Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Allocation of Rights
- Part III Patents, Publicity Rights, and Trademarks
- Part IV Condemnation and Adverse Possession
- Part V Gifts and Future Interests
- Part VI Tenancy in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety
- 12 Commentary on Sawada v. Endo
- 13 Commentary on Taylor v. Canterbury
- 14 Commentary on Coggan v. Coggan
- Part VII Exclusionary Zoning
- Part VIII Evictions
- Part IX Landlord–Tenant Premises Liability
- Index
13 - Commentary on Taylor v. Canterbury
from Part VI - Tenancy in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2021
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Allocation of Rights
- Part III Patents, Publicity Rights, and Trademarks
- Part IV Condemnation and Adverse Possession
- Part V Gifts and Future Interests
- Part VI Tenancy in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety
- 12 Commentary on Sawada v. Endo
- 13 Commentary on Taylor v. Canterbury
- 14 Commentary on Coggan v. Coggan
- Part VII Exclusionary Zoning
- Part VIII Evictions
- Part IX Landlord–Tenant Premises Liability
- Index
Summary
With its 2004 decision in Taylor v. Canterbury,1 Colorado joined several other states, most notably, California,2 in eliminating the “strawman” requirement for an effective severance of a joint tenancy by unilateral conveyance to oneself as a tenant in common. In the years following Taylor, several additional states have also abolished the requirement.3
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions , pp. 283 - 292Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021