We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
“La belle, la coupable, l’infortunée Coralie n’est plus… . Et c’est moi qui ai recueilli son dernier soupir… . O destinée! …”
—Eleonore in Coralie[The beautiful, guilty, unfortunate Coralie is no longer… . And it fell to me to receive her last sigh… . O destiny!]
The Case for Pichler in the Revised Canon
CAROLINE PICHLER IS THE AUTHOR of Frauenwürde (The Dignity of Women), the 1818 novel in this final case study. She was a prolific author. Her collected works are so substantial that their forty volumes outsize most of her peers, including La Roche, filling a scope similar to authors Goethe or Jean Paul. She published and reprinted her oeuvre, thanks in part to a family run press, and many research libraries still have her writing available in older editions. Among her oeuvre are multiple candidates for re-inclusion in the literary canon, which makes her absence all the more disappointing. The reasons are not simple but rather multifactorial. First, her reputation has been subjected to the same systemic trivialization as the five female novelists of the preceding chapters. In addition, the fact that she was born in Vienna leads to her work being narrowly categorized as Austrian, thus erecting a national divide between her and the other writers of this study. However, grouping the novelists of the preceding chapters together as “German” belies the fractured historical borders of middle European nations around 1800: we are rarely reminded that La Roche lived in a Swabian Free Imperial City (among other places), Unger in Prussia, and Wolzogen in Thuringia, and so on. Moreover, there is mutual intelligibility between the German as written by the Austrian Pichler and the German language as written by the Thuringian Wolzogen or the Swabian Sophie von La Roche. These novelists inherited basically the same written language and thus contributed to shaping the same modern German language. While the specific cultural personality of the city of Berlin plays an important role in Unger's novel, Pichler does not name the city in which she sets her novel. She contrasts the court with the countryside, much as La Roche and Wolzogen do, but she leaves open the precise location.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
