Enlightenment thinking about gender

Dorinda Outram

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139226318.008

This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

7 - Enlightenment thinking about gender

Dorinda Outram

Show author details

Dorinda Outram: Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Who made man the exclusive judge, if woman partake with him of the gift of reason?

For man and woman, truth, if I understand the meaning of the word, must be the same; yet for the fanciful female character, so prettily drawn by poets and novelists, demanding the sacrifice of truth and sincerity, virtue becomes a relative idea, having no other foundation but utility, and of that utility, men pretend arbitrarily to judge, shaping it to their own convenience.

The male is male only at certain moments. The female is female her whole life…everything constantly recalls her sex to her…a perfect woman and a perfect man ought not to resemble each other in mind any more than in looks.

The Enlightenment devoted great energies to the definition of gender, so great in fact that some historians have seen this period as a watershed in European culture's attempts to define difference between the sexes. Gender, like the exotic, was an area of difference. It therefore challenged some very strong strands in Enlightenment thought, the strands that emphasised the idea of a universal human nature, and a universal human history, both validated by the possession of a single universal human form of rationality. It was no accident that by the end of the eighteenth century many thinkers such as Mary Wollstonecraft were to equate the denial of rights to slaves and the denial of rights to women. Each destabilised crucial Enlightenment assumptions. Yet in practice as well as in much Enlightenment writing, each was insisted upon. This chapter attempts to understand this contradiction.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Enlightenment , pp. 84 - 98

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226318.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wollstonecraft, Mary, Vindication of the Rights of Women [1792], ed. M. B. Kramnick (London, 1982), 87, 139

Rousseau, Jean Jacques, Emile, ou de l’éducation [1762] (Paris, 1964), book V, 446, 450

Goldberg, Rita, Sex and Enlightenment: Women in Richardson and Diderot (Cambridge, 1984)

Laqueur, Thomas, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 5. ‘By around 1800, writers of all sorts were determined to base what they insisted were fundamental differences between the male and female sexes, and thus between man and woman, on discoverable biological distinctions, and to express these in a radically different rhetoric.’

Fauchéry, Pierre, La destinée féminine dans le roman européen du dix-huitième siècle, 1713–1807: Essai de gynécomythie romanesque (Paris, 1972)

Miller, Nancy K., The Heroine's Text: Readings in the French and English Novel 1722–1782 (New York, 1980)

Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth and Genovese, Eugene D., Fruits of Merchant Capital (Oxford, 1983)

Hippel, Theodor von, Über die Bürgerliche Verbesserung der Weiber (Berlin, 1792)

Caritat, Nicolas, Condorcet, Marquis de, ‘Lettres d'un bourgeois de New Haven’, in Oeuvres complètes de Condorcet (Paris, 1804), XII, 19–20

Jordanova, L. J., Sexual Visions: Images of Gender in Science and Medicine between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London and New York, 1989), 19–42, esp. 41

Tomaselli, Sylvana, ‘The Enlightenment Debate on Women’, History Workshop Journal, 20 (1985), 101–24Google Scholar

Lewis, Jan, ‘The Republican Wife: Virtue and Seduction in the Early Republic’, William & Mary Quarterly, 44 (1987), 689–721Google Scholar

de St-Pierre, J. H. Bernadin, Paul et Virginie (Paris, 1788)

Schiebinger, Londa, ‘Skeletons in the Closet: The First Illustrations of the Female Skeleton in Eighteenth-Century Anatomy’, Representations 14 (1986), 42–82Google Scholar

The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge, MA, 1989), 191–200

Fee, Elizabeth, ‘Nineteenth-Century Craniology: The Study of the Female Skull’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 53 (1979), 415–33; Schiebinger, ‘Skeletons’, 206–7Google Scholar

Hawkins, Laetitia, Letters on the Female Mind (London, 1792)

Jordanova, L., Sexual Visions: Images of Gender in Science and Medicine between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London and New York, 1989), 29

Knibichler, Yvonne, ‘Les médecins et la “nature féminine” au temps du Code Civil’, Annales, ESC, 31(1976), 824–45Google Scholar

Jones, V., Women in the Eighteenth Century: Constructions of Femininity (London, 1990)

Elshtain, J. B., Public Man, Private Woman (Oxford, 1981)

Armstrong, N., Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (Oxford, 1987)

Ozment, Steven, When Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe (Cambridge, MA, 1983)

Niestroj, B., ‘Modern Individuality and the Social Isolation of Mother and Child’, Comparative Civilisations’ Review, 16 (1987), 23–40Google Scholar

Charlton, D. G., ‘The New Eve’, in New Images of the Natural in France: A Study in European Cultural History 1750–1800 (Cambridge, 1984)

Sherriff, Mary, ‘Fragonard's Erotic Mothers and the Politics of Reproduction’, in L. Hunt (ed.), Eroticism and the Body Politic (Baltimore, MD, and London, 1991), 14–40

Duncan, Carole, ‘Happy Mothers and Other New Ideas in French Art’, Art Bulletin, 55 (1973), 570–83Google Scholar

Lindeman, Mary, ‘Love for Hire: The Regulation of the Wet-Nursing Business in Eighteenth-Century Hamburg’, Journal of Family History, 6 (1981), 379–95Google Scholar

Sussman, G., Selling Mother's Milk: The Wet-Nursing Business in France, 1715–1914 (Urbana, IL, 1982)

Hoffman, Paul, La Femme dans la pensée des Lumières (Paris, 1977)

Hunt, M., Jacob, Margaret, Mack, Phyllis and Perry, Ruth (eds.), Women and the Enlightenment (New York, 1984)

de Voltaire, F. M. A., ‘Femmes, soyez soumises à vos maris’, Dialogues et anecdotes philosophiques, ed. Raymond Nares (Paris, 1955), 216

Diderot, Denis, ‘Sur les Femmes’, Oeuvres, ed. André Billy (Paris, 1951), 985

Diderot, ‘Sur les femmes’; Voltaire, ‘Femmes, soyez soumises’; Montesquieu, Spirit of the Laws, Book XXIII, I (Paris, 1748).

Landes, Joan, Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution (Ithaca, NY, and London, 1988)

Hunt, L. (ed.), Eroticism and the Body Politic (Baltimore, MD, 1991), 63–89

Maza, Sara, ‘Le tribunal de la nation’, Annales ESC, 42 (1987), 73–90.Google Scholar

Outram, D., The Body and the French Revolution: Sex, Class and Political Culture (New Haven, CT, and London, 1989)

Book contents

7 - Enlightenment thinking about gender

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive