Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:11:58.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid

from Section 8 - Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

By
Bidyut Kumar  and
Ezechi Cally Nwosu
Edited by
Bidyut Kumar  and
Zarko Alfirevic
Bidyut Kumar
Affiliation:
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Zarko Alfirevic
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Medicine , pp. 321 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, RD, Barth, RA. Sonography of the gravid uterus and placenta: current concepts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160(3): 455–65.Google Scholar
Taniquchi, H, Aoki, S, Sakamaki, K, et al. Circumvallate placenta: associated clinical manifestations and complications – a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014; 986230.Google Scholar
Harris, RD, Wells, W A, Black, WC, et al. Accuracy of prenatal sonography for detecting circumvallate placenta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(6): 1603–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, S. Clinical significance of pregnancies with circumvallate placenta. J Obstet Gyneaecol Res 2008; 34(1): 51–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Tufail, S, Nawaz, S, Sadaf, M, et al. Association between battledore placenta and perinatal complications. J Rawalpindi Med College 2012; 16(2): 159–61.Google Scholar
Di Salvo, DN, Benson, CB, Laing, FC, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the placental cord insertion insertion site. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1295–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11: CD007529.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Placenta praevia, placenta accreta and vasa praevia: diagnosis and management. RCOG Green-Top guideline No. 27. London: RCOG Press, 2005.Google Scholar
d’Ercole, C, Cravello, L, Boubli, L, et al. Large choriangioma associated with hydrops fetalis: pren diagnosis and management. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Wattar, BH, Hillman, SC, Marton, T, et al. Placetal chorioangioma: a rare case and systematic review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27(10): 1055–63.Google Scholar
Secki, MJ, Sebire, NJ, Berkowtitz, RS. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet 2010; 376(9742): 717–29.Google Scholar
Moodley, M, Tunkyi, k, Moodley, J. Gestational trophoblastic syndrome: an audit of 112 patients. A South African experience. Int J Gyn Cancer 2003; 13(2): 234–9.Google Scholar
Sivanesaratnam, V. Management of gestational trophoblastic disease in developing countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obst Gynaecol 2003; 17(6): 925–42.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Prevention of RhD alloimmunization. Gynecology & Obstetrics ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 4, May 1999. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1999;66:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Green-Top Guideline No 38. London: RCOG Press, February 2010.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. ACOG Practice Bulletin – Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician–Gynaecologists, No. 53. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(6): 1365–77.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, RS, Goldstein, DP. Current management of gestational trophoblastic diseases. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 654–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The management of gestational trophoblastic disease. RCOG Green-Top Guideline No. 38, London: RCOG Press, February 2010.Google Scholar
Knight, M, Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, et al. (eds) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care – Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2014.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM. Occurrence of placental abruption in relatives. BJOG 2009; 116: 693–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tikkanen, M. Etiology, clinical manifestations and prediction of placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 732–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, BK, Beloglovkin, V, Ytan, L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of placental accreta: sonography and magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med 2008: 27(9): 1275–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, MM, Ho, ES, Lee, HY. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta praevia accreta by trans abdominal color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 28–35.Google Scholar
Palacious Jarquemada, JM, Bruno, CH. Magnetic resonance in 300 cases of placenta accrete: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 716–24.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Placenta praevia, placenta accrete and vasa praevia: diagnosis and management. RCOG Green-Top Guideline No 27. London: RCOG Press, January 2011.Google Scholar
Silver, RM. Abnormal placentation. Clinical expert series. Obstet & Gynecol 2015 Sept; 126(3): 654–68.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Barbour, KD. Placenta accreta spectrum. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am (2015); 42: 381–402.Google Scholar
Shetty, MK, Dryden, DK. Morbidly adherent placenta: ultrasound assessment and supplemental role of magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2015; 36: 324–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Rac, MWF, Dashe, JS, Wells, CE, Moschos, E. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the placenta accrete index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 343.e1–7.Google Scholar
Bowman, ZS, Eller, AG, Kennedy, AM, Richards, DS, Winter, TC, Woodward, PJ, Silver, RM. Interobserver variability of sonography for prediction of placenta accrete. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 2153–8.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Tang, AW, Collins, S, Robson, S, Jaraquemada, JP. Standardised proforma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP)– an international consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015 Nov; 13: Doi: 10.1002/uog.15810.Google Scholar
Srisajjakul, S, Prapaisilp, P, Bangchokdee, S. MRI of placental adhesive disorder. Br J Radiol 2014; 87: 20140294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magan, EF, Bass, JD, Chauhan, SP, et al. Amniotic fluid volume in normal singleton pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 524.Google Scholar
Ghidini, A, Schiliro, M. Locatelli, A. Amniotic fluid volume: when and how to take action. Contemporary OB/Gyn 2014; 59(6): 26–35.Google Scholar
Nwosu, EC, Welch, CR, Manasse, P, et al. Longitudinal assessment of amniotic fluid index. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 816–19.Google Scholar
Kollmann, M, Voetsch, J, Koidl, C, et al. Etiology and perinatal outcome of polyhydramnios. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35(4): 350–6.Google Scholar
Fayyaz, H, Rafi, J. TORCH screening in polyhydramnios: an observational study. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(7): 1069–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabham, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pockets of liquor as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 16(3): CD006593.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×