Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:20:18.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2023

Wiebke H. Ahlers
Wiebke H. Ahlers
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Consonantal Sound Change in American English
An Analysis of Clustered Sibilants
 , pp. 218 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aceto, Michael. 2003. What are Creole languages? An alternative approach to the anglophone Atlantic world with special emphasis on Barbudan Creole English. In Aceto, Michael & Williams, Jeffrey (eds.), Contact Englishes of the Eastern Caribbean, 121–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1), 38–59.Google Scholar
Ahlers, Wiebke & Meer, Philipp. 2019. Sibilant variation in New Englishes: A comparative sociophonetic study of Trinidadian and American English /s(tr)/-retraction. INTERSPEECH, 291–295. doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, Barden, Birgit, & Grosskopf, Beate. 1998. Subjective and objective parameters determining “salience” in long‐term dialect accommodation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(2), 163–187.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald, Davidson, Douglas, & Bates, Douglas. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy. 2008. Real and apparent time. In Chambers, Jack & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 312–332. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, Adam, Archangeli, Diana, & Mielke, Jeff. 2011. Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change 23(3), 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhael M. 1981. The Diologic Imagination, eds. Emerson, C. & Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale, Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Tily, Harry J.. 2014. Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 1–43.Google Scholar
Barth, Danielle & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2018. Evaluation logistic mixed effects models of corpus linguistic data in light of lexical diffusion. In Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris, & Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.), Mixed Effects Regression Models in Linguistics, 254–303. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Kliegl, Reinhold, Vasishth, Shravan, & Baayen, Harald. 2018. Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv:1506.04967.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2014. English phonotactics. English Language and Linguistics 19(3), 437–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Gareth & Croft, William. 2016. Modeling language change across the lifespan: Individual trajectories in community change. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 129–173.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1994. Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6(3), 303–326.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 2018. The quantitative paradigm. In Chambers, Jack & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed., 85–107. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. 2009. /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City’s Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(5), 634–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara & Coggshall, Elizabeth L.. 2009. The sociolinguistics of ethnicity in New York City. Linguistics and Language Compass 3(3), 751–766.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M. & Giles, Howard. 1984. Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46, 5–32.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2), 145.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah B. 2010. Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(2), 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1962. Social class, linguistic codes and grammatical elements. Language and Speech 5(4), 221–240.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2006a. Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2006b. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2), 117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984. Language, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Sheila E. 1989. Theoretical implications of the quantal nature of speech: A commentary. Journal of Phonetics 17(1–2), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25(2), 217–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6), 645–668.Google Scholar
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica. doi: 10.1159/000261913.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1994. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4), 977–990.Google Scholar
Burnett, Heather, Koopman, Hilda, & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. Structural explanations in syntactic variation: The evolution of English negative and polarity indefinites. Language Variation and Change 30(1), 83–107.Google Scholar
Burnham, Kenneth P., Anderson, David R., & Huyvaert, Kathryn P.. 2011. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(1), 23–35.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(May), 261–290.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2017. Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach. Language Variation and Change 29(3), 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, Erin. 2017. Interlanguage and cross-generational assimilation: Past tense unmarking in hispanicized English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(2), 103–129.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Linguistics and Language Compass 4(6), 377–389.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack. 1996. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack. 2002. Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 3–14. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. & S.-Y. Wang, William. 1975. Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language 51(2), 255–281.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2008. Sex and gender in variationist research. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 423–443. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
City of Austin. 2017. Census. www.austintexas.gov/.Google Scholar
City of Austin. 2019. Demographics. https://austintexas.gov/demographics.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1975. Vowel Harmony in Nonlinear Generative Phonology: An Autosegmental Model. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14(1), 83–89.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1986. Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coleman, John. 1998. Cognitive reality and the phonological lexicon: A review. Journal of Neurolinguistics 11(3), 295–320.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Age in social and sociolinguistic theory. In Coupland, Nikolas, Sarangi, Srikant, & Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory, 185–211. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Language change, social change, sociolinguistic change: A meta commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2), 277–286.Google Scholar
Currie, Haver C. 1952. A projection of socio‐linguistics: The relationship of speech to social status. The Southern Speech Journal 18(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah N. 1991. Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Laminal Articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1975. A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1978. Course in General Linguistics. Eds. Bally, Charles & Baskin, Wade. Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret. 1988. A pragmatic account of women’s use of standard speech. In Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, 27–32. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror., Malcah 2011. Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dillard, Joey L. 1972. Black English: Its History and Usage in the United States. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 2011. The phoneme. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 241–266. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Durian, David. 2007. Getting [(esh)]tronger every day?: More on urbanization and the socio-geographic diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2), 64–79.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 151–169. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 119–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008a. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 25–42.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008b. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–476.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2013. Research ethics in linguistics. In Podesva, Robert & Sharma, Devyani (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 11–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461–490.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edgell, Stephen. 1993. Class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel & Guy, Gregory R.. 2012. The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language 88(3), 526–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fant, Gunnar. 1971. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Recasens, Daniel. 2010. Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In Hardcastle, William, Laver, John, & Gibbon, Fiona E (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., 316–352. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Farrington, Charles Ryan. 2019. Language variation and the Great Migration: Regionality and African American language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1990a. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1990b. Tense marking in Black English. WORD 41(2), 203–218.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W., Labov, William, Vaughn-Cooke, Fay Boyd, Bailey, Guy, Wolfram, Walt, Spears, Arthur K., & Rickford, John. 1987. Are Black and White vernaculars diverging? American Speech 62(1), 3–80.Google Scholar
Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul, & Dougall, Ronald L.. 1988. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(1), 115–123.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 1997. The English and Spanish of young adult Chicanos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2007. Ethnicity. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 444–472. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2010. Language as a representation of Mexican American identity. English Today 26(3), 44–48.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathryn, & Kreuz, Roger. 2004. Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef. 2016. The early influence of phonology on a phonetic change. Language 92(2), 376–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef. 2017. Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist. Language Variation and Change 29(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
García, Maryellen. 1984. Parameters of the East Los Angeles speech community. In Ornstein-Galacia, Jacob and Metcalf, Allan (eds.), Form and Function in Chicano English, 85–98. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 2015. Sound change. In Bowern, Claire & Evans, Bethwyn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 227–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen. 1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22(5), 1166–1183.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. 1997. Sex, speech, and stereotypes: Why women use prestige speech forms more than men. Language in Society 26(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 2011. Variability. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1–24. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gylfadottir, Duna. 2015. Shtreets of Philadelphia: An acoustic study of /str /-retraction in a naturalistic speech corpus. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2), 89–97.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark. 2008. Neogrammarian sound change. In Joseph, Brian & Janda, Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 343–368. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, Vaux, Bert, & Wolf, Andrew. 2000. On feature spreading and the representation of place of articulation. Linguistic Inquiry 31(3), 387–444.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2001. Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony: Genes and development. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William. 1985. Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences. Speech Communication 4(1), 247–263.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan. 2010. Acoustic phonetics. In Harcastle, William J., Laver, John, & Gibbon, Fiona E (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 81–129. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas, & Reubold, Ulrich. 2008. Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5), 2825–2835.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2018. Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(4), 696–706.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Foulkes, Paul. 2016. The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92(2), 298–330.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2000. Salience, stigma and standard. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, 57–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Bergs, Alexander, Bohmann, Axel, Brozovsky, Erika, Hodge, Brian, Meemann, Kirsten, & Schultz, Patrick. 2015. Sibilants and ethnic diversity: A sociophonetic study of palatalized /s/ in STR-clusters among Hispanic, White, and African-American speakers of Texas English. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44: Intersections, October 22–25, Toronto.Google Scholar
Hlavac, Marek. 2018. stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. Social Policy Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia. R package version 5.2.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer.Google Scholar
Holliday, Nicole R. 2016. Identity performance among Black/biracial men through intonation: Examining pitch accents and peak delay. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2), 71–80.Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Levon, Erez. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Journal of Sociolinguistics 55(5), 1045–1072.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1998. Response to Koenraad Kuiper. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1), 104–106.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, Strobl, Carolin, & Zeileis, Achim. 2017. Party: A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning. R package version 1.2–3.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (IPA). 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian & Weatherholtz, Kodi. 2016. What the heck is salience? How predictive language processing contributes to sociolinguistic perception. Frontiers in Psychology 7(August), 1–5.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Joseph, Brian D.. 2003. Reconsidering the canons of sound-change: Towards a “big bang” theory. In Blake, Barry, Burridge, Kate, and Taylor, Jo (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 205–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, Keith & Mullennix, John W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
James, Deborah & Drakich, Janice. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction, 281–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2003. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2005. Decisions and Mechanisms in Exemplar-Based Phonology. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7m49b843.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Linguistics and Language Compass 10(11), 632–643.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer, & Danielson, Andrew E.. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 34(2), 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree, & Wong, Serena. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(3), 1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, Beverly. 2018. High tech industry. Austin Chamber, June 5. www.austinchamber.com/blog/06-05-2018-high-tech-industry.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2), 177–202.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2002. “Salience” as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Jones, Mari & Esch, Edith (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors, 81–110. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott. 2009. Style as stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth & Franz, Hannah Askin. 2009. Localized patterns for global variants: The case of quotative systems of African American and Latino speakers. American Speech 84(3), 259–297.Google Scholar
Kuha, Jouni. 2004. AIC and BIC: Comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods and Research 33(2), 188–229.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B., & Christensen, Rune H. B.. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). DOI:10.18637/jss.v082.i13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. WORD 19(3), 273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1981a. Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. Sociolinguistic Working Paper Number R1. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1981b. Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57(2), 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John (ed.), Language in Use, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social factors in the course of language change. Language Variation and Change 2(2), 205–254.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The South. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change, 240–262. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid, & Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1), 30–65.Google Scholar
Ladd, Dwight Robert. 2014. Phonetics in phonology. In Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason, & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 348–373. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishing.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2006. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages, 9th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavie, Rene-Joseph. 2007. Exemplar theory in linguistics: A perspective for the cognitive subject. Communication to the 11th Congress of Cognitive Linguistics, 1–21. HAL Id: halshs-00142394.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Wayne P. 2000. /str/ -> /Str/: Assimilation at a distance? American Speech 75(1), 82–86.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert & Andrée, Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan & Lindblom, Björn. 2011. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Linguistic Society of America 48(4), 839–862.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, John & Jaeger, Jeri (eds.), Experimental Phonology, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403–440. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A. & Pisoni, David. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing 19(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Luke, Steven G. 2017. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods 49(4), 1494–1502.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1887. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Consonant harmony via correspondence: Evidence from Chumash. Papers in Optimality Theory 3(January), 223–237.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff, Baker, Adam & Archangeli, Diana. 2010. Variability and homogeneity in American English /r/ allophony and /s/ retraction. Laboratory Phonology 10, 699–730.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The Emergence of Distinctive Features. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff & Hume, Elizabeth. 2006. Distinctive features. In Keil, Frank & Wilson, Robert (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, 723–731. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1993. Mechanisms of change in urban dialects: The role of class, social network and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1), 57–77.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2015. The emergence of African American English: Monogenetic or polygenetic? With or without “Decreolization”? Under how much substrate influence? In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 57–84. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Samuel, Scealy, Janice, & Welsh, Alan. 2013. Model selection in linear mixed models. Statistical Science 28(2), 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Shinichi, Johnson, Paul C. D., & Schielzeth, Holger. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 14(134), 1–11.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Shinichi & Schielzeth, Holger. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2), 133–142.Google Scholar
Bailey, George, Nichols, Stephen, Turton, Danielle, & Baranowski, Maciej. 2022. Affrication as the cause of /s/-retraction: Evidence from Manchester English. GLOSSA: A Journal of General Linguistics 7(1). doi: 10.16995/glossa.8026.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis, Holst, Tara, & Barbara, Kühnert. 1996. Modelling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English. Journal of Phonetics 24(1), 113–137.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1993a. Coarticulation and phonology. Language and Speech 36(2), 155–170.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1993b. The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems & Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Solé, Maria-Josep. 2008. Turbulence and Phonology. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. e-ISSN: 2768-5047.Google Scholar
Olive, Joseph, Greenwood, Alice, & Coleman, John. 1993. Acoustics of American English Speech. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Phillips, Jacob, B. 2016. Phonological and prosodic conditioning of /s/-retraction in American English. Paper presented at Higher Order Structure in Speech Variability, LabPhon15 satellite workshop, Ithaca, NY, 1–2.Google Scholar
Phillips, Jacob B. & Resnick, Paige. 2019. Masculine toughness and the categorical perception of onset sibilant clusters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145(6). doi: 10.1121/1.5113566.Google Scholar
Phillips, Jacob B. 2018. Temporal dynamics of /s/-retraction in American English. Preprint submitted to Journal of Phonetics.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII, 101–140. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 2006. How English became African American English. In van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English, 452–476. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pouplier, Marianne. 2012. The gaits of speech: Re-examining the role of articulatory effort in spoken language. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.), The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas C. 2010. Phonetic detail in the perception of ethnic varieties of US English. In Prestion, Dennis & Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 289–326. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William & Baugh, John. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(10), 10–30.Google Scholar
Core Team, R. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rácz, Péter. 2012. Operationalising salience: Definite article reduction in the north of England. English Language and Linguistics 16(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
Rácz, Péter. 2013. Salience in Sociolinguistics: A Quantitative Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L. 2008. The comparative method. In Joseph, Brian & Janda, Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 181–212. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reetz, Henning & Jongman, Allard. 2009. Phonetics: Transcription, Production, Acoustics, and Perception. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rickford, John & McNair-Knox, Faye. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (eds.), Perspectives on Register Variation within Sociolinguistics, 235–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, John & Price, MacKenzie. 2013. Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2), 143–179.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 2015. The Creole origins hypothesis. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 35–56. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Matilda White. 1971. Social gerontology and the age stratification of society. The Gerontologist 11(1), 79–87.Google Scholar
Robinson, Ryan. 2016. Top ten demographic trends in Austin, Texas. https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Top-Trends/bbi9-bw4t/.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1995. Bilingualism, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon. 2011. Long-distance assimilation of consonants. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1811–1837. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel. 2011. Harmony systems. In Riggle, Jason, Goldsmith, John A., & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed., 240–290. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rutter, Ben. 2011. Acoustic analysis of a sound change in progress: The consonant cluster /stɹ/ in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
Rutter, Ben. 2014. The acquisition of newly emerging sociophonetic variation: /str-/ in American English. Journal of Child Language 41(5), 1166–1178.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Rosaura. (1983). Chicano Discourse: Socio-Historical Perspectives. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David & Laberge, Suzanne. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods, 239–250. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert, Mattheier, Klaus J., and Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Volume 2: Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 1003–1013. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2006a. Age: Apparent time and real time. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., 110–116. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2006b. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In Peter Trudgill, Jack Chambers & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 638–668. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1993. Chicano English and the nature of the Chicano language setting. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15(1), 3–35.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1996. Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change 8(1), 63–69.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1(2), 37–51.Google Scholar
Scudieri, Kirsten. 2012. On the perception of /s/ and /ʃ/: Considering the effects of phonotactics. Master’s thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Semon, Richard. 1923. Mnemic Psychology. Ed. Duffy, Bella. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H., Proctor, Michael I., & Iskarous, Khalil. 2009. Revisiting the role of the sublingual cavity in the /s/‐/∫/ distinction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4), 2569–2569.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. & Scully, Celia. 1995. An articulatory-acoustic-aerodynamic analysisof [s] in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics 23(1–2), 53–66.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1995. A case of distant assimilation: /str/ → /ʃtr/. American Speech 70(1), 101–107.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia. 1991. Consonant harmony systems: The special status of coronal harmony. In Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-Francois (eds.), The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence, 125–157. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3–4), 193–229.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria Josep. 1992. Phonetic and phonological processes: The case of nasalization. Language and Speech 35(1), 29–43.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Howard B. 2007. Contemporary Baysian and Frequentist Statistical Research Methods for Natural Research Scientists. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth & Hanson, Helen M.. 2010. Articulatory: Acoustic Relations as the Basis of Distinctive Contrasts. In Hardcastle John Laver, William J. & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., 424–453. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth. 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary & Harrington, Jonathan. 2016. The phonetic origins of /s/-retraction: Acoustic and perceptual evidence from Australian English. Journal of Phonetics 58, 118–134.Google Scholar
Stewart, William A. 1967. Sociolinguistic factors in the history of American Negro dialects. The Florida FL Reporter 5(2), 11, 22, 24, 26, 30.Google Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth A. 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1), 86–100.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Macdonald, Rachel, & Mcauliffe, Michael. 2018. Cross-dialectal variation in /s/-retraction in English. BAAP Colloquium, April 12–14, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Mcauliffe, Michael, & Macdonald, Rachel. 2018. Dialectal and social factors affect the phonetic bases of English /s/-retraction. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 47, October 18–21, New York.Google Scholar
Tabain, Marija. 2001. Variability in fricative production and spectra: Implications for the hyper- and hypo-. Language and Speech 44(1), 54–94.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Rolf Harald. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24, 135–178.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Alexandra, D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1), 58–108.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2014. Sound change without frequency effects: Ramifications for phonological theory. In Santana-LaBarge, Robert E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 457–465. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
The X Factor UK. 2014. Maria Ellinas sings Randy Crawford’s Street Life – Audition Week 2 – The X Factor UK 2014. YouTube, September 6. https://youtu.be/NnbggCljAhk.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2016. Sociophonetics of consonantal variation. Annual Review of Linguistics 2, 95–113.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. & Ericson, Holly. 2007. Intonational distinctiveness of Mexican American English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R., Lass, Norman J., & Carpenter, Jeannine. 2010. Identification of African American Speech. In Preston, Dennis & Niedielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 265–285. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Kaufman, Terrence. 1991. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sociolinguistics. Penguin: London.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2006. Linguistic and social typology. In Trudgill, Peter, Chambers, Jack, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 707–728. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Twaddell, William Freeman. 1935. On defining the phoneme. Language 11(1), 5–62.Google Scholar
Välimaa-Blum, Riitta. 2009. Phonotactic constraints in cognitive phonology. Corela 7(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard. 2015. The English origins hypothesis. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 23–34. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benji., Wald 1984. The status of Chicano English as a dialect of American English. In Ornstein-Galacia, Jacob and Metcalf, Allan (eds.), Form and Function in Chicano English, 14–31. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Wang, William & Cheng, Chin-Chuan. 1977. Implementation of phonological change: The Shuāng-fēng Chinese case. In Wang, William S. (ed.), The Lexicon in Phonological Change, 148–158. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred & Malkiel, Yakow (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics,95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Whinnom, Keith. 1971. Linguistic hybridization and the “special case” of pidgins and creoles. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, 91–116. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wilbanks, Eric. 2017. Social and structural constraints on a phonetically motivated change in progress: (str) retraction in Raleigh, NC. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1), 301–310.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert L. 1997. The Ebonics controversy. Journal of Black Psychology 23(3), 208–214.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2015. The origins of African American vernacular English: Beginnings. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 85–104. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1974. The relationship of White Southern speech to vernacular Black English. Linguistic Society of America 50(3), 498–527.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1989. Structural variability in phonological development: Final nasals in vernacular Black English. In Fasold, Ralph W. & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2013. The contact dynamics of socioethnic varieties in North America. In Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), English as a Contact Language,106–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling, Natalie. 2016. American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Thomas, Erik R.. 2002. The Development of African American English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney A. J. 1996. Assimilation or coarticulation? Evidence from the temporal co-ordination of tongue gestures for the palatalization of Bulgarian alveolar stops. Journal of Phonetics 24(1), 139–164.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2013. Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Willbur. 2001. The Enigma of Ethnicity: Another American Dilemma. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1936. The Psychobiology of Language. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Wiebke H. Ahlers, Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Consonantal Sound Change in American English
  • Online publication: 10 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071055.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Wiebke H. Ahlers, Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Consonantal Sound Change in American English
  • Online publication: 10 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071055.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Wiebke H. Ahlers, Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Consonantal Sound Change in American English
  • Online publication: 10 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071055.009
Available formats
×