Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:30:59.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

William Phelan
William Phelan
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
Rethinking the Landmark Decisions of the Foundational Period
 , pp. 242 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angell, Norman (1911). The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Arnull, Anthony (2006). The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert M. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Azzalini, Marco and Sandei, Claudia (eds) (2008). La formazione del diritto europeo: Giornata di studio per Alberto Trabucchi nel centenario della nascita. Padua, CEDAM.Google Scholar
Bailleux, Julie (2013). “Michel Gaudet, a Law Entrepreneur: The Role of the Legal Service of the European Executives in the Invention of EC Law and the Birth of the Common Market Law Review”. Common Market Law Review 50: 359–368.Google Scholar
Barile, Giuseppe (1987). Costituzione e Rinvio Mobile a Diritto Straniero, Diritto Canonico, Diritto Comunitario, Diritto Internazionale. Padova, CEDAM.Google Scholar
Barton, John, Goldstein, Judith, Josling, Timothy and Steinberg, Richard (2006). The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellanger, François (1968). “Contribution a L’Etude de la Nature Juridique des “Accords de Luxembourg” du 29 January 1966”. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Internationaal Recht 15: 179–196.Google Scholar
Bernier, Alexandre (2018). “La France et le droit communautaire 1958–1981: Histoire d’une réception et d’une coproduction“. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Berri, Mario (1966). “Annotation on San Michele Decision of the Italian Constitutional Court”. Common Market Law Review 4: 238–242.Google Scholar
Besselink, Leonard F. M. (2007). A Composite European Constitution. Groningen, Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Boerger, Anne and Rasmussen, Morten (2017). “The Making of European Law: Exploring the Life and Work of Michel Gaudet”. American Journal of Legal History 57: 51–82.Google Scholar
Boulouis, Jean and Chevallier, R. M. (1978). Grands Arrêts de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes, vol. 1. Paris, Dalloz.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2009). Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC, Brookings.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel (2011). “The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement”. George Washington Law Review 80(1): 102–158.Google Scholar
Bribosia, Hervé (1997). “Report on Belgium”, in Slaughter, A-M., Stone Sweet, Alec and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford, Hart: 3–39.Google Scholar
Byberg, Rebekka (2017). “The History of the Integration Through Law Project: Creating the Academic Expression of a Constitutional Legal Vision for Europe”. German Law Journal 18(6): 1531–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David (1978). “The Expansion of the Public Economy”. American Political Science Review 72: 1243–1261.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. and Tomlin, Brian W. (2000). The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal was Done. Ithaca, NY,” Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo (1991). Trattati Internazionali e Guidizio di Costituzionalità. Milano, Guiffrè.Google Scholar
Carreau, Dominique (1978). “Droit Communautaire et Droits Nationaux: Concurrence ou Primauté: La Contribution de l’arrêt Simmenthal”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen: 381–418.Google Scholar
Cassuto, Thomas (ed.) (2015). L’Europe du droit face aux entreprises planétaires: Exposés, débats et perspectives. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar
Catalano, Nicola (1964). “Portée des Traités Instituant les Communautés Européennes et Limites des Pouvoirs Souverains des États Membres”. Le Droit et Les Affaires 49 (Document LXXXVI).Google Scholar
Chalmers, Damian, Davies, Gareth and Monti, Giorgio (2014). European Union Law: Text and Materials. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Claude, Yanovich, Alan, Crawford, Jo-Ann and Ugaz, Pamela (2013). Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements – Innovative or Variations on a Theme? WTO Working Paper ERSD-2013–07.Google Scholar
Claes, Monica (2006). The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas (2002). “A Theory of Direct Effect in Global Law”, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros and Mény, Yves (eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann. The Hague, Kluwer Law International: 99–123.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul (1992). “Once upon a Time in the West: Direct Effect and the Federalization of EEC Law”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12(4): 453–479.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul (2009). “The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules, and Exceptions”. European Law Review 34(3): 349–377.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) (2011). The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (2015). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Marise (2013). “The Judgment – Framing the Argument”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 23–27.Google Scholar
Da Cruz Vilaça, José Luís (2014). “Are there Substantive Limits to the Amendment of the Treaties?”, in Luís Da Cruz Vilaça, José (ed.) EU Law and Integration: Twenty Years of Judicial Application of EU law. Oxford, Hart: 13–43.Google Scholar
Dani, Marco (2010). “Remedying European Legal Pluralism: The FIAMM and Fedon Litigation and the Judicial Protection of International Trade Bystanders”. European Journal of International Law 21(2): 303–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dashwood, Alan, Dougan, Michael, Rodger, Barry, Spaventa, Eleanor and Wyatt, Derrick (2011). Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union Law. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar
Däubler, Wolfgang (1968). “Die Klage der EWG-Kommission gegen einen Mitgliedstaat”. NJW(8): 325–331.Google Scholar
Davies, Bill (2012). Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany’s Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina (2012). Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds) (2006). Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno (1986). “Retour à Costa – La primauté du droit communautaire à la lumière du droit international”, in Maihofer, Werner (ed.) Selected Working Papers of the European University Institute. Fiesole, European University Institute: 257–289.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno (1999). “Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”, in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 177–213.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno (2011a). “Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”, in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 323–362.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno (2011b). “The European Union as an International Legal Experiment”, in de Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 19–46.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno (2013). “The Impact of Van Gend en Loos on Judicial Protection at European and National Level: Three Types of Preliminary Questions”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 93–101.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud (1998). The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration. Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvolve, Jean-Louis (1968). “Le Pouvoir Judiciaire et le Traité de Rome ou la diplomatie des juges”. Juris-Classeur Périodique I, 2184.Google Scholar
Department for Exiting the European Union (2017). Enforcement and Dispute Resolution: A Future Partnership Paper. London, HM Government.Google Scholar
Dero, Delphine (2006). La Réciprocité et le Droit des Communautés et de L’Union Européenne. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar
Devereaux, Charan, Lawrence, Robert Z. and Watkins, Michael D. (2006). Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation, Vol. 2: Resolving Disputes. Washington, DC, Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Donner, Andreas (1968). The Role of the Lawyer in the European Communities. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dougan, Michael (2007). “When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the Relationship Between Direct Effect and Supremacy”. Common Market Law Review 44: 931–963.Google Scholar
Douglas-Scott, Sionaidh (2002). Constitutional law of the European Union. Harlow, Longman.Google Scholar
Downs, George W. and Rocke, David M. (1995). Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N. (1996). “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization (3): 379–406.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. (1986). “Liberalism in World Politics”. American Political Science Review 80(4): 1151–1169.Google Scholar
Duranti, Marco (2017). The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easson, A. J. (1979). “The ‘Direct Effect’ of EEC Directives”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 28(3): 319–353.Google Scholar
ECLR Editorial Comments (2014). “For History’s Sake: On Costa v. ENEL, André Donner and the Eternal Secret of the Court of Justice’s Deliberations”. European Constitutional Law Review 10(2): 191–198.Google Scholar
Edward, David (2001). “Lord Mackenzie-Stuart of Dean LLB, LLD”, in Yearbook of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, RSE Scotland Foundation: 180–182.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet (2002). “Judicial Enforcement of WTO Law in the European Union – Some Further Reflections”. Journal of International Economic Law 5(1): 91–110.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet (2011). EU External Relations Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisemann, Pierre Michel (ed.) (1996). The Integration of International and European Community Law into the National Legal Order: A Study of the Practice in Europe. The Hague, Boston, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Elagab, Omer Yousif (1988). The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Everson, Michelle (1995). “The Legacy of the Market Citizen”, in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) New Legal Dynamics of the European Union. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 73–89.Google Scholar
Fennelly, Nial (2010). “The European Court of Justice and the Doctrine of Supremacy: Van Gend en Loos; Costa v ENEL; Simmenthal”, in Poiares Maduro, Miguel and Azoulai, Loic (eds) The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford, Hart: 39–46.Google Scholar
Fischer, Ronald D. and Prusa, Thomas J. (2003). “WTO Exceptions as Insurance”. Review of International Economics 11(5): 745–757.Google Scholar
Foster, Nigel (2016). EU Law Directions. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Vera (2018). Juges et avocats généraux de la Cour de Justice de l’Union européenne (1952–1972): une approche biographique de l’histoire d’une révolution juridique. Frankfurt, Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, Marc D. (2014). “Regional Trade Agreements and the Paradox of Dispute Settlement”. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 11(3): 367–396.Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen A. and Hahn, Michael J. (1991). “The Participation of Parliament in the Treaty Process in the Federal Republic of Germany”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 67: 361–389.Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen A. and Oellers-Frahm, Karin (1996). “Allemagne Germany”, in Michel Eisemann, Pierre (ed.) The Integration of International and European Community Law into the National Legal Order: A Study of the Practice in Europe. The Hague, Boston, Kluwer Law International: 69–114.Google Scholar
Gaudet, Michel (1965). “Exposé de M. Michel Gaudet devant la Commission juridique en sa réunion du 18 février 1965”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen.Google Scholar
Gianelli, Alessandra (2004). “Aspects of the Relationship between the Law of Treaties and the State Responsibility”. Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz. Naples, Editoriale Scientifica 2: 757–805.Google Scholar
Gori, Paolo (1967). Les Clauses de Sauvegarde des Traités CECA et CEE. Heule, Belgium, Editions UGA.Google Scholar
Gori, Paolo (2013). “Souvenirs d’un survivant”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgment in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, European Union: 29–35.Google Scholar
Gradoni, Lorenzo (2008). “Regime failure” nel diritto internazionale. Padova, CEDAM.Google Scholar
Gradoni, Lorenzo and Tanzi, Attila (2008). “Diritto comunitario: una lex specialis molto speciale”, in Serena Rossi, Lucia and Di Federico, Giacomo (eds) L’incidenza del Diritto dell’Unione Europea sullo Studio delle Discipline Giuridiche. Rome, Editoriale Scientifica: 37–70.Google Scholar
Grayson, George W. (1995). The North American Free Trade Agreement: Regional Community and the New World Order. Lanham, MD, University Press of America.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan (2000). “Judicial Enforceability of WTO Law in the European Union: Annotation to Case C-149/96 Portugal v. Council”. Journal of International Economic Law 3: 441–472.Google Scholar
Gubin, Éliane (2008). Éliane Vogel-Polsky: A Woman of Conviction. Brussels, Institute for the Equality of Women and Men.Google Scholar
Hall, D. F. (1979). “’Plus ça change…’”. The Law Society’s Gazette 76(39): 1089.Google Scholar
Hartley, Trevor C. (2000). “International Law and the Law of the European Union – A Reassessment”. British Yearbook of International Law: 1–35.Google Scholar
Hartley, Trevor C. (2014). The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Admnistrative Law of the European Union. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard (1996–1997). “The Role of National Courts in International Trade Relations”. Michigan Journal of International Law 18: 321–356.Google Scholar
Hockin, Thomas A. (2003). The American Nightmare: Politics and the Fragile World Trade Organization. Lanham, MD, Lexington.Google Scholar
Hogan, Gerard and Whelan, Anthony (1995). Ireland and the European Union: Constitutional and Statutory Texts and Commentary. London, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Hübner, Denise Carolin (2016). “The ‘National Decisions’ database (Dec.Nat): Introducing a database on national courts’ interactions with European Law”. European Union Politics 17(2): 324–339.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J. and Wong, Yee (2003). NAFTA Dispute Settlement Systems. Institute for International Economics Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ipsen, Hans Peter (1964–1965). “The Relationship Between the Law of the European Communities and National Law”. Common Market Law Review 2: 379–402.Google Scholar
Ipsen, Hans Peter (1965). “Das Verhältnis des Rechts der europäischen Gemeinschaften zum nationalen Recht”, in Aktuelle Fragen des europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts. Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke: 1–27.Google Scholar
Isiksel, Turkuler (2016). Europe’s Functional Constitution: A Theory of Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacqué, J.-P. (2013). “Third Working Session – The Future Prospects – Introduction”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 129–134.Google Scholar
Jensen, Theresa (2011). “The Role of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in the Constitutionalization of Regional Trade Agreements”. Master of Law thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kaczorowska, Alina (2013). European Union Law. Abingdon, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2003 [1795]). To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1964–1965). “EUROPA-RUBRIEK”. Ars Aequi: 238–244.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Paul Joan George and VerLoren Van Themaat, Pieter (1973). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: After the Accession of the New Member States. London, Deventer, Sweet & Maxwell, Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1989). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: After the Coming into Force of the Single European Act. Deventer, Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1998). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam. London, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Paul Joan George, McDonnell, A. M., Mortelmans, K. J. M., Timmermans, Christian W. A. and Geelhoed, L. A. (2008). The Law of the European Union and the European Communites: With Reference to Changes To Be Made by the Lisbon Treaty. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kim, SooYeon (2010). Power and the Governance of Global Trade: From the GATT to the WTO Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kischel, Uwe (2000). The State as a Non-Unitary Actor: The Role of the Judicial Branch in International Negotiations. Working Paper 23, Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Kovar, Robert (1981). “Affaire 232/78”. Journal de Droit International: 108–110.Google Scholar
Kuilwijk, Kees J. (1996). The European Court of Justice and the GATT Dilemma. Beuningen, Nexed.Google Scholar
Le Beguec, Gilles (1989). “L’entrée au Palais Bourbon : les filières privilegiées d’accès à la fonction parlementaire (1919–1939)”. Doctoral thesis, Lille, Université de Paris X, Nanterre.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1931). Nature juridique de l’action en réintégrande: étude de la jurisprudence française Paris, A.-D.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1935). “Les J. D. P. presentent … La Route des Jeunes”. Route des Jeunes 1(May).Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1937). “La Politique est un devoir social”. L’Homme Réel. Revue Mensuelle du Syndicalisme et de l’humanisme 4(48): 28–34.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1963). “Role de la Cour de Justice Dans Le Développement de L’Europe”. Revue de Marché Commun (July–August): 273–275.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1964a). “Le rôle du droit dans l’unification européenne”. Gazette du Palais 1: 49–54.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1964b). “Le rôle du droit dans l’unification européenne”. Bulletin des juristes européens 17–18: 5–23.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1965). “La Dynamique Judiciaire dans l’Édification de l’Europe”. France-Forum 64(April–May): 20–22.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1966). “Diagnostic judiciaire de l’europe”. Le Monde (25 July).Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1967). “L’Heure des Juges dans Le Marché commun”. Le Monde (17 April).Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1968a). “Allocution prononcée par le président de la Cour, M. Robert Lecourt”. Dixième anniversaire 1958–1968. Luxembourg: 15–24.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1968b). “Barometre judiciaire de l’Europe”. Le Monde (15 January).Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1970). Le juge devant le Marché commun. Genève, Graduate Institute of International StudiesGoogle Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1973a). “Allocution Prononcée par Monsieur le President Robert LECOURT lors de l’audience solennelle du 9 Octobre 1973: Acceuil de Monsieur Reischl”, in Audiences Solennelles 1973. Luxembourg, Cour de Justice des Communautes Europeennes.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1973b). “[Speech at ‘Grand Night’]”. Graya 77: 171–173.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1974–1975). “Speech delivered by Mr R. Lecourt to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Robert Schuman Declaration”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities 1974–1975. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 25–27.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1976a). L’Europe des juges. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1976b). “Speech delivered by Mr R Lecourt, President, at the formal hearing on 7 October 1976 on the occasion of his departure”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 49–53.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1976c). “Speech delivered by Mr R. Lecourt, President, at the formal hearing on 7 October 1976 on the occasion of the departure of Mr A. Trabucchi, Advocate-General”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 27–30.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1979). “Interférences entre la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et le Droit de la Communauté au regard du controle judiciaire communautaire et national”. Actes du Colloque sur la Convention européenne des Droits de l’homme par rapport à d’autres instruments internationaux pour la protection des droits de l’homme, Athens.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1981). “La Cour de Justice des Communautes europeennes vue de l’interieur”, in Europäische Gerichtsbarkeit und nationale Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Hans Kutscher. Baden-Baden, Nomos: 261–272.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1984). “Le Role Unificateur du Juge dans La Communauté”, in Études de Droit des Communautés Européennes: Mélanges offerts à Pierre-Henri Teitgen. Paris, Pedone: 223–237.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1987). “Quelques souvenirs d’un passé anterieur”, in XXXV ANNI: 1952–1987. Luxembourg, CURIA.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert (1991). “Quel eut été le droit des Communautés sans les arrêts de 1963 et 1964?”, in Mélanges Jean Boulouis: l’Europe et le droit. Dalloz: 349–361.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Robert and Chevallier, R. M. (1963). “Chances et malchances de l’harmonisation des législations européennes”. Recueil Dalloz: 273–283.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen (1992). “Some Thoughts about the Interaction between Judges and Politicians”. University of Chcago Legal Forum 1992(1): 93–133.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen and Van Nuffel, Piet (2005). Constitutional Law of the European Union. London, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Lindseth, Peter L. (2002). “The Contradictions of Supranationalism: European Integration and the Constitutional Settlement of Administrative Governance”. PhD thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Lindseth, Peter L. (2010). Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindseth, Peter L. (2016). “The Perils of ‘As If’ European Constitutionalism”. European Law Journal 22(5): 696–718.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1993). “Pacific Divide: American Exceptionalism –Japanese Uniqueness”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5(2): 121–166.Google Scholar
Louis, Jean-Victor (1966). “Troisième Colloque de Droit Européen, Paris, 25–27 novembre 1965”. Cahiers du Droit Europenne: 90–96.Google Scholar
Louis, Jean-Victor (2013). “Concluding Remarks”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Office des publications de l’Union européenne: 205–225.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (1999). Questioning Sovereignty? Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares and Azoulai, Loic (2010). The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar
Maher, Imelda (1994). “National Courts as European Community Courts”. Legal Studies 14: 226–243.Google Scholar
Malenovský, Jiří (2013). “La contribution ambivalente de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne à la saga centenaire de la domestication du droit international public”, in Kronenberger, V., D’Alessio, M. T. and Placco, V. (eds) De Rome à Lisbonne: les juridictions de l’Union Europeenne à la croisée des chemins. Mélanges en l’honneur de Paolo Mengozzi. Brussels, Bruylant: 25–59.Google Scholar
Mayer, Frederick (1998). Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mendez, Mario (2013). The Legal Effects of EU Agreements. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michelet, Élisabeth (1973). La règle du non-cumul du posséssoire et du pétitoire. Paris, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S., Brennan, George and Romero, Federico (1992). The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Mongelli, Francesco Paolo, Dorrucci, Ettore and Agur, Itai (2005). What Does European Institutional Integration Tell Us about Trade Integration? ECB Occasional Paper Series 40, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel (2015). Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nicola, Fernanda and Davies, Bill (eds) (2017). EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nord, Philip (2010). France’s New Deal: From the Thirties to the Postwar Era. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Andrew (ed.) (1994). The Relationship between European Community Law and National Law: The cases, Volume 1. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pappini, Roberto (1996). The Christian Democrat International. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof (2016). Making and Bending International Rules: The Design of Exceptions and Escape Clauses in Trade Law. Cambridge, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre (1968). “Les Droits de l’Homme et L’Intégration Européenne”. Cahiers de Droit Européen: 629–673.Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre (1981). “Aspects judiciaires de l’ ‘acquis communautaire’”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 17(4): 617–651.Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre (2005). “Robert Lecourt (1908–2004). Eloge funèbre prononcé par Pierre Pescatore ancien Juge de la Cour, à l’audience solennelle du 7 mars 2005”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen (3): 589–596.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1983). “Application of GATT by the Court of Justice of the European Communities”. Common Market Law Review 20: 397ff.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1985). “International and European Foreign Trade Law: GATT Dispute Settlement Proceedings Against the EEC”. Common Market Law Review 22: 441ff.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1995). “Proposals for a New Constitution for the European Union: Building-Blocks for a Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law of the EU”. Common Market Law Review 32: 1123–1175.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2008). “Can Ireland Legislate Contrary to European Community Law?” European Law Review 33(4): 530–549.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2010). “Political Self-Control and European Constitution: The Assumption of National Political Loyalty to European Obligations as the Solution to the Lex Posterior problem in the National Legal Orders”. European Law Journal 16(3): 253–272.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2011a). “Open International Markets without Exclusion: Encompassing Domestic Political Institutions, International Organization, and Self-Contained Regimes”. International Theory 3(2): 286–306.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2011b). “Why do the EU Member States Accept the Supremacy of European Law? Explaining Supremacy as an Alternative to Bilateral Reciprocity”. Journal of European Public Policy 18(5): 766–777.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2012). “What is Sui Generis about the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime”. International Studies Review 14: 367–385.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2013). “The European Union’s Next Nobel Peace Prize”. E-International Relations, from www.e-ir.info/2013/08/05/the-european-unions-next-nobel-peace-prize/.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2014). “The Limited Practical Relevance of National Constitutional Rights as a Constraint on the National Application of European Law in the Early Decades of European Integration”. Irish Journal of European Law 17(1): 43–61.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2015a). “Enforcement and Escape in the Andean Community: Why the Andean Community of Nations is not a Replica of the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 840–856.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2015b). In Place of Inter-State Retaliation: The European Union’s Rejection of WTO-style Trade Sanctions and Trade Remedies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2015c). “The Troika: The Interlocking Roles of Commission v. Luxembourg and Belgium, Van Gend en Loos and Costa v. ENEL in the Creation of the European Legal Order”. European Law Journal 21(1): 116–135.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2016a). Diagonal Enforcement in International Trade Politics. EUI Working Paper SPS 2016/1. Fiesole, EUI.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2016b). “Safety Valves and Complete Exits in European Treaty Politics”. German Law Journal 17 (Brexit Supplement): 93–94.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2016c). “Supremacy, Direct Effect, and Dairy Products in the Early History of European Law”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 14(1): 6–25.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2017). “The Revolutionary Doctrines of European Law and the Legal Philosophy of Robert Lecourt”. European Journal of International Law 28(3): 935–957.Google Scholar
Phelan, William (2018). “European Legal Integration: Towards a More Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach”. Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1562–1577.Google Scholar
Plender, Richard (1976). “An Incipient Form of European Citizenship”, in Jacobs, Francis (ed.) European Law and the Individual. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Plötner, Jens (1997). “Report on France”, in Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alec and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford, Hart: 43–75.Google Scholar
Prechal, Sacha (2005). Directives in EC Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte (1983). “The Court of Justice”, in Thirty Years of Community Law. Luxembourg, European Community Information Service.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte (1986). On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking. Dordrecht, M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte (2009). Legal Opinion about The European Court of Justice’s Competence Transgressions, Poor Reasonings and the Complete Non-transparency of Willensbildung. Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten (2008). “The Origins of a Legal Revolution – The Early History of the European Court of Justice”. Journal of European Integration History 14(2): 77–98.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten (2010). “Constructing and Deconstructing ‘Constitutional’ European Law: Some Reflections on how to Study the History of European Law”, in Koch, Henning, Hagel-Sørensen, Karsten, Haltern, Ulrich R. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) Europe: The New Legal Realism: Essays in Honour of Hjalte Rasmussen. Copenhagen, Djøf Publishing: 639–660.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten (2012). “Establishing a Constitutional Practice of European Law: The History of the Legal Service of the European Executive 1952–65”. Contemporary European History 21(3): 375–397.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten (2014). “Revolutionizing European Law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos judgment”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1): 136–163.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten (2017). “How to Enforce European Law? A New History of the Battle over the Direct Effect of Directives, 1958–1987”. European Law Journal 23: 290–308.Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul (1968). “La Cour de justice des Communautés européennes et le droit international”, in Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim. Geneva, Éditions de la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Genève/Institut Universitaire de Hautes Études Internationales: 665–686.Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul (1969). “Le Droit International comme Source de Droit Communautaire”, in Ganshof van der Meersch, W. J. (ed.) Droit des Communautés européennes. Bruxelles, Larcier: 437–440.Google Scholar
Robert, Jean (1963).“Sur une Égalité de Droits devant La Communauté Économique Européenne Des Ressortissants Des États Membres Avec Ces États Eux-Mêmes”. Recueil Sirey (Mai): 29–33.Google Scholar
Roitinger, Alexander (2004). “The Institutional Design of Trade Policy Flexibility in the World Trading Order: Analysis and New Direction for Reform”. PhD thesis, St Gallen.Google Scholar
Rosendorff, B. Peter and Milner, Helen V. (2001). “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape”. International Organization 55(4): 829–857.Google Scholar
Rossa Phelan, Diarmuid (1997). Revolt or Revolution: The Constitutional Boundaries of the European Community. Dublin, Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Rudden, Bernard and Phelan, Diarmuid Rossa (1997). Basic Community Cases. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (1982). “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”. International Organization 36(2): 379–425.Google Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, Helene (2013). “Conjuguer justice et prudence: commentaire sur le développement de l’effet direct du droit international en droit de l’Union”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 189–196.Google Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, Helene (2014). “Is There a Case – Legally and Politically – for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?” European Journal of International Law 25: 151–173.Google Scholar
Rupp, Hans G. (1977). “Judicial Review of International Agreements: Federal Republic of Germany”. American Journal of Comparative Law 25(2): 286–302.Google Scholar
Savatier, René (1960). “Le Marché commun au regard du droit internationale privé”, in des facultés de droit, Colloque (ed.) Les Problèmes juridiques et économiques du Marché commun. Lille, Librairies techniques: 55–71.Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. (1975). “Community Law and International Law”. Common Market Law Review 12: 77–90.Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. (1977). “L’Europe des Juges by Robert Lecourt”. Common Market Law Review 14: 261–262.Google Scholar
Schütze, Robert (2016). European Constitutional Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joanne (1995). “GATT and Community Law: Rethinking the ‘Regulatory Gap’”, in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) New Legal Dynamics of the European Union. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 147–164.Google Scholar
Secretaría General (2006). Comunidad Andina: Avances y Perspectivas. Lima: Documento informativo SG/di 800.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno (1985). “Self-Contained Regimes”. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 16: 111–136.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno (1994). “Counter-Measures and Dispute Settlement: A Plea for a Different Balance”. European Journal of International Law 5: 102–105.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk (2006). “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law”. The European Journal of International Law 17(3): 483–529.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk (2010). “Leges Speciales and Self-Contained Regimes”, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds) The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 138–163.Google Scholar
Simmonds, K. R. (1975). “Van Duyn v. The Home Office: The Direct Effectiveness of Directives”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 24(3): 419–437.Google Scholar
Simon, Denys (2000). “The Sanction of Member States’ Serious Violations of Community Law”, in O’Keeffe, D. (ed.) Liber Amicorum in Honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley. The Hague, Kluwer 1: 275–286.Google Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn (2018). Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander (2017). “Is Legality a Principle of EU Law?”, in Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds) General Principles of EU Law: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford, Hart: 53–75.Google Scholar
Stein, Eric (1965). “Toward Supremacy of Treaty – Constitution by Judicial Fiat in the European Economic Community”. Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 48: 3–28.Google Scholar
Stein, Eric (1981). “Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution”. American Journal of International Law 75(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Antonello (2004). “EC Practice in the WTO: How Wide is the ‘Scope for Manoeuvre’?” European Journal of International Law 15(5): 933–961.Google Scholar
Teh, Robert, Prusa, Thomas J. and Budetta, Michele (2007). Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2007–03.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, John (1997). “The Duties of National Courts under Community Constitutional Law”. European Law Review 22: 3–18.Google Scholar
Thies, Anne (2013). International Trade Disputes and EU Liability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis (1962). “The Bosch Case”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 11(3): 721–741.Google Scholar
Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (2013). 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
Torrelli, Maurice (1968). “La Cour Constitutionnelle Fédérale Allemande et le Droit Communautaire: Note de Jurisprudence”. Revue de Marché Commun: 719–723.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M., Howse, R. and Eliason, A. (2013). The Regulation of International Trade. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tumlir, Jan (1983a). “International Economic Order and Democratic Constitutionalism”. ORDO 34: 71–83.Google Scholar
Tumlir, Jan (1983b). “Need for an Open Multilateral Trading System”. The World Economy: 393–408.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Karin (2012). “On Democratic Concerns and Legal Traditions: The Dutch 1953 and 1956 Constitutional Reforms ‘Towards’ Europe”. Contemporary European History 21(3): 357–374.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2010). “The Transnational Politics of Judicialization, Van Gend en Loos and the Making of EU Polity”. European Law Journal 16(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2015). Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vinuesa, Raúl Emilio (2005). “Enforcement of Mercosur Arbitration Awards within the Domestic Legal Orders of Member States”. Texas International Law Journal 40: 425–442.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania (2010). “Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59: 625–667.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, Michel (1967). “The Application of EEC Law by National Courts”. Stanford Law Review 19(6): 1248–1276.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, Michel (1969). Traités internation »aux et juridictions interns dans les pays du Marché commun. Bruxelles, CIDC.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, Michel (1974). “Effect of GATT within the Legal Order of the EEC”. Journal of World Trade Law 8: 614–623.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (ed.) (2003). Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford and Portland, OR, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Weatherill, Stephen (2014). Cases and Materials on EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1986). “Eurocracy and Distrust: Some Questions concerning the Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights within the Legal Order of the European Communities”. Washington Law Review 61: 1103–1142.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). “The Transformation of Europe”. Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–2483.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1996). The Jurisprudence of Human Rights in the European Union: Integration and Disintegration, Values and Processes. Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers 2/96. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?” and Other Essays on European Integration. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (2003). “Rewriting Van Gend en Loos: Towards a Normative Theory of ECJ Hermeneutics” in Wiklund, Ola (ed.) Judicial Discretion in European Perspective. The Hague, Kluwer Law International: 150–164.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (2014). “Van Gend en Loos: The Individual as Subject and Object and the Dilemma of European Legitimacy”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1): 94–103.Google Scholar
Wenner, Wolfgang (1962). “Zur Auslegung des EWG-Vertrages”. Aussenwirtschaftsdienst des Betreibs-Beraters (4): 110–112.Google Scholar
Woods, Lorna and Watson, Philippa (2014). Steiner & Woods EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Derrick (1975). “Directly Applicable Provisions of EEC Law”. New Law Journal: 458–460; 575–578; 669–672; 793, 794.Google Scholar
Zeitler, Franz-Christoph (1973). Verfassungsgericht und völkerrechtlicher Vertrag. Berlin, Dunkler & Humblot.Google Scholar
Zoller, Elisabeth (1984). Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures. Dobbs Ferry, NY, Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • William Phelan, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108615020.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • William Phelan, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108615020.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • William Phelan, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108615020.012
Available formats
×