Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:12:59.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Nobelists Gone Wild

Case Studies in the Domain Specificity of Critical Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

By
Scott O. Lilienfeld ,
Candice Basterfield ,
Shauna M. Bowes  and
Thomas H. Costello
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Diane F. Halpern
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

Research suggests that critical thinking skills are often surprisingly domain-specific. We survey the case histories of several Nobel Prize winners in the sciences to demonstrate that even extremely bright individuals can fall prey to bizarre ideas. These findings strongly suggest that intellectual brilliance and acceptance of weird ideas are not mutually incompatible. They also highlight the domain-specificity of critical thinking and the surprising independence of general intelligence from critical thinking. A number of cognitive errors, including bias blind spot and the senses of omniscience, omnipotence, and invulnerability; personality traits such as narcissism and excessive openness; and the “guru complex” may predispose highly intelligent individuals to disastrous critical thinking errors.

Keywords

bias blindspotcognitive sinsdomain specificityimbalance theory of foolishneeintellectual humilitymotivated reasoningNobel disease
Type
Chapter
Information
Critical Thinking in Psychology , pp. 10 - 38
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 313–337.Google Scholar
Arnold, W. P., Mittal, C. K., Katsuki, S., & Murad, F. (1977). Nitric oxide activates guanylate cyclase and increases guanosine 3′: 5′-cyclic monophosphate levels in various tissue preparations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 74, 3203–3207.Google Scholar
Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11, 361–375.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (2014a). The dark side of Linus Pauling’s legacy. Quackwatch. Online. https://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.htmlGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2014b). The dubious promotion of Herbalife’s Niteworks. MLM Watch. Online. https://www.mlmwatch.org/04C/Herbalife/niteworks.htmlGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, G., & Kenyon, T. (2018). The scope of debiasing in the classroom. Topoi, 37, 93–102.Google Scholar
Bensley, D. A. (2006). Why great thinkers sometimes fail to think critically. Skeptical Inquirer, 30(4), 47–52.Google Scholar
Berezow, A. (2016, December 18). Paul Krugman now has Nobel Disease. American Council on Science and Health. Online. https://www.acsh.org/news/2016/12/18/paul-krugman-now-has-nobel-disease-10609Google Scholar
Blattner, W., Gallo, R. C., & Temin, H. M. (1988). HIV causes aids. Science, 241, 515–516.Google Scholar
Blorn, J. (2010). A dictionary of hallucinations. New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.Google Scholar
Cameron, E., & Pauling, L. (1976). Supplemental ascorbate in the supportive treatment of cancer: Prolongation of survival times in terminal human cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 73, 3685–3689.Google Scholar
Cameron, E., & Pauling, L. C. (1979). Cancer and vitamin C: A discussion of the nature, causes, prevention, and treatment of cancer with special reference to the value of Vitamin C. Corvallis, Oregon: Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine.Google Scholar
Carrel, A. (1935). Man, the unknown. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Carson, B. (2011). Gifted hands: The Ben Carson story. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Carter, N. T., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Extreme personalities at work and in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 429–436.Google Scholar
Cassata, F. (2011). Building the new man: Eugenics, racial sciences and genetics in twentieth-century Italy. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147–1156.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. (1993). Contextual trends in intellectual development. Developmental Review, 13, 403–435.Google Scholar
Chiesi, H. L., Spliich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 257–273.Google Scholar
Creagan, E. T., Moertel, C. G., O’Fallon, J. R., Schutt, A. J., O’Connell, M. J., Rubin, J., & Frytak, S. (1979). Failure of high-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid) therapy to benefit patients with advanced cancer: a controlled trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 301, 687–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (2007). Clinical case studies are important in the science and practice of psychotherapy. In Lilienfeld, S. O. & O’Donohue, W. T. (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science (pp. 149–162). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeWys, W. D. (1982). How to evaluate a new treatment for cancer. Your Patient and Cancer, 2, 31–36.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Ursula. (2011). A vision of modern science: John Tyndall and the role of the scientist in Victorian culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dillow, C. (2011). Can our DNA electromagnetically ‘teleport’ itself? One researcher thinks so. Popular Science. Online. https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-01/can-our-dna-electromagnetically-teleport-itself-one-researcher-thinks-soGoogle Scholar
Donati, M. (2004). Beyond synchronicity: the worldview of Carl Gustav Jung and Wolfgang Pauli. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49, 707–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, A.C. (1892). The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. United Kingdom: George Newnes.Google Scholar
Eichner, A. S. (1983). Why economics is not yet a science. Journal of Economic Issues, 17, 507–520.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.Google Scholar
Enserink, M. (2010). French nobelist escapes “intellectual terror” to pursue radical ideas in China. Science, 330, 1732–1733.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. S. (1998). Using bad science to teach good chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 1399–1404.Google Scholar
Ernst, E. (2010). Homeopathy: What does the “best” evidence tell us. Medical Journal of Australia, 192, 458–460.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2004). Nobel prize winner didn’t disclose his Herbalife contract. Cult Education Institute. Online. https://culteducation.com/group/969-herbalife/9601-nobel-prize-winIidnt-disclose-his-herbalife-contract.htmlGoogle Scholar
Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 345–350.Google Scholar
Farber, C. (1994). Interview Kary Mullis. Virusmyth. Online. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cfmullis.htmGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.Google Scholar
Fiala, C., & Diamandis, E. P. (2018). Is it time to abandon the Nobel Prize? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 56, 1196–1197.Google Scholar
Folstein, S., & Rutter, M. (1977). Genetic influences and infantile autism. Nature, 265, 726–728.Google Scholar
Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253–292.Google Scholar
Gauld, A. (1968). The founders of psychical research. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
George, A. (2006, December 9). Lone voices special: Take nobody’s word for it. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19225812-200-lone-voices-special-take-nobodys-word-for-itGoogle Scholar
Gorski, D. (2008, August 18). High dose Vitamin C and cancer: Has Linus Pauling been vindicated? Science-Based Medicine. Online. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/high-dose-vitamin-c-and-cancer-has-linus-pauling-been-vindicatedGoogle Scholar
Gunderman, R. (2017, March 3). When science gets ugly – the story of Philipp Lenard and Albert Einstein. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/science/when-science-gets-ugly.aspxGoogle Scholar
Hall, H. (2009, October 20). The Montagnier “Homeopathy” Study. Science-Based Medicine. Online. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-montagnier-homeopathy-studyGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. DOI:10.1037/0003-066x.53.4.449Google Scholar
Harmon, A. (2019). James Watson had a chance to salvage his reputation on race. He made things worse. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/01/science/watson-dna-genetics-race.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In Potts, G. (Ed.), Indiana Cognitive Symposium. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1956). Ethological models and the concept of ‘drive’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 321–331.Google Scholar
Hoffer, L. J. (2008). Vitamin therapy in schizophrenia. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 45, 3–10.Google Scholar
Homeopathy Research Institute. (2018). ‘New Horizons in Water Science’: Evidence for Homeopathy? Homeopathy Research Institute. Online. https://www.hri-research.org/2018/08/new-horizons-in-water-science-evidence-for-homeopathyGoogle Scholar
Hurwic, A. (1995). Pierre Curie. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Hyman, R. (2002). Why and when are smart people stupid. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 1–23). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jagdish, M. (2000). Climbing the mountain: The scientific biography of Julian Schwinger. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jepson, C., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1983). Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 494–501.Google Scholar
Josephson, B. D. (1964). Non-linear conduction in superconductors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Josephson, B. D. (1997, November 1). Letters: Molecule memories. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/letter/mg15621067-000-letters-molecule-memoriesGoogle Scholar
Josephson, B. D. (2012, August 31). Martin Fleichmann obituary. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/31/martin-fleischmannGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision-Making, 8, 407–424.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich., T., Griffin., D. W., & Kahneman, D., (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, B. (2018). Losing the Nobel Prize: A story of cosmology, ambition, and the perils of science’s highest honor. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Klawans, H. L. (1996). Why Michael couldn’t hit: And other tales of the neurology of sports. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Konnikova, M. (2013). Mastermind: How to think like Sherlock Holmes. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kottler, M. J. (1974). Alfred Russel Wallace, the origin of man, and spiritualism. Isis, 65, 145–192.Google Scholar
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 209–221.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.Google Scholar
Leconte, D., Manil, C., & Lichtenstein, L. (2014). Water memory. Online video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8VyUsVOic0Google Scholar
Leonhardt, D. (2008, April 6). Holding on. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/realestate/keymagazine/406Lede-t.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lewer, N. (2006). Charles Richet: Medical scientist, innovator, peace thinker and savant. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 22, 145–158.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (2009). Why I am nominating Luc Montagnier for an IgNobel Prize. The Quackometer. Online. http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/10/why-i-am-nominating-luc-montagnier-for.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Lynn, S. J. (2016). You’ll never guess who wrote that: 78 surprising authors of psychological publications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 419–441.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway. In Cicchett, D. & Grove, W. M. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (pp. 3–39). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Markoff, J. (2008, January 13). The views of innovation colliding in Washington. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/business/13stream.htmlGoogle Scholar
Martil, I. (2018, April 9). William Shockley the invention of the transistor. Open Mind. Online. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/william-shockley-and-the-invention-of-the-transistorGoogle Scholar
Mazliak, L., & Tazzioli, R. (2009). Mathematicians at war: Volterra and his French colleagues in World War I. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
McKie, R. (2001, September 30). Royal Mail’s Nobel guru in telepathy row. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/sep/30/robinmckie.theobserverGoogle Scholar
McNally, R. J. (2012). Searching for repressed memory. In True and false recovered memories (pp. 121–147). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 825–847.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. (2013). Holding therapy: A harmful mental health intervention. Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 18, 70–76.Google Scholar
Moertel, C. G., Fleming, T. R., Creagan, E. T., Rubin, J., O’Connell, M. J., & Ames, M. M. (1985). High-dose vitamin C versus placebo in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer who have had no prior chemotherapy: A randomized double-blind comparison. New England Journal of Medicine, 312, 137–141.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2018, August 22). How a racist genius created Silicon Valley by being a terrible boss. SFGATE. Online. https://www.sfgate.com/technology/article/Silicon-Valley-Shockley-racist-semiconductor-lab-13164228.phpGoogle Scholar
Montagnier, L., Aissa, J., Ferris, S., Montagnier, J. L., & Lavalléee, C. (2009). Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 1, 81–90.Google Scholar
Montagnier, L., Aissa, J., Del Giudice, E., Lavallee, C., Tedeschi, A., & Vitiello, G. (2011). DNA waves and water. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 306, 1–10.Google Scholar
Montagnier, L., Del Giudice, E., Aïssa, J., Lavallee, C., Motschwiller, S., Capolupo, A., Polcari, A., Romano, P., Tedeschi, A., & Vitiello, G. (2015). Transduction of DNA information through water and electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 34(2), 106–112. DOI:10.3109/15368378.2015.1036072Google Scholar
Morano, M. (2015). Noble prize-winning scientist who endorsed Obama now says prez. is ‘ridiculous’ & ‘dead wrong’ on ‘global warming’. Climate Depot. Online. https://tinyurl.com/y3t5lnccGoogle Scholar
Morrice, P. (2005). ‘The genius factory’: Test-tube superbabies. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/03/books/review/the-genius-factory-testtube-superbabies.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mostert, M. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy – Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18, 31–41.Google Scholar
Mullis, K. (n.d.). AIDS and global warming. Online. https://www.karymullis.com/pdf/On_AIDS_and_Global_Warming.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mullis, K. (1998). Dancing naked in the mind field. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mullis, K. (2007). Biography. Kary Mullis. Online. http://www.karymullis.com/pdf/biography.pdfGoogle Scholar
Napoli, C., Williams-Ignarro, S., De Nigris, F., Lerman, L. O., Rossi, L., Guarino, C., Mansueto, G., Di Tuoro, F., Pignalosa, O., De Rosa, G., Sica, V., & Ignarro, L. J. (2004). Long-term combined beneficial effects of physical training and metabolic treatment on atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 8797–8802. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0402734101Google Scholar
Nattrass, N. (2007). AIDS denialism vs. science. Skeptical Inquirer, 31(5), 31–37.Google Scholar
New Scientist. (1974, May 16). Josephson on transcendental meditation. New Scientist, 62, 416.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Fong, G. T., Lehman, D. R., & Cheng, P. W. (1987). Teaching reasoning. Science, 238, 625–631.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339–363.Google Scholar
Nobel Media AB (2019a). Brian D. Josephson Facts. The Nobel Prize. Online. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1973/josephson/factsGoogle Scholar
Nobel Media AB (2019b). Linus Pauling Biographical. The Nobel Prize. Online. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1954/pauling/biographicalGoogle Scholar
Nobel Media AB (2019c). Louis J. Ignarro Facts. The Nobel Prize. Online. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1998/ignarro/factsGoogle Scholar
Nokes, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Chi, M. (2010). Problem solving and human expertise. In Peterson., P., Baker., E., & McGraw, B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 265–272). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Orac (2015, November 6). Ben Carson: A case study on why intelligent people are often not skeptics. Respectful Insolence. Online. https://respectfulinsolence.com/2015/11/06/ben-carson-why-intelligent-people-are-not-necessarily-skepticsGoogle Scholar
Orac (2017, November 28). The Nobel Disease strikes again: Luc Montagnier goes full antivax, with a little help from Henri Joyeux. Respectful Insolence. Online. https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/11/28/the-nobel-disease-strikes-again-luc-montagnier-goes-full-antivax-with-a-little-help-from-henri-joyeuxGoogle Scholar
Oregon State University Special Collections & Archives (1991–2000). Ava Helen and Linus Pauling papers, 1873–2013. Online. https://tinyurl.com/yy4l2rv3Google Scholar
Palfreman, J. (1993). The prisoners of silence. Frontline. Television documentary series. Boston, MA: WGBH.Google Scholar
Parapsychological Association (2011, February 11). What is parapsychology? Parapsychological Association. Online. https://parapsych.org/articles/36/76/what_is_parapsychology.aspxGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational researcher, 18, 16–25.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1960).The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1968). Orthomolecular psychiatry. Science, 160, 265–271.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1970).Vitamin C, the common cold (1st ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1976).Vitamin C, the common cold, and the flu (2nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Peitzman, S. J. (2007). Dropsy, dialysis, transplant: A short history of failing kidneys. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2009). Public intellectuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. (2015). Brain surgeon – or brain addled? Skeptic, 20(4), 43–46.Google Scholar
Quinn, V. S. (2015). Using astrology to confront and discuss pseudoscience in the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 77, 542–548.Google Scholar
Radin, D. (2006). Entangled minds. New York: Paraview Pocket Books.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reinhold, R. (1973, December 5). Shockley debates Montagu as Innis angrily pulls out. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1973/12/05/archives/shockley-debates-montagu-as-innis-angrily-pulls-out-tests-called.htmlGoogle Scholar
Robson, D. (2019). The intelligence trap: Why smart people make dumb mistakes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 497–510.Google Scholar
Sala, J., Cardeña, E., Holgado, M. C., Anez, C., Perez, P., Periñán, R., & Capafons, A. (2008). The contributions of Ramón y Cajal and other Spanish authors to hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56, 361–372.Google Scholar
Salzberg, S. (2012, May 27). Nobel laureate joins anti-vaccination crowd at Autism One. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2012/05/27/nobel-laureate-joins-anti-vaccination-crowd-at-autism-one/#63ab0f595c53Google Scholar
Schawlow, A. T., & Schawlow, A. L. (1985). The endless search for help. In Brady, M. F. & Gunther, P. (Eds.), Integrating moderately and severely handicapped learners: Strategies that work (pp. 5–15). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
Schneider, L. (2018). Fake data and real pomegranate juice in Nobelist Lois Ignarro’s Papers. For Better Science. Online. https://forbetterscience.com/2018/08/27/fake-data-and-real-pomegranate-juice-in-nobelist-lois-ignarros-papersGoogle Scholar
Schwinger, J. (1990). Cold fusion: A hypothesis. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 45, 756–756.Google Scholar
Shermer, M. (2003). Why smart people believe weird things. Skeptic, 10(2), 62–73.Google Scholar
Shockley, W. (1972). Dysgenics, geneticity, raceology: A challenge to the intellectual responsibility of educators. The Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 297–307.Google Scholar
Smalley, R. (2005, October 29). Remarks by Richard Smalley at 2005 alumni banquet. Hope College. Online. https://hope.edu/news/2005/10/29/remarks-by-richard-smalley-at-alumni-banquet.htmlGoogle Scholar
Smalley, R. (2005). Creation scientists applaud PA judge’s ruling against intelligent design. Free Republic. Online. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/1546528/postsGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (2010). The guru effect. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 583–592.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2009).What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–287.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Smart people are not stupid, but they cure can be foolish: The imbalance theory of foolishness. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 232–241). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9, 145–150.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2008).Why smart people can be so stupid. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. (2015, October 16). Nobel Laureates who were not always noble. National Geographic. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/10/151005-nobel-laureates-forget-racist-sexist-scienceGoogle Scholar
Tan, S. Y., & Yip, A. (2014). António Egas Moniz (1874–1955): Lobotomy pioneer and Nobel Laureate. Singapore Medical Journal, 55, 175–176.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. E., Swerdfeger, A. L., & Eslick, G. D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32, 3623–3629.Google Scholar
Tick, B., Bolton, P., Happé, F., Rutter, M., & Rijsdijk, F. (2016). Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: A meta‐analysis of twin studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 585–595.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1973, December 12). Ethology and stress diseases. Nobel Lecture, pp. 113–130. The Nobel Prize. Online. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/tinbergen-lecture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N., & Tinbergen, E. A. (1985). Autistic children: New hope for a cure. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433.Google Scholar
Tschetter, L., Creagan, E., & O’Fallon, J. (1983). A community-based study of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) in patients with advanced cancer. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2, 92.Google Scholar
United States Global Change Research Program (2009). Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States: 2009 Report. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Online. https://nca2009.globalchange.gov/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D. M., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A. P., Thomson, M. A., Harvey, P., Valentine, A., Davies, S. E., & Walker-Smith, J. A. (1998). RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 351(9103), 637–641. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1874). A defence of modern spiritualism. Boston, MA: Colby and Rich.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. K. (1970). Physiological effects of transcendental meditation. Science, 167, 1751–1754.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (2001). A passion for DNA: Genes, genomes, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, A. L. (2018). Confident but clueless? The nature and boundaries of the link between personality disorder features and self-enhancement. Doctoral dissertation, Emory University.Google Scholar
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 506–519.Google Scholar
White, M. (1999). Isaac Newton: The last sorcerer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109, 21–32.Google Scholar
Young, N. L., Shaffer, N., Chaowanachan, T., Chotpitayasunondh, T., Vanparapar, N., Mock, P. A., Waranawat, N., Chokephaibulkit, K., Chuachoowong, R., Wasinrapee, P., & Mastro, T. D. (2000). Early diagnosis of HIV-1-infected infants in Thailand using RNA and DNA PCR assays sensitive to non-B subtypes. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 24, 401–407.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×