Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) (WT/DS353) Report of the Appellate Body
- Table of Contents
- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT
- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT
- I INTRODUCTION
- II ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS AND THE THIRD PARTICIPANTS
- III ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL
- IV THE MEASURES AT ISSUE
- V PROCEDURES UNDER ANNEX V TO THE SCM AGREEMENT
- VI NASA PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS AND USDOD ASSISTANCE INSTRUMENTS
- VII NASA/USDOD ALLOCATION OF PATENT RIGHTS – SPECIFICITY
- VIII WASHINGTON STATE BUSINESS AND OCCUPATION (B&O) TAX RATE REDUCTION
- IX CITY OF WICHITA INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (IRBS) – SPECIFICITY
- X ADVERSE EFFECTS
- XI FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
- ANNEX I NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE EUROPEAN UNION
- ANNEX II NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES
- ANNEX III PROCEDURAL RULING AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES TO PROTECT SENSITIVE INFORMATION
- ANNEX IV PROCEDURAL RULING AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES ON THE CONDUCT OF THE ORAL HEARING
- ANNEX V HSBI ANNEX
- Cumulative List of Published Disputes
IX - CITY OF WICHITA INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (IRBS) – SPECIFICITY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) (WT/DS353) Report of the Appellate Body
- Table of Contents
- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT
- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT
- I INTRODUCTION
- II ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS AND THE THIRD PARTICIPANTS
- III ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL
- IV THE MEASURES AT ISSUE
- V PROCEDURES UNDER ANNEX V TO THE SCM AGREEMENT
- VI NASA PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS AND USDOD ASSISTANCE INSTRUMENTS
- VII NASA/USDOD ALLOCATION OF PATENT RIGHTS – SPECIFICITY
- VIII WASHINGTON STATE BUSINESS AND OCCUPATION (B&O) TAX RATE REDUCTION
- IX CITY OF WICHITA INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (IRBS) – SPECIFICITY
- X ADVERSE EFFECTS
- XI FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
- ANNEX I NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE EUROPEAN UNION
- ANNEX II NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES
- ANNEX III PROCEDURAL RULING AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES TO PROTECT SENSITIVE INFORMATION
- ANNEX IV PROCEDURAL RULING AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES ON THE CONDUCT OF THE ORAL HEARING
- ANNEX V HSBI ANNEX
- Cumulative List of Published Disputes
Summary
859. We next turn to the United States' appeal of the Panel's finding that the IRB subsidies provided by the City of Wichita are a specific subsidy within the meaning of Article 2.1(c) of the SCM Agreement. We begin, in section A, with a brief background on the IRBs issued to Boeing and Spirit, followed by a summary, in section B, of the Panel's findings in respect of this measure. In section C, we assess the United States' claim on appeal.
Background
860. As a general matter, IRBs are issued by the City of Wichita to the general public on behalf of a qualifying private entity, the proceeds of which are used to purchase, construct, or improve commercial or industrial property for that entity. The City of Wichita holds title to the property during the term of the IRB, and leases the property to the private entity in exchange for rent payments sufficient to cover the payment of principal and interest on the IRB to the public bondholders. During the term of the IRB, the private entity benefits from exemptions from certain interest rate, property, and sales taxes. At the conclusion of the IRB term, title to the property transfers to the private entity involved. The IRB scheme operated somewhat differently for Boeing, and subsequently Spirit (which acquired Boeing's Wichita division in June 2005), because the IRBs at issue, rather than being purchased by the public, were purchased by Boeing and Spirit themselves.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dispute Settlement Reports 2012 , pp. 374 - 387Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014