Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:25:08.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Resilience in Reproductive Loss

from V - Special Topics in Fertility Counseling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, MD
Get access

Summary

Fertility counselors see an array of clients who may be diverse in terms of countries of origin, ethnicity, race and/or cultural background. This chapter identifies principles to guide this conversation. These principles include understanding how we consider race, ethnicity and culture, and emphasize the importance of not essentializing race, ethnicity and culture. The chapter continues with a brief overview of the meaning and consequences of infertility in various places worldwide and among migrant and racial minorities in particular, how this can affect access to, use of and experiences with fertility treatments and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Finally, we offer considerations for racially and culturally sensitive clinical approaches in fertility counseling.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonanno, GA. Loss, trauma and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Psych Trauma: Theory Res Pract Policy 2008;8:101113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, RG, Calhoun, LG. Beyond the concept of recovery: growth and the experience of loss. Death Studies 2007;32:2739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutten, BP, Hammels, C, Geschwind, N, et al. Resilience in mental health: linking psychological and neurobiological perspectives. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2013;128:320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridenour, AF, Yorgason, JB, Peterson, B. The infertility resilience model: assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemp Fam Ther 2009;31:3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, SK. Stepping back to gain perspective: pregnancy loss history, depression, and parenting capacity in the early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B). Death Studies 2008;32:97122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, Kezur D, Meyers, M, et al. Couple Therapy for Infertility. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Leon, IG. Understanding and treating infertility: psychoanalytic considerations. J Am Acad Psa Dynam Psycho 2010;38:4776.Google ScholarPubMed
Stroebe, M, Schut, H. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: a decade on. Omega 2010;61:273289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janoff-Bulman, R. Shattered Assumptions: Toward a New Psychology of Trauma. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Neimeyer, R. Searching for the meaning of meaning: grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Studies 2000;24:541558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uren, Wastell C. Attachment and meaning-making in perinatal bereavement. Death Studies 2002;26:279308.Google Scholar
Frosch, DJ, Shakespeare-Finch, J. Grief, traumatic stress, and posttraumatic growth in women who have experienced pregnancy loss. Psychol Trauma: Theory Pract Policy 2017;9:425433.Google Scholar
Brin, D. The use of rituals in grieving for a miscarriage or stillborn. Women and Therapy 2004;27:123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote-Arsenault, D. Weaving babies lost in pregnancy into the fabric of the family. J Fam Nurs 2003;9:2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klass, D. The Spiritual Lives of Bereaved Parents. Philadelphia, MA: Brunner/Mazel, 1999.Google Scholar
Lasker, J, Toedter, L. Predicting outcomes after pregnancy loss: results from studies using the perinatal grief scale. Ill Crisis Loss 2000;8 :350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, ME, Csikszentmihalyi, M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Amer Psychol 2000;55 :5–14.Google Scholar
Seligman, ME, Steen, TA, Park, N, et al. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Amer Psychol 2005;60 :410–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lathrop, A, Van deVusse, L. Continuity and change in mothers’ narratives of perinatal hospice. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 2011;25 :21–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Lang, A, Goulet, C, Aita, M, et al. Weathering the storm of perinatal bereavement via hardiness. Death Studies 2001;25:497512.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×