Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:22:45.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2023

Charles F. Meyer
Charles F. Meyer
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
English Corpus Linguistics
An Introduction
 , pp. 175 - 185
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, Bas (2001) Corpus Linguistics, Chomsky and Fuzzy Tree Fragments. In Mair, Christian and Hundt, Marianne (eds.) (2001) Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 5–13.Google Scholar
Aarts, Bas and Meyer, Charles F. (eds.) (1995) The Verb in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aarts, Jan, Halteren, Hans van, and Oostdijk, Nelleke (1996) The TOSCA Analysis System. In Koster, C. and Oltmans, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the First AGFL Workshop. Nijmegen: CSI. 181–91.Google Scholar
Acuña, Juan Carlos Fariña (1996) The Puzzle of Apposition: On So-Called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Acuña, Juan Carlos Fariña (2006) A Constructional Network in Appositive Space. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja and Carter, Ronald (2013) Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo (2018) Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed or Holistic Research? Combining Methods in Linguistic Research. In Litosseliti, Lia (ed.) Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 35–56.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn, Wilson, Andrew, and Rayson, Paul (2002) Introduction to the USAS Category System. Benedict Project Report.Google Scholar
Aston, Guy and Burnhard, Lou (1998) The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika (2014) ‘Who Are You and Why Are You Following Us?’ Wh-questions and Communicative Context in Television Dialogue. In Flowerdew, John (ed.) Discourse in Context (Contemporary Applied Linguistics 3). London/New York: Bloomsbury [formerly Continuum]. 49–70. www.monikabednarek.com/5.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alan (1988) The British Base and the American Connection in New Zealand Media English. American Speech 63: 326–44.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas (1990) Methodological Issues Regarding Corpus-based Analyses of Linguistic Variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5: 257–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas (1993) Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 241–57.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas (2019) Multi-Dimensional Analysis: A Historical Synopsis. In Berber, Tony and Veriano, Marcia (eds.) Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 11–26.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Burges, Jená (2000) Historical Change in the Language Use of Women and Men: Gender Differences in Dramatic Dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 21–37.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany (2016) Grammatical Complexity in Academic English, Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, and Atkinson, Dwight (1994) ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of English Historical Registers. In Fries, , Tottie, , and Schneider, (1993). 1–13.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, and Reppen, Randi (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Language Use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse, and Davies, Mark (2015) Exploring the Composition of the Searchable Web: A Corpus-based Taxonomy of Web Registers. Corpora 10(1): 11–45.Google Scholar
Blachman, Edward, Meyer, Charles F., and Morris, Robert A. (1996) The UMB Intelligent ICE Markup Assistant. In Greenbaum, (1996a). 54–64.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav (2018) Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1995) Adequacy, User-Friendliness, and Practicality in Transcribing. In Leech, , Myers, , and Thomas, (eds.) (1995). 54–61.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, Bois, John Du, and Thompson, Sandra (1991) Towards a New Corpus of American English. In Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt (eds.) English Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman. 64–91.Google Scholar
Chapelle, Carol A. (ed.) (2020) The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chen, Xueliang, Yan, Yuanle, and Jie, Hu (2019) A Corpus-Based Study of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s Linguistic Styles. International Journal of English Linguistics 9( 3): 13–22. www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijel/article/view/0/39048Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle and Jack Grieve, (2019) Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted Between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0222062. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter (1991a) Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. Andover: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (1991b) The Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English. In Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt (eds.) English Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman. 145–65.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy (1995) Theoretical Issues: Transcribing the Untranscribable. In Leech, , Myers, , and Thomas, . 35–53.Google Scholar
Copestake, Ann (2016) Computational Linguistics. In Allan, Keith (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 485–501.Google Scholar
Corpus Encoding Standard (2000) www.cs.vassar.edu/CES/122.Google Scholar
Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowdy, Steve (1993) Spoken Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 259–65.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne (2003) Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan (2003) The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark (2015) Corpora: An Introduction. In Biber, Douglas and Reppen, Randi (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11–31.Google Scholar
Dunning, Ted (1993) Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad (1993) HIAT: A Transcription System for Discourse Data. In Edwards, Jane and Lampert, Martin (eds.) (1993) Talking Data. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 123–48.Google Scholar
Elsness, Johan (1982) That v. Zero Connective in English Nominal clauses. ICAME News: 1–45.Google Scholar
Elsness, J. (1997) The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fang, Alex (1996) AUTASYS: Automatic Tagging and Cross-Tagset Mapping. In Greenbaum, (ed.) (1996a). 110–24.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles (1992) Corpus Linguistics or Computer-Aided Armchair Linguistics. In Svartvik, (ed.) (1992). 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles T., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary Catherine (1988) Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3): 501–83.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson (1979) A Tagged Corpus—Problems and Prospects. In Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan (eds.) Studies in English Linguistics. London: Longman. 192–209.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson (1992) Language Corpora B.C. Svartvik, Jan (ed.) Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 17–31.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson and Kučera, Henry (1982) Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fraser, Michael (1996) Tools and Techniques for Computer-assisted Biblical Studies. Paper delivered to the New Testament Research Seminar, Faculty of Theology, University of Oxford, June 1996. Available at: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mikef/pubs/NT_Seminar_Oxford_Fraser_1996.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fries, Udo, Tottie, Gunnel, and Schneider, Peter (eds.) (1993) Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey, and Sampson, Geoffrey (1987) The Computational Analysis of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger and Smith, Nicholas (1997) A Hybrid Grammatical Tagger: CLAWS 4. In Garside, , Leech, and McEnery, (1997). 102–21.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey, and McEnery, Anthony (eds.) (1997) Corpus Annotation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey, and Váradi, Tamás (1992) Lancaster Parsed Corpus. Manual to accompany the Lancaster Parsed Corpus. http://khnt.hit.uib.no/icame/manuals/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Gatto, Maristella (2014) Web as Corpus: Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gatto, Maristella A Gentle Introduction to SGML. In Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEI P3) http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bin/tei-tocs-p3?div=DIV1&id=SGGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Gries, Stefan T. (2009) Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-art Review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–26.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny, and Paquot, Magali (eds.) (2009) International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany (2019) Tagging and Counting Linguistic Features for Multi-Dimensional Analysis. In Berber-Sardinha, T. and Veirano, M. (eds.) Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. Bloomsbury: Continuum. 43–66.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney (1984) Corpus Analysis and Elicitation Tests. In Aarts, J. and Meijs, W (eds.) Corpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 195–201.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney (ed.) (1996a) Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney (1996b) The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney and Quirk, Randolph (1970) Elicitation Experiments in English: Linguistic Studies in Use and Attitude. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney and Svartvik, Jan (1990) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. In Svartvik, Jan (ed.) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press. 11–45.Google Scholar
Greene, Barbara B. and Rubin, Gerald M. (1971) Automatic Grammatical Tagging. Technical Report. Department of Linguistics: Brown University.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. (2017) Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R (2nd edn.). Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. and Berez, Andrea L. (2017) Linguistic Annotation in/for Corpus Linguistics. In Ide, Nancy and Pustejovsky, James (eds.) Handbook of Linguistic Annotation. Dordrecht: Springer. 379–409.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Lilliane (1991) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael and Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew (2014) Modest XML for Corpora: Not a Standard, But a Suggestion. ICAME Journal 38(1): 73–103. doi:10.2478/icame-2014-0004Google Scholar
Hasko, Victoria (2020) Qualitative Corpus Analysis. In Chapelle, Carol A (ed.) (2020) The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 951–7.Google Scholar
Heenan, Charles H. (2002) Manual and Technology-Based Approaches to Using Classification for the Facilitation of Access to Unstructured Text. (Unpublished Manuscript), Engineering Informatics Group, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hockey, Susan M. (2000) Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Sebastian (2007) From Web-Page to Mega-Corpus: The CNN Transcripts. In Hundt, Marianne, Nesselhauf, Nadja, and Biewer, Carolin (eds.) Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 69–85.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne and Leech, Geoffrey (2012) “Small is Beautiful”: On the Value of Standard Reference Corpora for Observing Recent Grammatical Change. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Closs Traugott, Elizabeth (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 175–88.Google Scholar
Jatav, Visaal, Teja, Ravi, Bharadwaj, Sudi, and Srinivasan, Mahesh (2017) Improving Part-of-Speech Tagging for NLP Pipelines. CoRR, abs/1708.00241.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto (1909–49) A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kalton, Graham (1983) Introduction to Survey Sampling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Keay, Julia (2005) Alexander the Corrector: The Tormented Genius whose Cruden’s Concordence Unwrote the Bible. Woodstock and New York: The Overlook Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme (1998) An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme (1996) Over Once Lightly. In Percy, Carol, Meyer, Charles F., and Lancashire, Ian (eds.) Synchronic Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 253–62.Google Scholar
Kepser, Stephan and Reis, Marga (eds.) (2005) Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Greyter.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Atkins, Sue, and Rundell, Michael (2007) BNC Design Model Past its Sell-by. In Proc. Corpus Linguistics. Birmingham, UK. Retrieved from www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/2007-KilgAtkinsRundell-CL-Sellby.pdf.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam and Kosem, Iztok (2012) Corpus Tools for Lexicographers. In Granger, Sylviane and Paquot, Magali (eds.) Electronic Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 31–55.Google Scholar
Kirk, John (1992) The Northern Ireland Transcribed Corpus of Speech. In Leitner, Gerhard (ed.) New Directions in English Language Corpora. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 65–73.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William, Meyer, Charles F., and Ingegneri, Dominique (1997) Uses of Inferential Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. In Ljung, Magnus (ed.) Corpus Based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 167–77.Google Scholar
Kučera, Henry (2002) Obituary for W. Nelson Francis. Journal of English Linguistics, 30(4), 306–9. doi:10.1177/007542402237878Google Scholar
Kučera, Henry and Francis, W. Nelson (1967) Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja (1991) Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Studies on “Can”/“May” and “Shall”/“Will”. University of Bamberg Studies in English Linguistics 28. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja (1996) Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts (3rd ed.). Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972) The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax. In Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 354–96.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Sidney (1984) Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (1992) Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance. In Svartvik, Jan (ed.) Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 105–22.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (1997) Grammatical Tagging. In Garside, , Leech, and McEnery, (eds.) (1997). 19–33.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey(1998) Preface. In Granger, Sylvianne Learner English on Computer. London: Longman. xiv–xx.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Garside, Roger, and Atwell, Eric (1983) The Automatic Grammatical Tagging of the LOB Corpus. ICAME Journal 7: 13–33.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg, and Thomas, Jenny (eds.) (1995) Spoken English on Computer. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey and Eyes, Elizabeth (1997) Syntactic Annotation: Treebanks. In Garside, , Leech, , and McEnery, (eds.). 34–52.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, and Smith, Nicholas (2009) Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leon, Fernando Sanchez and Nieto Serrano, Amalio F. (1997) Retargeting a Tagger. In Garside, , Leech, and McEnery, (eds.) (1997). 151–65.Google Scholar
Ljung, Magnus (ed.) (1997) Corpus-based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Love, Robbie (2020) Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction, The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei (2014) Computational Methods for Corpus Annotation and Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. (2002) Probabilistic Syntax. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefani (eds.) Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 289–342.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. (2011) Part-of-Speech Tagging from 97% to 100%: Is It Time for Some Linguistics? In Gelbukh, A. F Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6608. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19400-9_14Google Scholar
Mair, Christian (1995) Changing Patterns of Complementation, and Concomitant Grammaticalisation, of the Verb Help in Present-Day British English. In Aarts, and Meyer, (eds.) (1995). 258–72.Google Scholar
Maniez, François (2000) Corpus of English proverbs and set phrases. Message posted on the “Corpora” List, January 24.Google Scholar
Marcus, Mitchell, Santorini, Beatrice, and Marcinkiewicz, Mary Ann (1993) Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19: 314–30.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred (1997) Normalization of Middle English Prose in Practice. In Ljung, Magnus Corpus-Based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 211–26.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael and O’Keeffe, Anne (2010) Historical Perspective: What Are Corpora and How Have They Evolved? In O’Keefe, Anne and McCarthy, Michael (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. New York: Routledge. 3–13.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Hardie, Andrew (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Hardie, Andrew (2013) The History of Corpus Linguistics. In Allan, Keith (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics. Oxford Handbooks Online: Oxford University Press. 727–45.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (1987) Apposition in English. Journal of English Linguistics 20(1): 101–21.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (1992) Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (2002) Pseudo-Titles in the Press Genre of Various Components of the International Corpus of English. In Reppen, Randi, Fitzmaurice, Susan M., and Biber, Douglas (eds.) Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 147–66.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (2009) The Empirical Tradition in Linguistics Journal of English Linguistics 37: 208–13.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (2009) Pre-Electronic Corpora. In Lüdeling, Anke and Kytö, Merja (eds.) Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–14.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (2012) Textual Analysis: From Philology to Corpus Linguistics. In Kytö, Merja (ed.) English Corpus Linguistics: Crossing Paths. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 23–42.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. (2014) A Diachronic Study of Pseudo-titles and Related Appositives in the Press Reportage of British and American Newspapers. In Green, Eugene and Meyer, Charles F (eds.) The Variability of Current World Englishes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 239–56.Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra (2007) The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. doi:10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187Google Scholar
Mönnink, Inga (1997) Using Corpus and Experimental Data: A Multi-Method Approach. In Ljung, (ed.) (1997). 227–44.Google Scholar
Murphy, Bróna (2010) Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu (2000) Gender Differences in the Evolution of Standard English: Evidence from the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 38–59.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.) (1996) Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
New York Times (2009, Sept. 11) “The Cookbook Wars: Judge Rejects Copyright Suit Against Jessica Seinfeld.” Retrieved from https://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/the-cookbook-wars-judge-rejects-copyright-suit-against-jessica-seinfeld/Google Scholar
Oakes, Michael P. (1998) Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ooi, Vincent (1998) Computer Corpus Lexicography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke (1991) Corpus Linguistics and the Automatic Analysis of English. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi and Nevanlinna, Saara (1997) Re-phrasing in Early English. Expository Apposition with an Explicit Marker from 1350 to 1710. In Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja, and Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds.) English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in English Linguistics and Genre Styles. Topics in English Linguistics 23. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 121–83.Google Scholar
Pepper, Steven (2000) The Whirlwind Guide to SGML & XML Tools and Vendors. www.infotek.no/sgmltool/guide.htmGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A. (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Nick and Quinn, Akiva (1996) Developing the ICE Corpus Utility Program. In Greenbaum, (ed.) (1996a). 79–91.Google Scholar
Powell, Christina and Simpson, Rita C. (2001) Collaboration Between Corpus Linguists and Digital Librarians for the MICASE Web Search Interface. In Simpson, R. and Swales, J. (eds.) Corpus Linguistics in North America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. 32–47.Google Scholar
Prescott, Andrew (1997) The Electronic Beowulf and Digital Restoration. Literary and Linguistic Computing 12: 185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette (1987) Corpus Development. In Sinclair, (ed.) (1987). 1–40.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti (1992) The Diachronic Corpus as a Window to the History of English. In Svartvik, J. (ed.) Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 185–205.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti (2000) The World of English Historical Corpora: From Cædmon to the Computer Age. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 7–20.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter (1998) New Methods of Editing, Exploring, and Reading The Canterbury Tales. http://cts.dmu.ac.uk/repository/robinson-1998/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John (1866) The Crown of Wild Olive. London: Smith, Elder & Co.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, Christer and Voutilainen, Atro (1997) Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics: Madrid, Spain. 246–53.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef (1996) Second-Language Corpora. In Greenbaum, (ed.) (1996a). 182–96.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef and Claridge, Claudia (1997) Classifying Text- or Genre-Variation in the Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Texts. In Hickey, Raymond, Kytö, Merja, Lancashire, Ian, and Rissanen, Matti (eds.) Tracing the Trail of Time: Proceedings of the Diachronic Corpora Workshop, Toronto (Canada) May 1995. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi. 119–35.Google Scholar
Shastri, S. V. (1988) The Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English and Work Done on its Basis So Far. ICAME Journal 2: 15–26.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert J. (1997) “Choosing Your Relatives: Relative Clauses in New Zealand English.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Wellington: Department of Linguistics, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita, Lucka, Bret, and Ovens, Janine (2000) Methodological Challenges of Planning a Spoken Corpus with Pedagogical Outcomes. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 43–9.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John (ed.) (1987) Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John, Jones, Susan, and Daley, Robert (2004) English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita and Andersen, Gisle (1996) More Trends in Teenage Talk: A Corpus-Based Investigation of the Discourse Items cos and innit. In Percy, Carol, Meyer, Charles F., and Lancashire, Ian (eds.) Synchronic Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 189–203.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan (ed.) (1990) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Lund, Sweden: Lund University PressGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, Jan (1992) Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan and Quirk, Randolph (eds.) (1980) A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry (1891–98) A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali (1998) Was/Were Variation across the Generations: View from the City of York. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 153–91.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Lawrence, Helen (2000) “I Used to Dance, but I don’t Dance Now”: The Habitual Past in English. Journal of English Linguistics 28(4): 324–53.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tapanainen, Pasi and Järvinen, Timo (1997) A Non-Projective Dependency Parser. www.conexor.fi/anlp97/anlp97.html [also published in Procs. ANLP-97. ACL. Washington, DC]Google Scholar
Tatlock, John S. P. and Kennedy, Arthur Garfield (1963) A Concordance to the Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer and to the “Romaunt of the Rose.” 1927. Washington: The Carnegie Institute of Washington.Google Scholar
Thompson, Henry S. and McKelvie, David (1996) A software architecture for simple, efficient SGML applications. Paper presented at SGML Europe ’96 Munich. www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/software/nsl/sgml-europe/talk.html.Google Scholar
Thompson, Henry S., Anderson, Anne H., and Bader, Miles (1995) Publishing a Spoken and Written Corpus on CD-ROM: The HCRC Map Task Experience. In Leech, , Myers, , and Thomas, (eds.) (1995). 168–80.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena (2001) Corpus Linguistics at Work Vol. 6. Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Atro (1999) A Short History of Tagging. In van Halteren, Hans (ed.) Syntactic Word Class Tagging. Text, Speech and Language Technology Vol. 9. Dordrecht: Springer. 9–21.Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean (2003) Completing Parsed Corpora: From Correction to Evolution. In Abeillé, Anne (ed.) Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Springer. 61–71.Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean (2021) Statistics in Corpus Linguistics Research. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xiong, W. et al. (2017) Toward Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 25(12): 2410–23. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2017.2756440Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Charles F. Meyer, University of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Book: English Corpus Linguistics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107298026.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Charles F. Meyer, University of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Book: English Corpus Linguistics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107298026.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Charles F. Meyer, University of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Book: English Corpus Linguistics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107298026.009
Available formats
×