Book contents
- English in Multilingual South Africa
- Studies in English Language
- English in Multilingual South Africa
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- I A Framework for English in South Africa
- Chapter 1 English in South Africa: Contact and Change
- Chapter 2 South Africa in the Linguistic Modeling of World Englishes
- Chapter 3 South African English, the Dynamic Model and the Challenge of Afrikaans Influence
- Chapter 4 The Historical Development of South African English: Semantic Features
- Chapter 5 Regionality in South African English
- Chapter 6 Does Editing Matter? Editorial Work, Endonormativity and Convergence in Written Englishes in South Africa
- II Sociolinguistics, Globalisation and Multilingualism
- III Language Interfaces
- Timeline for South African History
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - South African English, the Dynamic Model and the Challenge of Afrikaans Influence
from I - A Framework for English in South Africa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2019
By
Edited by
Book contents
- English in Multilingual South Africa
- Studies in English Language
- English in Multilingual South Africa
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- I A Framework for English in South Africa
- Chapter 1 English in South Africa: Contact and Change
- Chapter 2 South Africa in the Linguistic Modeling of World Englishes
- Chapter 3 South African English, the Dynamic Model and the Challenge of Afrikaans Influence
- Chapter 4 The Historical Development of South African English: Semantic Features
- Chapter 5 Regionality in South African English
- Chapter 6 Does Editing Matter? Editorial Work, Endonormativity and Convergence in Written Englishes in South Africa
- II Sociolinguistics, Globalisation and Multilingualism
- III Language Interfaces
- Timeline for South African History
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Summary
South African history provides a uniquely complex environment for the development of New Englishes, a fact reflected in recent work which has both questioned Schneider’s Phase-4 ‘placement’ of South African English (SAfE) in terms of the Dynamic Model (DM) and argued for refinements to the DM to account for SAfE’s current relative lack of homogeneity and the different phases that different South African Englishes appear to be in. It is argued here that the sociohistorical role played by the Afrikaans-speaking community is the main source of this unique complexity. The European background of the IDG strand created conditions for extremely rapid convergence with the STL strand, in effect ‘collapsing’ Phases 1 to 3 of the DM. Concurrently, Afrikaner separatism and nationalism actualized a countervailing divergent tendency that has not been incorporated into the DM. Thus, the DM rests on an overly optimistic social psychology and sociology, with an over-emphasis on convergent forces; while the actualization of this convergence explains existing developmental similarities across New Englishes worldwide, it is an historical accident unreflective of a ‘deeper’ (universal) balance between centripetal and centrifugal forces.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- English in Multilingual South AfricaThe Linguistics of Contact and Change, pp. 30 - 51Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). ‘Discourse in the novel’, in Holquist, Michael (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 259–422.Google Scholar
Bekker, Ian (2012). ‘South African English as a late 19th-century extraterritorial variety’, English World-Wide 33(1): 127–46.Google Scholar
Bekker, Ian (2013). ‘The formation of South African English’, English Today 29(1): 3–9.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan (2007). ‘Bakhtin and sociolinguistic theory’, in Bayley, Robert (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–109.Google Scholar
Coetzee-Van Rooy, Susan (2014). ‘The identity issue in bi- and multilingual repertoires in South Africa’, in Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus and Kautzsch, Alexander (eds.), The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
Da Silva, Arista B. (2008). ‘South African English: a sociolinguistic investigation of an emerging variety’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Denis, Derek and d’Arcy, Alexandra (2018). ‘Settler Colonial Englishes are distinct from Postcolonial Englishes’, American Speech 93(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Deon (2015). ‘Regionality in White South African English: an acoustic dialectometric investigation’, unpublished MA dissertation, North-West University.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Deon and Bekker, Ian (2014). “To err is human’: the case for neo-rhoticity in White South African English’, Language Matters 45(1): 23–39.Google Scholar
Evans, Stephen (2014). ‘The evolutionary dynamics of postcolonial Englishes: a Hong Kong case study, Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(5): 571–603.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Bourhis, Richard Y. and Taylor, Donald M. (1997). ‘Towards a theory of language in ethnic-group relations’, in Giles, Howard (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, pp. 317–48.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (2014). ‘New perspectives on linguistic variation and ethnic identity in North America’, Language and Communication 35(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Dieter and Zerbian, Sabine (2009). ‘Rhoticity in Black South African English: a sociolinguistic study’, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 27(1): 135–48.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (2003). ‘How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of new dialect formation’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–39.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (2013). ‘Supraregionalisation and dissociation’, in Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 537–54.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. and Susan, Gal (2000). ‘Language ideology and linguistic differentiation’, in Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–84.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Chris and van Rooy, Bertus (2004). ‘Emphasizer now in colloquial South African English’, World Englishes 23(2): 269–80.Google Scholar
Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. (2010). ‘Review of Schneider (2007)’, World Englishes 29(2): 316–19.Google Scholar
Lanham, Len W. (1982). ‘English in South Africa’, in Bailey, Richard W. and Görlach, Manfred (eds.), English as a World Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 324–52.Google Scholar
Lanham, Len W. and Macdonald, Carol (1979). The Standard in South African English and its Social History. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger and Wright, Susan (1986). ‘Endogeny vs. contact: ‘Afrikaans influence’ on South African English’, English World-Wide 7(2): 201–23.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend (1992). English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend (2010). ‘Socio-phonetics and social change: deracialisation of the goose vowel in South African English’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(1): 3–33.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend (2017). ‘Class, gender and substrate erasure in sociolinguistic change: a sociophonetic study of schwa in deracializing South African English’, Language 93(2): 314–46.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2008). World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistics Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar (2003). ‘The dynamics of New Englishes: from identity construction to dialect birth’, Language 79(2): 233–81.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar (2007). Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar (2008). ‘Accommodation versus identity? A response to Trudgill’, Language in Society 37(2): 262–7.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar (2014). ‘New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes’, World Englishes 33(1): 9–32.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar (2017). ‘The linguistic consequences of Brexit? No reason to get excited!’, World Englishes 36(3): 353–5.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel (2008). St Helenian English: Origins, Evolution and Variation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spencer, Brenda (2011). ‘International sporting events in South Africa, identity realignment, and Schneider’s EVENT X’, African Identities 9(3): 267–78.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa and Peräkylä, Anssi (2014). ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: on the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations’, Language in Society 43(2): 185–207.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (2004). New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (2008). ‘Colonial dialect contact in the history of the European languages: on the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation’, Language in Society 37(2): 241–54.Google Scholar
Tuten, Donald L. (2008). ‘Identity formation and accommodation: sequential and simultaneous relations’, Language in Society 37(2): 259–62.Google Scholar
Van Onselen, Charles (1982). Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Witwatersrand 1886–1914. Vol 1: New Babylon. Johannesburg: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus (2010). ‘Social and linguistic perspectives on variability in world Englishes’, World Englishes 29(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus (2014). ‘Convergence and endonormativity at Phase 4 of the Dynamic Model’, in Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus and Kautzsch, Alexander (eds.), The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus and Terblanche, Lize (2010). ‘Complexity in word-formation processes in New Varieties of South African English’, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 28(4): 357–74.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka (2016). ‘Interview with Edgar Schneider’, Journal of English Linguistics 44(4): 346–70.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Ronel and van Rooy, Bertus (2014). ‘The development of modals of obligation and necessity in White South African English through contact with Afrikaans’, Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 31–50.Google Scholar
Wileman, Bruce (2011). ‘Regional variation in South African English: a socio-phonetic comparison of young white speakers in Cape Town and Durban’, unpublished MA dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Wileman, Bruce (2018). ‘A sociophonetic investigation of ethnolinguistic differences in voice quality among young South African English speakers’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Wilmot, Kirstin (2014). ‘“Coconuts” and the middle-class: identity change and the emergence of a new prestigious English variety in South Africa’, English World-Wide 35(3): 306–37.Google Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine (2015). ‘Syntactic and prosodic focus marking in contact varieties of South African English’, English World-Wide 36(2): 228–58.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by