Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:59:16.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Czech Republic

from Drawing on Lessons from Families of Origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2020

Francine M. Deutsch
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts
Ruth A. Gaunt
Affiliation:
University of Lincoln
Get access

Summary

Each of these chapters contains a case study of a couple from the relevant country. Each includes a description of the everyday life of the couple with respect to the division of housework and childcare, a recounting of the history of their relationship and how it became equal, a discussion of how they balance paid work and family, and an analysis of the factors that facilitate their equality. Those factors include their conviction in gender equality, their rejection of essentialist beliefs, their familism, and their socialization in their families of origin. By showing how and why they undo gender, these couples provide lessons on how equality at home can be achieved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Creating Equality at Home
How 25 Couples around the World Share Housework and Childcare
, pp. 247 - 269
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bičáková, A. & Kalíšková, K. (2015). Od mateřství k nezaměstnanosti: postavení žen s malými dětmi na trhu práce [From Maternity to Unemployment: Women with Young Children Returning to the Labor Market]. Prague: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.Google Scholar
Čermáková, M., Hašková, H., Křížková, A., Linková, M., Maříková, H., & Musilová, M. (2000). Relations and Changes of Gender Differences in the Czech Society in the 90’s. Prague: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.Google Scholar
Chaloupková, J. (2009). Rodinné a pracovní dráhy mladých: holistická perspektiva [A Holistic Perspective on the Work and Family Trajectories of Young People]. Prague: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.Google Scholar
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, Women’s Employment and the Domestic Division of Labour. Work, Employment & Society, 19(2), 213233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2017). Focus on Women and Men – 2017. (Table 5-7, Number of parental allowance recipients). Retrieved from: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/focus-on-women-and-men-2017.Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2018). Focus on Women and Men – 2018. (Labor and earnings: Table 4-37, Gender pay gap, international comparison, and Table 4-24, Employment rates by number of children, international comparison.) (Population, families, households: Table 1-35 Private households by economic activity of head of household in 2017). Prague: Český statistický úřad. Retrieved from: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/focus-on-women-and-men-2018.Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2019a). Population. Czech Demographic Handbook. (Table 1-16 Population by ethnicity by 1921–2011 censuses and Table 1-18 Population by religious belief and sex by 1921, 1930, 1950, 1991, 2001 and 2011 censuses). Prague: Český statistický úřad. Retrieved from: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/population.Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2019b). Rates of Employment, Unemployment, and Economic Activity – November 2018. Prague: Český statistický úřad. Retrieved from: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ari/rates-of-employment-unemployment-and-economic-activity-november-2018.Google Scholar
Fialová, L. & Kučera, M. (1996). Demografické chování obyvatelstva České republiky během přeměny společnosti po roce 1989 [Demographic Behavior in the Czech Republic During the Transformation of Society after 1989]. Prague: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.Google Scholar
Horáková, M., Jahoda, R., Kofroň, P., Sirovátka, T., & Šimíková, I. (2013). Příjmová chudoba a materiální deprivace v České republice podle indikátorů EU - vývoj v důsledku krize, fiskální konsolidace a sociální reformy. [Income poverty and material deprivation in the Czech Republic according to EU indicators - developments as a result of the crisis, fiscal consolidation and social reforms.] Prague: Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí.Google Scholar
Křížková, A., Maříková, H., Hašková, H., & Formánková, L. (2011). Pracovní dráhy žen v České republice. [Working Paths of Women in the Czech Republic] Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Lutherová, S., Maříková, H., & Válková, J. (2017). Childcare Preferences of Parents in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Sociológia, 49(3), 285309.Google Scholar
Maříková, H. (2008). Caring Fathers and Gender (In)Equality? Polish Sociological Review, 48(162), 135152.Google Scholar
Možný, I. (1983). Rodina vysokoškolsky vzdělaných manželů. [Family of Spouses with University Degrees.] Brno: Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně.Google Scholar
Možný, I. (1991 ). Proč tak snadno. Některé důvody sametové revoluce. [Why So Easy? Some Reasons for the Velvet Revolution.] Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
OECD (2018). Family Database (Figure PF 4.1.A, Typology of childcare, Figure PF 3.2.A Enrolment rates in early education and care services, 0–2 year olds, Figure PF 3.2.E Enrolment rates in early childhood education and care services and primary education, 3-5 year olds.) Retrieved from: www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm#public_policy.Google Scholar
Renzetti, C. M. & Curran, D. J. (2003). Ženy, muži a společnost [Women, Men, and Society]. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Sekce pro lidská práva (2017). Zpráva o stavu romské menšiny [Report on the Situation of the Roma minority]. Prague: Úřad vlády České republiky. Retrieved from: www.vlada.cz/cz/ppov/zalezitosti-romske-komunity/dokumenty/zprava-o-stavu-romske-mensiny-za-rok-2017-168061/.Google Scholar
Vohlídalová, M. (2007). Trvalá nebo dočasná změna? Uspořádání genderových rolí v rodinách s pečujícími otci [A Permanent or Temporary Change? The Arrangement of Gender Roles in Families with Fathers Participating in Childcare]. In Maříková, H. (ed.) Sociologické texty, 7(11), 3-103. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×