the Mass Production of Legal Transplants’ in Frankenberg, G (ed.), Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture (Studies in comparative law and legal culture series, Edward Elgar Publishing 2013).Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments’ [2009] Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law.Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘Some Fundamental Jurisdictional Conceptions as Applied in Judgment Conventions’ in Gottschalk, E (ed.), Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Mills, A, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Mortensen, R, Garnett, R and Keyes, M, Private International Law in Australia (3rd ed., LexisNexis Butterworths 2015).Google Scholar
Muir Watt, H, ‘New Perspectives for Jurisdiction and Judgments within Europe: A Critical View’ in Barcelo, J and Clermont, KM (eds.), A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgement: Lessons from Hague (1st ed., Kluwer Law International 2002).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, K, ‘Jurisdictionally Improper Fora in Treaties on Recognition of Judgments: The Common Market Draft’ in Nadelmann, K (ed.), Conflicts of Law: International And Interstate: Selected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1972).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, K, ‘The United States Join the Hague Conference on Private International Law’ in Nadelmann, K (ed.), Conflicts of Law: International and Interstate: Selected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1972).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, K, ‘Uniform Legislation versus International Conventions as a Method of Unification of Private International Law’ in Nadelmann, K (ed.), Conflicts of Law: International and Interstate: Selected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1972).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, K, ‘Uniform Legislation Versus International Conventions Revisited’ in Nadelmann, K (ed.), Conflicts of Law: International and Interstate: Selected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1972).Google Scholar
Oppong, RF, Private International Law in Commonwealth Africa (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Paulsson, J, ‘Awards Set Aside at the Place of Arbitration’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention: Experience and Prospects (United Nations 1999).Google Scholar
Paulsson, J, ‘The New York Convention in International Practice: Problems of Assimilation’ in Blessing, M (ed.), The New York Convention of 1958 (ASA Special Series 9, 1996).Google Scholar
Paulsson, M, The 1958 New York Convention in Action (Wolters Kluwer 2016).Google Scholar
Phillip, A, ‘The Global Hague Judgments Convention’ in Einhorn, T and Siehr, K (eds.), Intercontinental Cooperation through Private International Law: Essays in Memory of Peter E Nygh (TMC Asser Press 2004).Google Scholar
Platto, C, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Worldwide (Graham & Trotman 1993).Google Scholar
Polinsky, AM and Shavell, S, Handbook of Law and Economics (Elsevier 2007).Google Scholar
Poser, NS, Lord Mansfield: Justice in the Age of Reason (McGill-Queen’s University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Reed, L, ‘Experience of Practical Problems of Enforcement’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (KluwerArbitration, Kluwer Law International 2011).Google Scholar
Rossouw, M, The Harmonisation of Rules on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Southern African Customs Union (Pretoria University Law Press 2016).Google Scholar
Rubens, N, ‘Group of Companies Doctrine and the New York Convention’ in Gaillard, E and Di Pietro, D (eds.), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (1st ed., Cameron May 2008).Google Scholar
Sanders, P, ‘The Making of the Convention’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention: Experience and Prospects (United Nations 1999).Google Scholar
Sbolci, L, ‘Supplementary Means of Interpretation’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed.), The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Secretariat, C, 1999 Meeting of Commonwealth Law Ministers and Senior Officials: Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 3–7 May 1999: Memoranda (Commonwealth Secretariat 2001).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G, ‘Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change’ in Shaffer, G (ed.), Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society, Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Silberman, LJ, ‘The Need for a Federal Statutory Approach to the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Country Judgments’ in Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Sloss, D, The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Spiegelberger, W, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russia (Juris Publishing, Inc 2014).Google Scholar
Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Stephan, PB, ‘Introduction: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments’ in Stephan, PB (ed.), Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System (Brill 2014).Google Scholar
Stone, P, EU Private International Law (Elgar European law series, Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Story, J, Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws: Foreign and Domestic, in Regard to Contracts, Rights, and Remedies, and Especially in Regard to Marriages, Divorces, Wills, Successions, and Judgments (8th ed., Lawbook Exchange (2007 Reprint) 1887).Google Scholar
Thiele, C, ‘The Hague Convention on Choice-of-Court Agreements: Was It Worth the Effort?’ in E Gottschalk, R Michaels, G Rühl, and von Hein, J (eds.), Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Twining, W, ‘Globalisation and Comparative Law’ (Hart 2007).Google Scholar
Wagner, G, ‘Dispute Resolution as a Product: Competition between Civil Justice Systems’ in Eidenmüller, H (ed.), Regulatory Competition in Contract Law and Dispute Resolution (First ed., Hart Publishing 2013).Google Scholar
Whytock, C, ‘Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Governance, Rights, and the Market for Dispute Resolution Services’ in Micklitz, H-W and Wechsler, A (eds.), The Transformation of Enforcement: European Economic Law in Global Perspective (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Yekini, A, The Hague Judgments Convention and Commonwealth Model Law: A Pragmatic Perspective (Hart Publishing 2021).Google Scholar
Zweigert, K and Kötz, H, An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., Clarendon Press 1998).Google Scholar
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: General Theory and the Role of Jurisdictional Requirements (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1981).Google Scholar
Alférez, FJG, ‘Regulatory Competition: A Private International Law Approach’ (1999) 8 European Journal of Law and Economics 251.Google Scholar
Allsop, J, ‘Comity and Commerce (Address to the 16th Conference of Chief Justices of Asia & the Pacific)’ [2015] Federal Judicial Scholarship 27.Google Scholar
Arvind, TT, ‘The “Transplant Effect” in Harmonization’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65.Google Scholar
Bailey, D, ‘International Commercial Arbitration: A Critique’ (2015) 43 Australian Business Law Review 344.Google Scholar
Basedow, J, ‘The Hague Conference and the Future of Private International Law: A Jubilee Speech’ (2018) 82 Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law 922.Google Scholar
Beaumont, P, ‘United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention’ (1998) 24 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 75.Google Scholar
Beaumont, P, ‘Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention 2005 Hague: Background, Negotiations, Analysis and Current Status’ [2009] Journal of Private International Law 125.Google Scholar
Beaumont, P, ‘Some Reflections on the Way Ahead for UK Private International Law after Brexit’ (2021) 17 Journal of Private International Law 1.Google Scholar
Beaumont, P, ‘The Revived Judgments Project in The Hague’ (2014) 4 Nederlands internationaal privaatrecht 532.Google Scholar
Beaumont, PR, ‘Judgments Convention: Application to Governments’ [2020] Netherlands International Law Review.Google Scholar
Bellinger, J and Anderson, R, ‘Tort Tourism: The Case for a Federal Law on Foreign Judgment Recognition’ (2014) 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 501.Google Scholar
Bermann, GA, ‘Provisional Relief in Transnational Litigation’ (1997) 35 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 553.Google Scholar
Binder, C, ‘Stability and Change in Times of Fragmentation: The Limits of Pacta Sunt Servanda Revisited’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 909.Google Scholar
Bookman, P, ‘The Adjudication Business’ (2019) 45 Yale Journal of International Law 227.Google Scholar
Brand, O, ‘Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies’ (2007) 32 Brooklyn Journal of International Law.Google Scholar
Brand, RA, ‘Jurisdiction and Judgments Recognition at the Hague Conference: Choices Made, Treaties Completed, and the Path Ahead’ [2020] Netherlands International Law Review.Google Scholar
Brand, RA, ‘Jurisdictional Developments and the New Hague Judgments Project’ [2013] A chapter in, ‘A Commitment To Private International Law: Essays In Honor of Hans Van Loon’, Intersentia, 2013 University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No 2013-19.Google Scholar
Brand, RA, ‘Understanding Judgments Recognition’ (2015) 40 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 877.Google Scholar
Calamita, NJ, ‘Rethinking Comity: Towards a Coherent Treatment of International Parallel Proceedings’ (2006) 27 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 601.Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf-Peter, ‘Value-Added Norms, Local Litigation, and Global Enforcement: Why the Brussels-Philosophy Failed in The Hague’ (2004) 05 German Law Journal 1489.Google Scholar
Carrington, PD, ‘Regulating Dispute Resolution Provisions in Adhesion Contracts Statute’ (1998) 35 Harv J on Legis 225.Google Scholar
Childress, DE, ‘Comity as Conflict: Resituating International Comity as Conflict of Laws’ (2010–11) 44 UC Davis Law Review 11.Google Scholar
Clermont, K, ‘Res Judicata as Requisite for Justice’ (2016) 68 Rutgers University Law Review 1067.Google Scholar
Clermont, K and Palmer, J, ‘Exorbitant Jurisdiction’ (2006) 58 Maine Law Review 474.Google Scholar
Clopton, Z, ‘Transnational Class Actions in the Shadow of Preclusion’ (2015) 90 Indiana Law Journal 1387.Google Scholar
Cooter, R, Marks, S, and Mnookin, R, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior’ [1982] Journal of Legal Studies 225.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R, ‘What Is Transnational Law?’ (2012) 37 Law & Social Inquiry 500.Google Scholar
Coyle, J, ‘Rethinking Judgements Reciprocity’ (2014) 92 North Carolina Law Review 1109.Google Scholar
Craig, WL, ‘Some Trends and Developments in the Laws and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration’ (2016) 50 Texas International Law Journal 699.Google Scholar
Devenish, P, ‘Enforcement in England and Wales of Arbitral Awards Set Aside in Their Country of Origin’ (2018) 18 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 143.Google Scholar
Dore, L, ‘Public Courts versus Private Justice: It’s Time to Let Some Sun Shine in on Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2006) 81 Chicago-Kent Law Review 463.Google Scholar
Drahozal, CR, ‘Why Arbitrate? Substantive versus Procedural Theories of Private Judging’ (2011) 22 American Review of International Arbitration 163.Google Scholar
Dubinsky, PR, ‘Adventures in Treaty Interpretation (Book Review)’ (2009) 57 The American Journal of Comparative Law 745.Google Scholar
Elbalti, B, ‘Reciprocity and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A Lot of Bark but Not Much Bite’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 184.Google Scholar
Faria, JAE, ‘Globalisation, Legal Identity and Regional Integration: Complementarity or Conflict?’ (2013) 18 Uniform Law Review 435.Google Scholar
Feldman, A, ‘Rethinking Review of Foreign Court Jurisdiction in Light of the Hague Judgments Negotiations’ (2014) 89 New York University Law Review 2190.Google Scholar
Fox, H, ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law’ (1985) 26 Harvard International Law Journal 411.Google Scholar
Fox, H, ‘State Immunity and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Do We Need an UNCITRAL Model Law Mark II for Execution against State Property?’ (1996) 12 Arbitration International 89.Google Scholar
Fullerton, M, ‘Enforcing Judgments Abroad: The Global Challenge: Introduction’ (1998) 24 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Garcimartín, F, ‘The Judgments Convention: Some Open Questions’ (2020) 67 Netherlands International Law Review 19.Google Scholar
Garcimartín, F and Saumier, G, ‘Explanatory Report on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’ [2020].Google Scholar
Garnett, R, ‘Internationalism in New Zealand Conflict of Laws’ (2021) 17 Journal of Private International Law 380.Google Scholar
Garnett, R, ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Magnum Opus or Much Ado About Nothing?’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 161.Google Scholar
Garnett, R, ‘Increasing Co-Operation between Australia and China in the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments’ (2018) 19 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Garnett, R, ‘The Judgments Project: Fulfilling Assers Dream of Free-Flowing Judgments’ [2020] The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law.Google Scholar
Garnett, R and Pryles, M, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards under the New York Convention in Australia and New Zealand’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 899.Google Scholar
Garro, AM, ‘Unification and Harmonization of Private Law in Latin America’ (1992) 40 The American Journal of Comparative Law 587.Google Scholar
Gillies, P, ‘Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards: The New York Convention’ (2004) 9 International Trade and Business Law Review 19.Google Scholar
Goddard, D, ‘The Judgments Convention: The Current State of Play’ (2019) 29 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 473.Google Scholar
Golomb, A, ‘Recognition of Foreign Money Judgments: A Goal-Oriented Approach’ (1969) 43 St John’s Law Review 604.Google Scholar
Hackney, P, ‘Is the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods Achieving Uniformity? Comment’ (2000–1) 61 Louisiana Law Review 473.Google Scholar
Hill, J, ‘The Exercise of Judicial Discretion in Relation to Applications to Enforce Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention 1958’ (2016) 36 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 304.Google Scholar
Ho, HL, ‘Policies Underlying the Enforcement of Foreign Commercial Judgments’ (1997) 46 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 443.Google Scholar
Huang, J, ‘Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: Lessons for China from US and EU Laws’ (2010) 6 Journal of Private International Law 109.Google Scholar
Hwang, M, ‘Commercial Courts and International Arbitration: Competitors or Partners?’ (2015) 31 Arbitration International 193.Google Scholar
Jenard, P, ‘Report on the Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters of 27 September 1968’ (1979) No C59/1 Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Kaplan, N, ‘Arbitration in Asia: Developments and Crises: Part 1’ (2002) 19 Journal of International Arbitration 163.Google Scholar
Kaplan, N, ‘Arbitration in Asia: Developments and Crises: Part 2’ (2002) 19 Journal of International Arbitration 245.Google Scholar
Khanna, D, ‘Dallah: The Supreme Court’s Positively Pro-Arbitration No to Enforcement’ (2011) 28 Journal of International Arbitration 127.Google Scholar
Kinsch, P, ‘Enforcement as a Fundamental Right’ (2014) 32 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 540.Google Scholar
Koh, H, ‘Transnational Legal Process’ (1996) 75 Nebraska Law Review 181.Google Scholar
Kojovic, T, ‘Court Enforcement of Arbitral Decisions on Provisional Relief-How Final is Provisional?’ (2001) 18 Journal of International Arbitration 511.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R, ‘Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability’ (2003) 70 The University of Chicago Law Review 1203.Google Scholar
Kramer, XE, ‘Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: Effecting and Protecting Rights in the European Judicial Area’ (2011) 4 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 633.Google Scholar
Kramer, XE, ‘Cross-Border Enforcement and the Brussels I-Bis Regulation: Towards a New Balance between Mutual Trust and National Control over Fundamental Rights’ (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 343.Google Scholar
Kramer, XE, ‘Cross-Border Enforcement in the EU: Mutual Trust Versus Fair Trial? Towards Principles of European Civil Procedure’ (2011) 2 International Journal of Procedural Law 202.Google Scholar
Kwok, D, ‘Pro-Enforcement Bias by Hong Kong Courts: The Use of Indemnity Costs’ (2015) 32 Journal of International Arbitration 677.Google Scholar
Lee, S, ‘The Equitable Jurisdiction to Enforce Foreign Judgments’ (2020) 39 University of Queensland Law Journal 313.Google Scholar
Legrand, P, ‘European Legal Systems Are Not Converging’ (1996) 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K, ‘The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 1625.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, E, ‘Huber’s De Conflictu Legum’ (1919) 13 Illinois Law Review 375.Google Scholar
Maier, HG, ‘Hague Conference Judgments Convention and United States Courts: A Problem and a Possibility, A’ (1997–98) 61 Albany Law Review 1207.Google Scholar
Maloy, RHM and Nisi, DM, ‘Message to the Supreme Court: The Next Time You Get a Chance, Please Look at Hilton v. Guyot; We Think It Needs Repairing’ (1999) 5 Journal of International Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar
Martinez, JC, ‘Recognizing and Enforcing Foreign Nation Judgments: The United States and Europe Compared and Contrasted – A Call for Revised Legislation in Florida’ (1995) 4 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 49.Google Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘International Litigation and the Reworking of the Conflict of Laws’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 580.Google Scholar
von Mehren, A, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Approach for the Hague Conference?’ (1994) 57 Law and Contemporary Problems 271.Google Scholar
von Mehren, AT, ‘Drafting a Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable World-Wide: Can the Hague Conference Project Succeed?’ (2001) 49 The American Journal of Comparative Law 191.Google Scholar
Menon, S, ‘The Transnational Protection of Private Rights: Issues, Challenges, and Possible Solutions’ (2015) 5 Asian Journal of International Law 219.Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘The Second Wave of Comparative Law and Economics?’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 197.Google Scholar
Mills, A, ‘The “Hague Choice of Court Convention” and Cross-Border Commercial Dispute Resolution in Australia and the Asia-Pacific’ (2017) 18 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, K, ‘Multilateral Conventions in the Conflicts Field: An Historical Sketch’ (1972) 19 Netherlands International Law Review 107.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, KH and Reese, WLM, ‘The American Proposal at the Hague Conference on Private International Law to Use the Method of Uniform Laws’ (1958) 7 The American Journal of Comparative Law 239.Google Scholar
Nygh, P, ‘Towards a Global Judgments Convention: The Proposed New Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (1997) 7 Australian International Law Journal 96.Google Scholar
Oestreicher, Y, ‘The Rise and Fall of the “Mixed” and “Double” Convention Models Regarding Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments’ (2007) 6 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 339.Google Scholar
Paige, B, ‘Foreign Judgments in American and English Courts: A Comparative Analysis’ (2003) 26 Seattle University Law Review 591.Google Scholar
Paul, J, ‘The Transformation of International Comity’ (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 19.Google Scholar
Paulsson, M, ‘The 1958 New York Convention from an Unusual Perspective: Moving Forward by Parting with It’ (2017) 5 Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 21.Google Scholar
Perez, A, ‘The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate between Private and Public Law Solutions’ (2001) 19 Berkeley Journal of International Law 44.Google Scholar
Pertegás, M and Marshall, B, ‘Party Autonomy and Its Limits: Convergence through the New Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2014) 39 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 975.Google Scholar
Petsche, MA, ‘Punitive Damages in International Commercial Arbitration: Much Ado about Nothing?’ (2013) 29 Arbitration International 89.Google Scholar
Pham, K, ‘Enforcement of Non-Monetary Foreign Judgments in Australia’ (2008) 30 Sydney Law Review, The 663.Google Scholar
Pitel, SGA, ‘Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)’ (2007) 3 Journal of Private International Law 241.Google Scholar
Quilling, M, ‘The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Country Judgments and Arbitral Awards: A North-South Perspective’ (1981) 11 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 635.Google Scholar
Rana, R, ‘The Enforceability Of Awards Set Aside at the Seat: An Asian and European Perspective’ (2017) 40 Fordham International Law Journal 813.Google Scholar
Reyes, A, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Interlocutory and Final Judgments of the Singapore International Commercial Court’ (2015) 2 Journal of International and Comparative Law 337.Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Bidaoui, J, ‘The International Obligation of the Uniform and Autonomous Interpretation of Private Law Conventions: Consequences for Domestic Courts and International Organisations’ (2020) 67 Netherlands International Law Review 139.Google Scholar
Rödl, F, ‘Private Law beyond the Democratic Order? On the Legitimatory Problem of Private Law “Beyond the State”’ (2008) 56 The American Journal of Comparative Law 743.Google Scholar
Roodt, C, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Still a Hobson’s Choice among Competing Theories?’ (2005) 38 The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 15.Google Scholar
Saumier, G, ‘Submission as a Jurisdictional Basis and the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’ (2020) 67 Netherlands International Law Review 49.Google Scholar
Secretariat, P, ‘Commonwealth Practice in the Recognition of Foreign Judgments’ (2009) 35 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 345.Google Scholar
Shill, G, ‘Ending Judgment Arbitrage: Jurisdictional Competition and the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States’ (2013) 54 Harvard International Law Journal 459.Google Scholar
Spiegelberger, W, ‘The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russia: An Analysis of the Relevant Treaties, Laws and Cases’ (2005) 16 American Review of International Arbitration 261.Google Scholar
Spigelman, J, ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention and International Commercial Litigation’ (2010) 9 The Judicial Review 389.Google Scholar
Spigelman, J, ‘Transaction Costs and International Litigation’ (2006) 80 Australian Law Journal 438.Google Scholar
Talpis, J and Krnjevic, N, ‘The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements of June 30, 2005: The Elephant That Gave Birth to a Mouse’ (2006) 13 Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas 1.Google Scholar
Thai, L, ‘Commercial Litigation Funding: The Need to Impose Regulations to Improve the Outcome of the Shareholder Class Actions’ (2011) 4 Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association 1.Google Scholar
Thieffry, J, ‘Finality of Awards in International Arbitration, The’ (1985) 2 Journal of International Arbitration 27.Google Scholar
Tietje, C, ‘The Changing Legal Structure of International Treaties as an Aspect of an Emerging Global Governance Architecture Focus Section: The Law of International Treaties in the 21st Century’ (1999) 42 German Yearbook of International Law 26.Google Scholar
Traynor, M, ‘An Introductory Framework for Analyzing the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: U.S. and European Perspectives’ (2000) 6 Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law.Google Scholar
Turner, J, ‘Enforcing Foreign Judgments at Common Law in New Zealand: Is the Concept of Comity Still Relevant?’ (2013) 2013 New Zealand Law Review 653.Google Scholar
Van Loon, H, ‘The Hague Conference on Private International Law’ (2007) 2 Hague Justice Journal 3.Google Scholar
Weller, M, ‘Mutual Trust: In Search of the Future of European Union Private International Law’ (2015) 11 Journal of Private International Law 64.Google Scholar
Whincop, M, ‘The Recognition Scene: Game Theoretic Issues in the Recognition of Foreign Judgments’ (1999) 23 Melbourne University Law Review 416.Google Scholar
Whytock, C, ‘Litigation, Arbitration, and the Transnational Shadow of Law’ (2008) 18 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 449.Google Scholar
Wong, DH, ‘The Rise of the International Commercial Court: What Is It and Will It Work?’ (2014) 33 Civil Justice Quarterly 205.Google Scholar
Yackee, J, ‘A Matter of Good Form: The (Downsized) Hague Judgments Convention and Conditions of Formal Validity for the Enforcement of Forum Selection Agreements’ (2003) 53 Duke Law Journal 1179.Google Scholar
Zeynalova, Y, ‘The Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Is It Broken and How Do We Fix It?’ (2013) 31 Berkeley Journal of International Law 150.Google Scholar
‘Draft Convention on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods’ (1956) 5 The American Journal of Comparative Law 653.Google Scholar
‘Texaco Panama Inc v Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation (Liberia)’ [1996] 95 Civ 37/61.Google Scholar
American Law Institute, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Analysis and Proposed Federal Statute’ (2005).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, ‘Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States’ (1987).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, ‘Tentative Draft No. 1 – Jurisdiction (Covering Part IV Enforcement; Restatement of the Law Fourth: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States)’ (1 April 2014).Google Scholar
American Tort Reform Foundation, ‘Judicial Hellholes’ (2018) <www.judicialhellholes.org/> accessed 23 January 2018.+accessed+23+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Ancel, Marie-Elodie, Fournier, Benoit and Mailhe, Francois, ‘From Brussels to Lugano – A Panoramic Table’ (June 2014) <www.lynxlex.com/sites/default/files/files/From%20Brussels%20to%20Lugano%20-%20A%20panoramic%20table_0.pdf> accessed 31 January 2016.+accessed+31+January+2016.>Google Scholar
Betancourt, J-C, ‘Anti-Suit Injunctions in the EU: Are They Finally Back on the Menu?’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 12 February 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/02/12/anti-suit-injunctions-in-the-eu-are-they-finally-back-on-the-menu/> accessed 20 August 2021.+accessed+20+August+2021.>Google Scholar
Born, GB, ‘Why It Is Especially Important That States Not Ratify the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention, Part I’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 23 July 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/23/why-it-is-especially-important-that-states-not-ratify-the-hague-choice-of-court-agreements-convention-part-i/> accessed 2 October 2021.+accessed+2+October+2021.>Google Scholar
Born, GB, ‘Why It Is Especially Important That States Not Ratify the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention, Part II’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 23 July 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/23/why-it-is-especially-important-that-states-not-ratify-the-hague-choice-of-court-agreements-convention-part-ii/> accessed 2 October 2021.+accessed+2+October+2021.>Google Scholar
Born, GB, ‘Why States Should Not Ratify, and Should Instead Denounce, the Hague Choice-Of-Court Agreements Convention, Part III’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 18 June 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/06/18/why-states-should-not-ratify-and-should-instead-denounce-the-hague-choice-of-court-agreements-convention-part-iii/> accessed 2 October 2021.+accessed+2+October+2021.>Google Scholar
European Communities, ‘Treaty on European Union’ (no date) vol NO C 191/1 (92/C).Google Scholar
European Economic Community, ‘Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (1 February 1973).Google Scholar
European Economic Community, ‘Joint Declaration of 27 September 1968’ (no date).Google Scholar
European Economic Community, ‘Protocol on the Interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (1 September 1975) vol 027.Google Scholar
European Union, ‘Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union’ (7 June 2016).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (1 February 1971).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Supplementary Protocol of 1 February 1971 to the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (1 February 1971).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Convention on Choice of Court Agreements’ (1 October 2015).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Convention of 15 April 1958 on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods’ (no date).Google Scholar
Hague Conference, ‘Convention on the Choice of Court’ (first published 1965, no date).Google Scholar
Jelinić, Z and Knol Radoja, K, ‘Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions and the Right to a Fair Trial with Special Focus on the ECHR’s Findings in the Case of Avotiņš v. Latvia’ in (EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement, Tunjica Petrašević and Dunja Duić eds, Faculty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek no date) <https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eclic/article/view/7127> accessed 3 January 2019.+accessed+3+January+2019.>Google Scholar
Kovar, Jeffrey D. (Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law), ‘United States State Department Letter to the Hague Conference (Addressed to Hans van Loon): Dated 22 February 2000’ (no date).Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Bidaoui, J, ‘Hailing the HCCH (Hague) 2005 Choice of Court Convention, A Response to Gary Born’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 July 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/21/hailing-the-hcch-hague-2005-choice-of-court-convention-a-response-to-gary-born/> accessed 2 October 2021.+accessed+2+October+2021.>Google Scholar
Switzerland Federal Office of Justice, ‘Reports on National Caselaw’ (no date) <www.bj.admin.ch/bj/en/home/wirtschaft/privatrecht/lugue-2007/rechtsprechung.html> accessed 8 July 2016.+accessed+8+July+2016.>Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission, ‘Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act’ (2005).Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission, ‘Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act’ (1962).Google Scholar
United Nations, ‘Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards’ (25 July 1929).Google Scholar
Williamson, Edwin (Legal Adviser, United States Department of State), ‘Letter to Secretary General, Hague Conference’ (5 May 1992).Google Scholar
‘Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2012).Google Scholar
‘Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements: Status Table (Last Update: 1-VI-2018)’ (no date) <www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=98> accessed 10 August 2018.+accessed+10+August+2018.>Google Scholar
‘European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations - From 6 to 28 Members - European Commission’ (13 May 2015) <http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/from-6-to-28-members/index_en.htm> accessed 13 July 2016.+accessed+13+July+2016.>Google Scholar
‘First Contact of Greek Courts with the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention’ (Conflict of Laws, 7 May 2020) <https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/first-contact-of-greek-courts-with-the-2005-hague-choice-of-court-convention/> accessed 1 October 2021.+accessed+1+October+2021.>Google Scholar
‘Hague Conference Website: Hague Conference Members’ (no date) <www.hcch.net/en/states/hcch-members> accessed 18 August 2021.+accessed+18+August+2021.>Google Scholar
‘HCCH | Jurisdiction Project’ (no date) <www.hcch.net/en/projects/legislative-projects/jurisdiction-project> accessed 28 September 2021.+accessed+28+September+2021.>Google Scholar
‘Legislative Fact Sheet - Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act’ (no date) <www.uniformlaws.org/LegislativeFactSheet.aspx?title=Foreign%20Money%20Judgments%20Recognition%20Act> accessed 2 August 2016.+accessed+2+August+2016.>Google Scholar
‘Legislative Fact Sheet - Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act’ (no date) <www.uniformlaws.org/LegislativeFactSheet.aspx?title=Foreign-Country%20Money%20Judgments%20Recognition%20Act> accessed 29 August 2016.+accessed+29+August+2016.>Google Scholar
‘Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (first published 1988, no date).Google Scholar
‘Lugano II Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (21/12/07).Google Scholar
‘Protocol No 2 on the Uniform Interpretation of the Lugano Convention and on the Standing Committee’ (21/12/07).Google Scholar
‘Protocol No 2 on the Uniform Interpretation of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (16 September 1988).Google Scholar
‘Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (2001).Google Scholar
‘Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council Creating a European Enforcement Order for Uncontested Claims’ (21 April 2004).Google Scholar
‘Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council Creating a European Small Claims Procedure’ (11 July 2007).Google Scholar
‘Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Creating a European Order for Payment Procedure’ (12 December 2006).Google Scholar
‘Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 Establishing a European Account Preservation Order Procedure to Facilitate Cross-Border Debt Recovery in Civil and Commercial Matters’ (15 May 2014).Google Scholar
‘Scrutinizing the 2005 Hague Convention: Two Further Reasons to Keep Arbitration a Viable Option’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22 July 2021) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/22/scrutinizing-the-2005-hague-convention-two-further-reasons-to-keep-arbitration-a-viable-option/> accessed 3 October 2021.+accessed+3+October+2021.>Google Scholar
‘Texts: Brussels Convention and Protocols’ (no date) <http://curia.europa.eu/common/recdoc/convention/en/c-textes/_brux-textes.htm> accessed 24 May 2016.+accessed+24+May+2016.>Google Scholar
‘Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community’ (1 January 1958).Google Scholar
‘Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts’ (Official Journal C 340 1 May 1999).Google Scholar
‘UNCITRAL: Status of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958)’ (no date) <www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.html> accessed 12 January 2017.+accessed+12+January+2017.>Google Scholar
‘The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (1 January 1988).Google Scholar
‘United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’ (7 June 1959) vol 330.Google Scholar
‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (27 January 1980) vol 1155.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Drossos Stamboulakis, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Comparative Recognition and Enforcement
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076340.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Drossos Stamboulakis, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Comparative Recognition and Enforcement
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076340.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Drossos Stamboulakis, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Comparative Recognition and Enforcement
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076340.013
Available formats
×