Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:03:36.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Beyond the Retributive System

from Part I - On the Practical Implications of Free Will Skepticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2019

By
Bruce N. Waller
Edited by
Elizabeth Shaw ,
Derk Pereboom  and
Gregg D. Caruso
Elizabeth Shaw
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Derk Pereboom
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Gregg D. Caruso
Affiliation:
Corning Community College, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

The retributive system is motivated by powerful strike-back desire (actually a general desire to pass the pain along) combined with nonconscious belief in a just world. To preserve belief in a just world, we must suppose that most people are receiving their just deserts, and that requires belief in moral responsibility. Neoliberal societies are deeply dedicated to individual moral responsibility, resulting in harsh judgments and gross inequity. The systems approach offers a promising path away from moral responsibility and toward a more just and equitable society.

Keywords

belief in a just worldmoral responsibilityneoliberalismretributionself-makingsystems approach
Type
Chapter
Information
Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
Challenging Retributive Justice
 , pp. 73 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Barash, D. P., and Lipton, J. E.. (2011). Payback: Why we Retaliate, Redirect Aggression, and Take Revenge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. (1997). Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In Clarkson, C. and Morgan, R., eds., The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 15–49.Google Scholar
Braithewaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 25, 1–110.Google Scholar
Braithewaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Response Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canton, R. (2010). Not another medical model: using metaphor and analogy to explore crime and criminal justice. British Journal of Community Justice, 8, 40–57.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M., and Dignan, J.. (2006a). Penal policy and political economy. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 435–456.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M., and Dignan, J.. (2006b). Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clark, T. W. (2007). Encountering Naturalism: A Worldview and Its Uses. Somerville, MA: Center for Naturalism.Google Scholar
Dalbert, C., and Yamauchi, L.. (1994). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward immigrants and foreign workers: A cultural comparison between Hawaii and Germany. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1612–1626.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1984). Elbow Room. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doob, A. N., and Roberts, J. V.. (1983). An Analysis of the Public View of Sentencing. Ottawa: Department of Justice (Canada).Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M. (2012). Deep Control: Essays on Free Will and Value. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1996). Bringing deliberation to democracy. The Public Perspective, 7, 1–4.Google Scholar
French, P. (2001). The Virtues of Vengeance. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Gunter, B.. (1984). Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor. British Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 265–269.Google Scholar
Gilligan, J. (2001). Preventing Violence. New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Hafer, C. L., and Bègue, L.. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.Google Scholar
Harper, D., and Manasse, P.. (1992). The just world and the third world: British explanations for poverty abroad. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 783–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hernu, P. (2011). Norway’s controversial ‘cushy prison’ experiment – Could it catch on in the UK? Daily Mail. Updated July 25, 2011: www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article1384308Google Scholar
Indermaur, D., Roberts, L., Spiranovic, C., Mackenzie, G., and Gelb, K.. (2012). A matter of judgment: the effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment. Punishment and Society, 14, 147–165.Google Scholar
Johnstone, G., ed. (2003). A Restorative Justice Reader. Cullompton UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Kawamura, S. (1967). Aggression as studied in troops of Japanese monkeys. In Clemente, C. and Lindsley, D., eds., Aggression and Defense, Brain Function. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 195–224.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. (2008). The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leape, L. (1994). Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1851–1857.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, M. J. and Miller, D. T.. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.Google Scholar
Levy, N. 2011. Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Major, J. (1993). Interview with the editor of the Mail (London), Jonathan Holbrow, February 21, 8.Google Scholar
Martinson, R. (1974). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar
Martinson, R. (1979). New findings, new view: a note of caution regarding sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review, 7, 243–258.Google Scholar
Montada, L. (1998). Belief in a just world: a hybrid of justice motive and self-interest. In Montada, L. and Lerner, M., eds., Responses to Victimizations and Belief in the Just World. New York: Plenum, pp. 217–245.Google Scholar
Moore, M. S. (1997). Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics: a brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 596–615.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2007). After incompatibilism: a naturalistic defense of the reactive attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 405–428.Google Scholar
Potegal, M. (1994). Aggressive arousal: the amygdala connection. In Potegal, M. and Knutson, J. F., eds., The Dynamics of Aggression: Biological and Social Processes in Dyads and Groups. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 73–112.Google Scholar
Sher, G. (1987). Desert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2011). Hard determinism and punishment: A practical reductio. Law and Philosophy, 30, 353–367.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. (2004). In Defense of Sentimentality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, T. (2009). A Very Bad Wizard. San Francisco, CA: Believer Books.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25.Google Scholar
Virgin, C. E., and Sapolsky, R.. (1997). Styles of male social behavior and their endocrine correlates among low-ranking baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 42, 25–39.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagstaff, G. F. (1983). Correlates of the just world in Britain. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 145–146.Google Scholar
Waller, B. N. (2007). Sincere apology without moral responsibility. Social Theory and Practice, 33, 441–465.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1987). Responsibility and the limits of evil. In Schoeman, F., ed., Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–286.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (1998). Selective incapacitation. In von Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A., eds., Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 113–120.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×