We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
INTRODUCTION
Complaint of Canada
On 19 May 2000, Canada requested consultations with the United States pursuant to Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (“the DSU”), Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and Article 30 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (“the SCM Agreement”), concerning US measures that treat a restraint on exports of a product as a subsidy to other products made using or incorporating the restricted product if the domestic price of the restricted product is affected by the restraint.
On 15 June 2000, Canada and the United States held the requested consultations with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory resolution of the matter, but the consultations failed to settle the dispute.
On 24 July 2000, Canada requested the establishment of a panel to examine the matter.
Establishment and Composition of the Panel
At its meeting of 11 September 2000, the Dispute Settlement Body (“the DSB”) established a Panel pursuant to the request made by Canada in document WT/DS194/2.
At that meeting, the parties to the dispute also agreed that the Panel should have standard terms of reference as follows:
“To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by Canada in document WT/DS194/2, the matter referred to the DSB by Canada in that document, and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.”
On 23 October 2000, the parties agreed to the following composition of the Panel:
Chairman: Mr. Michael Cartland
Members: Mr. Scott Gallacher
Mr. Richard Plender
Australia, the European Communities, and India have reserved their rights to participate in the panel proceedings as third parties.
Panel Proceedings
The Panel met with the parties on 18 January 2001 and on 21 February 2001. The Panel met with third parties on 18 January 2001.
On 27 April 2001, the Panel provided its interim report to the parties. See Section VII, infra.
FACTUAL ASPECTS
This dispute concerns the treatment of export restraints under US countervailing duty (“CVD”) law.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
