Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on Contributors
- Chapter One The Economic Turn in Enlightenment Europe
- Chapter Two The Physiocratic Movement: A Revision
- Chapter Three The Political Economy of Colonization: From Composite Monarchy to Nation
- Chapter Four Against the Chinese Model: The Debate on Cultural Facts and Physiocratic Epistemology
- Chapter Five “Le superflu, chose très nécessaire”: Physiocracy and Its Discontents in the Eighteenth-Century Luxury Debate
- Chapter Six François Véron de Forbonnais and the Invention of Antiphysiocracy
- Chapter Seven Between Mercantilism and Physiocracy: Forbonnais's ‘Est modus in Rebus’ Vision
- Chapter Eight Physiocrat Arithmetic versus Ratios: The Analytical Economics of Jean-Joseph-Louis Graslin
- Chapter Nine Galiani: Grain and Governance
- Chapter Ten “Live and Die Proprietors and Free”: Morellet Dismantles the Dialogues and Defends the Radical Liberal Break
- Chapter Eleven “Is the Feeling of Humanity not More Sacred than The Right of Property?”: Diderot's Antiphysiocracy in His Apology of Abbé Galiani
- Chapter Twelve De facto Policies and Intellectual Agendas of an Eighteenth-Century Milanese Agricultural Academy: Physiocratic Resonances in the Società patriotica
- Chapter Thirteen Sensationism, Modern Natural Law and the “Science of Commerce” at the Heart of the Controversy between Mably and the Physiocrats
- Chapter Fourteen ‘One Must Make War on the Lunatics’: The Physiocrats’ Attacks on Linguet, the Iconoclast (1767–1775)
- Chapter Fifteen The Grain Question as the Social Question: Necker's Antiphysiocracy
- Chapter Sixteen Physiocracy in Sweden: A Note on the Problem of Inventing Tradition
- Chapter Seventeen Spain and the Economic Work of Jacques Accarias de Serionne
- Chapter Eighteen Captured by the Commercial Paradigm: Physiocracy Going Dutch
- Chapter Nineteen Cameralism, Physiocracy and Antiphysiocracy in the Germanies
- Chapter Twenty No Way Back to Quesnay: Say's Opposition to Physiocracy
- Chapter Twenty-One “A Sublimely Stupid Idea”: Physiocracy in Italy from the Enlightenment to Fascism
- Chapter Twenty-Two Epilogue: Political Economy and the Social
- Index
Chapter Twenty - No Way Back to Quesnay: Say's Opposition to Physiocracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on Contributors
- Chapter One The Economic Turn in Enlightenment Europe
- Chapter Two The Physiocratic Movement: A Revision
- Chapter Three The Political Economy of Colonization: From Composite Monarchy to Nation
- Chapter Four Against the Chinese Model: The Debate on Cultural Facts and Physiocratic Epistemology
- Chapter Five “Le superflu, chose très nécessaire”: Physiocracy and Its Discontents in the Eighteenth-Century Luxury Debate
- Chapter Six François Véron de Forbonnais and the Invention of Antiphysiocracy
- Chapter Seven Between Mercantilism and Physiocracy: Forbonnais's ‘Est modus in Rebus’ Vision
- Chapter Eight Physiocrat Arithmetic versus Ratios: The Analytical Economics of Jean-Joseph-Louis Graslin
- Chapter Nine Galiani: Grain and Governance
- Chapter Ten “Live and Die Proprietors and Free”: Morellet Dismantles the Dialogues and Defends the Radical Liberal Break
- Chapter Eleven “Is the Feeling of Humanity not More Sacred than The Right of Property?”: Diderot's Antiphysiocracy in His Apology of Abbé Galiani
- Chapter Twelve De facto Policies and Intellectual Agendas of an Eighteenth-Century Milanese Agricultural Academy: Physiocratic Resonances in the Società patriotica
- Chapter Thirteen Sensationism, Modern Natural Law and the “Science of Commerce” at the Heart of the Controversy between Mably and the Physiocrats
- Chapter Fourteen ‘One Must Make War on the Lunatics’: The Physiocrats’ Attacks on Linguet, the Iconoclast (1767–1775)
- Chapter Fifteen The Grain Question as the Social Question: Necker's Antiphysiocracy
- Chapter Sixteen Physiocracy in Sweden: A Note on the Problem of Inventing Tradition
- Chapter Seventeen Spain and the Economic Work of Jacques Accarias de Serionne
- Chapter Eighteen Captured by the Commercial Paradigm: Physiocracy Going Dutch
- Chapter Nineteen Cameralism, Physiocracy and Antiphysiocracy in the Germanies
- Chapter Twenty No Way Back to Quesnay: Say's Opposition to Physiocracy
- Chapter Twenty-One “A Sublimely Stupid Idea”: Physiocracy in Italy from the Enlightenment to Fascism
- Chapter Twenty-Two Epilogue: Political Economy and the Social
- Index
Summary
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, in France and then in Europe, Jean-Baptiste Say progressively became a central figure in political economy. Situating himself in the tradition of Adam Smith, he came to oppose the Physiocratic school of political economy on essential points. For this reason he has his own place in the current of opponents of Physiocracy.
This opposition is, however, of a different nature from the one that had prevailed in the decades when Physiocracy was at the center of the debates. The fact that Say claimed an affiliation with Smith did not prevent him from sharing a conception of political economy similar to that of the Physiocrats: like them, he based this new science on a sensualist theory of knowledge, a utilitarian theory of action and a theory of government—which we have proposed to call economic philosophy. His opposition to the Physiocrats bears more on the content of certain elements of economic philosophy than on its existence and structure. The works that Say published and the courses he professed show that his intellectual strategy was not frontal criticism of Physiocracy, but rather an attempt to integrate what he found true in their writings in order to achieve a complete exposition of the science—this is moreover the strategy he follows with respect to Smith. If he shows himself to be critical of some of their theses (fiscal and value theory), he is nonetheless not hard on Physiocracy and makes little use of eighteenth-century Antiphysiocratic writings.
In the late 1820s, Say's intellectual strategy undergoes a change with the arrival of a new adversary, David Ricardo. While the French economist aims at a “historicization” (mise en histoire) of Physiocracy insofar as it is no longer a live intellectual force in industrial society, he finds himself obliged to return to Quesnay's methodological mistakes so as to combat those he sees coming to the fore in the writings of the British economist.
Two overlapping generations of economists
Born in 1767, Jean-Baptiste Say was still in his childhood when François Quesnay died in 1774 at the age of 80.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Economic TurnRecasting Political Economy in Enlightenment Europe, pp. 677 - 698Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2019