Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:59:40.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Presence of the Past

Imperialism and Modes of Historicity in International Politics

from Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2023

By
Klaus Schlichte  and
Stephan Stetter
Edited by
Klaus Schlichte  and
Stephan Stetter
Klaus Schlichte
Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Stephan Stetter
Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München
Get access

Summary

This overarching chapter offers a comprehensive overview on how history is dealt with in International Relations (IR) and presents a conceptual framework for the study of history in IR based on the concept of historicity. The chapter also makes the case why looking at imperialism – the cross-cutting theme addressed in every chapter in this book – is a particularly fruitful way for both tracing the role of history in international politics and making use of the concept of historicity. The chapter introduces in particular six modes of historicity which shape its core argument on the centrality of history for a better understanding and better analyses of international politics.

Keywords

international politicsimperialismhistoricitypowerInternational Relationshistorical sociologyglobal history
Type
Chapter
Information
The Historicity of International Politics
Imperialism and the Presence of the Past
 , pp. 3 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberts, T. E. (2010). Playing the Game of Sovereign States: Charles Manning’s Constructivism avant-la-lettre, European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 247–68.Google Scholar
Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies, International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–59.Google Scholar
Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, M. (2016). A Theory of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, M., Brunkhorst, H., Neumann, I.B. & Stetter, S. (2023). The Social Evolution of World Politics, Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Allan, B. (2017). From Subjects to Objects: Knowledge in International Relations Theory, European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 841–64.Google Scholar
Anderl, F. & Wallmeier, P. (2018). Modi der Kritik des Internationalen Regierens: Ein Plädoyer für immanente Kritik, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 25(1), 65–89.Google Scholar
Anievas, A. & Kamran, M. (eds.). (2016). Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Duree, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anievas, A. & Nişancıoğlu, K. (2015). How the West Came to Rule the Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. [1951] (1976). The Origins of Totalitarianism, San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Aron, R. (1973). République impériale: Les Etats-Unis dans le monde, 1945–1972, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Autesserre, S. (2010). The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balandier, G. [1951] (1952). The Fact of Colonialism: A Theoretical Approach, Cross Currents, 2(4), 10–31.Google Scholar
Barkawi, T. (2005). Globalization and War, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bartelson, J. (2017). War in International Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelson, J. (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. (2008). Global Subjects: A Political Critique of Globalization, London: Polity.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. (2000). Africa in the World: A History of Extraversion, African Affairs, 99(395), 217–67.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. (1996). L’historicité de l’Etat importé, in Bayart, J.-F. (ed.). La reinvention du capitalisme. Les trajectorie du politique, 11–39, Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. & Bertrand, R. (2006). De quel legs colonial parle-t-on? Esprit (12), 1–27.Google Scholar
Bayly, M. (2016). Taming the Imperial Imagination: Colonial Knowledge, International Relations, and the Anglo-Afghan Encounter, 1808–1878, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (ed.). (2019). Empire, Race and Global Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2007). The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination, Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Biecker, S. & Schlichte, K. (2021). Extended Experience: The Political Anthropology of Internationalized Politics, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease, Alternatives, 27(1), 63–92.Google Scholar
Bilgin, P. (2010). The ‘Western-Centrism’ of Security Studies: ‘Blind Spot’ or Constitutive Practice?, Security Dialogue, 41(6), 615–22.Google Scholar
Bilgin, P. (2008). Thinking Past ‘Western IR’, Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23.Google Scholar
Blanchard, P. & Lemaire, S. (2004). Culture Imperial, 1931–1961: Les colonies au cœur e la République, Paris: Editions Autrement.Google Scholar
Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (ed.). (2012). Statebuilding and State-Formation: The Political Sociology of Intervention, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloch, E. (1932). Erbschaft dieser Zeit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Booth, K. (2005). Critical Security Studies and World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. & Risse, T. (2012). From Europeanisation to Diffusion, West European Politics, 35(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeot, A. (1994). Révoltes et rébellions en pays touareg, Afrique contemporaine, 170, 3–19.Google Scholar
Branch, J. (2014). The Cartographic State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (1969). Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue durée, in Braudel, F. (ed.), Ecrits sur l’histoire, 41–83, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. (2018). China’s Rise in English School Perspective, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18(3), 449–76.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. (2014). The ‘Standard of Civilisation’ as an English School Concept, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42(3), 576–94.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Little, R. (2001). Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It, Millennium, 30(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Little, R. (2000). International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, B., Leira, H. & Hobson, J. M. (2011). The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You About 1648 and 1919, Millennium, 39(3), 735–58.Google Scholar
Carvalho, B., Lopez, Julia C. & Leira, H. (eds.). (2021). Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Césaire, A. [1955] (2004). Discours sur le colonialisme, Paris: Présence Africaine.Google Scholar
Chakrabarthy, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-Building, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. (1999). Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe, International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 83–114.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. (2014). Internal Colonialism in Germany: Culture Wars, Germanification of the Soil, and the Global Market Imaginery, in Naranch, B. & Eley, G. (eds.). German Colonialism in a Global Age, 246–64, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. (1991). Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. & Stoler, A. L. (eds.). (1997). Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, P. (2004). Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of International Relations, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Dayak, M. (1992). Touareg, la tragédie, Paris: Lattès.Google Scholar
Del Sarto, R. A. (2016). Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, Its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 215–32.Google Scholar
Derichs, C. (2017). Knowledge Production, Area Studies and Global Cooperation, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. (1944). Prospect of a World without Race Conflict, in Weinberg, M. (ed.). William Du Bois: A Reader, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Duffield, M. (2001). Global Governance and New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Dunne, T., Hansen, L. & Wight, C. (2013). The End of International Relations Theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, T. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.). (2017). The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1961). Les damnes de la terre, Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1952). Peau noire, masques blancs, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Fioretos, O. (2011). Historical Institutionalism in International Relations, International Organization, 65(3), 367–99.Google Scholar
Forsberg, T. & Haukkala, H. (2018). An Empire without an Emperor? The EU and Its Eastern Neighbourhood, in Heiskala, R. & Aro, J. (eds.). Policy Design in the European Union, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1990). Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1959). Vom Zirkel des Verstehens, in Gadamer, H.-G. (ed.). Gesammelte Werke, 57–65, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Go, J. & Lawson, G. (eds.). (2017). Global Historical Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, H. (1972/1982). Geschichte des weltpolitischen Denkens, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Pelaez, A. (2009). The Primary Institutions of the Middle Eastern Regional Interstate Society, in Buzan, B. & Gonzalez-Pelaez, A. (eds.). International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, 92–116, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, F. (2005). The Middle East in International Relations: Power, Politics and Ideology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, S. & Palan, R. (2015). Introduction. Legacies of Empire, in Halperin, S. & Palan, R. (eds.). Legacies of Empire, 1–24, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. (2013). The End of International Relations Theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–25.Google Scholar
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobden, S. & Hobson, J. (eds.). (2002). Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. M. (2007). Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and of Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphalia towards a Post-Racist Critical IR, Review of International Studies, 93 (S1), 91–116.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. & Lawson, G. (2008). What Is History in International Relations? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 415–35.Google Scholar
Hoppe, S. (2021). Internationale historische Soziologie und historische Sozialwissenschaft in den deutschen und anglo-amerikanischen IB: Zur Relevanz einer Paralleldebatte für die Außenpolitikforschung, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 28(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Isachenko, D. (2019). Coordination and Control in Russia’s Foreign Policy: Travails of Putin’s Curators in the Near Abroad. Third World Quarterly, Online first.Google Scholar
Jabri, V. (2012). The Postcolonial Subject: Claiming Politics/Governing Others in Late Modernity, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. [1784] (1973). Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, in Kant, I. (ed.), Kleinere Schriften zur Geschichtsphilosophie, Ethik und Politik, 3–20, Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Keene, E. (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knutsen, T. (2016). A History of International Relations Theory, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Koddenbrock, K. (2015). Strategies of Critique in International Relations: From Foucault and Latour towards Marx, European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, S. (2008). Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Laïdi, Z. (1999). Le temps mondial, Bruxelles: Editions Complexes.Google Scholar
Laurence, H. (2009). L’empire et ses ennemis, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. (2006). The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations, International Studies Review, 8(3), 397–423.Google Scholar
Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (1990). Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations, Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lüthy, H. (1967). In Gegenwart der Geschichte, Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1984). The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results, European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213.Google Scholar
Manning, C. A. W. (1962). The Nature of International Society, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Markovits, A. S., Reich, S. & Westermann, F. (1996). Germany: Hegemonic Power and Economic Gain?, Review of International Political Economy, 3(4), 698–727.Google Scholar
Mazower, M. (2013). Governing the World: The History of an Idea, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2013). Critique de la raison nègre, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2000). De la postcolonie: Essai sur l’imagination politique dans l’Afrique contemporaine, Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Mehta, U. S. (1997). Liberal Strategies of Exclusion, in Cooper, F. & Stoler, A. L. (eds.). Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, 59–86, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, J. S. (2001). States in Societies: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. & Walsh, C. E. (2015). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mudimbe, V.-Y. (1988). The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Münkler, H. (2006). Imperien: Die Logik der Weltherrschaft. Vom Alten Rom bis zu den Vereinigten Staaten, Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Neumann, I. B. & Wigen, E. (2018). The Steppe Tradition in International Relations: Russians, Turks and European State Building 4000 BCE-2017 CE, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, D. H. (2009). The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires & International Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2016). Global History and Historical Sociology, in Belich, J., Darwin, J., Frenz, M. & Wickham, C. (eds.). The Prospect of Global History, 23–46, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, München: Beck.Google Scholar
Owen, J. (2015). Fail: Why the US Lost the War in Afghanistan, Fayetteville: Blacksmith.Google Scholar
Persaud, R. & Sajed, A. (eds.). (2018). Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations: Postcolonial Perspectives, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Philips, A. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.). (2020). Culture and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, A. & Sharman, J. C. (2015). International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, N. (2017). Battling Instability? The Recurring Logic of French Military Interventions in Africa, African Security, 10(1), 42–72.Google Scholar
Putin, V. (2021). On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians, Moscow: Kremlin.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (1999). The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rixen, T, Viola, L. & Zürn, M. (eds.). (2016). Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. (2006). Why Is There No International Political Sociology? European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 307–40.Google Scholar
Rosenboim, O. (2017). The Emergence of Globalism: Visions of World Order in Britain and the United States, 1939–1950, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. (ed.). (2005). Dynamics of States: The Emergence and Crisis of State Domination Outside the OECD, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. (1998). La Françafrique: Postkolonialer Habitus und Klientelismus in der französischen Afrikapolitik, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 5(2), 309–43.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P. W. (1997). History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit, International Security, 22(1), 64–74.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P. W. (1994). The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Seth, S. (2011). Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 167–83.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Shani, G. (2008). Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory, International Studies Review, 10, 722–34.Google Scholar
Shilliam, R. (2015). The Black Pacific: Anti-colonial Struggles and Oceanic Connections, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Siegelberg, J. (1994). Kapitalismus und Krieg: Eine Theorie des Krieges in der Weltgesellschaft, Hamburg: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Siegelberg, J. & Schlichte, K. (eds.). (2000). Strukturwandel internationaler Beziehungen. Zum Verhältnis von Staat und internationalem System seit dem Westfälischen Frieden, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, L. (2012). Gender, Structure, and War: What Waltz Couldn’t See, International Theory, 4(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smouts, M.-C. (ed.). (2007). La situation post-coloniale: Les postcolonial studies dans le débat français, Paris: Presse de Science Po.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G. (2014). The Sociology of Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonialism, Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 77–103.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G. (ed.). (2013). Sociology and Empire: The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, G. (2007). The Devil’s Handwriting: Procoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stetter, S. (2008). World Society and the Middle East: Reconstructions in Regional Politics, Houndsmill: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. (1997). Sexual Affronts and Racial Frontiers: European Identities and the Cultural Politics of Exclusion in Colonial Southeast Asia, in Cooper, F. & Stoler, A. L. (eds.). Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, 198–237, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1988). The Future of the American Empire, Journal of International Affairs, 42(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (2014). The Art of Social Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. (2006). Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues, in Brooke, A. A., Stern, M. & True, J. (eds.). Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, 19–41, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, A. (2001). Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, A. & Wæver, O. (eds.). (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toal, G. (2017). Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1989). Nous et les autres: La réflexion française sur la diversité humaine, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Todorova, M. (1997). Imagining the Balkans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veit, A. (2010). Intervention as Indirect Rule: Civil War and State Building in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag and Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Vitalis, R. (2015). White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vitalis, R. (2000). The Graceful and the Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Visible in American International Relations, Millenium, 29(2), 331–56.Google Scholar
Vrasti, W. (2008). The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations, Millenium, 37(3), 279–301.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (2014). International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1999). IR: The Resurrection or New Frontiers of Incorporation, European Journal of International Relations, 5(4), 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. [1913] (2012). On Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology, in Bruun, H. & Whimster, S. (eds.). Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings, 273–301, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State Is Inevitable, European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542.Google Scholar
Zarakol, A. (ed.). (2017). Hierarchies in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, A. (2010). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×