Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:08:18.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - “To Be or Not to Be?” Qualitative Research upon and during a Pandemic Outbreak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Gillie Gabay
Edited by
Paul M.W. Hackett ,
Christopher M. Hayre ,
Dave Muller ,
Marcia Scherer  and
Ava Gordley-Smith
Paul M.W. Hackett
Affiliation:
Emerson College, Boston
Christopher M. Hayre
Affiliation:
The University of Canberra
Dave Muller
Affiliation:
Suffolk University, Massachusetts
Marcia Scherer
Affiliation:
University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
Ava Gordley-Smith
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

Qualitative research has much to contribute to our knowledge regarding lived experiences in a crisis, but most research in the context of crises is quantitative. Domains of qualitative research remain under-represented. Qualitative researchers bear the responsibility to voice populations who may be already struggling in a health crisis. This chapter aims to disentangle a few dilemmas of qualitative researchers in planning and implementing rigorous research upon and during an outbreak of a crisis. Initial dilemmas are whether and how to conduct a qualitative study during the outbreak or retrospectively; how may the researcher access study populations; and how the researcher may encourage participation. Other dilemmas concern obtaining informed consent, determining the right timing and length for the interviews, and creating interviewee--interviewer trust and intimacy. The dilemmas following data collection relate to the quality criteria of data analysis.

Keywords

qualitative research in a health crisishidden communitiesinnovative methods
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
The Role and Management of Digital Methods
 , pp. 52 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, D, Maissen, LB, & Brockner, J (2012) The role of listening in interpersonal influence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3): 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E, & Corneli, A (2018) 100 Questions (and answers) about research ethics (Vol. 5). SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annelli, C (2020) Teachers, students and social margins on the Italian screen. Italica, 97(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, MM, Ambagtsheer, RC, Casey, MG, & Lawless, M (2019) Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18: 1609406919874596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attride-Stirling, J (2001) Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3): 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, JB, Coates, L, & Johnson, T (2000) Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6): 941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodie, GD (2012) Listening as positive communication. In Socha, T & Pitts, M (eds) The Positive Side of Interpersonal Communication. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc., 109–125.Google Scholar
Castro, DR, Kluger, AN, & Itzchakov, G (2016) Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(6): 762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Cohen, N, & Arieli, T (2011) Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4): 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, DG (2014) Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(1): 89–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denzin, NK, & Lincoln, YS (2008) Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1–32.Google Scholar
Egan, G (2013) The Skilled Helper: A Problem-Management and Opportunity-Development Approach to Helping. Chicago: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Flick, U (2018) Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, MA, & Sullivan, C (2018) Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Gabay, G (2019) Patient self-worth and communication barriers to trust of Israeli patients in acute-care physicians at public general hospitals. Qualitative Health Research, 29(13): 1954–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabay, G, & Shafran-Tikva, S (2020) Sexual harassment of nurses by patients and missed nursing care: A hidden population study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(8): 1881–1887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guba, EG, & Lincoln, YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(163–194): 105.Google Scholar
Hall, J, Gaved, M, & Sargent, J (2021) Participatory research approaches in times of Covid-19: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20: 16094069211010087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K, Yeomans, M, Brooks, AW, et al. (2017) It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3): 430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzchakov, G, & Kluger, AN (2017) Can holding a stick improve listening at work? The effect of Listening Circles on employees’ emotions and cognitions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5): 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzchakov, G & Kluger, AN (2019) Changing the other party’s attitude with high quality listening. In Schneider, A & Honeyman, C (eds) Negotiation Essentials for Lawyers. American Bar Association, 129–134.Google Scholar
Itzchakov, G, Castro, DR, & Kluger, A (2016) If you want people to listen to you, tell a story. International Journal of Listening, 30(3): 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzchakov, G, DeMarree, KG, Kluger, AN, et al. (2018) The listener sets the tone: High-quality listening increases attitude clarity and behavior-intention consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5): 762–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzchakov, G, Kluger, AN, & Castro, DR (2017) I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: The effect of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzchakov, G, Kluger, A, Emanuel-Tor, M, et al. (2014) How do you like me to listen to you? International Journal of Listening, 28(3) 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzchakov, G (2020) Can listening training empower service employees? The mediating roles of anxiety and perspective-taking. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(6): 938–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, GA, & Vindrola-Padros, C (2017) Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 189, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Josselson, R (2013) Interviewing for Qualitative Inquiry: A Relational Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kluger, A, Malloy, TE, Pery, S, et al. (2021) Dyadic listening in teams: Social relations model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(3): 1045–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S, & Cavallaro, L (2018) Researcher self-care in emotionally demanding research: A proposed conceptual framework. Qualitative Health Research, 28(4): 648–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K, Rhodes, T, & Rosengarten, M (2020) Making evidence and policy in public health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 for adaptive evidence-making and intervention. Evidence and Policy, 16(3): 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavee, E (2017) Low-income women’s encounters with social services: Negotiation over power, knowledge and respectability. British Journal of Social Work, 47(5): 1554–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavee, E, & Itzchakov, G (2021) Good listening: A key element in establishing quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 14687941211039402.Google Scholar
Lincoln, YS, Lynham, SA, & Guba, EG (2011) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 97–128.Google Scholar
Lobe, B, & Morgan, DL (2021) Assessing the effectiveness of video-based interviewing: A systematic comparison of video-conferencing based dyadic interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3): 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longman, C (2008) Sacrificing the career or the family?: Orthodox Jewish women between secular work and the sacred home. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(3), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lune, H, & Berg, BL (2016) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 8th ed. Long Beach: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Mason, J (2017) Qualitative Researching. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Mays, N, & Pope, C (2020) Quality in qualitative research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care. 4th ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, SI (2017) Vulnerable listening: Possibilities and challenges of doing qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3): 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirick, RG, & Wladkowski, SP (2019) Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 24(12): 3061–3072.Google Scholar
Morrow, SL (2005) Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2): 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, J (2020) The changing face of qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, JM (2007) Ethics in action: Ethical principles for doing qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8): 1003–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, JM (2015) Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9): 1212–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemec, PB, Spagnolo, AC, & Soydan, AS (2017) Can you hear me now? Teaching listening skills. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 40(4): 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowell, LS, Norris, JM, White, DE, & Moules, NJ (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1): 1609406917733847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasupathi, M, & Billitteri, J (2015) Being and becoming through being heard: Listener effects on stories and selves. International Journal of Listening, 29(2): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, KI, Alexander, SC, Tulsky, JA, et al. (2011) Physician empathy and listening: associations with patient satisfaction and autonomy. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 24(6): 665–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, SA, Tuckerman, L, Vorley, T, & Gherhes, C (2021) Resilient research in the field: Insights and lessons from adapting qualitative research projects during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211016106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, RP, & Sohi, RS (1997) Listening to your customers: The impact of perceived salesperson listening behavior on relationship outcomes. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 25(2): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rier, DA, Schwartzbaum, A, & Heller, C (2008) Methodological issues in studying an insular, traditional population: A women’s health survey among Israeli Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) Jews. Women & Health, 48(4): 363–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringel, S (2007) Identity and gender roles of Orthodox Jewish women: Implications for social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 77(2–3): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, CR, & Roethlisberger, FJ (1991) HBR classic – barriers and gateways to communication (Reprinted from Harvard Business Review, 1952). Harvard Business Review, 69(6): 105–111.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.Google Scholar
Salganik, MJ, & Heckathorn, DD (2004) Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent‐driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1): 193–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, K, Abdeljawad, T, Mahariq, I, & Jarad, F (2020) Qualitative analysis of a mathematical model in the time of COVID-19. BioMed Research International, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5098598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, MT (2011) Please hear what I’m not saying: The art of listening in the clinical encounter. The Permanente Journal, 15(2): 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, M (1992) Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: What and why? Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 36(1): 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, W (2008) Clean Language: Revealing Metaphors and Opening Minds. New York: Crown House Publishing.Google Scholar
Teti, M, Schatz, E, & Liebenberg, L (2020) Methods in the Time of COVID-19: The vital role of qualitative inquiries. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962.Google Scholar
Teti, M, Pichon, L & Myroniuk, TW (2021) Community-engaged qualitative scholarship during a pandemic: Problems, perils and lessons learned. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211025455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, SK, & Collins, LM (2002) Adaptive sampling in research on risk-related behaviors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjora, A (2018) Qualitative Research as Stepwise-Deductive Induction. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, SJ, & Hinrichs, MM (2017) Big tent criteria for qualitative quality. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10): 837–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unadkat, S, & Farquhar, M (2020) Doctors’ wellbeing: Self-care during the Covid-19 pandemic. BMJ, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1150.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, JJ, Baicker, K, Boggio, PS, et al. (2020) Using social and behavioral science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behavior, 1–12. doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.Google Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, Chisnall, G, Cooper, S, et al. (2020) Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: Emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research, 30(14): 2192–2204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, & Johnson, GA (2020) Rapid techniques in qualitative research: A critical review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research, 30(10): 1596–1604. doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walby, K, & Luscombe, A (2017) Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences. Qualitative Research, 17(5): 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K, Johnson, A, & Corrigan, M (2004) Communicating emotional support and its relationship to feelings of being understood, trust, and self-disclosure. Communication Research Reports, 21(3): 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S (2017) Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6): 613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalcberg, S (2015) “They won’t speak to me, but they will talk to you”: On the challenges facing a woman researcher doing fieldwork among male Ultra-Orthodox victims of sexual abuse. Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies & Gender Issues (29): 108–132.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, & Wildemuth, BM (2009) Unstructured interviews. In Wildemuth, B. (ed.) Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 222–231). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×