Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:09:16.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Published Works of Denis Feeney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

Denis Feeney
Introduction by
Stephen Hinds
Denis Feeney
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Stephen Hinds
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 387 - 395
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

‘Wild beasts in the De Rerum Natura’, Prudentia 10 (1978), 15–22Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

A Commentary on Silius Italicus Punica Book 1 (DPhil Diss., Oxford University)Google Scholar
‘The taciturnity of Aeneas’, CQ 33 (1983), 204–19;Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Volpilhac, J., Miniconi, P. and Devallet, G. (eds.), Silius Italicus. La Guerre Punique. Tome II (Paris, 1981), in CR 33 (1983), 322–3Google Scholar
‘The reconciliations of Juno’, CQ 34 (1984), 179–94;Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Burck, Erich, Historische und epische Tradition bei Silius Italicus (Munich, 1984), in CR 35 (1985), 390–1Google Scholar
‘Epic hero and epic fable’, CompLit 38 (1986), 137–58 (= Vol. 1.3)*Google Scholar
‘Stat magni nominis umbra: Lucan on the greatness of Pompeius Magnus’, CQ 36 (1986), 239–43;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
‘History and revelation in Vergil’s underworld’, PCPhS 32 (1986), 1–24;Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
‘Following after Hercules, in Virgil and Apollonius’, PVS 18 (1986), 47–83 (= Vol. 1.6)*Google Scholar
Review of Schubert, Werner, Jupiter in den Epen der Flavierzeit (Frankfurt am Main, 1984), in CR 36 (1986), 134–5Google Scholar
Review of Clausen, Wendell, Virgil’s ‘Aeneid’ and the Traditions of Hellenistic Poetry (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, 1987);Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Boyle, A.J., The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil (Leiden, 1986), in CR 37 (1987), 171–3Google Scholar
Review of Kuppers, Jochem, Tantarum causas irarum: Untersuchungen zur einleitenden Bücherdyade der Punica des Silius Italicus (Berlin, 1986), in CR 37 (1987), 306–7Google Scholar
Review of Renger, Cornelia, Aeneas und Turnus: Analyse einer Feindschaft (Frankfurt, 1985), in JRS 77 (1987), 250–1Google Scholar
Review of Johnson, W.R., Momentary Monsters: Lucan and his Heroes (Cornell, NY, 1987), in TLS (26 February 1988), 227Google Scholar
Review of Papanghelis, O., Propertius on Love and Death (Cambridge, 1987), in TLS (18 March 1988), 312Google Scholar
Review of Ross, D.O., Physics and Poetry in Vergil’s ‘Georgics’ (Princeton, NJ, 1987) andGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Conte, Gian Biagio, The Rhetoric of Imitation. Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets (Ithaca, NY, 1986), in JRS 79 (1989), 206–7Google Scholar
The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar
Review of Hainsworth, J.B., The Idea of Epic (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, 1991), in The Times Higher Educational Supplement no. 974 (5 July 1991), 20Google Scholar
‘Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the problem of free speech under the Principate’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (London, 1992), 1–25;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
‘“Shall I compare thee … ?” Catullus 68 and the limits of analogy’, in Woodman, A.J. and Powell, J. (eds.), Author and Audience in Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1992), 33–44;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Conte, G.B., Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l’elegia d’amore, l’enciclopedia di Plinio (Milan, 1991), in JRS 82 (1992), 237Google Scholar
Review of West, D., Virgil: The Aeneid (London, 1990), in CR 42 (1992), 191–2Google Scholar
Review of Boyle, A.J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire (Berwick, Vic., 1990), in CR 42 (1992), 323–4Google Scholar
‘Epilogue: towards an account of the ancient world’s concepts of fictive belief’, in Wiseman, T.P. and Gill, C. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter, 1993), 230–44 (= Vol. 2.3)*Google Scholar
‘Horace and the Greek lyric poets’, in Rudd, N. (ed.), Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium (London, 1993), 41–63;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Korn, M. and Tschiedel, H.J., Ratis omnia vincet: Untersuchungen zu den Argonautica des Valerius Flaccus (Hildesheim, 1991), in CR 43 (1993), 174Google Scholar
Review of Galinsky, Karl (ed.), The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? (Frankfurt am Main, 1992), in BMCR 4 (1993), 457–61Google Scholar
‘Beginning Sallust’s Catiline’, in Gray, V.J. (ed.), Nile, Ilissos and Tiber: Essays in Honour of Walter Kirkpatrick Lacey (Auckland, 1994), 139–46 (= Vol. 1.7)*Google Scholar
Review of White, Peter, Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome (Cambridge, MA, 1993), in BMCR 5.4 (1994), 346–9Google Scholar
‘Criticism ancient and modern’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford, 1995), 301–12;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Herbert-Brown, Geraldine, Ovid and the Fasti: An Historical Study (Oxford, 1994), in CO 72 (1995), 106Google Scholar
Review of Luce, T.J. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition (Princeton, NJ, 1992);Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Lyne, R.O.A.M., Horace: Behind the Public Poetry (New Haven, CT, 1995);Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Fantham, Elaine, Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius (Baltimore, MD, 1997), in TLS (1 August 1997), 27Google Scholar
Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar
Virgil: Aeneid, trans. C.H. Sisson, ed. Feeney, D. (London, 1998)Google Scholar
‘Leaving Dido: the appearance(s) of Mercury and the motivations of Aeneas’, in A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth, ed. Burden, M (London, 1998), 105–27 (=Vol. 1.8)*Google Scholar
Review of Easterling, P.E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy (Cambridge, 1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Bartsch, Shadi, Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War (Cambridge, MA, 1997), in TLS (24 July 1998), 28Google Scholar
‘Epic violence, epic order: killings, catalogues, and the role of the reader in Aeneid 10’, in Perkell, C. (ed.), Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide (Norman, OK, 1999), 178–94 (=Vol. 1.9)*Google Scholar
‘Mea tempora: patterning of time in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception (Cambridge, 1999), 13–30 (=Vol. 1.10)*Google Scholar
Review of Hardie, Philip, Virgil (Oxford, 1998), in JACT Review 25 (1999), 28Google Scholar
Review of Levi, Peter, Virgil: His Life and Times (London, 1998), in TLS (25 June 1999), 38Google Scholar
Review of Dupont, Florence, The Invention of Literature: From Greek Intoxication to the Latin Book, tr. Janet Lloyd (Baltimore, MD, 1999), in TLS (28 April 2000), 9Google Scholar
Review of Fowler, Don, Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin (Oxford, 2000), in JRS 91 (2001) 212–14Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge, 2002)Google Scholar
‘The odiousness of comparisons: Horace on literary history and the limitations of synkrisis’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry (Rethymnon, 2002), 7–18 (=Vol. 2.6)*Google Scholar
‘Vna cum scriptore meo: poetry, principate, and the traditions of literary history in the Epistle to Augustus’, in Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge, 2002), 172–87;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Henderson, John, Telling Tales on Caesar: Roman Stories from Phaedrus (Oxford, 2001), in TLS (29 March 2002), 29Google Scholar
Review of Newlands, Carole, Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire (Cambridge, 2002), in TLS (15 November 2002), 29Google Scholar
Review of Depew, Mary and Obbink, Dirk (eds.), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society (Cambridge, MA, 2000), in JRS 93 (2003), 337–9Google Scholar
‘Interpreting sacrificial ritual in Roman poetry: disciplines and their models’, in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome Held at Stanford University in February 2002 (Stuttgart, 2004), 9–29 (=Vol. 1.11)*Google Scholar
‘Tenui … latens discrimine: spotting the differences in Statius’ Achilleid’, MD 52 (2004) (Re-Presenting Virgil: Special Issue in Honor of Michael C.J. Putnam, eds. G.W. Most and S. Spence), 85–105 (=Vol. 1.12)*Google Scholar
‘Introduction’, in Ovid: Metamorphoses. A New Verse Translation, tr. D. Raeburn (London, 2004), xiii–xxxviGoogle Scholar
Review of Nisbet, R.G.M. and Rudd, Niall, A Commentary on Horace Odes Book 3 (Oxford, 2004), in TLS (8 October 2004), 8–9Google Scholar
‘Two Virgilian acrostics: certissima signa?’, with Damien Nelis, CQ 55 (2005), 644–6 (=Vol. 2.8)*Google Scholar
‘The beginnings of a literature in Latin’, JRS 95 (2005), 226–40:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Green, Peter, Ovid: The Poems of Exile (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, 2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Goldberg, Sander M., Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception (Cambridge, 2005), in BMCR 2006.08.45Google Scholar
Review (with Joshua T. Katz) of Habinek, T., The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order (Baltimore, MD and London, 2005), in JRS 96 (2006), 240–2Google Scholar
Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, 2007)Google Scholar
‘On not forgetting the “Literatur” in “Literatur und Religion”: Representing the Mythic and the Divine in Roman Historiography’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, vol. 2 (Berlin, 2007), 173–202 (=Vol. 1.13)*Google Scholar
‘The history of Roman religion in Roman historiography and epic’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion (Oxford, 2007), 129–42Google Scholar
Review of Fallon, Peter, Virgil: Georgics (Oxford, 2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Gibson, Roy, Green, Steven and Sharrock, Alison (eds.), The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris (Oxford, 2007), in TLS (4 May 2007), 8–9Google Scholar
Review of Beard, Mary, The Roman Triumph (Cambridge, MA, 2007), in LRB (21 February 2008), 11–12Google Scholar
Review of Conte, Gian Biagio, The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, tr. E. Fantham and G. Most, ed. Harrison, S. (Oxford, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Lyne, R.O.A.M., Collected Papers on Latin Poetry (Oxford, 2007), in CR 58 (2008), 459–61Google Scholar
Review of de Jong, Irene J.F. and Nünlist, René (eds.), Time in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume Two (Leiden, 2007), in BMCR 2008.07.24Google Scholar
‘Virgil’s tale of four cities: Troy, Carthage, Alexandria and Rome’, The Ninth Syme Memorial Lecture (Victoria University of Wellington, 2009) (=Vol. 1.14)*Google Scholar
‘Catullus and the Roman paradox epigram’, Materiali e Discussioni 61 (2009), 29–39 (=Vol. 2.9)*Google Scholar
‘Becoming an authority: Horace on his own reception’, in Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Perceptions of Horace: A Poet and his Readers (Cambridge, 2009), 16–38 (=Vol. 2.10)*Google Scholar
‘Time’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Historiography (Cambridge, 2009), 139–51Google Scholar
Review of Hall, Edith and Wyles, Rosie (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime (Oxford, 2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
‘Fathers and sons: the Manlii Torquati and family continuity in Catullus and Horace’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C.B.R. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts (Oxford, 2010), 205–23 (=Vol. 2.11)*Google Scholar
‘Doing the numbers: the Roman mathematics of civil war in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, in Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars (Oxford, 2010), 273–92 (=Vol. 2.12)*Google Scholar
‘Crediting Pseudolus: trust, belief, and the credit crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus’, CPh 105 (2010), 281–300 (=Vol. 2.13)*Google Scholar
‘Time and calendar’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to Roman Studies (Oxford, 2010), 882–94Google Scholar
Review of O’Connell, Robert L., The Ghosts of Cannae: Hannibal and the Darkest Hour of the Roman Republic, in The New York Times Book Review (5 September 2010), 13Google Scholar
Review of McGing, Brian, Polybius’ Histories (Oxford, 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
‘Hic finis fandi: on the absence of punctuation for the endings (and beginnings) of speeches in Latin poetic texts’, MD 66 (2011), 45–91 (=Vol. 2.14)*Google Scholar
Review of Volk, Katharina, Ovid (Oxford, 2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of White, Peter, Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic (Oxford, 2011), in LRB (22 September 2011), 19–20Google Scholar
Review of Schwindt, J. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne/Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung (Heidelberg, 2005), in JRS 101 (2011), 300–1Google Scholar
‘Representation and the materiality of the book in the polymetrics’, in Woodman, A.J and Du Quesnay, I.M.LeM. (eds.), Perspectives and Contexts in the Interpretation of Catullus (Cambridge, 2012), 29–47 (=Vol. 2.15)*Google Scholar
Review of Robinson, Matthew, Ovid: Fasti Book 2 (Oxford, 2011), in Gnomon 84 (2012), 76–8Google Scholar
‘Catullus 61: epithalamium and comparison’, CCJ 59 (2013), 70–97 (=Vol. 2.16)*Google Scholar
Review of Gowers, Emily, Horace: Satires Book 1 (Cambridge, 2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Review of Beard, Mary, Confronting the Classics: Traditions, Adventures and Innovations (London, 2013), in The Irish Times (25 May 2013)Google Scholar
‘First similes in epic’, TAPhA 144 (2014), 189–228 (=Vol. 1.15)*Google Scholar
‘Ovid’s Ciceronian literary history: end-career chronology and autobiography’, Sixth UCL Housman Lecture, pamphlet published by Department of Greek and Latin, University College London (2015) (=Vol. 2.17)*Google Scholar
Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature (Cambridge, MA, 2016)Google Scholar
‘Horace and the literature of the past: lyric, epic, and history in Odes 4’, in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N. and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), La Poésie lyrique dans la cité antique: les Odes d’Horace au miroir de la lyrique grecque archaïque (Paris and Lyon, 2016), 295–312(=Vol. 2.18)*Google Scholar
Review of Goldschmidt, Nora, Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid (Oxford, 2013), in Gnomon 88 (2016), 77–8Google Scholar
‘Carthage and Rome: Introduction’, CPh 112.3 (2017), 301–11 (a specially commissioned issue of the journal, edited by D. Feeney)Google Scholar
Review of Chaudhuri, Pramit, The War with God: Theomachy in Roman Imperial Poetry (Oxford, 2014), in Mnemosyne 70 (2017), 173–5Google Scholar
Review of Rogerson, Anne, Virgil’s Ascanius: Imagining the Future in the ‘Aeneid’, in LRB (15 June 2017), 41–2Google Scholar
Review of Wiseman, T.P., The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History (Oxford, 2015), in Gnomon 89 (2017), 412–18Google Scholar
Review of David Ferry (tr.), Virgil: The Aeneid (Chicago, IL, 2017), The New York Times Book Review (10 December 2017), 25Google Scholar
Review of Woodman, A.J., Tacitus: Annals Book IV (Cambridge, 2018), in TLS (16 July 2019), 32Google Scholar
‘Forma manet facti (Ov. Fast. 2.379): aetiologies of myth and ritual in Ovid’s Fasti and Metamorphoses’, CJ 115 (2020), 339–66 (=Vol. 2.19)*Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×