Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The First Quarto of Romeo and Juliet
- Copyright page
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare the Early Quartos
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Preface
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the text
- The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet
- Book part
- Reading List
- References
Reading List
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 August 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The First Quarto of Romeo and Juliet
- Copyright page
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare the Early Quartos
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Preface
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the text
- The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet
- Book part
- Reading List
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The First Quarto of Romeo and Juliet , pp. 192Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Dessen, Alan C., ‘Q1 Romeo and Juliet and Elizabethan theatrical vocabulary’, in Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: Texts, Contexts, and Interpretation, ed. Halio, Jay L., Newark, 1995, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
Farley-Hills, David, ‘The “bad” quarto of Romeo and Juliet’, S.Sur. 49 (1996), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan, ‘“What? in a names that which we call a rose”: the desired texts of Romeo and Juliet’, in Crisis in Editing: Texts of the English Renaissance, ed. McLeod, Randall, New York, 1994, pp. 173–202.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew, ‘Maximal and minimal texts: Shakespeare v. the Globe’, S.Sur. 52 (1999), 68–87.Google Scholar
Halio, Jay L., ‘Handy-dandy: Q1/Q2 Romeo and Juliet’, in Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: Texts, Contexts, and Interpretation, ed. Halio, Jay L., Newark, 1995, pp. 125–50.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Harry R., The Bad Quarto of ‘Romeo and Juliet’: A Bibliographical and Textual Study, Ithaca, NY, 1948.Google Scholar
Hosley, Richard, ‘The use of the upper stage in Romeo and Juliet’, SQ 5 (1954), 371–9.Google Scholar
Irace, Kathleen O., Reforming the ‘Bad’ Quartos: Performance and Provenance of Six Shakespearean First Editions, Newark, NJ, 1994.Google Scholar
Jowett, John, ‘Henry Chettle and the first quarto of Romeo and Juliet’, PBSA 92 (1998), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, Jill L. and Gaines, Barry, eds., Romeo and Juliet, 1597, Malone Society Reprints, Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie E., Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The ‘Bad’ Quartos and Their Contexts, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchiori, Giorgio, ‘The music of words: from madrigal to drama and beyond: Shakespeare foreshadowing an operatic technique’, in Italian Culture in Early Modern English Drama: Rewriting, Remaking, Refashioning, ed. Marrapodi, Michele, Aldershot, 2007, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Thomson, Leslie, ‘“With patient ears attend”: Romeo and Juliet on the Elizabethan stage’, Studies in Philology 92 (1995), 230–47.Google Scholar
Urkowitz, Steven, ‘Two versions of Romeo and Juliet 2.6 and Merry Wives of Windsor 5.5.215–45: an invitation to the pleasures of textual/sexual di(per)versity’, in Elizabethan Theater: Essays in Honor of S. Schoenbaum, ed. Parker, R. B. and Zitner, S. P., Newark, 1996, 222–38.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul, ‘Narratives about printed Shakespeare texts: “foul papers” and “bad” quartos’, SQ 41 (1990), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar