Book contents
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Chapter 5 Metre
- Chapter 6 Morphology and Syntax
- Chapter 7 Support Verb Constructions in Plautus and Terence
- Chapter 8 Ecquis in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 9 Indirect Questions in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 10 Latin edepol ‘by Pollux!’
- Chapter 11 Early Latin Lexicon in Terence (and Plautus)
- Chapter 12 A Comparison of the Language of Tragedy and Comedy in Early Latin Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Chapter 8 - Ecquis in ‘Early Latin’
Aspects of Questions
from Part II - Drama
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2023
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Chapter 5 Metre
- Chapter 6 Morphology and Syntax
- Chapter 7 Support Verb Constructions in Plautus and Terence
- Chapter 8 Ecquis in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 9 Indirect Questions in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 10 Latin edepol ‘by Pollux!’
- Chapter 11 Early Latin Lexicon in Terence (and Plautus)
- Chapter 12 A Comparison of the Language of Tragedy and Comedy in Early Latin Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Summary
Among the most characteristic lexical features of Early Latin drama is its rich system of exclamations and interjections, prominently including expressions based on theonyms: hercle/mehercle ‘by Hercules!’, ēcastor/mēcastor ‘by Castor!’, edepol/pol ‘by Pollux!’, and others. Considerable linguistic interest attaches to these forms, concerning their syntax, their gender-differentiated usage, and in some cases their phonological, morphological, and etymological background. The background of Lat. edepol as an imprecation to Pollux has been clear at least since Varro (ap. Gell. 11.6). Alternative etymologies—e.g. “[m]ed Apoll[o]” (Speyer) and others (see LEW s.v. ēcastor)—can be discarded; but they point to indeterminacies that remain neglected. The modern understanding of edepol assumes a three-part univerbated structure: e- is a particle; -de- is a shortened form of the word for ‘god’ (Class. Lat. deus); and -pol is a shortened form of Pollux (or older Pollūcēs, borrowed from Gk. Πολυδεύκης). Each element incorporates interesting problems, and there is also a problem concerning the word as a whole.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Early LatinConstructs, Diversity, Reception, pp. 138 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023