Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:10:12.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Donor-Conceived Families

Relatedness and Regulation in the Digital Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

By
Fiona Kelly  and
Deborah Dempsey
Edited by
Fiona Kelly ,
Deborah Dempsey  and
Adrienne Byrt
Fiona Kelly
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Deborah Dempsey
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Adrienne Byrt
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Get access

Summary

How are siblings who were conceived using the same sperm or egg donor making connections in the absence of legal support? What is it like to discover you are part of a fifty plus donor sibling group? How are donor-conceived adults using new technologies to connect with their genetic family and explore their identity? This edited collection considers the donor-linking experiences of donor-conceived adults and children, recipient parents, and donors in a global context. It includes contributions from legal academics, social workers, sociologists, psychologists, and policy makers who work in the assisted conception field. As a result, it will be of particular interest to scholars of reproductive law, sociology, and digital media and reproductive technologies. It will also engage those following the debate around donor linking and the use of do-it-yourself technologies, including direct-to-consumer genetic testing and social media.

Type
Chapter
Information
Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
Relatedness and Regulation
 , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blyth, E. (2012). Discovering the ‘facts of life’ following anonymous donor insemination. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebs006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosson, B., Dempsey, D., & Kelly, F. (2022). Secret shame – male infertility and donor conception in the wake of retrospective legislative change. Men and Masculinities, 25(3), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x211038329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., … & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempsey, D. (2010). Conceiving and negotiating reproductive relationships: lesbians and gay men forming families with children. Sociology, 44(6), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038510381607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, D. (2012a). More like a donor or more like a father? Gay men’s concepts of relatedness to children. Sexualities, 15(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363460711433735Google Scholar
Dempsey, D. (2012b). Gay male couples’ paternal involvement in lesbian-parented families. Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, D., & Kelly, F. (2017). Transnational third-party assisted conception: pursuing the desire for ‘origins’ information in the internet era. Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218567.ch-011Google Scholar
Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2018). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, F. J., & Dempsey, D. J. (2016). Experiences and motives of Australian single mothers by choice who make early contact with their child’s donor relatives. Medical Law Review, 24(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww038Google ScholarPubMed
Kelly, F., & Dempsey, D. (2016). The family law implications of early contact between sperm donors and their donor offspring. Family Matters, (98), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebz011Google Scholar
McNair, R., & Dempsey, D. (2002). Exploring diversity in lesbian-parented families Paper 1: Family formation and women’s roles. Family Matters, (63), 40–49.Google Scholar
Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297648Google Scholar
Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2011). Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22(5), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Standlee, A. (2019). Friendship and online filtering: The use of social media to construct offline social networks. New Media & Society, 21(3), 770–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818806844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15(9), 2041–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadeh, S. (2016). Disclosure of donor conception in the era of non-anonymity: safeguarding and promoting the interests of donor-conceived individuals? Human Reproduction, 31(11), 2416–2420. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew240Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×