Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:04:20.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Stress Evolution and Damage Formation in Confined Metal Lines under Electric Stressing

1D Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Paul S. Ho ,
Chao-Kun Hu ,
Martin Gall  and
Valeriy Sukharev
Paul S. Ho
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Chao-Kun Hu
Affiliation:
IBM T J Watson Research Center, New York
Martin Gall
Affiliation:
GlobalFoundries
Valeriy Sukharev
Affiliation:
Siemens Business
Get access

Summary

The momentum exchange between lattice atoms and conduction electrons together with the stress gradient along the metal wire embedded into the rigid confinement are two major driving forces for electromigration-induced evolution of stress and vacancy concentration. The growth of mechanical stress causes an evolution of a variety of defects that are inevitably present in the metal, leading to void formation. It affects the electrical properties of the interconnect. In order to estimate the time to failure caused by voiding, the kinetics of stress evolution should be resolved until the first void is nucleated. Then the analysis of the void size evolution should be performed in order to trace changes in resistances of individual voided lines and vias. In this chapter, we review the major results that have been achieved with the 1D phenomenological EM model. We demonstrate its capability to predict the transient and steady-state distributions of the vacancy concentration and the hydrostatic stress, a void nucleation, and its growth, and also a drift of small voids along a metal wire. Despite its simplified nature, the 1D model is capable of addressing the confinement effect of ILD/IMD dielectric on EM-induced degradation, and also the effect of metal grain structure.

Keywords

stressvacancydiffusionvoidKorhonen’s equationnucleation timecritical stressmicrostructurediffusion barriersgrain boundaries
Type
Chapter
Information
Electromigration in Metals
Fundamentals to Nano-Interconnects
 , pp. 80 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blech, I. A., Electromigration in thin aluminum films on titanium nitride, Journal of Applied Physics 47 (1976), 1203–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blech, I. A. and Herring, C., Stress generation by electromigration, Journal of Applied Physics Letters 29 (1976), 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nix, W. D. and Arzt, E., On void nucleation and growth in metal interconnect lines and electromigration conditions, Metallurgical Transactions 23A (1992), 2007–2013.Google Scholar
Arzt, E. and Nix, W. D., A model for the effect of line width and mechanical strength on electromigration failure of interconnects with “near-bamboo” grain structure, Journal of Materials Research 6 (1991), 731–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheim, R., Stress and electromigration in Al-lines of integrated circuits, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 40 (1992), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheim, R. and Kaeber, V., Atomistic and computer modeling of metallization failure of integrated circuits by electromigration, Journal of Applied Physics 70 (1991), 172–181.Google Scholar
Li, C.-Y., Borgesen, P. and Korhonen, M. A., Electromigration‐induced failure in passivated aluminum‐based metallizations − the dependence on temperature and current density, Applied Physics Letters 61 (1992) 411–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, M. A., Borgesen, P., Tu, K. N., and Li, C.-Y., Stress evolution due to electromigration in confined metal lines, Journal of Applied Physics Letters 73 (1993), 3790–3799.Google Scholar
Herring, C., Diffusional viscosity of a polycrystalline solid, Journal of Applied Physics 21 (1950), 437–445.Google Scholar
Larche, F. C. and Cahn, J. W., Overview No. 41: the interactions of composition and stress in crystalline solids, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 33 (1985), 331–357.Google Scholar
Mishin, Y. and Herzig, Chr., Grain Boundary Diffusion in Metals, Diffusion in Condenced Matter, ed. Kärger, J., Heitjans, P., and Haberlandt, R. (Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1998), 33–366.Google Scholar
Herzig, C. and Divinski, S. V., Grain boundary diffusion in metals: recent developments, Materials Transactions 44 (2003), 14–27.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. C., Calculation of diffusion penetration curves for surface and grain boundary diffusion, Journal of Applied Physics 22 (1951), 74–77.Google Scholar
Nomura, M. and Adams, J., Self-diffusion along twist grain boundaries in Cu, Journal of Materials Research 7 (1992), 3202–3212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, M., Mishin, Y., and Voter, A., Diffusion mechanism in Cu grain boundaries, Physical Review B 62 (2000), 3658–3673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Swygenhoven, H., Farkas, D., and Caro, A., Grain boundary structures in polycrystalline metals at the nanoscale, Physical Review B 62 (2000), 831–838.Google Scholar
Crosby, K. M., Grain boundary diffusion in copper under tensile stress. arXiv: cond-mat/0307065 (2003).Google Scholar
Suzuki, A. and Mishin, Y., Atomistic modeling of point defects and diffusion in copper grain boundaries, Interface Science 11 (2003), 131–148.Google Scholar
Ho, P. S. and Kwok, T., Electromigration in metals, Reports on Progress in Physics 52 (1989), 301–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, M. J., Thermodynamics of diffusion under pressure and stress: relation to point defect mechanisms, Applied Physics Letters 70 (1997) 2810–2812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewmon, P., Diffusion in Solids, 2nd ed. (Switzerland: Pergamon International Publishers, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R., and Ohring, N., Void formation and growth during electromigration in thin films, Journal of Applied Physics 42 (1971) 5671–5679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suo, Z., Reliability of interconnect structures. Volume 8: Interfacial and Nanoscale Failure. Comprehensive Structural Integrity, ed. Gerberich, W. and Yang, W. (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003), 265–324.Google Scholar
Hau-Riegea, S. P. and Thompson, C. V., The effects of the mechanical properties of the confinement material on electromigration in metallic interconnects, Journal of Materials Research 15 (2000), 1797–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarychev, M. E., Zhitnikov, Y. V., Borucki, L., Liu, C. L., and Makhviladze, T. M., General model for mechanical stress evolution during electromigration, Journal of Applied Physics 86 (1999), 3068–3075.Google Scholar
Sukharev, V., Zschech, E., and Nix, W. D., A model for electromigration- induced degradation mechanisms in dual-inlaid copper interconnects: effect of microstructure, Journal of Applied Physics 102 (2007), 053505 1–14.Google Scholar
Clement, J. J., Reliability analysis for encapsulated interconnect lines under dc and pulsed dc current using a continuum electromigration transport model, Journal of Applied Physics 82 (1997), 5991–6000.Google Scholar
Shatzkes, M. and Lloyd, J. R., A model for conductor failure considering diffusion concurrently with electromigration resulting in a current exponent of 2, Journal of Applied Physics 59 (1986), 3890–3893.Google Scholar
Clement, J. J., Electromigration modeling for integrated circuit interconnect reliability analysis, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 1 (2001), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, B. M., Nix, W. D., and Gleixner, R. J., Void nucleation on a contaminated patch, Journal of Materials Research 12 (1997), 2038–2042.Google Scholar
Gleixner, R. J., Clemens, B. M., and Nix, W. D., Void nucleation in passivated interconnect lines: effects of site geometries, interfaces, and interface flaws, Journal of Materials Research 12 (1997), 2081–2090.Google Scholar
Gleixner, R. J. and Nix, W. D., A physically based model for electromigration and stress-induced void formation in microelectronic interconnects, Journal of Applied Physics 86 (1999), 1932–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., Suo, Z., Marieb, T. N. and Maiz, J. A., Electromigration lifetime and critical void volume, Applied Physics Letters 85 (2004), 4639–4641.Google Scholar
Farlow, S. J., Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1993).Google Scholar
Huang, X., Yu, T., Sukharev, V., and Tan, S. X.-D., Physics-based electromigration assessment for power grid networks, Proceedings of the 51st Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC) (San Francisco, CA: ACM, 2014), 1–6.Google Scholar
Hau-Riege, C. S., Hau-Riege, S. P., and Marathe, A. P., The effect of interlevel dielectric on the critical tensile stress to void nucleation for the reliability of Cu interconnects, Journal of Applied Physics 96 (2004), 5792–5796.Google Scholar
Thouless, M. D., Effects of the surface diffusion on the creep of thin films and sintered arrays of particles, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 41 (1993), 1057–1064.Google Scholar
Huang, R., Gan, D., and Ho, P. S., Isothermal stress relaxation in electroplated Cu films. II. Kinetic modelling, Journal of Applied Physics 97 (2005), 103532 1–9.Google Scholar
Flinn, P. A., Gardner, D. S., and Nix, W. D., Measurements and interpretation of stress in aluminum-based metallization as a function of thermal history, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 34 (1987), 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, F. F., Homogeneous Nucleation Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Yost, F. G., Voiding due to thermal stress in narrow conductor lines, Scripta Metallurgica 23 (1989), 1323–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukharev, V., Beyond Black’s equation: full-chip EM/SM assessment in 3D IC stack, Microelectronic Engineering 120 (2014), 99–105.Google Scholar
Black, J. R., Electromigration-a brief survey and some recent results, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 16 (1969), 338–347.Google Scholar
Ohring, M., Reliability and Failure of Electronic Materials and Devices (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. R., New Models for interconnect failure in advanced IC technology, Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA) (Piscataway, IEEE, 2008), 297–302.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, M., Gall, M., Hennesthal, C., et al. Electromogration void nucleation and growth analysis using large-scale early failure statistics, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena and Reliability in 3D Microelectronics, ed. Ho, P. S., Hu, C. K., Nakamoto, M., et al. (Kyoto: AIP Conference Proceedings 1601, 2014), 89–98.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, M., Hennesthal, C., Talut, G., et al. Electromigration early failure void nucleation and growth phenomena in Cu and Cu(Mn) interconnects, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) (Anaheim: IEEE, 2013), 2C.1.1–6.Google Scholar
Blech, I. A. and Kinsbron, E., Electromigration in thin gold films on molybdenum surfaces, Thin Solid Films 25 (1975), 327–334.Google Scholar
Oates, A. S., Strategies to ensure electromigration reliability of Cu/Low-k interconnects at 10 nm, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technololgy 4 (2015), N3168–N3176.Google Scholar
Sukharev, V. and Zschech, E., A model for electromigration-induced degradation mechanism in dual-inlaid copper interconnects: effect of interface bonding strength, Journal of Applied Physics 96 (2004), 6337–6343.Google Scholar
Choi, Z. S., Lee, J., Lim, M. K., Gan, C. L., and Thompson, C. V., Void dynamics in copper-based interconnects, Journal of Applied Physics 110 (2011) 033505 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, B. D., Clement, J. J., and Thompson, C. V., Simulation of the effects of grain structure and grain growth on electromigration and the reliability of interconnects, Journal of Applied Physics, 81 (1997), 6073–6080.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. R., Nucleation and growth in electromigration failure, Microelectronics Reliability 47 (2007), 1468–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C.-K. and Rosenberg, R., Capping layer effects on electromigration in narrow Cu lines, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Ho, P. S., Baker, S. P., and Volkert, C. (Austin: AIP Conference Proceedings 741, 2004), 97–111.Google Scholar
Hau-Riege, S. P. and Thompson, C. V., Experimental characterization and modeling of the reliability of interconnect trees, Journal of Applied Physics 89 (2001), 601–609.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Sukharev, V., and Najm, F. N., Fast physics-based electromigration checking for on-die power grids, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) (Austin: IEEE/ACM, 2016), 110:1–8.Google Scholar
Black, J. R., Mass transport of aluminum by momentum exchange with conducting electrons, Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) (Los Angeles: IEEE, 1967), 148–159.Google Scholar
He, J. and Suo, Z., Statistics of electromigration lifetime analyzed using a deterministic transient model, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Ho, P. S., Baker, S. P., and Volkert, C. (Austin: AIP Conference Proceedings 741, 2004), 15–26.Google Scholar
Sukharev, V., Kteyan, A., and Huang, X., Postvoiding stress evolution in confined metal lines, IEEE Transactions on Device and Material Reliability 16 (2016), 50–60.Google Scholar
Chen, H.-B., Tan, S. X.-D., Huang, X., Kim, T., and Sukharev, V., Analytical modeling and characterization of electromigration effects for multibranch interconnect trees, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 35 (2016), 1811–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Kteyan, A., Tan, S. X.-D., and Sukharev, V., Physics-based electromigration models and full-chip assessment for power grid networks, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 35 (2016), 1848–1861.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Sukharev, V., and Najm, F. N., Power grid electromigration checking using physics-based models, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 37 (2018), 1317–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, 0., Bader, S., Sanchez, J. E. Jr., and Arzt, E., Observation and modeling of electromigration-induced void growth in Al-based interconnects, Materials Reliability in Microelectronics III, vol. 309, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 309, ed. Filter, W. F., Frost, H. J., Ho, P. S. and Rodbell, K. P. (San Francisco: Materials Research Society, 1993), 199–204.Google Scholar
Zschech, E., Engelmann, H.-J., Meyer, M. A., et al., Effect of interface strength on electromigration-induced inlaid copper interconnect degradation: Experiment and simulation, Z. Metallkunde 96 (2005), 966–971.Google Scholar
Vavra, I. and Lobotka, P., TEM in-situ observation of electromigration in A1 stripes with quasi-bamboo structure, Physica Status Solidi A 65 (1981), K107–K108.Google Scholar
Zschech, E., Meyer, M. A., and Langer, E., Effect of mass transport along interfaces and grain boundaries on copper interconnect degradation, Materials, Technology and Reliability Advanced Interconnects and Low-k Dielectrics, vol. 812, Materials Research Society Symposium. Proceedings, ed. Carter, R. J., Hau-Riege, Proc. C. S., Kloster, G. M., Lu, T.-M., and Schulz, S. E. (Warrendale: Materials Research Society, 2004), 361–372.Google Scholar
Ho, P. S., Motion of inclusion induced by a direct current and a temperature gradient, Journal of Applied Physics 41 (1970), 64–68.Google Scholar
Besser, P. R., Madden, M. C., and Flinn, P. A., In situ scanning electron microscopy observation of the dynamic behavior of electromigration voids in passivated aluminum lines, Journal of Applied Physics, 72 (1992), 3792–3797.Google Scholar
Arzt, E., Kraft, O., Nix, W. D., and Sanchez, J. E. Jr., Electromigration failure by shape change of voids in bamboo lines, Journal of Applied Physics 76 ( 1994), 1563–1571.Google Scholar
Marieb, T., Flinn, P., Brawman, J. C., Gardner, D., and Madden, M., Observations of electromigration induced void nucleation and growth in polycrystalline and near-bamboo passivated Al lines, Journal of Applied Physics 78 (1995) 1026–1032.Google Scholar
Suo, Z., Motion of microscopic surfaces in materials, Advances in Applied Mechanics 33 (1997), 193–294.Google Scholar
Suo, Z. and Wang, W., Diffusive void bifurcation in stressed solid, Journal of Applied Physics 76 (1994), 3410–3421.Google Scholar
Lane, M. W., Liniger, E. G., and Lloyd, J. R., Relationship between interfacial adhesion and electromigration in Cu metallization, Journal of Applied Physics 93 (2003), 1417–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zschech, E. and Sukharev, V., Microstructure effect on EM-induced copper interconnect degradation: experiment and simulation, Microelectron. Engineering 82 ( 2005), 629–638.Google Scholar
Zschech, E., Meyer, M. A., Mhaisalkar, S. G., et al. Effect of interface modification on EM-induced degradation mechanisms in copper interconnects, Thin Solid Films 504 ( 2006), 279–283.Google Scholar
Ogawa, E. T., Lee, K. D., Blaschke, V. A., and Ho, P. S., Electromigration reliability issues in dual-damascene Cu interconnects, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 51 (2002), 403–419.Google Scholar
Cao, L., Ganesh, K. J., Zhang, L., et al., Grain structure analysis and effect on electromigration reliability in nanoscale Cu interconnects, Applied Physics Letters 102 (2013), 131907, 1–4.Google Scholar
Peterson, N. I., Self diffusion in pure metals, Journal of Nuclear Materials 69, 70 (1978), 3–37.Google Scholar
Handbook of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion Data, ed. Kaur, I. and Gust, W. (Stuttgart: Ziegler Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Gupta, D., Hu, C. K., and Lee, K. L., Grain boundary diffusion and electromigration in Cu-Sn alloy thin films and their VLSI interconnects, Defect and Diffusion Forum 143 (1997), 1397–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zschech, E., Geisler, H., Zienert, I., et al., Reliability of copper inlaid structures – geometry and microstructure effects, Proceedings of the Advanced Metallization Conference (AMC), ed. Melnick, B. M., Cale, T. S.. Zaima, S. and Ohta, T. (San Diego: Materials Research Society, 2002), 305–312.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. A., Grafe, M., Engelmann, H.-J., Langer, E., and Zschech, E., Investigation of void formation and evolution during electromigration testing, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Zschech, E., Maex, K., Ho, P. S., Kawasaki, H., and Nakamura, T. (Dresden: AIP Conference Proceedings 817, 2006), 175–184.Google Scholar
Kteyan, A., Sukharev, V., Meyer, M. A., Zschech, E., and Nix, W. D., Microstructure effect on EM‐induced Degradations in dual‐inlaid copper interconnects, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Stress-Induce Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Ogawa, S., Ho, P. S., and Zschech, E. (Kyoto: AIP Conference Proceedings 945, 2007), 42–55.Google Scholar
Sukharev, V., Kteyan, A., Zschech, E., and Nix, W. D., Microstructure effect on EM-induced degradation in dual inlaid copper interconnects, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 9 (2009) 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, M. A., Borgesen, P., Brown, D. D., and Li, C.-Y., Microstructure based statistical model of electromigration damage in confined line metallizations in the presence of thermally induced stresses, Journal of Applied Physics 74 (1993), 4995–5004.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. R., Murray, C. E., Shaw, T. M., Lane, M. W., Liu, X.- H. and Liniger, E. G., Theory for electromigration failure in Cu conductors, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Zschech, E., Maex, K., Ho, P. S., Kawasaki, H., and Nakamura, T. (Dresden: AIP Conference Proceedings 817, 2006), 23–33.Google Scholar
Berger, T., Arnaud, L., Gonella, R., Touet, I., and Lormand, G., Electromigration characterization of damascene copper interconnects using normally and highly accelerated tests, Microelectronic Reliability 40 (2000), 1311–1316.Google Scholar
Vanasupa, L., Joo, Y.-C., Besser, P.R., and Pramanick, S., Texture analysis of damascene-fabricated Cu lines by X-ray diffraction and electron backscatter diffraction and its impact on electromigration performance, Journal of Applied Physics 85 (1999), 2583–2590.Google Scholar
Mullins, W. W., Mass transport at interfaces in single component systems, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 26 (1995), 1917–1929.Google Scholar
Rzepka, S., Meusel, E., Korhonen, M. A., and Li, C.-Y., 3-D finite element simulator for migration effects due to various driving forces in interconnect lines, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, ed. Kraft, O., Arzt, E., Volkert, C., and Ho, P. S. (Stuttgart: AIP Conference Proceedings 491, 1999), 150–162.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Zhou, J. P., Im, J., et al. Effects of cap layer and grain structure on electromigration reliability of Cu/low-k interconnects for 45 nm technology node, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) (Anaheim: IEEE, 2010), 581–585.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Kraatz, M., Aubel, O., et al., Cap layer and grain size effects on electromigration reliability in Cu/low-k interconnects, 2010 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings (IITC) (Burlingame: IEEE, 2010), 1–3.Google Scholar
COMSOL, Inc., Burlington, MA. 8 New England Executive Park.Google Scholar
Choy, J.-H., Sukharev, V., Chatterjee, S., Najm, F. N., Kteyan, A., and Moreau, S., Finite-difference methodology for full-chip electromigration analysis applied to 3D IC test structure: simulation vs. experiment, Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD) (Kamakura: IEEE, 2017), 41–44.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×