Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:59:52.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Punishment: A Preliminary Ethical Analysis

from Part III - Free Will Skepticism and the Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2019

By
Farah Focquaert
Edited by
Elizabeth Shaw ,
Derk Pereboom  and
Gregg D. Caruso
Elizabeth Shaw
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Derk Pereboom
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Gregg D. Caruso
Affiliation:
Corning Community College, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

If we are unlikely to possess the kind of free will that legitimates desert-based punishment, the rationally defensible route is to adopt a cautionary perspective that draws on non-desert-based criminal justice procedures that are fair and just to all parties. This chapter analyzes the options: (1) we can acknowledge that we have no justification for desert-based moral responsibility but disregard this at both trial and sentencing phases; (2) we can acknowledge this and disregard it at trial but not sentencing phase; (3) we can acknowledge this and take it into account during both the trial and sentencing phase. The author therefore presents some potential models to effectively address criminal behavior and critically assesses the most striking difficulties each of these models faces. The chapter concludes that innovative criminal justice systems must continue to identify causal responsibility, promote taking responsibility for future behavior, and thoroughly respond to victims’ rights and needs. The attribution of moral guilt and the implementation of desert-based punishment face numerous objections. Debate is needed on the desirability of a criminal justice model focusing on causal responsibility and taking responsibility; a model that aims at victim recovery, restitution, and restoration by implementing forward-looking justice mechanisms.

Keywords

free will skepticismdesertretributionpunishmentmoral responsibilityretributivismcriminal behavior
Type
Chapter
Information
Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
Challenging Retributive Justice
 , pp. 207 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alliance for Safety and Justice. (2016). Crime survivors: The first-ever national survey of victims’ views on safety and justice. Available at: https://allianceforsafetyandjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/Crime%20Survivors%20Speak%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, J., Penn, J. V., Knight, K., et al. (2009). Risk of reincarceration among prisoners with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(4), 367–374.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., and DeWall, C. N.. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 260–268.Google Scholar
Bayer, R. (2008). Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 463–472.Google Scholar
Beven, J. P., O’Brien-Malone, A., and Hall, G.. (2004). Using the interpersonal reactivity index to assess empathy in violent offenders. International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1(2), 33–41.Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. E., and Shapland, J.. (2016). Learning to desist in early adulthood: The Sheffield desistance study. In Shapland, E., Farrall, S., and Bottoms, A. E., eds., Global Perspectives on Desistance: Reviewing What We Know, Looking to the Future. New York: Routledge, pp. 99–125.Google Scholar
Callender, J. S. (2018). Justice, Reciprocity and the Internalisation of Punishment in Victims of Crime. Neuroethics, 1–12.Google Scholar
Canton, R. (2017). Why Punish? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Punishment. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. D. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. D., ed. (2013). Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. D. (2016). Free will skepticism and criminal behavior: A public health-quarantine model. Southwest Philosophy Review, 32(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. (2005). On an argument for the impossibility of moral responsibility. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. doi: http://10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1984). Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Double, R. (2002). The moral hardness of libertarianism. Philo, 5, 226–234.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. (2017). A criminal law we can call our own. Northwestern University Law Review, 111(6), 1491–1505.Google Scholar
Falk, O., Wallinius, M., Lundström, S., et al. (2014). The 1% of the population accountable for 63% of all violent crime convictions. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 559–571.Google Scholar
Fazel, S., and Danesh, J.. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. The Lancet, 359(9306), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, S., Fiminska, Z., Cocks, C., and Coid, J.. (2016). Patient outcomes following discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 208, 17–25.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1970). Justice and personal desert. In Feinberg, J., ed., Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 55–94.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M.. (2007). Four Views on Free Will. New York: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., and Ravizza, M. S. J.. (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Focquaert, F., Glenn, A. L., and Raine, A.. (2015). Psychopathy and free will from a philosophical and cognitive neuroscience perspective. In Glannon, W., ed., Free Will and the Brain: Neuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565820.007Google Scholar
Frick, P. J., and White, S. F.. (2008). Research review: The importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 359–375.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Glenn, A. L., Schug, R. A., Yang, Y., and Raine, A.. (2009). The neurobiology of psychopathy: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(12), 813–823.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. (2011). Who’s in Charge. Free Will and the Science of the Brain. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R., Piazza, J., and Espinosa, P.. (2011). What do the TOSCA guilt and shame scales really measure: Affect or action? Personality and Individual differences, 51, 445–450.Google Scholar
Hamzaoglu, O., Ozkan, O., Ulusoy, M., and Gokdogan, F.. (2010). The prevalence of hopelessness among adults: Disability and other related factors. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 40(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
Husak, D. (2000). Retribution in criminal theory. San Diego Law Review, 37, 959–986.Google Scholar
James, D. J., and Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Special Report Bureau of Justice Statistics. US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2013). Skepticism and sanction: The benefit of rejecting moral responsibility. Law and Philosophy, 31(5), 477–493.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. (2009). Compatibilism and desert: Critical comments on Four Views on Free Will. Philosophical Studies, 144, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics. A brief response to critics of restorative justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 42, 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T., and Tocchetto, D. G., (2013). The potential dark side of believing in free will (and related concepts). In Caruso, G., ed., Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
Odgers, C. L., Burnette, M. L., Chauhan, P., Moretti, M. L., and Reppucci, D.. (2005). Misdiagnosing the problem: Mental health profiles of incarcerated juveniles. The Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review, 14(1), 26–29.Google Scholar
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinettie, C., and Caprara, G. V.. (2008). Stability and change in moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288–1309.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. J., and Begun, A.. (2006). The relationship between moral reasoning, provictim attitude and interpersonal aggression among imprisoned young offenders. International Journal of Offending Theory and Comparative Criminology, 50, 446–457.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2001). Living without Free Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2011). Free-will skepticism and meaning in life. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–424.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2013). Free will skepticism and criminal Punishment. In Nadelhoffer, T., ed., The Future of Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2014). Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2015). A notion of moral responsibility immune to the threat from causal determination. In Clarke, R., McKenna, M., and Smith, A. M., eds., The Nature of Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. D.. (2018). Hard incompatibilist existentialism: Neuroscience, punishment and meaning in life. In Caruso, G. D., and Flanagan, O., eds., Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–222.Google Scholar
Pickard, H. (2011). Responsibility without blame: Empathy and the effective treatment of personality disorder. Philosophy, Psychiatry, Psychology, 18, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickard, H. (2017). Responsibility without blame for addiction. Neuroethics, doi: http://10.1007/s12152-016-9295-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, H., and Pearce, S.. (2010). Finding the will to recover: Philosophical perspectives on agency and the sick role. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 831–833.Google Scholar
Pryce, C .R., Azzinnari, D., Spinelli, S., et al. (2011). Helplessness: A systematic translational review of theory and evidence for its relevance to understanding and treating depression. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 132, 142–267.Google Scholar
Roos, S., Salmivalli, C., and Hodges, E. V. E.. (2015). Emotion regulation and negative emotionality moderate the effects of moral (dis)engagement on aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapland, J. (2016). Forgiveness and restorative justice: Is it necessary? Is it helpful? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5, 94–112.Google Scholar
Sharp, C. (2008). Theory of mind and conduct problems in children: Deficits in reading the “emotions of the eyes.” Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1149–1158.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2001). Free will: From nature to illusion. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 101, 71–95.Google Scholar
Specker, J., Focquaert, F., Sterckx, S., & Schermer, M. H. (2018). Forensic practitioners’ Views on Stimulating Moral Development and Moral Growth in Forensic Psychiatric Care. Neuroethics, 1–13.Google Scholar
Spenser, K. A., Betts, L. R., and Gupta, M. D.. (2015). Deficits in theory of mind, empathic understanding and moral reasoning: A comparison between young offenders and non-offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21(7), 632–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., et al. (2010). Personal philosophy and personnel achievement: Belief in free will predicts better job performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 43–50.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (1994). The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 75(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Kendall, S., et al. (2015). Children’s proneness to shame and guilt predict risky and illegal behaviors in young adulthood. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(2), 217–227.Google Scholar
Tadros, V. (2011). The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., and Mashek, D. J.. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilhauer, B. (2009). Free will and reasonable doubt. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46(2), 131–140.Google Scholar
Vohs, K.D., and Schooler, J.W.. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walen, A. (2014). Retributive justice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Waller, B. N. (2015). The Stubborn System of Moral Responsibility. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ward, T., Mann, R. E., and Gannon, T. A.. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 87–107.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×