Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:32:19.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Gibbons of Assam

Impacts of Environment and Anthropogenic Disturbance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2023

By
Jayashree Mazumder
Edited by
Susan M. Cheyne ,
Carolyn Thompson ,
Peng-Fei Fan  and
Helen J. Chatterjee
Susan M. Cheyne
Affiliation:
Borneo Nature Foundation
Carolyn Thompson
Affiliation:
University College London
Peng-Fei Fan
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Helen J. Chatterjee
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

The current study was conducted among 18 groups of western hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) in the Hoollongapar Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary of Assam to understand their behavioural pattern in a wild habitat when influenced by environmental and anthropogenic factors. The study mainly aimed to understand how they adapt to region-specific conditions such as heavy rain, mate selection and protection against predators. Focal animal sampling and all-occurrence sampling were used to record the behavioural patterns during the study. Although the northern region of the forest is rich in biodiversity, it has witnessed heavy wood poaching, which directly affects the movement and territory of the gibbon populations. There is also an acute scarcity of biogeographic corridors, thereby weakening the gibbons’ movement and resulting in the formation of larger groups. This study suggests that the behavioural activities of these gibbons augment most of their requirements without any (visible) need for innovative behaviour, such as the use or manufacture of tools. Also, the forest has witnessed a slow yet gradual decrease in total land cover, and with the increased anthropogenic pressure, the gibbons are being forced towards a particular geographical point, which has raised aggressive behaviour among them.

Keywords

gibbonstimber poachingmovementterritoryaggression
Type
Chapter
Information
Gibbon Conservation in the Anthropocene , pp. 167 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aars, J. and Ims, R.A. (1999). The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes. Ecology, 80(5): 1648–1655.Google Scholar
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3): 227–267.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. and Boesch, H. (1989). Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78(4): 547–573.Google Scholar
Chetry, D., Chetry, R. and Bhattacharjee, P.C. (2007). Hoolock: The Ape of India. Gibbon Conservation Centre, Assam, India.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. (1990). Population dynamics of hoolock gibbons (Hylobates hoolock) in Assam, India. American Journal of Primatology, 20(1): 37–41.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. (2009). The hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) in Tinsukia and Dibrugarh districts of Assam, India. Asian Primates Journal, 1(2): 24–30.Google Scholar
Christel, M. (1993). Grasping techniques and hand preferences in Hominoidea. In Preuschoft, H. and Chivers, D.J. (eds.), Hands of Primates. Springer, Vienna: 91–108.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C.L., Anderson, J.R. and Mootnick, A.R. (2006). Object manipulation to obtain a food reward in hoolock gibbons, Bunopithecus hoolock. Animal Behaviour, 71(3): 621–629.Google Scholar
Das, D.K. (2012). Western hoolock Hoolock hoolock preying on chicks of greater racket-tailed drongo Dicrurus paradiseus in Lawachara National Park, Bangladesh. Forktail, 28: 142–144.Google Scholar
Das, J., Feeroz, M.M., Islam, M.A., et al. (2003). Distribution of hoolock gibbon (Bunopithecus hoolock hoolock) in India and Bangladesh. Zoos’ Print Journal, 18(1): 969–976.Google Scholar
Das, J., Biswas, J., Bhattacherjee, P.C. and Mohnot, S.M. (2009). The distribution and abundance of hoolock gibbons in India. In Whittaker, D. and Lappan, S. (eds.), The Gibbons. Springer, New York: 409–433.Google Scholar
DeBlois, S.T. and Godfrey, L.R. (1994). What do we know about the cognitive basis of tool use in primates? Review of The Use of Tools by Human and Non-human Primates, edited by Arlette Berthelet and Jean Chavaillon. American Journal of Primatology, 33(4): 329–332.Google Scholar
Geissmann, T. (2009). Door slamming: tool-use by a captive white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Gibbon Journal, 5: 53–60.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. (2007). Primate behavior: spear-wielding chimps seen hunting bush babies. Science, 315(5815): 1063.Google Scholar
Government of India. (2014). The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Available at www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1726/1/A1972-53.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R., Devi, O.S. and Islam, M. (eds.) (2015). Common Spiders from Selected Protected Areas of Upper Assam. Assam State Biodiversity Board, Guwahati, Assam.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. and Arrowood, P. (1978). Copulatory vocalizations of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), gibbons (Hylobates hoolock), and humans. Science, 200(4348): 1405–1409.Google Scholar
Hardus, M.E., Lameira, A.R., van Schaik, C.P. and Wich, S.A. (2009). Tool use in wild orang-utans modifies sound production: a functionally deceptive innovation? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 276(1673): 3689–3694.Google Scholar
Janson, C. (1985). Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18(2): 125–138.Google Scholar
Linden, B., Foord, S., Horta-Lacueva, Q.J. and Taylor, P.J. (2020). Bridging the gap: how to design canopy bridges for arboreal guenons to mitigate road collisions. Biological Conservation, 246: 108560.Google Scholar
Meulman, E.J.M. and van Schaik, C.P. (2013). Orangutan tool use and the evolution of technology. In Sanz, C.M., Call, J. and Boesch, C. (eds.), Tool Use in Animals: Cognition and Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 176–202.Google Scholar
Meulman, E.J.M., Sanz, C.M., Visalberghi, E. and van Schaik, C.P. (2012). The role of terrestriality in promoting primate technology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 21(2): 58–68.Google Scholar
Michilsens, F., Vereecke, E.E., D’août, K. and Aerts, P. (2009). Functional anatomy of the gibbon forelimb: adaptations to a brachiating lifestyle. Journal of Anatomy, 215(3): 335–354.Google Scholar
Mosley, H. and Haslam, M. (2016). Extending material cognition to primate tool use. Quaternary International, 405A: 70–77.Google Scholar
Nakamichi, M. (2004). Tool-use and tool-making by captive, group-living orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) at an artificial termite mound. Behavioural Processes, 65(1): 87–93.Google Scholar
Pal, A., Kumara, H.N., Mishra, P.S., Velankar, A.D. and Singh, M. (2018). Extractive foraging and tool-aided behaviors in the wild Nicobar long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis umbrosus). Primates, 59(2): 173–183.Google Scholar
Pruetz, J.D. and Bertolani, P. (2007). Savanna chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, hunt with tools. Current Biology, 17(5): 412–417.Google Scholar
Quattrocchi, U. (2012). CRC World Dictionary of Medicinal and Poisonous Plants: Common Names, Scientific Names, Eponyms, Synonyms, and Etymology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Reader, S.M. and Laland, K.N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99(7): 4436–4441.Google Scholar
Setchell, J.M. (2019). Studying Primates: How to Design, Conduct and Report Primatological Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .Google Scholar
Setchell, J.M. and Curtis, D.J. (2011). Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Setchell, J.M. and Wickings, E.J. (2005). Dominance, status signals and coloration in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Ethology, 111(1): 25–50.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Cox, J. (1987). Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology, 1(1): 63–71.Google Scholar
Singh, A.P., Gogoi, L. and Sebastain, J. (2015). The seasonality of butterflies in a semi-evergreen forest: Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, northeastern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 7(1): 6774–6787.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. (2004). Orangutan technology. Scientific American, 291(6): 112–115.Google Scholar
Umapathy, G. and Kumar, A. (2003). Impacts of forest fragmentation on lion-tailed macaque and Nilgiri langur in Western Ghats, South India. In Marsh, L.K. (ed.), Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York: 163–189.Google Scholar
Umapathy, G., Singh, M. and Mohnot, S.M. (2003). Status and distribution of Macaca fascicularis umbrosa in the Nicobar Islands, India. International Journal of Primatology, 24(2): 281–293.Google Scholar
van Horn, R.N. (1972). Structural adaptations to climbing in the gibbon hand. American Anthropologist, 74(3): 326–334.Google Scholar
van Schaik, C.P., Fox, E.A. and Sitompul, A.F. (1996). Manufacture and use of tools in wild Sumatran orangutans: implications for human evolution. Naturwissenschaften, 83(4): 186–188.Google Scholar
Velankar, A.D., Kumara, H.N., Pal, A., Mishra, P.S. and Singh, M. (2016). Population recovery of Nicobar long-tailed macaque Macaca fascicularis umbrosus following a tsunami in the Nicobar Islands, India. PLoS ONE, 11(2): e0148205.Google Scholar
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W.C., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399(6737): 682–685.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×