Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:11:24.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Classification of representation-finite algebras and their modules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2010

Lidia Angeleri Hügel
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Italy
Dieter Happel
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Chemnitz, Germany
Henning Krause
Affiliation:
Universität-Gesamthochschule Paderborn, Germany
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We describe how tilting modules are used to classify the representationfinite algebras and their indecomposable modules.

Introduction

Probably the first appearance of tilting modules in representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras was in 1973 the use of reflection functors when Bernstein, Gelfand and Ponomarev [5] reproved Gabriel's classification of the representation-finite hereditary quiver algebras. Dlab and Ringel [18] extended in 1976 the use of reflection functors to arbitrary representation-finite hereditary algebras. Next, the concept of reflection functors has been generalized in 1979 by Auslander, Platzeck and Reiten [2] (they called it ”Coxeter functors without diagrams”), and finally in 1980 by Brenner and Butler [13], who coined the term tilting and gave the first general definition of a tilting module, together with basic properties of tilting functors.

In a time where most people working with representation-finite algebras were knitting Auslander-Reiten sequences, this was a new approach: To study a class of modules which are given by abstract properties. Tilting modules have then been used very successfully by Bongartz [9] and by Happel and Vossieck [26] to find a far-reaching generalization of Gabriel's Theorem to representation-directed algebras, see Theorems 6 and 7 below.

The aim of these notes is to describe this powerful application of tilting theory in the classification of representation-finite algebras, and to add some more details on the representation-infinite case and the classification of tame algebras. These notes arose from two lectures which I gave at the meeting on ’Tilting Theory’ at the Fraueninsel near Munich.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×